Ahmadis seem to ask me as to why I openly criticize Ahmadiyya. They are confused as to why me and people like Hani Tahir and AK Shaikh criticize Ahmadiyya. Most Ahmadis live in the Ahmadiyya-bubble and thus they see a much different world around them. They see the world similar to how members of the Nation of Islam view the world around them.
I am to Ahmadiyya what Malcolm X was to the Nation of Islam
I openly criticize Ahmadiyya the same way that Malcolm X openly accused Elijah Muhammad of immorality. Similarly, MGA and his sons also had extra-wives and their inner-circles covered their misgivings. Its no wonder that the Nation of Islam is exactly like Ahmadiyya, since that is where it learned Islam from, it was the Qurans of Muhammad Ali that were circulated in America in the 30’s, 40’s and 50’s. Another similarity is that just like MGA didnt know arabic, never led Salaat, never led Khutbah Juma, Elijah Muhammad was the same, in fact, even Farrakhan barely knows arabic, they never even have salaat.
Farrakhan is allowed to make Hajj, Ahmadiyya Khalifas are not
Farrakhan is allowed to make Hajj and Umra simply because he opposes America. This is wherein the NOI and Ahmadiyya differ. Ahmadis are not allowed in Arabia, at all whatsoever. In 1974, Ahmadis were viewed by Saudi Arabia as pro-america, or pro-western-powers. However, from 1889 to 1974, Ahmadis were allowed to make Hajj as they liked, in fact, Mahmud Ahmad performed the pilgrimage in 1913, before he became Khalifa, and Noorudin also performed the Hajj before he met MGA. However, no Ahmadi-Khalifa ever even attempted Hajj from 1908 to 1974. Thus proving that Ahmadiyya leadership never even saw Hajj as essential, which is against Islam in many ways.
Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad on Jalsa being more important then Hajj-1955
Summary of his speech
“””Ahmadi leadership concept of hajj is as per khutbat Mahmoud page 254 is their jalsa in qadyan. It is just ” just like hajj ” . And ” the nation ‘s advancement which cannot be get from hajj , can be get by jalsa “
MGA’s comments on not performing Hajj
1–ain e kalimat e Islam, ruhaani khazain vol 5 page 392. Mirza Qadiani writes that people go for small hajj or Nafli hajj but this place meaning Qadian has more reward than a Nafli hajj.
2–“He who visits the tomb of the Promised Messiah (in Qadian) is blessed to the same degree as one who visits the green tomb of the Prophet Muhammad(pbuh) in Medina. Woe to the person who debars himself from the benefits of the blessing of Hajj-al-Akbar towards Qadian.”
(Al-Fadl , December 13, 1939).
3–“These people raise this objection out of mischief. The Holy Prophet (saw) lived ten years in Medina. It was only two days travel between Medina and Mecca, but Holy Prophet (saw) did not perform Hajj for ten years, even though he could have arranged for conveyance. It is not the only condition for Hajj that one has sufficient wealth but it is also important that there is no danger of mischief and there should be means available to reach there with peace and to perform Hajj. When beasts like maulvis issue fatwa of death here and do not fear the government, then what else could they do there? But these people have no interest that we do not perform Hajj. If we perform Hajj then they will consider us Muslims? And will they join our jama’at? Well, firstly all these Muslim scholars should write a declaration that if we perform Hajj then all of them will repent on our hand and will enter our jama’at and will become our followers. If they write as such and take an oath then we will perform Hajj. Allah will arrange means of convenience for us so that in future the mischief of maulvis ends. It is no good to object mischievously. This objection of theirs does not come on us but on Holy Prophet (saw) as well because Holy Prophet (saw) performed Hajj in his last year only” (Malfuzat, vol 5 page 248).