Intro
In 1893, he was a worker at Qadian and an Ahmadi, he was the assistant of Muhammad Saeed who was in-charge of the library at Qadian (sounds like MGA’s library)(See his court testimony in Kitab al Barriya). He told the British courts that he was currently a Christian and was an Ahmadi in 1893 and was part of the debate with Athim. He confessed that left Ahmadiyya and became a Christian 1 year after this famous debate (March-1894). He even told that MGA prophesied that Athim would be bitten by a snake. He also confessed that one time after the debate, news had reached Qadian that Dr. Clark was sick, and MGA immediately prophesied about the death of Dr. Clark too (this was not published).
In late July-1897, Maulvi Burhan-ud-Din Ghazi’s paternal nephew (Abdul Hameed) showed up at the Church/School/mission of Dr. Clark and confessed to have been sent to commit murder. On 1 August 1897, Dr. Henry Martyn-Clark filed a lawsuit of attempted murder against Mirza Ghulam Ahmad with Deputy Commissioner Montagu William Douglas in Ludhiana. The case of Dr. Clarke and the British government vs. MGA was in full effect. Lekh Ram had died just a few months earlier, and it seemed like some fanatical Ahmadi’s had planned the murder. Nevertheless, a few months later, Abdul Hameed showed up at Dr. Clarke’s location in Amritsar in the guise of wanting to convert to Christianity. Soon after showing up, he confessed that MGA had sent him to murder Dr. Clarke. However, after the case started, and trial began, Abdul Hameed seemed to have totally recanted the story and blamed the Christians at Amritsar and Beas for scaring him into such a testimony, i.e. that MGA sent him to commit murder. In the below, we have extracted Yusuf Khan’s testimony in this case to Abdul Hameed via Ahmadi sources. We found this testimony in MGA’s book,. “kitab ul Barriya” (1897), in a Lahori-Ahmadi translation, pages 197-198. After Abdul Hameed recanted, Yusuf Khan gave this specific testimony.
He disappeared in all literature after 1897.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1869
Yusuf Khan (an Ex-Ahmadi) told British courts in the Punjab, and under oath, that he knew Maulvi Burhan-ud-Din since 1869.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1893
In 1893, he was a worker at Qadian and an Ahmadi, he was the assistant of Muhammad Saeed who was in-charge of the library at Qadian (sounds like MGA’s library)(See his court testimony in Kitab al Barriya). He told the British courts that he was currently a Christian and was an Ahmadi in 1893 and was part of the debate with Athim.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Via Kitab al Barriya, abridged english edition by the Lahori-Ahmadi’s
20th August 1897. Yusuf Khan witness on solemn affirmation
Son of Akhhund Ahmad Shah Khan, caste Afghan Christian, resident of Gujrat, Tehsil Mardan, age 36 years, stated: I am a farmer. I was formerly a Muslim (he means Qadiani-Ahmadi) and remained a Muslim till the age of 33 years. I had become a follower of Mirza sahib. I was the assistant of Muhammad Saeed who was in-charge of the library. After Muhammad Saeed left, I had taken charge. I had gone to Jandiala before the debate of 1893, so that the Muslim people select Mirza sahib for the debate. On 5th June 1893, at the end of the debate, Mirza sahib made the prophecy, exhibit ‘A’. He said that the party which was in the wrong would be punished by death and thrown in hell within a period of fifteen months. Note: The witness read the prophecy and said: “The party which is in the wrong will be defeated, that is, will be destroyed”. I had understood at that time that the prophecy was in respect of Abdullah Atham. But afterwards, Mirza sahib had explained orally that the prophecy was in respect of every man belonging to the opponents. Reaching Qadian eight or nine days later, I enquired. When Dr. Clarke fell ill, Mirza sahib said that he must also be punished, that is, with the death penalty. The witness presented the notification dated 15th October 1894, exhibit ‘W’. Also he presented notification dated 5th September 1894, exhibit ‘H’. At that time Mirza sahib was grossly displeased with Doctor sahib. One day in July 1893 Mirza sahib narrated his dream before many persons as follows: “A snake bit me on the right hand and I went to my father. My father began incising this wound with a razor and incised it up to the breast”. On the strength of this Mirza sahib prophesied that Atham would be bitten by a snake. People were informed about this in Sialkot and elsewhere by post. I became a Christian a year after the debate. I parted ways with Mirza sahib in March 1894. I have known Maulvi Burhan-ud-Din since 1869. Note: The witness read the prophecy exhibit ‘A’ and interpreted it just as Dr. Clarke had done. (On a question from the lawyer of the defendant) I have not passed any examination in Arabic, Persian or English. Yuraddu il-an-Nasa¯ra¯ means that “we returned him towards the Christians”. Mirza sahib interprets this prophecy to refer to Abdullah Atham, I do not. I was a Christian when the term of the prophecy passed. Muhammad Saeed and myself had lived together at Qadian. After me, Muhammad Saeed left Qadian. He also is a Christian. I do not like Mirza sahib’s teachings.
Yusuf Khan with own pen. Read out. Is correct. Accepted.
Signature of the Judge.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Links and Related Essays
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Lekh+Ram
Dr. Henry Martyn Clark vs. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/30/who-is-abdul-hameed/
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/06/who-is-maulvi-burhanuddin-of-jhelum-1830-1905/
http://www.ahmadiyya.org/bookspdf/bar/bar180-201-frm.htm
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/26/the-mirza-family-was-above-the-law-in-british-india/
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Lekh
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Athim
http://www.ahmadiyya.org/bookspdf/bar/bar180-201-frm.htm
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad sent Abdul Hameed to murder Dr. Clark, after Lekh Ram was murdered
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad had 5 official written debates, NO ORAL Debates
The Punjab Mission News and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s death prophecy vs. Athim
After Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s lost the debate with Athim, 3 of his followers left Ahmadiyya
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad vs. Athim—through the lens of Asif M Basit–Review of Religions 2013
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian
5 Pingback