Intro
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad loved to curse his opponents. His favorite method of cursing was to call someone as a “children of a prostitutes” (Zurrayatul Baghaya), or bitch or pig, or to call a man a woman or womanly. There are so many instances. MGA even called the wife of his first cousin as a prostitute, the Ahmadiyya editing team edited this out also, however, we have found it. It seems that in 1897, MGA and his team called Sa’dullah as a son of prostitutes (ibn Bagha).
In Feb-1907, After Sa‘dullah of Ludhiana died (he died in Jan-1907), MGA mentioned him in the Al-Hakam, vol. 11, no. 7, p. 12, dated 24 February 1907 (See also Malfuzat-9, online English edition, pages 146-148). MGA and his team of writers quoted MGA’s poem from Anjam e Athim wherein Sa‘dullah of Ludhiana was referred to as “ibn bagha” (son of zina). In this utterance, MGA alleges that Sa‘dullah of Ludhiana had indirectly entered a Mubahila with MGA which caused Sa‘dullah of Ludhiana to die 10 years later. In Dec-2025, Maulvi Razi alleged (24:20 time stamp) that MGA wrote that when he used “ibn bagha” for Sa‘dullah of Ludhiana in 1898, MGA meant “sarkash insan”. In 2023, here razi claims mga translated “ibn e baghay” as “sarkash insan” (9:33 timestamp).
As Haqiqatul Wahi was published (May-1907), MGA claimed that Sa’dullah died of plague and mubahila. MGA also purposely left out his poetry wherein he called Sa’dullah as the son of prostitutes (ibn Bagha)(See page 446 and 450 of the Appendix of Haqeeqat-ul-Wahi (RK- 22, Urdu) and see pages, 554, 559 and 564 of the English edition). Mirza Bashir Ahmad claims that Muhammad Ali advised MGA to leave this out, in fear of legal recourse, i.e. the son of Sa’dullah might have sued for defamation. Dard tells us it was Khwaja Kamal-ud-Din and not Muhammad Ali however (See the al-Hakam, volume 38, number 7, February 28, 1935, pages 3–4, narrating the eye-witness accounts of Maulavi Muhammad Ibrahim Baqapuri, via the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah and via Seeratul Mehdi, page 31 part 1).
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ In 1897, MGA (and his team) wrote Arabic poetry about his opponents
He called Saadullah ‘son of prostitution’ in an Arabic poem and translated it into Persian as it is in Arabic. Years later (1907), when Mirza was gloating over the death of Saadullah, he left out the vile epithet in the Urdu translation — not once, but twice:
“””You have pained me with filth and I would not be truthful
Then, on page 446 of the Appendix of Haqeeqat-ul-Wahi (RK, vol. 22), there is no mention of the offensive phrase in the translation:
And again on page 450 of the same, there is a longer translation, but no mention of the abusive phrase that is there in Arabic. Mirza mentions that the translations are his own.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1907
Feb-1907
Al-Hakam, vol. 11, no. 7, p. 12, dated 24 February 1907
Malfuzat-9, online English edition, pages 146-148
Malfuzat-Urdu
Al-Hakam, vol. 11, no. 7, p. 12, dated 24 February 1907
Click to access Al-Hakam-vol.-11-no.-7-p.-12-dated-24-February-1907.pdf
https://www.youtube.com/live/L_hBfW6pgJA?si=_2RST4pgJweSJ5TA
In Feb-1907, After Sa‘dullah of Ludhiana died (he died in Jan-1907), MGA mentioned him in the Al-Hakam, vol. 11, no. 7, p. 12, dated 24 February 1907 (See also Malfuzat-9, online English edition, pages 146-148). MGA and his team of writers quoted MGA’s poem from Anjam e Athim wherein Sa‘dullah of Ludhiana was referred to as “ibn bagha” (son of zina). In this utterance, MGA alleges that Sa‘dullah of Ludhiana had indirectly entered a Mubahila with MGA which caused Sa‘dullah of Ludhiana to die 10 years later. In Dec-2025, Maulvi Razi alleged (24:20 time stamp) that MGA wrote that when he used “ibn bagha” for Sa‘dullah of Ludhiana in 1898, MGA meant “sarkash insan”. In 2023, here razi claims mga translated “ibn e baghay” as “sarkash insan” (9:33 timestamp).
As Haqiqatul Wahi was published (May-1907), MGA claimed that Sa’dullah died of plague and mubahila. MGA also purposely left out his poetry wherein he called Sa’dullah as the son of prostitutes (ibn Bagha)(See page 446 and 450 of the Appendix of Haqeeqat-ul-Wahi (RK- 22, Urdu) and see pages, 554, 559 and 564 of the English edition). Mirza Bashir Ahmad claims that Muhammad Ali advised MGA to leave this out, in fear of legal recourse, i.e. the son of Sa’dullah might have sued for defamation. Dard tells us it was Khwaja Kamal-ud-Din and not Muhammad Ali however (See the al-Hakam, volume 38, number 7, February 28, 1935, pages 3–4, narrating the eye-witness accounts of Maulavi Muhammad Ibrahim Baqapuri, via the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah and via Seeratul Mehdi, page 31 part 1).
______________________________________________________________________________________________
The 2019 english edition of Haqiqatul Wahy
The english edition of this book also has the entire line wherein MGA calls him the son of prostitutes as not mentioned (see pages, 554, 559 and 564).
In 1897, he called Saadullah ‘son of prostitution’ in an Arabic poem and translated it into Persian as it is in Arabic. Years later (1907), when Mirza was gloating over the death of Saadullah, he left out the vile epithet in the Urdu translation — not once, but twice:
“””You have pained me with filth and I would not be truthful
Then, on page 446 of the Appendix of Haqeeqat-ul-Wahi (RK, vol. 22), there is no mention of the offensive phrase in the translation:
And again on page 450 of the same, there is a longer translation, but no mention of the abusive phrase that is there in Arabic. Mirza mentions that the translations are his own.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Bashir Ahmad Rafiq mentioned the quote in his book however
Taken from https://www.alislam.org/books/truth/opponents.html, middle of the webpage, retrieved on 11-9-16.
An Imam of the Ahmadiyya movement, Bashir Ahmad Rafiq wrote a book entitled, “Truth about Ahmadiyya”, 6 editions were published between 1978 and 1992 in German and English. Bashir Ahmad Rafiq claims that Ibn Bagha only means son of the wicked. See here also—“”””You have persecuted me out of your vileness and now if you do not die in disgrace, oh wicked one ibn baghaI will not have been proved truthful in my claim.””””(anjam e athim, 1897).
_______________________________________________________________________________________________Muhammad Ali advised MGA to leave out the Ibn Bagha and other quotes out of Haqiqatul Wahy MGA also mentions this in HW. However, by 1935, Mirza Bashir Ahmad said: The lawyer was Khwajah Kamal-ud-Din. In al-Hakam, volume 38, number 7, February 28, 1935, pages 3–4, narrating the eye-witness accounts of Maulavi Muhammad Ibrahim Baqapuri (see the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah).
Seeratul Mehdi, page 31 part 1.
(42) stated to me by shaikh Abdurehman misri that once Hazrat sb (MGAQ) kept sitting after zuhur prayer in masjid of qadiyan…an. Few days ago hazrat sb has written that Saadullah will remain without progeny. His son that is alive today, is impotent, will surely not be able to take his name ahead. This humble self says that saadullah was worst enemy of hazrat sb and used to talk bad against him. But before publishing this ” ishtihar” molvi Muhammad Ali advised hazrat sb that publishing such ishtihar would be against law. He said if Saadullah filed a suit in the court we would not be in a position to prove impotency of his son. Hazrat sb did not agree, when molvi Muhammad Ali insisted on his advise, hazrat sb,s face turned red he got infuriated and said “when a prophet gets himself armed and comes to battle field, he does not disarm him”.
The scan
_______________________________________________________________________________________________Links and Related Essays
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad cursed at his critics, even calling them pigs, bitches and sons of prostitutes
Anjam-e-Athim (1897) quotes – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
The “Zarrayatul baghaya” insult by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was meant for Muslims
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad wrote vulgarities in Arabic also, new research from Arab Ex-Ahmadi’s
Who is Maulvi Sa’adullah or Saadullah or Sa’dullah of Ludhiana (died Jan-1907)??
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad called his first cousin’s wife a prostitute
https://www.alislam.org/library/book/truth-about-ahmadiyyat/opponents-promised-messiah/
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/15/mirza-ghulam-ahmads-debate-with-batalvi-summer-of-1891-was-stopped-by-the-british-govt-on-mgas-behalf/
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/05/28/nurul-haqq-part-1-quotes-and-background-data/
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/02/20/hani-tahir-describes-mirza-ghulam-ahmads-vulgar-writings/
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam
3 Pingback