Search

ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Thorough research work on the Ahmadiyya Movement, #ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyat #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome

Month

September 2023

In 1891, MGA denied all miracles and accused Eisa (as) of mesmerism and slight of hand, Musa (as) also and Ibrahim (as) and the birds

Intro
MGA was already discreetly denying the miracles of Eisa (as) in the Barahin series (1–4)(1880)(MGA argued that flies can be brought back to life with salt). Some of Ahl-e-Hadith ulema immediately took notice and some called MGA a Kafir (1884). Even Nawab Siddiq Hassan Khan tore of the Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya and sent it back to Qadian in that condition, which enraged MGA. MGA was also accused of claiming prophethood by the Ahl-e-Hadith, only Batalvi defended him. I have written a full review of BA3 herein.

In 1886, MGA called the miracle of the splitting of the moon a rare natural phenomenon like male humans/goats that give milk (a lie).

In 1891 (see Izala Auham), MGA took it a step further and straight up accused Eisa (as) of mesmerism and slight of hand and thus, was accusing Eisa (as) of using magic, or being a magician. He also denied the miracle of the snake of Musa (as). #Ahmadis deny 26:63 (26:64 in the Qadiani Quran) of the Quran and claim that Musa (as) never split the sea, it was a low tide phenomenon. Watch Bro Imtiaz explain this whole thing herein. MGA also denied the miracle of Ibrahim (as) and 4 birds in 2:260.

MGA kept going, in 1893, via his written debate with Athim, MGA denied the miraculous birth of Eisa (as)(See Ruhani Khazain volume 6 Jang-e-Muqadas page 280-281) and later on Qadiani-Ahmadi’s began to call Maryam a Hermaphrodite (astagfarullah) and argued that all miracles happened via science. In 2023, they have backtracked and only call it a possibility, however, to consider this a possibility is to cede and reject the signs of Allah.

MGA also denied the miracle of the splitting of the moon after 1891 and called it an eclipse.

In 2022, Mirza Masroor Ahmad was asked about miracles by an Ahmadi boy, the answer is strange and weird. The young boy was asking about the red drops incident of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. In response to this, and very ironically, Mirza Masroor Ahmad said that science can’t comprehend the spiritual realm. Mirza Masroor Ahmad was so confused he even said that 1+1=2 can’t be proven (See the clip on TikTok and Twitter). Mirza Masroor Ahmad also commented on the splitting of the Moon miracle by Muhammad (saw) and seems to have forgot that MGA eventually called it an eclipse.

Continue reading “In 1891, MGA denied all miracles and accused Eisa (as) of mesmerism and slight of hand, Musa (as) also and Ibrahim (as) and the birds”

This history of #Ahmadiyya in the #USA

Intro
In 1976, Mirza Nasir Ahmad (3rd Qadiani Khalifa) visited the USA, this was the first time a sitting Khalifa visited the USA. By 1979, the Ahmadiyya Movement was claiming to have only 5 mission houses and 4 mosques in the country. However, at least 2 of the 4 alleged mosques are residential properties (the property on Wabash in Chicago and the residential property in Washington D.C. aka the American Fazl Mosque). The 3rd being the Ahmadiyya temple/mosque in Dayton, Ohio. The 4th is unknown.

The Ahmadiyya Movement sent Mufti Muhammad Sadiq in 1920 to the USA without a visa (however, with paperwork from the British Government). However, MGA’s correspondence with Alexander Webb goes back to the 1880’s. Specifically in 1887, MGA was published in the USA.(See “Religious Jottings,” New York Tribune, March 27, 1887, 11., Via Bowen). Furthermore, in this advertisement, MGA is saying that he is under the protection of the British Government!!! MGA is grateful to the colonist, in fact, MGA called them a temporal Khalifa in 1902! Moreover, MGA gives a ridiculous challenge of asking people to pay 200 rupees before they come to Qadian and promising them a heavenly sign.

Additionally, MGA’s photo and life story were also published in the American press from 1902-1907 in terms of his challenge to Dowie.

In 1907, C.F. Sievwright was mentioned in one of the most famous local newspapers of Northern California, (See The Placer Herald of Sat, Jan 26, 1907 ·Page 2)(Rocklin, Ca), M. Abdul Haq C.F. Sievwright was mentioned as someone who was in the USA on a mission to convert all to Allah. Sievwright is also described as a writer in the Review of Religions magazine from the Punjab (this is not true). The newspaper reports that Sievwright came from India and is a well known Moslem in India (a lie). He is now in San Diego. Sievwright alleges that his only mission is to spread Islam in California.

The Dec-1919 edition of the ROR tells the world that Mufti Muhammad Sadiq has been ordered by the Khalifa to go to the USA. The essay or announcement is written by Rahim Baksh aka Dard, who is working as the 2nd Khalifa’s secretary on 11-25-1919. The April-May-1920 edition of the ROR tells us that Mufti Muhammad Sadiq is detained in prison in the USA, Maulvi Sher Ali calls intolerance. Mufti Sadiq had sailed from England on January 26, 1920, and reached Philadelphia in the second week of February (2-15-1920, see ROR of July-1920). The immigration department blocked his entry into the U.S.A. on the grounds that he was not allowed to preach the message of God (See also the ROR of April-May-1920). Sadiq set up his first headquarters in April 1920 at 1897 Madison Avenue in New York City. His address was also written as: “Mufti Mohammad Sadiq Ahmadi Missioner 245 W 72 Street, New York City (USA)”.

On page 47, Michael Muhammad Knight points out Mufti Muhammad Sadiq posted fake degrees from scam colleges in the Moslem Sunrise (See the Moslem Sunrise, Oct-1921, page 35 and April 1922, last page). In 1921, it was a Doctor of Divinity diploma from the College of Divine Metaphysics”, a New York thought institution in St. Louis. In 1922, it was a “Doctor of Orientalist Sciences, from Oriental University. This was a huge scam ran by Helmuth P. Holler, who was arrested and thrown in jail in 1926.

In 1976, Mirza Nasir Ahmad visited the USA, marking the first time ever that a sitting Khalifa came to the USA.


Continue reading “This history of #Ahmadiyya in the #USA”

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad lied on ibn Qayyim

Intro
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad lied on ibn Qayyim in terms of the alleged death of Eisa (as). See the full quote in the below. MGA did acknowledge that Ibn Qayyim believed in the physical descent of Eisa (As). Thus, MGA was stuck in a quagmire, MGA was accusing them of believing in the death of Eisa (as) and his physical descent.

MGA also lied about the beliefs of the teacher of ibn Qayyim, i.e., Ibn Taymiyyah. MGA also said that Ibn Taymiyyah believed that Eisa (As) died and in his physical return. Obviously, the first part is a lie. Feel free to read about Ibn Taymiyyah on 3:55, 4:158, 39:42, 3:144, 5:117 and 6:60.


Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad lied on ibn Qayyim”

2:281 of the Quran derails the Qadiani-Ahmadi arguments for Waffa

Intro
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad argued that “wherever the expression Tawaffi is used for a human being,
and the action is attributed to Allah the Glorious, Tawaffi invariably means death and taking possession of the soul” (see the ref in the below).  

However, this is contradicted by 2:281 (2:282 in the Qadiani Quran) of the Quran, which MGA never mentioned. In 2:281, the action is attributed to Allah and Tawaffa doesn’t mean death. 3:185 is another case wherein Tawaffi is used for a human being, and the action is attributed to Allah, however, Waffa means “full reward”.

Even in the 2018 edition of the famous 5-volume commentary, Waffa is not translated as death. Check out my other essay on: Is there a difference between Tuwaffa and Tawaffa in the Quran? Or are they just diacritical marks?

Continue reading “2:281 of the Quran derails the Qadiani-Ahmadi arguments for Waffa”

Did MGA get Wahy Nubuwwat or Wahy-i-Wilayat?

Intro
In Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya V-3 (1882)(See page 195-198, online English edition, Sub-Footnote Number One is referenced from Footnote Number Eleven on page 150), MGA made ilham=wahi. MGA targeted this argument vs. Maulavi Abu Abdullah Qasuri. Maulvi Abu Abdullah Qasuri argued that ilham and wahi are totally different. Bro Imtiaz and Adnan covered this topic on a recent livestream. The word ilham doesn’t exist at all in Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya V-4 or any other volume of the Barahin.

In 1891, MGA denied that he was a recipient of “Wahy Nubuwwat”, in fact, in Izala Auham (page 614, Part-2), he even said that “Wahy Risalat” had been cut off forever. Thus, MGA only claimed to receive “Wahy-i Wilayat” (revelation granted to saints).

In “Khutbah Ilhamiya” (1900), MGA called himself as the “Khatam-ul-Wilayat” (this is in terms of Wahi-i-Wilayat, the revelations/ilhams of the saints). This is not the Arabic part of the book which MGA allegedly uttered on Eid. This comes from the Urdu part of the book that was added later and has never been translated into English. Nevertheless, MGA never qualified this statement, did MGA mean, “the best” of the saints, or “the last” of the saints?

MGA claimed prophethood in 1901, a year later, in Tofha Golarvia (1902), MGA again claimed that it was impossible for anyone to get Wahy Nubuwwat.

In 1907 (via Haqiqatul Wahi”(see page 15), MGA wrote about wahyul-ibtila’ [the revelation of trial] and wahyul-istifa’ [the revelation of exaltation].

Most of these quotes are from Muhammad Ali’s famous 300 references that he wrote as an appendix to “Prophethood in Islam” (1915). Muhammad Ali commented on “Wahy-Nubuwwat” vs. “Wahy Wilayat” on pages, 113, 114, 382. Check out Bro Imtiaz vs. Razi on this topic herein. You can listen to Bro Imtiaz discussing how MGA denied “Wahy Nubuwwat” herein (27:13 time stamp).

On page-78 of Imam Abu Hanifa’s famous book, “Fiqh al Akbar”, Imam Abu Hanifa explains how “Wahi” is only for the prophets/messengers, whereas “ilham” is for non-prophets, like Hazrat Umar (via the Muhaddath theory). This is in total contradiction to MGA’s usage of Wahi/ilham in 1882.

In the Quran, “Wahi” is used for humans that are non-prophets twice, to an animal/insect once and to the Samaat Wattay (lower heavens) once. Thus, only 4 instances of usage for Wahi for non-prophets. We found 17 instances of Wahi used for the prophets/messengers. We also found one instance of the word “ilham” (see ref in the below). Listen to Mirza Tahir Ahmad explaining the Ahmadi belief that Wahi=ilham, in the 1990′s.

4 instances of Wahi for non-prophets in the Quran
In the Quran, Wahi is used to signify ilham to non-prophets like the companions of Eisa (as)(See 5:112, 5:113 in the Qadiani Quran), the mother of Musa (as)(See 28:7, 28:8 in the Qadiani Quran)(See also 20:38, 20:39 in the Qadiani Quran), the bee (see 16:68, 16:69 in the Qadiani Quran). In 41:12 (41:13 in the Qadiani Quran) Allah gave Wahi to Samaa Wattay (lower heavens) and assigned duties to them.

17 instances of Wahi used for Rasul/Nabi
7:117 (7:118 in the Qadiani Quran), 10:2 (10:3 in the Qadiani Quran) also mentions how Allah sent Wahi to Muhammad (Saw). See 42:51 and 42:52 also (42:52 and 42:53 in the Qadiani Quran) Allah says that he only communicates via Wahi to his prophets. 53:4 (53:5 in the Qadiani Quran). 3 times in 4:163 (4:164 in the Qadiani Quran). 21:45 (21:46 in the Qadiani Quran). 11:36 (11:37 in the Qadiani Quran). 16:43 (16:44 in the Qadiani Quran). 14:13 (14:14 in the Qadiani Quran). 20:114 (20:115 in the Qadiani Quran). 21:73 (21:74 in the Qadiani Quran). 23:27 (23:28 in the Qadiani Quran). 20:77 (20:78 in the Qadiani Quran). 21:7 (21:8 in the Qadiani Quran).

Tanzila
This seems to be another word that Allah uses to describe his revelations to humans.

Unzila
Unzila is also used to describe the revelations of Allah.

ilham via Allah to the Universe
91:8 (91:9 in the Qadiani Quran).

Continue reading “Did MGA get Wahy Nubuwwat or Wahy-i-Wilayat?”

Maulvi Abudofour engages in slander vs. #Ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
Qadiani-Ahmadi Maulvi Abudofour has shown his true colors, he is showing what Ahmadiyya has taught, i.e., to attack people personally and engage in slander, and then to cry persecution. If you check out his youtube channel, you will see that he hosted Khurram Shah and only to slander me, Khurram Shah will not answer any of my questions. Further, Khurram Shah and his silly wife Qanta Shah have always hated me and all of her direct in-laws and in spite. Khurram and Qanta manipulated people their entire lives to make a few pennies, whereas, I have earned everything.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s

You searched for Adubofour – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #ahmadianswers #ahmadiyyamuslimcommunity #ahmadiyya_creatives #ahmadiyyatthetrueislam #ahmadiyyatzindabad #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiyyamuslim #mirzaghulamahmad #qadiani #qadianism

Reem Shraiky EXPOSED!!!

Intro
Reem Shraiky allegedly converted to Ahmadiyya in 2007 and immediately got a Visa to the West. She claims that she was living in Saudi Arabia alone and working some type of job. She is Syrian, she abruptly went home to Syria and found that her brother had converted to Ahmadiyya. She also claims that her father was a Sunni Muslim Scholar. However, in her statements she seems to have been clearly confused, she conflated the imam mahdi with prophethood, which are 2 opposing beliefs. They then admit that this is the wife of Ibrahim Ikhlaf. She became an Ahmadi and immediately got married and immediately got a visa to the UK (From Syria) in just a few months (her paperwork seems to have been expedited by the jamaat). She confesses that she showed up to an embassy (most likely the UK embassy in Saudi Arabia), with barely any paperwork, she came back in 3 days and she had a visa to the west (wink wink). Ibrahim Ikhlaf then confesses that Mirza Masroor Ahmad told him that the visa would be expedited (and simply because Ahmadi’s get special treatment from government officials).

Thus, we have proven that Reem Shraiky converted to Ahmadiyya without a proper investigation and immediately got a visa to the West. Moreover, Ibrahim Ikhlaf called her sister in this video and seemed to be deceptively trying to act like that wasn’t his wife.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s

The history of Ahmadiyya in Syria – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Ibrahim Ikhlaf EXPOSED!!!! – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

The history of Ahmadiyya in Syria – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

https://youtu.be/VShV5IEjC2A?si=KolhKQgGFGN6tZ-f

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #ahmadianswers #ahmadiyyamuslimcommunity #ahmadiyya_creatives #ahmadiyyatthetrueislam #ahmadiyyatzindabad #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiyyamuslim #mirzaghulamahmad #qadiani #qadianism

Mahdi Appah barely knew what Ahmadiyya was and was dead by 1929

Intro
Per Hanson (see page 194), Mahdi Appah was dead by 1929. Per Fisher (see page 117, published in 1963), the precursor to Ahmadiyya in Ghana was a man named Abu Bakr. Abu Bakr seems to have had some type of connection with the British Army via the Anglo-Ashanti wars. It’s unclear who’s side he was on, nevertheless, he seems to have been a Muslim and he converted two members from the Fante people, Benjamin Sam and Mahdi Appah. However, Hanson tells us that a man named Amadu Ramano Pedro who was an Afro-Brazilian Ahmadi, seems to have facilitated Ahmadiyya in Ghana (See page 168). Hanson tells us that Pedro was looking to gain converts in 1910 and he seems to have met Yusuf Nyarko (Ben Sam‘s cousin) before he had his famous false dream. In the 1920’s, Amadu Ramano Pedro left Ahmadiyya in the 1920’s and joined another ex-Qadiani, Lawal Basil Agusto (See Hanson). 

The first contact with Ahmadiyya in Ghana can perhaps be attributed to a consequence of Sam’s cousin (Yusuf Nyarko) who dreamt of white men called “Muslims”, (See Fisher, page 118) with whom he was praying. (See Antoine 2010, p. 77, The term “white” corresponded to non-African foreigners. Thus, Ahmadi Muslims from the Indian subcontinent were counted among the “whites”. Before the invitation, the young group of orthodox Muslims were not aware of the existence of “white” Muslims. See:Antoine 2010, p. 3 and Antoine 2010, p. 77). Hanson asserts that it was Amadu Ramano Pedro who facilitated contact between the 300 Fante Muslims and the Qadiani’s. 

Mahdi Appah was born a Pagan. The birth name of Mahdi Appah was Aduogyir Appah. After converting to the Ahmadiyya movement, he changed his first name to Mahdi. He converted to Christianity via Benjamin Sam and seems to be his follower (See Fisher). It seems that Abu Bakr converted them to Islam (See Fisher). It also seems that Mahdi Appah could read some English, however, Urdu and Arabic were out of the question. Benjamin Sam was a trader and a Wesleyan teacher-catechist, he got Mahdi Appah to convert to Christianity, and then to convert to Islam via Abu Bakr (See Fisher, page 117).

Islam grew rapidly among the Fante people (See Fisher, page 117). Starting from Ekrofol, Sam self-designated himself as its Imam, and quickly built a community of 500 Fante Muslims across southern Ghana (Samwini, page 37). Thus, only 500 of the Fante people converted to Islam.

At times, Muslim clerics from the northern regions continued to supervise the growing, but nascent group of Muslims in southern Ghana. In July 1896, a secular Muslim school was opened in Ekrofol, and Appah was appointed as its manager (See Fisher, page 117). However, the northern clerics expressed strong disapproval of a secular-leaning school (See Fisher, page 118). Despite this, the school prospered with governmental assistance until 1908 when it was infected by Guinea worm disease and attendance soon dropped (See Fisher, page 118). As a convert from Christianity, Sam taught customs, brought from Christianity, that were sometimes considered un-Islamic. This was a major cause of disagreement between him and his friend Appah. As a result, Appah left Ekrofol (Samwini, page 37). Sam died soon after, in the same year the disease struck the school. Appah once again returned to Ekrofol and continued to propagate Islam among the Fante people (See Samwini, page 37 and Fisher, page 118). 

It was believed by converts that the only people who prayed as Muslims were the northern Hausa. However, a resident in Saltpond, originally from Nigeria, informed the presence of the Indian-origin Ahmadiyya movement in Nigeria (See Antoine 2010, p. 77). 

Soon, through the Review of Religions (See Fisher, page 118), the Fante Muslims under the leadership of Appah made contact with the caliphMirza Bashir-ud-Din Mahmud Ahmad, in Qadian, India (See Samwini, page 37). The Muslims were no longer interested to remain under the spiritual guidance of the northern Ghanaians or Hausa Muslims. The caliph sent Al-Hajj Abdul Rahim Nayyar who sailed from London to Freetown, in Sierra Leone. After a short stay he arrived on 28 February 1921 to Saltpond, Ghana and started preaching in the first week of March 1921. (See Fisher, page 118 and Samwini, page 87). Following a lecture, the Fante community “believed there and then”, following which an oath of allegiance was held (See Antoine 2010, p. 77).

In the history of the Ahmadiyya Community, Mahdi Appah is regarded as the first Ghanaian to become an Ahmadi (“Hadhrat Khalifatul Masih V – Service in Ghana”Review of Religions. May 2008). Despite resistance from northern clerics, the Fante Muslims converted en masse, giving immediate rise to the Ahmadiyya movement in Ghana (See Fisher, page 118 and Samwini, page 87).

Mahdi Appah used Yusuf Nyarko’s dream to reassert his authority over Fante Muslims. Hedid so in part by calling a meeting of Fante Muslims at Mankessim. This town had been the center of an eighteenth-century Fante political coalition and, more recently, the site where late nineteenth-century political activists met to form the Fante Confederation on the eve of the British declaration of the Gold Coast colony. Meeting at Mankessim marked the significance of the meeting. It also avoided Ekrawfo, the historical base of the movement, and enabled Mahdi
Appah and Fante Muslims to discuss the Ahmadiyya in isolation from Yakubu, the savanna Muslim scholar who ran the Arabic school at Ekrawfo in the late igios. Appah could focus attention on the dream and not on issues of Muslim practice that divided the community. In 1919 Mahdi Appah was a newly engaged leader who used his influence to facilitate a meeting, explicitly to discuss a dream but perhaps implicitly to reconcile divisions in the Fante Muslim community created by the criticism of savanna Muslim scholars.

Continue reading “Mahdi Appah barely knew what Ahmadiyya was and was dead by 1929”

Who is Benjamin Sam?

Intro
Benjamin Sam (aka Binyameen Sam, see Hanson) was a member of the Fante people. One of his close associates was Mahdi Appah, they were both born pagans. The birth name of Mahdi Appah was Aduogyir Appah. After converting to the Ahmadiyya movement, he changed his first name to Mahdi. Appah converted to Christianity via Benjamin Sam and seems to be his follower (See Fisher). It seems that some guy named Abu Bakr converted them to Islam (See Fisher). It also seems that Mahdi Appah could read some English, however, Urdu and Arabic were out of the question. Benjamin Sam was a trader and a Wesleyan teacher-catechist, he got Mahdi Appah to convert to Christianity, and then to convert to Islam via Abu Bakr (See Fisher, page 117-119).

By the late 1910’s, he was working in a Muslim school as an english teacher and leader of the Fante Muslims. Mahdi Appah was totally missing from the scene and out farming cocoa. Ben Sam was tolerant of alcohol, circumcision and etc. This seems to have caused Mahdi Appah to move away. However, Ben Sam died in roughly 1919 and Mahdi Appah returned to Ekrofol. Ben Sam’s cousin (or nephew) Yusuf Nyarko dreamed of white man leading them. Mahdi Appah heard about this dream and with the help of Amadu Ramano Pedro invited the Ahmadiyya Movement to Ghana.

Continue reading “Who is Benjamin Sam?”

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑