ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
In a recent video, Mufti Mubasher Shah explained how Mirza Bashir Ahmad advised Ahmadi’s in roughly 1917 to recite the revelations of MGA for their own purification (Via “Mazameen-e-Basheer”, V-1, page 244).  However, in 2025, Ahmadi’s don’t do this.

“You may be aware that three years ago, at the Jalsa Salana, Hazrat Amirul Momineen emphasized to the members of the Jama’at for regular and consistent recitation of the compilation of the Promised Messiah’s revelations, for their purification” (MAZAMEEN E BASHIR
VOL 1, Pg. 244). 

Continue reading “Did Mirza Ghulam Ahmad said that he wanted Ahmadi’s to recite his ilham/wahi publicly?” →

Intro
In a recent this week with Huzoor, Mirza Masroor Ahmad acknowledged that he knows about the lack of attendance of Ahmadi’s at their own temples in the West (See the clip on TikTok and Twitter). Mirza Masroor Ahmad suggests to Ahmadi’s to never be like the harsh Maulvi’s who ridicule people and look down upon them if they aren’t religious. Mirza Masroor Ahmad suggests well known customer service techniques instead which are aimed at retaining customers.

Continue reading “Mirza Masroor Ahmad knows that Ahmadi’s don’t attend their temples, suggests well known customer service techniques” →

Intro
In July of 2025, a string of divorces has shook the Baypoint, Ca Ahmadiyya Temple Community.

A Qadiani-Ahmadi Maulvi named Syed Tallal Ahmad had recently married an extended relative from the Baypoint, Ca Ahmadiyya Temple Community just a few years ago, and the woman has returned home with a baby and a refusal from a Maulvi pay child support. Vice President of the Baypoint Community of Ahmadi’s, Mr. Khurram Shah was so triggered by all of this, that he came to a Bro Imtiaz stream and began issuing silly nonsensical challenges to Dr. Shah. However, in real life Khurram Shah is terrified to get into any fight with any man (see all the screenshots in the below). This Maulvi Syed Tallal Ahmad also owns a side business and was allowed to do as such by Mirza Masroor Ahmad.

Moreover, there are 2 more cases. One is a man named Tahir, who works at Home Depot and married a 2-time divorced Ahmadi woman with kids. He had a babygirl with this Ahmadi woman about 6 months and has now totally abandoned his family and is refusing to pay any child support. He saw coming to America as having won a lottery (just like Qanta Shah) and planned to marry this woman and abandon her thereafter.

The third case is also sad and will be discussed later.

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Screenshots of Khurram Shah raging in the comments

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s

Khurram Shah is secretly officially representing the Ahmadiyya Movement – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Khurram Shah is secretly officially representing the Ahmadiyya Movement

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #mirzaghulamahmad

Intro
In 1900, via Arba’in, MGA quotes 53:3, 53:4, 53:5 (53:4, 53:5 and 53:6 in the Qadiani Quran) and alleges that he has the Holy Spirit (Ruhul-Qudus) with him and other angels (page 26)(Read about MGA and Tauhid herein).

In 1901, MGA and his team of writers quoted 53:3 of the Quran (53:4 in the Kadiani Koran) and connected it with the concept of Wahdat-e-Wujudi [Unity of Being]. MGA alleged that the person who discards the mantle of their human nature and cloaks themselves under the mantle of divinity, so as to become a reflection of the divine, fulfills 53:3 of the Quran (53:4 in the Kadiani Koran). MGA alleges that some Sufi’s are ignorant of this and have went into an error and have went too far and then considered themselves to be God. MGA also quoted 53:8 of the Quran (53:9 in the Kadiani Koran) and alleged that when “Wahdat-e-Wujud” is achieved, Allah comes close to his servant. MGA then argues that until one keeps the attributes of Allah Almighty in the forefront of their heart and honours them, and shows a reflection of them in one’s own state and morals how can one be admitted in the presence of God? (See Malfuzat-2, online English edition, page 129, via Al-Hakam, vol. 5, no. 10, dated 17 March 1901, pp. 1-4).

In 1905, via Al-Hakam, MGA and his team of writers quoted 53:3 of the Quran (53:4 in the Kadiani Koran) and alleged that Muhammad (saw) had achieved the rank of Hujjatullah (Proofs of Allah) and Allah had become his limbs (naozobillah). MGA argued that Muhammad’s (Saw) every motion, or lack thereof, was with Allah’s permission and command (See Al-Hakam, vol. 9, no. 25, p. 10, 11, dated 17 July 1905, Via Malfuzat-7, online English edition, page 525).

In 1906-1907, via “Haqiqatul Wahi” MGA alleges that men can become like God by gaining the attributes of Allah (See page 24).

Also read about MGA’s violations of Tauhid herein.

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and 53:3 of the Quran (53:4 in the Kadiani Koran)” →

Intro
Technically, the Injeel (modern day Gospel of Jesus [as]) which is mentioned in the Quran, is not found anywhere on Earth. In Aug-1905, (Al-Hakam, vol. 9, no. 29, p. 3, dated 17 August 1905, via Malfuzat-7, Online English edition, pages 297-305), MGA and his team of writers argued that the Injil motivated Christians to think of themselves as God and to eat pork and drink wine (which is prohibited in the Torah). MGA was also called his old “Barahin” series as the Torah.

In 1898, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and his team of writers claimed that the Injeel of Eisa (AS) had been found in Tibet (“Raz-e-Haqiqat” (see page 30, online english edition).

In 1902, in Tofha Golarviyya, (RK, v-17, page 100, see scans in the below), MGA and his team of writers again quoted Swane Yuzay Asaf and again assert that he brought the injeel, see, the ref in the below. But what is Swane Yuzay Asaf? Swane simply means a autobiography. Why was MGA and his team of writers vague on this? Why didn’t they want people to double check?

In late 1902, 4 years after MGA began asserting that there was a “Tibetan-injil” that had been found (1898). MGA and his team of writers connected 23:50 with Yuz Asaf, and an alleged escape of Eisa (As) and Maryam to Kashmir. MGA and his team of writers then published a fake dream of MGA wherein MGA claimed that he saw that the injil that had been found in Kashmir would break the cross.

Also in 1902, via the book entitled, Al-Huda (page 101), MGA and his team of writers argued that Yuz Asaf called his book “the Injil” and this info can be found in Ikmal ud Din.

In 1906, MGA mentions the story of Yuz Asaf. MGA claims that the injeel of Yuz Asaf is older than Jesus (as). MGA and his team seem to be quoting the famous book, “Barlaam and Josaphat”.

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad blamed the Injeel for Christians eating pork and drinking wine” →

Intro
Maulvi Syed Shamshad Nasir is a Senior Murrabi in the USA Jamaat, at the 2025, USA Jalsa, he gave an Urdu only speech wherein he reiterated the comments of Mirza Maghfoor Ahmad (President of the USA Ahmadiyya Jamaat of Qadiani’s) which were made in terms of Ahmadi refugees who have recently settled in the USA (24:47 time stamp)(See on TikTok). Maulvi Syed Shamshad Nasir said that these Ahmadi refugees told the United Nations that they didn’t have religious freedom in Pakistan and needed asylum (he attempted to publicly absolve the Ahmadiyya Community from apparent legal responsibility in human trafficking). Maulvi Syed Shamshad Nasir even asserts that technically, Ahmadi’s can’t even say the Kalima in Pakistan. Maulvi Syed Shamshad Nasir says that Ahmadi’s can’t believe in God. Maulvi Syed Shamshad Nasir says that now that these Ahmadi refugees are in America, this Kalima should be even louder. If you were in Pakistan (25:33), and you were scared to read the Kalima, scared of “Ghair Ullah” (“other than Allah”), but you come here (USA) and partake in the love of “Ghair Ullah” (“other than Allah”) and then totally forget this Kalima. Among you there must be some whose elders (buzurgun) took bait at the hand of MGA, they were hand-in-hand! And MGA grabbed their hand and had a spiritual moment with them (khuda talla kee wadaniyat kee taleez per la kara gee gay). Among you there are also those, who separated their children from the hands of that same Messiah (MGA). And now you are standing with your children at the door of “Ghair Ullah” (“other than Allah”)(26:06). Your elders (buzurgun) saw the Noor (light) of Allah, however, your (Ahmadi refugees) off-spring are already entrapped by Satan. Maulvi Syed Shamshad Nasir then says that he hopes this never happens (why did he say it then?). Maulvi Syed Shamshad Nasir says that he prays to Allah that this never happens, however, you look around in the surrounding area, you see that Ahmadi’s have worried been making their children as their God (this is punjabi sarcasm, he means that Ahmadi’s have made their children as God). He says that these Ahmadi’s have thus forgot all about the real God. Maulvi Syed Shamshad Nasir then says that he quotes the final words of Mirza Maghfoor Ahmad wherein he said that he doesn’t know if this is of any benefit (implying that it’s too late to save most Ahmadi’s). There was another note, it was about MGA, and some quote no one has ever heard of wherein MGA said that he knows that some Ahmadi’s are not believing in all Ahmadi beliefs like Tauhid and other disagreeable with other specific arguments. MGA also alleged that if a man isn’t fair with his brother and steals his Haq (Haq Mar), then MGA doubts that person’s belief in Tauhid….

Continue reading “At the 2025 USA Jalsa, Maulvi Syed Shamshad Nasir admitted that the majority of previous generations of Ahmadi’s in the West, have left Ahmadiyya” →

Intro
Abu Hayyan Al-Andalusi (November 1256 – July 1344 CE), an authoritative linguist and a mufassir who mentioned 3 possible meanings of [Tawaffi] in Ayah 8:50 (8:51 in the Kadiani Koran):

1- Taking possession [of the soul].
2- Killing.
3- Driving [to the Hellfire].

However, in BA-5 (page 507), MGA argued that Tawaffi means to die a natural death and even quoted Lisan al Arab.

Abu Ja’far An-Nahhas is another authoritative linguist who mentioned [physically taking/driving] as a meaning of [Tawaffi] in Ayah 8:50.

Continue reading “Abu Hayyan Al-Andalusi and 8:50 of the Quran (8:51 in the Kadiani Koran)” →

Intro
In 1903, via Mawahibur-Rahman (page 117), MGA and his team of writers argued that if an Ayah (verse of the Quran) has dual implication (not Kuttee), the meaning presented by MGA is worthier of acceptance. Anything opposed to this is transgression/falsehood and imposture. MGA also said something similar about hadith, since he was Hakam and Adl, only MGA could choose which hadith were authentic or not. MGA was talking about the meaning of Tawaffi in relation to ’Isa ﷺ. He was saying that for the sake of argument even if both meanings (the Muslims’ interpretation and the Qadiani interpretation) are contextually possible, his interpretation takes precedence since he is the arbiter

However, many years later, via Tafseer-e-Kabeer and Tafseer-e-Sagheer” there are multiple examples of MGA’s son, the Musleh Maud, Mirza Basheer uddin Mahmud Ahmad, the 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa rejecting MGA’s interpretation, even saying it contradicts Qur’an. See also the case of MGA and his writings on the Ashab-e-Kahf. See also, 27:40 (27:41 in the Kadiani Koran). See also 18:65 (18:66 in the Kadiani Koran), the case of MGA and Al-Khidr.

Continue reading “According to MGA,if an Ayah has dual implication…..” →

Intro
In 1906, via the Al-Badr, (Badr, vol. 2, no. 16, p. 3, dated 19 April 1906)(Via Malfuzat-8, Online English edition, page 363), Mirza Ghulam Ahmad described those who do Ta’weel of the throne of Bilqis materializing in a moment in Ayah 27:40 as (the people who don’t fully believe in the powers of God Almighty).

However, in the 1960’s, via Tafseer-e-Kabeer, the 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa and his team of writers did Ta’weel of it interpreting it as making a replica of the throne of Bilqis in a short time.

In the Official 5-volume commentary by Malik Ghulam Farid in 1988 (via the later edition), he doesn’t even connect throne of Bilqis to this verse. However, it does seem to be mentioned under 27:21 (27:22 in the Kadiani Koran). In the new (2025) online edition of the 5-vol commentary, the verse doesn’t even have any commentary.

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, throne of Bilqis and 27:40 in the Quran (27:41 in the Kadiani Koran)” →