Even though MGA had been called a Kafir in 1884, since he was claiming to have fulfilled all the requirements of Eisa (as), Syed Muhammad Hussain Batalvi assured the world that MGA hadn’t taken it there via his exhaustive review. Thus, MGA was given the benefit of the doubt. MGA went silent on his prophethood and Messiah claims for 6-7 years. Finally, in January of 1891, MGA made the claim of being the Messiah. Syed Muhammad Hussain Batalvi then immediately drafted a letter of mass Takfir and sent it to Syed Nazeer Hussain of Delhi so that he could be the first to sign it. This was also published in Batalvi’s magazine, “Ishaat us Sunnah” (see the full reference in the below). Dard discussed it also in 1947 in his famous autobiography. We have found a portion of this Fatwa in Jalal ud Din Sham‘s 1956 commentary of MGA’s arabic poem entitled Qasidah (1892)._____________________________________________________________________________________________1915

See Muhammad Ali, “Prophethood in Islam” (1915), page 452

“””As against this accusation perhaps the Qadiani or his friends may put forth two excuses.  Firstly, that although the Qadiani is a claimant to prophethood but has also stated at the same time that the other name of this prophethood in muhaddathiyyat which shows that by his claim of prophethood is only meant the claim of muhaddathiyyat and not in reality the claim of being a nabi…..the reply is that although it has been stated by the Qadiani that he is a claimant to that kind of prophethood the door whereof shall remain open unto the Day of Resurrection, and that muhaddathiyat is another name of this prophethood whereof he is the claimant, but he has, at the same time, put such an interpretation upon the term muhaddathiyat, and explained its nature to be such that it cannot mean anything but prophethood. “””

See Muhammad Ali, “Prophethood in Islam” (1915), page 484
703—-Fatwa Kufr, pp. 76, 77

Dard writes about the famous Fatwa of Kufr
See page 575, footnote

“””In the joint fatwas issued in 1890 against him by certain Maulawis of the Punjab and other parts of India the following are some of the expressions used: Dajjal, a word taken to mean ‘personification of all vices’ by the issuers of the fatwa (Fatwa Ulema’-e-Punjab wa Hindustan, p. 41) ; Dhurriyyat-ud-Dajjal i.e., ‘children of Dajjal’ (Fatwa p. 40) Kadhdhab i. e. ‘a confirmed liar and fabricator’ (Fatwa p. 87), Mulhid wa Zindiq i e., ‘a faithless infidel and a double-dealing heretic’ (Fatwa p. 90); Bad-tarin-e- Khalq i.e., ‘the most wicked of God’s creatures’ (Fatwa, p. 96); Ashaddulmurtaddin i.e., ‘worst of apostates’ (Fatwa, p. 119); Uspar Khuda ki La‘nat i.e , ‘accursed of God’ (Fatwa, p. 149); Uska munh kala hu i.e., ‘may his face be blackened’ (Fatwa, p. 150); Dajajila ka ra‘s-e-ra‘is, i.e., ‘the ring-leader of Dajjals’ (Fatwa, p. 155), Kaj-rau, Balid … Us Shaitan sei ziyadah gumrah hai ju is kei sath kheil raha hai … i.e., ‘perverse, dunce, … even more astray than his playmate the devil …’ (Fatwa p. 101); Is Qadiani kei, chuze Hanud-u-Nasara kei mukhannath hai􀄔 i.e., ‘the chicks of this Qadiani are castrated eunches of Hindus and Christians’ (Fatwa, p. 100). In the fatwa issued by the ulema of Ludhiana in 1890 the following
words have been used: Chamaru􀄔 ka ‘Isa i.e., ‘the Christ of the Chamars’ (p.13); Un kei nikah baqi nahi􀄔 rahei; ju chahei unki ‘Aurtu􀄔 sai nikah kar lei i.e., ‘the marriage contracts of his and his followers are all void; and any body is free to enter into marriage relationship with any woman in the wedlock of any of them’ (p. 3).

Maulawi Muhammad Husain of Batala wrote in the Isha‘atus-Sannah: Bhangar, makkar, fareibi, mal‘un, a‘war dajjal, abdud-darahim waddananir, jiska ilham ihtilam hai, bei-haya, bhangiyu􀄔 aur bazari shuhdu􀄔 ka sargaruh, daku, khu􀄔reiz, jis ki jama‘at badma‘sh, badkirdar, zani, sharabi, i.e., ‘raving drunkard, intriguer, swindler, accursed, the one eyed Dajjal, slave of silver and gold, whose revelation is nothing but a seminal discharge, shameless, the ring-leader of sweepers and street vagabonds, dacoit, murderer whose followers are scoundrels, villains, adulterers, and drunkards’. (Vol. 16).

Mullah Muhammad Bakhsh of Lahore wrote in a handbill: Gurg-ekuhan Qadiani i.e., ‘deceitful old wolf’; Bharwa jorune jutiaya, i.e., ‘a procurer, who lives on the earnings of prostitutes and is beaten with shoes by his wife.’

Maulawi Abdul Haq Ghaznavi of Amritsar wrote in a leaflet: Ru Siyah, badkar, shaitan, la‘nati, shaqi sarmadi, la‘nat ka tauq us kei galei ka har, la‘n ta‘n ka jut us kai sar par, i.e., ‘black-faced, adulterous, devil, accursed, doomed for ever, having the collar of curse round his neck, and the shoe of imprecation on his head.'”””””””

Fatwa of the scholars of India and Arabia and Fatwa by ‘ulama of Ludhiana, published in Isha‘atus-Sunnah, vol. 13, no.6–7 /Pak-o-Hind kay ‘Ulama’-e-Islam Ka Awwalin Muttafiqqah Fatwa, by Muhammad Husain Batalawi, Darud-Da‘watis-Salafiyyah, Lahore 1986.

Click to access Commentary-of-Al-Qasida.pdf

“””Mirza Qadiani is one of the thirty Dajjals mentioned in the hadith, his followers are the children of Dajjal. Muslims must stay away from this type of Dajjal and must not join them in performing any religious matters as they normally would with other Muslims. Muslims should not sit with him nor accept his invitation, should not say prayers behind him, and must not perform his funeral prayer… He and people like him are thieves of religion. They are from Dajjal, they are liars, they are accursed, they are satans… There is no doubt that this Qadiani is a nonbeliever and an apostate… He is a very big Dajjal and is out of the pale of Islam, and is an infidel and is of bad character…, has the lowest morals and is an enemy of God… Any person who doubts in his being on the wrong path is just as wrong himself and is himself a Kafir rather Akfar [the greatest disbeliever]… He is worse than the Satan that is playing with him and he must not be
allowed to be buried in a Muslim cemetery… He is an enemy of the prophets and God is his enemy… Any person who has the same beliefs as of Qadiani is an outcast. Mirza Qadiani is a Dajjal and actually, the leader of Dajjals. Their women’s marriages have been nullified and anyone is free to marry them.”””
_______________________________________________________________________________________________Links and Related Essays

Who is Syed Nazeer Hussain of Delhi (1805–13 October 1902) and his connection with Ahmadiyya


Mirza Ghulam’s Ahmad lecture in Amritsar (Nov–1905) was not a Lecture, it was a riot!!!

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian