MGA denied prophethood as early as 1884, some ulema of India had already issued a Fatwa of Kufr. As we have recently learned, MGA was already claiming to be the Messiah in 1889, Ahmadiyya leadership has always suppressed this data, the Ahmadi-mullahs lie about almost everything in their pursuit of gainful employment. We can come across some additional data about MGA’s denial of prophethood in 1891, it is posted in the below. This is a longer story…MGA and his team denied prophethood until November of 1901, and even a bit earlier to the summer of 1900. A reader would have to be very well versed in the dynamic of the split to fully understand the brevity of this data. Finally, it should be noted that MGA and his team vehemently denied prophethood using the argument that the word prophet should be replaces in all of MGA’s books and revelations to muhaddas.
In 1891 Mirza Qadiani had to flee from Ludhiana to Amritsar after a complaint was lodged against him for creating Law and order situation.From Ludhiana he came to Amritsar. Peoples of this city were against him too.
Mirza was so petrified that he sent Mufti Sadiq to offer prayer in the Masjid of Ghaznavi Scholars, Where Mufti Sadiq managed to have a meeting of Mirza Qadiani with Ahle Hadis Scholar Molvi Ahmadullah.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Mufti Sadiq a, close disciple of Mirza Qadiani writes in his book ZIKR E HABIB (screen shot attached), that:-
“During meeting Molvi Ahmadullah said to Mirza Qadiani that some of your writings reveal that you are a claimant of prophethood that is why peoples have turned against you. Hazrat SAHIB (MGQ) explained the actual meaning of his claim (ie he do not at all means actual prophethood). Molvi Ahmadullah sahib said ok you give us in writing that wherever the word nabuwwat appears in your writings, it does not mean Nabuwwat it means MOHADDISIYAT AND IN NO WAY IT IS AGAINST THE FAITH OF KHATM E NABUWWAT. Hazrat sahib immediately wrote this on a piece of paper and handed it over to Molvi Ahmadullah Sahib which was kept by Molvi sahib for showing to ulema who were to excommunicate MGQ because of his claims.”
Links and Related Essays
The Causes of Internal Dissensions in the Ahmadiyya Movement, By Khwaja Kamaluddin, 1914
“”Prophethood among the Followers of Muhammad”” by Maulana Sayyid Muhammad Ahsan of Amroha, Oct-1913, in Tashhizul Azhan
An Ahmadi claimed prophethood in late-1901 or early 1902, and was boycotted by Ahmadis–Chiragh Din of Jammu (Jamooni)
Maulvi Abdul Karim claims Prophethood per MGA, Maulvi Amrohi disagrees
In 1891, when MGA made his big claims, he denied prophethood–Mufti Sadiq was heavily involved
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was accused of claiming prophethood in the 1879–1884 era
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was considered a Kafir in 1884, before his wildest claims
Some rare books from the 1901-1902 era, which refute MGA’s claim to prophethood
Maulvi Sanuallah acknowledges that MGA claimed prophethood in Nov 1901
Mirza Sultan Ahmad, Son Of Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, On Finality Of Prophethood
“Eik Ghalti Ka Izala” aka “Correction of an Error” was re-published on March-1-1914
A few months after becoming Khalifa, Mirza Mahmud Ahmad waffled on his father’s prophethood
MGA explains how he misunderstood his prophethood in 1880 and was confused for 20+ years
Noorudin didn’t care if Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed even law-bearing prophethood
MGA lost the debate with MOLVI MUHAMMAD BASHIR BHOPALI (1891)
#ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #ahmadiyyat #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog