Search

ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Thorough research work on the Ahmadiyya Movement, #ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyat #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome

Month

January 2020

In 1884, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed that the Quran 21:107 was also revealed to him

Intro
After the publishing of the 4th volume of Braheen e Ahmadiyya in late 1884, MGA was called a Kafir by the leaders of the Ahl-e-hadith sect, who had just helped MGA marry an Ahl-e-Hadith girl. MGA was so bold, he began claiming that many verses of the Quran had been also revealed onto himself. In the Ahmadi quran’s it would be 21:108. For example, 21:107 claims:

“””And We have sent thee not but as a mercy for all peoples.”””

In Braheen e Ahmadiyya, vol.4, page 62, MGA has this revelation: 
“”””And We have sent you so that We may show mercy to the whole world and to open for them the path to salvation [Surah al-Anbiya’, 21:108], and so that you may draw the attention of people, who are languishing in a state of heedlessness, towards the truth and warn them [Surah Ya Sin, 36:7]. Do you think that most among them hear and understand? Nay, they are like cattle, and indeed, even worse [Surah al-Furqan, 25:45].”””””

Other Quranic verses that MGA claimed for himself in 1884
——48:28, 61:09 and 9:32
——-21:107
——-10:16
——17:8
——18:83
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Links and Related Essay’s

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/11/28/in-1884-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-indirectly-denying-quran-349-as-he-denied-the-miracles-of-esa-as/

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad quoted and commented on 17:8 in 1884 in the Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya, vol. 4, he then connected 17:8 with the return of the Messiah

In 1884, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed that the Quran 61:09, 48:28 and 9:32 was also revealed to him

In 1884, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed that the Quran 10:16 was also revealed to him

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/09/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-considered-a-kafir-in-1884-before-his-wild-claims/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/02/17/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-quoted-and-commented-on-178-in-1884-in-the-braheen-e-ahmadiyya-vol-4-he-then-connected-178-with-the-return-of-the-messiah/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/02/09/during-the-writing-of-braheen-e-ahmadiyya-mga-masked-his-beliefs-he-was-already-asserting-that-esa-as-died/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/14/what-is-maseel-e-maseeh-the-like-of-the-messiah/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/10/27/sir-syeds-view-on-esa-as/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/16/the-queen-of-the-princely-state-of-bhopal-invested-heavily-1878-into-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-and-his-braheen-they-were-disappointed-by-the-product/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/26/did-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-claim-to-be-the-messiah-in-1889/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/14/mga-confuses-all-of-his-readers-in-1891-as-he-claimed-to-be-the-promised-messiah/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/06/nusrat-jehan-begum-and-other-women-didnt-get-into-to-mgas-bait-in-1889-and-after-were-they-illiterate/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/17/ahmadiyya-leadership-lied-about-the-first-bait-ceremony-in-1889/

http://www.aaiil.org/text/articles/reviewofreligions/raw/reviewreligionsenglish1908.pdf

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/09/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-accused-of-claiming-prophethood-in-the-1879-1884-era/

_____________________________________________________________________________________________Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam

In 1884, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed that the Quran 10:16 was also revealed to him

Intro
After the publishing of the 4th volume of Braheen e Ahmadiyya in late 1884, MGA was called a Kafir by the leaders of the Ahl-e-hadith sect, who had just helped MGA marry an Ahl-e-Hadith girl. MGA was so bold, he began claiming that many verses of the Quran had been also revealed onto himself. In the Ahmadi quran’s it would be 10:17. For example, 10:16 claims:

“”””Say, ‘If Allah had so willed, I should not have recited it to you nor would He have made it known to you. I have indeed lived among you a whole lifetime before this. Will you not then understand?’””””

MGA claims 10:16 as for himself and Muhammad (Saw)
This is blasphemy. See Braheen e Ahmadiyya, vol. 4, page 392 online english edition.

ROR of June-1904
Maulvi Abdul Karim wrote an essay entitled, “The Sinless Prophet”, in this essay, he also quotes 10:16 and refers to the Barahin i Ahmadiyya, however, he doesn’t call it Brahin i Ahmadiyya vol. 4, he simply called it the Barahin i Ahmadiyya. He also claims that the verse says, “I have lived among you a great part of my life before my claim to prophethood”. However, this is incorrect. It should be:  “”I have indeed lived among you a whole lifetime before this.””, furthermore, this is the middle sentence of 3 sentences which compromise 10:16. Maulvi Abdul Karim seems to be negligent in reporting the proper wording of the verse.

MGA re-iterated this ilham in Nuzul ul Masih

“””It was about 1884 that God vouchsafed to me the revelation:

[Arabic] [I have lived a whole lifetime among you before this, then do you not understand?]

This was an indication on behalf of God the All-Knowing, that no opponent of mine would be able to point to any default in my life. Accordingly, up till now, when I am about sixty-five years of age, no one, whether living close to me or far from me, can point to any stain in my past life. Indeed God Himself has made my opponents bear witness to the purity of my past life. For instance, Maulavi Muhammad Husain has, on many occasions, praised me and the members of my family in his journal Isha’atus-Sunnah and has claimed that no one is better acquainted with me and my family than him. Then, to the extent that he understood, he praised me. In this way an opponent, who became the originator of my condemnation as a non-believer, has confirmed the truth of this prophecy [I have lived among you…].”””” [Nuzulul-Masih, p. 212, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 18, p. 590, printed and published in 1909, after MGA died](See also the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah, page 112-113).

Other Quranic verses that MGA claimed for himself in 1884
——48:28, 61:09 and 9:32
——-21:107
——-10:16
——17:8
——18:83

Links and Related Essay’s
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/11/28/in-1884-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-indirectly-denying-quran-349-as-he-denied-the-miracles-of-esa-as/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2020/01/28/in-1884-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-claimed-that-the-quran-6109-4828-and-932-was-also-revealed-to-him/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2020/01/27/in-1884-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-claimed-that-the-quran-21107-was-also-revealed-to-him/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/09/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-considered-a-kafir-in-1884-before-his-wild-claims/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/02/17/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-quoted-and-commented-on-178-in-1884-in-the-braheen-e-ahmadiyya-vol-4-he-then-connected-178-with-the-return-of-the-messiah/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/02/09/during-the-writing-of-braheen-e-ahmadiyya-mga-masked-his-beliefs-he-was-already-asserting-that-esa-as-died/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/14/what-is-maseel-e-maseeh-the-like-of-the-messiah/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/10/27/sir-syeds-view-on-esa-as/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/16/the-queen-of-the-princely-state-of-bhopal-invested-heavily-1878-into-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-and-his-braheen-they-were-disappointed-by-the-product/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/26/did-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-claim-to-be-the-messiah-in-1889/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/14/mga-confuses-all-of-his-readers-in-1891-as-he-claimed-to-be-the-promised-messiah/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/06/nusrat-jehan-begum-and-other-women-didnt-get-into-to-mgas-bait-in-1889-and-after-were-they-illiterate/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/17/ahmadiyya-leadership-lied-about-the-first-bait-ceremony-in-1889/

http://www.aaiil.org/text/articles/reviewofreligions/raw/reviewreligionsenglish1908.pdf

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/09/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-accused-of-claiming-prophethood-in-the-1879-1884-era/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad never paid Zakat

Intro
Ahmadi’s run around on social media making arguments for Ahmadiyya, however, they know nothing, they have never done any substantial homework in Islam or Ahmadiyya. I recently had an Ahmadi argue that chanda was the same as Zakat. He has been brainwashed to believe as such, its not his fault, but the problem is, he never double checks the Ahmadi mullahs who serve these lies to him constantly. Nevertheless, MGA never paid Zakat and never even paid Sadaqa, he never gave any money to any islamic organizations in British-India, instead he forced his followers to pay him heavily. In fact, MGA never fasted during ramadhan and never paid any fidya (eid tax for the poor).

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad never paid Zakat”

Even in 1987, there were 328 Ahmadi officers in the Pakistani military

Intro
As we all know, Ahmadi’s were the most trusted group of people by the British government, this was what led 1000’s of Ahmadi’s to join the British military and subsequently the Pakistani military in 1947. In fact, in 1947, 199 Ahmadi’s were specifically named by the Jamaat as they presented their case to the boundary commission. We are unsure how many Ahmadi’s joined the Indian military after 1947, however, there aren’t many at all. Further, by 1982, Ahmadi’s had infiltrated civil and government jobs in Pakistan, they totally dominated most institutions, and only gave other Ahmadi’s promotions, and told some Ahmadi’s to keep their faith a secret. As the list in the below shows, there is no Ahmadi persecution at all. Zia ul Haq seems to have came into power in 1977 and allowed 5 Ahmadi’s to become Generals, we know of 2, there were 4 in the Army and one in the Air Force. There were an additional 88 Colonel’s who were Ahmadi. 156 Majors and 77 captain’s. It should be remembered, that back in 1975, Bhutto had stopped Ahmadi’s from progressing pass the rank of Major and reassigned many Ahmadi’s and thus force them to quit. So where was the persecution? There was none!!!  This list is the proof.

Sahibzada Yaqub Ali Khan (Foreign Minister of Pakistan) announced that there were 328 officers in the Pakistani military
Yaqub Ali Khan was brought in to the Zia administration as Foreign Minister in 1982 when Agha Shahi was departed from President Zia-ul-Haq‘s cabinet. He was appointed Foreign Minister in the conservative-aligned government but Yaqub maintained his composure and his Western wit in the Zia administration. Nevertheless, on 18 February 1987, the Daily Jhang of Rawalpindi published a report which indicated that there were 328 Ahmadi officers in the Pakistani military in 1987 (see Bashir Ahmad, “Ahmadiyya, British-Jewish connections”, 1994, see pages 411-412).
Continue reading “Even in 1987, there were 328 Ahmadi officers in the Pakistani military”

Some Pakistani General’s who may have been Qadiani’s

Intro
We have already shown how Zia Ul Haq seems to have converted to Qadian-ism in 1941, he may have done this so as to become an officer in the British Army. Our friend, Mr. Agha Mohammad Waseem seems to have recently made a list of undercover Ahmadi’s who worked in the Pakistani Army as officers. We already know how many Ahmadi officer’s were close friends with General’s like Ayub Khan and etc.

Their names are as follows, from right to left, top to bottom, for archival purposes
—-General Iqbal Khan
—-General Rahim ud Din Khan
—-General Khalid Mahmood Arif
—-General Zia Ul Haq

2nd line
—Major Tufail from Hoshiarpur
—General Gul Hasan
—General Tikka Khan
—Air Marshal Nur Khan

3rd line
—General Sahibzada Yaqub Ali Khan
—Air Chief Marshal Shamim Anwar
—Colonel Zia Ahmad Suleri
—General Ghulam Jilani Khan
Continue reading “Some Pakistani General’s who may have been Qadiani’s”

Sexual abuse in Ahmadiyya, 2020 version

Intro
As we all know, the Mirza family is sick and twisted in all ways. Recently, an Ahmadi on reddit went into details about sexual abuse that they have suffered at the hands of Ahmadiyya.

The write-up

Any victims of sexual abuse here? I was. The person who molested me is a relative but, they cannot be classified as a Muslim of any kind. However, all the relatives, including my father, who told me to shut up about it are definitely card-carrying, Jalsa-attending, chanda-paying members. What I would learn years after I came forward was that they already knew this person was a sexual predator because there were other victims. And literally nothing was done to protect the other children. I disowned my father’s family and I only see my father because my parents are not divorced. My father is very good at hiding his feelings. I was so hurt when I found out that he was actually furious that I refuse to acknowledge his family. It felt like a knife through my heart. I stopped speaking to him that day.

I’m not ignorant. I know sexual abuse happens everywhere. What really grinds me about most Ahmadis I’ve known is the belief in their own superiority over everyone. I know many people of different religious groups may have this same attitude but, Ahmadis are who I was raised around so that’s what has affected my life. And I know that culture is a massive contributor to the problem. Some non-Ahmadi family friends who are Muslims found out about this and I did not get any support from them either. They continue to fraternize with my father’s family like they never heard the story.

Anyone else have a similar experience or know of any?

Edit: I just recalled an article by Qasim Rashid talking about how Islamic principles would prevent sexual abuse. Perhaps they should be applied to Ahmadi families before preaching to the rest of the world. And the premise of his article suggests that sexual abuse only happens between members of the opposite sex as his solution is extreme gender segregation. Just something I wanted to throw in there.

Links and Related Essay’s
https://www.reddit.com/r/islam_ahmadiyya/comments/eookas/sexual_abuse/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/07/26/fauzia-faizi-confirms-that-the-mirza-family-is-full-of-incest-and-rapists/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/26/the-mirza-family-was-above-the-law-in-british-india/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/08/30/who-are-aziz-bhambri-and-ibrahim-bhambri-the-gangsters-of-rabwah-1974/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/10/09/who-is-dr-abdus-sattar-shah/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/02/18/mirza-mubarak-got-married-before-he-died/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/01/some-testimonies-on-the-immoral-life-of-mirza-mahmud-ahmad/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/24/basheer-uddin-mahmud-ahmad-was-accused-of-immoral-behavior-at-qadian-1938-he-calls-it-normal/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/24/who-is-fakhuruddin-multani/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/01/15/in-qadian-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-allowed-to-touch-all-women/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/04/21/bashir-ahmad-misri-and-ahmadiyya/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/08/07/in-1937-was-the-mirza-family-was-suffering-the-divine-the-wrath-of-their-false-claims/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/25/bashir-ahmad-misri-murdered-multani-were-correct-about-mirza-mahmud-in-1937-viceroy-papers/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/05/29/mazhar-multani-son-of-fakhar-uddin-multani-wrote-3-books-vs-ahmadiyya/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/25/fakhar-ud-din-multani-on-his-death-bed/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/25/new-data-on-the-murder-of-fakhar-ud-din-multani/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/24/who-is-fakhuruddin-multani/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/10/20/the-first-time-a-qadiani-ahmadi-murdered-a-muslim-for-criticizing-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-1930/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/03/abdul-sami-zafar-tells-the-inside-story-on-the-may-29th-1974-rabwah-train-attacks/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #ahmadiyyat #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #drsalam #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Sialkot #Mosqueattack

Ahmadiya Fact Check blog reddit

Dear readers,

We have created a reddit wherein we will also post all of our essays on Ahmadiyya.
See here–

https://www.reddit.com/r/AhmadiyaFactCheckblog/

In 1924, Ahmadi’s were soooo embarrassed about MGA’s eyes, that they edited them!

Intro
As we all know, MGA could never fully open his eyes. His eye lids were always only 30% open as a result of opium use. We found a book by the Khalifa, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad from 1924, entitled, “Ahmad, the Messenger of the Latter Days”. On the 3rd page of this book, MGA’s famous picture from 1902 is posted, however, MGA’s eyeballs are edited and made to be bigger and open. You can compare and contrast with the other pics in the below.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________The pic

Photoshoot from the 1902 era
11196348_1577309249224248_20072459595199897_n


______________________________________________________________________________________________
A Quote which also proves that MGA was taking opium his own life

“When he (Mirza Ghulam) came for the first time to my press, he sat on a pillowed seat and I sat on one seat and he discussed with me about the book, looking at his dozy eyes, I thought that perhaps he uses opium, as is commonly the habit of rich people, but when I heard his talk or speech and thought about the articles of Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya, I was amazed at the condition of an Opium use is not like this, such man cannot write like this.  Then Hazrat Sahib went awat…..Now I regretted my first mistake and repented it and know very well that it is the intoxication of divine knowledge and not that of opium as I first thought.””” Continue reading “In 1924, Ahmadi’s were soooo embarrassed about MGA’s eyes, that they edited them!”

On July 5th, 1977, Zia said in a speech that only Allah can decide as to who is a Muslim or not

Intro
Zia was born an Ahmadi. He also seems to have converted to Ahmadiyya in late 1941, just to join the British-Indian Army as an officer. Following civil disorder, Zia deposed Bhutto in a military coup and declared martial law on 5 July 1977. Bhutto was controversially tried by the Supreme Court and executed less than two years later, for allegedly authorizing the murder of Nawab Muhammad Ahmed Khan Kasuri, a political opponent. It seems that Zia immediately made pro-Qadiani statements, in this speech, he forcefully argued that only Allah can decide as to who is a Muslim. Thus, bemoaning the 2nd amendment wherein Ahmadi’s (of all sects) are declared as non-Muslim. Saqib Zeervi who was a famous Pakistani poet and a Qadiani. He claims to have met Zia (on the 25th/26th of July in Lahore) while the press was also invited. He explains how Zia called on him during this session and asked him why he hadn’t asked any questions. Saqib Zeervi claims that he questioned Zia specifically about his statements from 7-5-1977 in terms of him being a Muslim or not (at the 36:50 mark). Zia also said that he doesn’t need a PNA (Pakistan National Alliance) certificate either proving that he was a Muslim. Saqib Zeervi then asked Zia as to why he (Saqib Zeervi) would need a certificate from Zia proving that he was a Muslim. Zia immediately closed the session and left. Saqib Zeervi claims that he was never invited to another press conference again in his life. By 1982, Ahmadi’s were still dominating the job scene in the civil service of Pakistan.
Continue reading “On July 5th, 1977, Zia said in a speech that only Allah can decide as to who is a Muslim or not”

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑