Intro
A few weeks before this death in 2003, Mirza Tahir Ahmad tells Ahmadi’s that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is the final prophet (see the clip on twitter and tik tok). Qadiani-Ahmadi’s aren’t expecting any additional prophets in the future (see Abu Daqqa admit to this fact), they see their Khilafat as an eternal promise that will last until the day of judgement. When cornered on this, Qadiani-Ahmadi’s will say, only the Khalifa can claim prophethood. All of this goes back to MGA. Before 1901, MGA was claiming that anyone could become a prophet and it was a matter of prayer. In fact, from 1891 to 1900, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad denied his own prophethood 50-100 times.
However, in 1901, MGA abruptly claimed prophethood, and a year later, MGA called himself as the Khatamul-Khulafa and claimed to be mentioned in 1:6 of the Quran, and he claimed to be the FINAL BRICK. MGA was claiming to be an Ummati-Nabi, this contradicted all of his previous comments, i.e., that a prophet could never be a follower. Remember, In 1890-91, in Izala Auham, MGA argued over and over again that a prophet could never be a follower of another prophet. MGA and his team of writers quoted the Quran, 4:64 (4:65 in the Ahmadi Quran) as evidence.
5-6 years later, MGA was claiming in Haqiqatul Wahy (1906-1907) that he was the only person in the entire Muslim ummah to be given the title of prophet. MGA was claiming to be Muhammad (Saw)(astagfarullah), and thus, MGA was claiming to be the FINAL prophet. After MGA died, in 1911, an Ahmadi, Muhammad Zahir Al-Din wrote a book wherein he discussed the prophethood of MGA and its implications of Kufr upon the Muslims of the world. Muhammad Zahir Al-Din was promoting MGA as a law-bearing prophethood and wasn’t immediately kicked out of Ahmadiyya by the 1st Khalifa. In fact, the 1st Khalifa (Nur ud Din) didn’t care if MGA claimed law-bearing prophethood.
However, in theory, Qadiani-Ahmadi’s won’t stop saying that prophethood is open. They lie and bring 4:69 and 7:35 and will argue for hours and hours that prophethood is still open. The 2nd Khalifa, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad wrote Qaul al-Fasl in January of 1915 and Haqiqatun Nubuwwat in March of 1915, wherein he quoted 7:35, 4:69, 2:5 and 61:6 as verses from the Quran wherein MGA was explained as a prophet to come. MGA had never used these verse to argue pro-prophethood. The 2nd Khalifa claimed that 1000’s of prophets could come. The 2nd Khalifa even twisted 2:4 of the Quran and claimed that there were additional revelations that Muslims must believe in after the Quran. Further, in 1915, Ahmadi’s claim that Surah Fatiha has a mention of MGA, specifically in the Quran 1:6 (1:7, in the Qadiani Quran). Also in 1915, an Ahmadi scholar said that it was disrespectful to call MGA an Ummati-Nabi, since he was Muhammad (Saw)(astagfarullah)(see the scans in the below).
In this same era, MGA was called the Messenger of the latter days. The ROR of Dec-1915 has an article, “Ahmad, the Messenger of the Latter Days”.
We also have references from 1916 wherein MGA is called: “””….the last prophet, the last Maseeh, last Adam, the last mujadid, the last musleh, the last Khalifa, the last Imam, the last brick…””” (See Tasheezul Adhan, Feb-16, Page-5)(See scan in the below).
The Jan-1917 edition of the ROR has an article, “Ahmad, the Messenger of the Latter Days” (Part-1). The ROR of Feb-March-1917 has an article, “Ahmad, the Messenger of the Latter Days” (Part-2) translated into english by Abul Hashem Khan (M.A.). The ROR of June-1917 has an article, “Ahmad, the Messenger of the Latter Days” (Part-3) translated into english by Abul Hashem Khan (M.A.).
In 1924, a book by the 2nd Khalifa was published, “Ahmad, the Messenger of the Latter Days”. Many of the scans can be found herein too.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1902
Noahs-Ark-Kashti-Nuh.pdf (alislam.cloud)
See page 97
“””Blessed are those who have recognised me. Of all the ways that lead to God I am the last, and of all His lights I am the last. Unfortunate is one who rejects me, for besides me there is nothing but darkness.”””
Scan
______________________________________________________________________________________________1899-1902
Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 15, p. 478, Tiryaqul-Qulub
MGA says Khatim-ul-Alaud (last of the family of Adam).
Transliteration
“”Zaroor ho, kay vo shaks, jispay bakamalo tamam dhoray haqeeqatay adamiyyat khutum ho, voh khatam ul aulad ho, yanee iskee maut kay baad koy kamul insaan kissee aurat kay payt say na nickle-ay, ab yad rayhay kay is bundahay, hazrat hadiyat kee paidaish jismani issee paishan goi kay mutabak hoi hay….”””
Translation
“”For surely, that person, upon whom the many real cycles of Adam have finished with, he is also the last of his offspring (khatam ul Aulad), in other words, after his death no competent human, could ever be born from a woman’s stomach. And remember, that this person, hazrat hadiyat’s birth will be spiritual….””
Scan
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1899–1902
Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 15, p. 479, Tiryaqul-Qulub
Transliteration
“”maira baad, maira waldan kay gar, koy larkee ya larka nay howa, aur main unkayleeyay khatamum aulad tha, jis kay baad koy aur nay eye, wo hota hay khatam, yay mairee paidash ka vo turz hai, jis ko baaz ahl-e-kashf nay mahdi khatam-ul-wilayat kee alamtau may leekha hay, aur byan kee-a hai, kay vo akhree mahdi, jis kee wafat kay baad, aur koy Mahdi nay paida ho gah…”
Translation
“”…after me, in my parent’s house, no girl or boy arrived (were born), I was for them, the final of the offspring (Khatam ul Aulaud), after whom, no one came (arrived or was born), this is that final (khatam) means. This was the story of my birth, which some people who get Kashf have called the Mahdi, the Khatam-ul-Wilayat, it is written as such, and explained that this person will be the last Mahdi, and after his death, no Mahdi will ever be born….”””
Scan
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ 1899-1902
Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 15, p. 481, Tiryaqul-Qulub
MGA calls himself the Final Barooz of Adam (as).
Transliteration
“”Jis kudder akabir aur arif mujsay palay guzeraray hay, vo tammam akhree Adam ko Wilayat-e-amma ka khatam sumauj tai hai, aur haqeeqat e Adamiyyat ka Baroozat ka tammam daie-ra isspay khutum kartay hai, aur ghushufay sahee-a kee ruh say, isse ka naam akhree adam rakhtay hain, aur isee ka naum mahdi e maodd or maseeh e maud rakhtay hain….”””
Translation
“”All of the intelligent/competent people who came before me were all in agreement that the Last Adam would be the finisher and in reality was the Barooz of the cycle of Adam’s, and they finished upon him (MGA), and with a pure spirit, his name is also the last Adam and the same name is the Promised Mahdi and Promised Messiah…”
Scans
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1900
Forty Announcements to Convey the Message Conclusively to the Opponents
In Arba’in, MGA called himself as “Khatamul-Muslehin” (the Final reformer)(page 20).
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1902
Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 15, pp. 489, Tiryaqul-Qulub
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed that Adam (as) was born a twin (in pairs), totally unislamic – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
MGA argues that Adam (as) was born a twin. See Brother Obaidullah’s explanation herein.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1902
Tohfah Golarhviyyah, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 17, p. 244
https://www.youtube.com/live/vLzzM-hTgms?si=8wowS4RG0wjKa9GO
Then there is the verse in Surah Al-Mursalat which indicates that a great sign of the approach of the Day of Judgement is that someone should appear and with his coming the number of Messengers should be determined.
This means that the last Khalifah in the chain of successors in the Islamic dispensation, whose name is the Promised Messiah and the awaited Mahdi, shall make his appearance in the last days. The verse is:
Al-Mursalat 77:12
i.e., the time when number of the Messengers will be determined. This means that with the appearance of the last Khalifah, the number of Messengers which had been determined by Divine decree and had been hidden, shall become manifest. This verse also clearly shows that the Promised Messiah will be from among the Muslims.”””””
Scan
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1902
In 1902, MGA said that Allah doesn’t intend to send any other prophet after MGA – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
In a recent livestream, Bro Imtiaz (1:17:00 time stamp) showed how MGA alleged in 1902 that that Allah doesn’t want to send another prophet (via the wisdom and intention of Allah). MGA even said that Allah has stopped “law-bearing” and “non-law-bearing” prophets from appearing. Again, MGA then re-iterated that after Muhammad (saw) and with the exception of MGA,
The title was “Khatam Nubuwwat Ghair Ummati Nabi Anay Ko Manay Hai” (In Khatme Nubuwwat, non-follower-prophets are not allowed). This was published in the Al-Hakam of Oct-1902, see the full ref in the below.
16 oct 1902
Al hakam jild 6, number 39, page 6-7 31 Oct 1902
“Khatam Nubuwwat Ghair Ummati Nabi Anay Ko Manay Hai” (In Khatme Nubuwwat, non-follower-prophets are not allowed).
Malfuzat, V-2, page 400, 1988 edition, Urdu
Scans
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1904
See Urdu-ROR of Sep-Oct-1904
English ROR of Sep-1904. See page 338
Lecture Lahore, see page 52
In 1904, MGA and his team told the world that MGA was the Last Messenger (akhri mursal)(this could also be translated as last one sent)(See Urdu-ROR of Sep-Oct-1904). A partial version of the book was published in the English ROR of Sep-1904. See page 339, Akhree Mursal was translated as simply as “Messenger”. The British military was there also, MGA seems to have always moved around British-India with the full support of the British military (see page 48).
Scan from Urdu
Scan from English
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1906-1907
Haqiqatul Wahy, online English edition, See page 58
Urdu edition, Ruhani Khazain, vol. 22, page 46
Scan
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1908
May-16
Malfuzat-10, page 363
Malfuzat vol.10 (alislam.cloud), pages
LIVE DEBATE | MUSLIM VS AHMADI (QADIANI) | KHATME NABUWT FROM WRITINGS OF MIRZA GHULAM QADIANI (youtube.com)
Official English Translation by the Qadiani’s
“””The descent of wahi [Divine revelation] continued from Adam all the way to the Holy Prophet sas. Subsequent to it, Allah the Exalted promised that He would raise Mujaddids [Reformers] for the tajdid of faith. Tajdid is to wash a cloth clean that has become soiled with dirt and filth; dirt is removed from it thoroughly and it is made to look like new.”””
Scan
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1910
Tashhiz-ul-Azhan (v. 1, pages 5&6)
Page no 5 of vol.5
Book name : Tash-heezan Ahzan No;5 (title : maseeh Maoud is in the end of all) . It is necessary that i think it important to show from the writings of Maseeh maoud that Hazrat Maseeh Maoud is in end of all the prophets -Last Maseeh-Last Adam- Last Mujjadad – Last Khalifa – Last Imam – Last Brick- Last Link- -Last way – Last Noor-As to take maseeh maoud in last it is neceesary that i explain and divide the things into five things
Scan
______________________________________________________________________________________________1914
March-27th
https://www.youtube.com/live/vLzzM-hTgms?si=rMEt-FvMjalorYvQ
Magazine-3, pages 31-32
Will there be another Ummati prophet after MGA? Whomever is a prophet, it is mandatory that he is the khatam of zilli prophet, there must be only one. There can be many imperfect zilli’s. Thus, it is proven that there is only additional prophet in the ummah. The Prophet Muhammad (Saw) has only given the good news of one additional prophet, who is MGA.
Scans
______________________________________________________________________________________________1914
June-9-1914, Al-Fazl, page -14
“”‘Before the advent of Hazrat sahib (MGA), we used to call each and every sect of Muslims as Muslim, and we could legitimately say so, but when the last Prophet and Messenger of God appeared and finally the time came to separate the milk from the water. So now two parties have different, i.e., the believers and disbelievers, those who believed in Hazrat Sahib remained the believers, the Ummah of Muhammad (saw) and of other prophets who did not believe in this last prophet are considered as Kuffar (disbelievers), and this is not a strange or surprising thing, because since the beginning of the world, there have been only two groups in the world, one disbelievers and other believers……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………your objection is that why do we use the word Muslim in relation to them, i.e., in relation to Non-Ahmadi’? The answer is that in reality they are Kuffar (disbelievers) and according to the terms of the Holy Quran and the Arabic dictionary we are forced to consider them Kuffar (disbelievers), but because of them presenting their kalima and other islamic beliefs in shahadah, they call themselves Muslims and they liked to be called Muslims. There it should be our duty to call them Muslims in public, there is no problem in it and there is no sin in it….”””
Scans
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1915
Here is the official scan of the portion quoted from al Fazl June 29, 1915, p. 7:
The title of the essay is “Akhiri zamanay mein ek Rasul ka maboos hona zahir hotha hai aur wo masih mawood hai.” Written by Ghulam Rasul Rajeki. Roughly 60 years later, and during the 1974 NA hearings, Mirza Nasir Ahmad was questioned about this quotation from 1915. He lied and said that this doesn’t exist in any edition and will never be found.
“Masih Mawood ko Ahmad Nabi ullah tasleem na karna aur aap ko ummati qarar dena ummi groh samajhna goya aan Hazrat jo syed ul mursaleen aur khatam an nabiyeen hain Ummati qarar dena hai. Ummati mein dakhil karna hai jo kufr e azeem aur kufr dar kufr hai.”
Translation:
“To not accept the promised messiah as Ahmad Nabi ullah and to call You (MGA) an Ummati is seen as an illiterate group. Moreover, it is (the equivalent of) calling his holiness (the prophet Muhammad PBUH) an Ummati who was the seal of messengers and seal of prophets. To add into an Ummati is the greatest kufr and kufr upon kufr!”
Scans
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1916
Kalimatul Fasl, Page 101
https://www.youtube.com/live/vLzzM-hTgms?si=Laly0VkoL1HYexl6
MGA is the last savior for this world. MGA is the only spiritual son of Muhammad (Saw)(naozobilllah).
Scan
Scan
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1916
Tasheezul Adhan, Feb-16, Page-5
“””…Maseeh e Maod’s writing’s show us that Maseeh e Maud will be the last prophet, the last Maseeh, last Adam, the last mujadid, the last musleh, the last Khalifa, the last Imam, the last brick…”””
Scan
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1933
Tashishazul Adhan
(Tashidhul Adhan, Qadian, Vol. 9, No. 3, p. 20, March 1933)
“Henceforth, it has been established that in the Ummah of Muhammad the addition of more than one prophet cannot be made in any way. Consequently, the Holy Prophet (PBUH) has informed his ummah of the coming of only one prophet of Allah, which is the Promised Messiah and other than this no one has been named a prophet of Allah or messenger of Allah irrefutably. And no one else has been foretold as a prophet. In fact, by stating, “la nabiyya ba’adi” (there is no prophet after me) the possibility of others coming has been eliminated and it has openly been stated irrefutably that other than the Promised Messiah, no prophet or messenger can come after me.”
Scan
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
2003
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZPRoFdY5A/
https://x.com/ahmadiyyafacts/status/1814358522970382745?s=46&t=HTqZKquoOvKbgoBAF2aQcg
A few weeks before this death, Mirza Tahir Ahmad tells Ahmadi’s that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is the final prophet (see the clip on twitter and tik tok).
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s
Why did Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claim to be the Khatam-ul-Khulafa? – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
In the Ahmadiyya Movement, only the Khalifa can claim prophethood – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
From 1901 to roughly 1922 Ahmadis believed MGA=Muhammad – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
Ahmadiyya and 4:69, everything you need to know – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
Ahmadis lie about 7:35 of the Quran – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
Ahmadiyya leadership began twisting the Quranic verse in 2:4 in 1915 – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
Ibrahim Ikhlaf vs. Tamim Abu Daqqa – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
The concept of the Ummati-Nabi – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
From 1891 to 1900, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad denied his own prophethood 50-100 times – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZPRoFdY5A/
https://x.com/ahmadiyyafacts/status/1814358522970382745?s=46&t=HTqZKquoOvKbgoBAF2aQcg
Click to access Mirza-Akhri-Nabi-2.pdf
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #ahmadianswers #ahmadiyyamuslimcommunity #ahmadiyya_creatives #ahmadiyyatthetrueislam #ahmadiyyatzindabad #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiyyamuslim #mirzaghulamahmad #qadiani #qadianism
1 Pingback