ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
My team and I have across some interesting information in terms of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and 17:8 of the Quran (17:9 in the Qadiani Quran). The Urdu reference for this is RK, vol. 1, page 601, this most likely corresponds to the original edition of Braheen e Ahmadiyya vol. 4. The 1988 edition of RK will have a different page number. The reference appears in the online english edition of Braheen e Ahmadiyya, vol. 4, page 382. Furthermore, Zahid Aziz, a Lahori-Ahmadi has discussed this entire issue herein.

Other Quranic verses that MGA claimed for himself in 1884 are as follow: 48:28, 61:09, 9:32, 21:107, 10:16 and 48:29. It should be noted that in the online english edition, this verse isn’t properly quoted by the Qadiani’s, nor do they acknowledge it as a verse of the Quran.

See Farid Responds explaining this at 3:04 time stamp, after alleging that he (MGA) is like the prophets. MGA alleges to have gotten a revelation from his God which is in reality 17:8 of the Quran (17:9 in the Kadian Koran). MGA then asserts that this verse is actually a prophet about the return of “Hadrat Maseeh”. However, after 1891, MGA never made this argument again, in fact, NO Ahmadi commentary ever used this explanation (Lahori or Qadiani). A few pages later, on page 398 (of BA-4), MGA quoted 3:55 (3:56 in the Kadiani Koran) and argued that that Inni-Mutawafeeka (3:55), wa Raffa, as: I shall give you full reward and shall raise you towards Me. However, on page 434, MGA translates the same verse as:

“””O ‘Isa, I shall give you full reward or cause you to die and shall raise you towards Me, meaning that I shall raise your status or will raise you from the life on earth towards Me, and I shall
grant predominance to your followers over those who disbelieve, until the Day of Judgment”””.

In 1890-ish, MGA claimed to be “Maseel-e-Maseeh” only (See Izala Auham, Part-1). A few months later, he claimed to be the Messiah.

In 1892, MGA confessed that before the publishing of the Barahin i Ahmadiyya series, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad already knew that he was the second coming of Esa (as).

In 1902, (Via Noah’s Ark, page 81), MGA admitted that he was confused on being Eisa (as) aka the promised messiah in the 1880’s. It was a secret.

MGA confirmed all of this again in 1906-1907 (via Haqiqatul Wahi), MGA admitted that he believed that Eisa (as) was alive in the 1880’s and he misunderstood it and instead claimed to be “Maseel-e-Maseeh” instead.

This was also confirmed in 1947 (see Dard explaining the same). Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad quoted and commented on 17:8 in 1884 in the Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya, vol. 4, he then connected 17:8 with the return of the Messiah” →

Intro
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was the classic Punjabi fraudster, in 1879, he literally promised 300 arguments (See BA-3, online english edition, page 2) to defend Islam and for only .94 cents. Check out Bro Imtiaz and Adnan covering this topic herein. He had promised the Muslims of the Indian sub-continent 300 arguments in favor of Islam in roughly 1878. He made many announcements about a completed book to refute the Hindus and Christians, which we have no idea where they were published. MGA started asking for .94 paisa (94 cents), then the price kept going up. Ironically, MGA had already collected roughly 900 rupees from Muslims who wanted this book. Why was MGA constantly raising the price?

However, he only delivered one argument, and that argument was his claim of prophethood, which immediately got him declared as a Kafir by the ulema in India.

The Ahl-e-Hadith Muslims of North India tore up the Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya and sent it back to Qadian in that state (1884-1885 era), these were the Muslims who had invested heavily in the publishing of the Barahin. MGA stopped at one argument and even that was incomplete, see the quote in the below. In 1886, in Surmah Chashmay Arya, MGA again asserted that the Barahin was ready to be published, however, funds were needed. For the next 20 years, this promise remained broken. In 1906-1907 (See Haqiqatul Wahy), MGA and his team of writers of spoke about the creation of Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya Vol. 5. However, it was not completed or published in MGA’s life.

After MGA died, Noorudin (who was the main ghost writer) wrote BA-5 and had it published in October of 1908, he added that MGA promised 50 volumes and 50=5. MGA didn’t write this at all. In fact, BA-5 isn’t even a continuation of BA 1-4, it is altogether a new book and in-fact contains 3-4 small booklets which were mashed together to create BA-5, one of which is Nusrat ul Haq and at least 40 pages of nonsensical poetry.

The ROR of Oct-1916 also confesses that the Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya was supposed to contain 300 arguments, this is via Qazi Abdullah, an Ahmadi missionary in London. The ROR of Sep-1939 also discusses the Barahin series and confesses that 2500 pages of the Barahin were ready to be published in 1879, however, this is a total lie. The ROR of Sep-1939 also confesses that only 1 argument out of 300 was given in the BA 1-4. The ROR of Sep-1939 also lies and claims that BA-5 was published (appeared) in 1905, which is a lie, it was published posthumously in Oct-1908. The ROR of Feb-1940 has a review on the Barahin series and even mentions how MGA offered a 10,000 rupee reward for anyone who could refute him.

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad promised 300 arguments for his Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya, but only delivered one argument” →

Intro
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad lusted after his niece Muhammadi Begum for his entire life. Initially, he was giving guarantees that he would end up marrying this innocent girl.
Continue reading “In terms of Muhammadi Begum, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was guaranteeing that she would eventually (TAQDIR E MUBRA) be married to him” →

Intro
In this video, Dr. Samie Samson explains in Urdu the scam of Ahmadi’s to move to North America, Europe and many other countries.

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/08/ahmadis-offend-pakistani-christians-specifically-and-the-planet-in-general/

The video

Intro
As we continue to sift through the books of Ahmadiyya we find inconsistencies and cover-up jobs by the Ahmadiyya mullah team. In this specific instance, we have found inconsistencies in terms of MGA’s marriage to Nusrat Jehan Begum. Remember, MGA was impotent, there is a story from Ashab-e-Ahmad which tells how MGA went to Delhi, got married, and luckily, his new wife was on her period. Shaikh Hamid Ali, a famous toilet attendant of MGA relates the entire story in Ashab-e-Ahmad. A video here also explains the whole story in urdu.

In the below, we have presented “Seerat Nusrat Jehan” which was written by the famous Shaikh Yaqub Ali Irfani. It was published on November 25, 1943.

Per history, in 1923, Nusrat Jehan told the world that she married MGA in 1302 Hijri, which is anywhere from Oct-21, 1884 to Oct-10, 1885 (See Seerat ul Mahdi, page 44). In 1927, the Ahmadiyya Movement told the world via Hyat-e-Nasir that MGA married his daughter in 1885. However, by 1943, the story had changed, they were now claiming that MGA got married in 1883. Dard changed it again in 1947 and gave the year as 1884. The ROR of Nov-1939 tells the world that they were married on Monday, 27th of Muharram, 1302, which is a Saturday, and the date is November 15, 1884.
Continue reading “When did MGA’s marriage with his second wife Nusrat Jehan take place? What year?” →

Intro
People are quitting Ahmadiyya all the time. However, this type of news isn’t always announced in Ahmadiyya circles or even on news channels.

Summary of the scan
AHMADIS REVERTED TO ISLAM.
FIVE FAMILIES CONSISTING OF 23 MEMBERS QUIT JAMAT E AHMADIYYA.
Despite hollow claims of Ahmadiyya progress, Ahmadis continue to revert to Islam in great numbers day in and day out.  Latest reversion news came from Talhi, sub district Kunri district Umerkot Sindh province of Pakistan. According to news five families consisting of 23 residents of Town Talhi embraced Islam quitting jamaat e Ahmadiy. They took shahada at the hand of Molana Manzoor of Imam Masjid Tahaffuz e Khatme Nabuwwat Talhi Kunri Sindh. Some of the names of entrants are Ghumman, Abdul Karim, Ummed Ali, Naeem, Ameer Hasan, Gargees their Ladies Hakim Zadi, Nasreen, Husna etc. The Markaz of Thaffuze Khatme Nabuwwt has been operational since 2004 in this area.

The scan

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

Intro
My team and I have written about the wild claims of MGA many times. We have written how MGA was most likely planning on claiming to be a law-bearing prophet if he had lived to 1911.  Further, in the era of 1900 to possibly 1935, Ahmadi’s considered MGA to be equal to Muhammad (saw) (nauzobillah) and vice versa. This article is a translation of some arabic writings of MGA, that seem to have been recovered in this era, and then translated by M. Rahim Baksh. The Review of Religions, was edited by the Khalifa’s younger brother, Mirza Bashir Ahmad, who was the only college educated child of the mirza family by 1924.

Highlights of this article
1—MGA claims that his coming was actually revealed to Muhammad (saw) in Surah Fatiha.
2—MGA claims to be the final brick, in the house of prophets, not Muhammad (saw).
3—MGA claims that the Jews are an accursed people and that Muslims have become just like the Jews.

The article
Prophecy Contained in The Opening Chapter of The Quran
Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed that his coming to Earth was revealed in Surah Fatiha!!! Review of Religions, Feb 1924” →

Intro
We continue to collect information on the Rabwah incident from the Pakistan times and other newspapers.  What has become crystal clear is the fact that ALL Ahmadi sources have lied about the incident.  In this entry, we show how 72 Ahmadi’s were actually arrested pointed out by eye witnesses, as reported by the Pakistan Times of June 19th, 1974.

Read here: https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/02/10/eye-witnesses-states-that-ahmadis-has-revolvers-during-the-rabwah-incident-pakistan-times-june-19th-1974/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/03/abdul-sami-zafar-tells-the-inside-story-on-the-may-29th-1974-rabwah-train-attacks/

The report

1st round of identification ends
From our correspondent
Sarghoda June 18: Identification parade of 72 accused involved in Rabwah Railway Station rioting incident completed today in the first round under the supervision of Duty Magistrate in the local district jail.  

Eight persons claiming to be eye-witnesses had joined identification parade.  It was learnt that identification of accused will start again in the second round with the arrival of Multan students who were allegedly tortured by accused party.  

Intro
On May 29th-1974, 400-500 Ahmadis were laying in wait at the Rabwah Train Station, they had calculated and planned a terrorist attack (see Charles Kennedy, pages 90-91), they were supposed to ambush a certain rail-car wherein there was 500+ teenagers from the Nishtar Medical College in Multan. The attack was a success, the train was stopped for 1-full hour as Ahmadis mercilessly beat teenagers to a bloody pulp, (this entire youtube channel seems to have been deleted, Ahmadiyya leadership may have gotten this entire channel banned).   however, they were careful not to kill anyone. The train station operator was an Ahmadi and he deliberately stopped the train until all the terrorist-Ahmadis had safely dispersed. This became a national incident, and as the train approached Faisalabad, Muslims had gathered to collect their injured brethren. The scene was shocking…..19 students were immediately hospitalized.

Rioting broke out almost immediately, all schools in the Punjab were closed on June 1st, 1974, this was the first national incident of terrorism under the new constitution of Pakistan. The average Pakistani was shaken to his/her core. The story of Ahmadis had been decided by the Govt in 1954, they were Muslims, per the Govt, they had every right to exist, in fact, from 1955-May 1974, it was the most peaceful era of Ahmadiyya history in Pakistan. There were barely any attacks on Ahmadis, the Chief Scientist was an Ahmadi, the Economic minister had been an Ahmadi…2 out of 3 military generals were Ahmadi, Pakistan was a pro-Ahmadi country in every single way and for 20+ years. In fact, in the 1971 elections, Ahmadis were ordered to vote for Bhutto and Bhutto even visited Rabwah during his campaigning.

We have collected the testimony of a few key eye-witnesses.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Mirza Nasir Ahmad’s Khutbah of May 31st, 1974

Here is a Friday Sermon right after the attack in which Hazrat Mirza Nasir Ahmad (rh) has addressed this incident: pages 534-536

https://www.alislam.org/urdu/sermon/FST19740531-UR.pdf

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/03/abdul-sami-zafar-tells-the-inside-story-on-the-may-29th-1974-rabwah-train-attacks/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/02/10/eye-witnesses-states-that-ahmadis-has-revolvers-during-the-rabwah-incident-pakistan-times-june-19th-1974/
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
#Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #ahmadiyyat #muslimsforpeace