Intro
The life of Maulana Sayyid Muhammad Ahsan of Amroha is an interesting case study. He left Ahmadiyya in roughly 1915, and with his entire family, it is unclear who his wife was and his children. He wrote an article in the Tashhizul Azhan of Oct-1913(as quoted by Mahmud Ahmad in 1924 and Muhammad Ali before him) in which he showed that the only prophethood which could be granted to Muslims was Nubuwwti Juzwi or partial prophethood. This contradicts the view of the Qadiani jamaat about the prophethood of MGA. In fact, Amrohi famously opposed the prophethood claim of MGA in 1901.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Some quotes
Tashhidhul Adhhan October 1913, page 500, See also, “Truth About the Split” (1921), online edition, see page 127.
“Hence it follows that prophecies regarding future events granted in proof of the truth of Islam will be transmitted through the medium of Nubuwwat and that is what is meant by Nubuwwati Ghair Tashri‘i (Prophethood without Law) or Nubuwwati Juzwi Partial Prophethood). All the Ambiya’ who came after Mosesas, were honoured by the gift of this kind of Nubuwwat because the Nubuwwat of Ahkam (Lawbearing Prophethood) had ceased among the Israelites with the advent of the Torah”
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Links and Related Essays
Maulvi Abdul Karim claims Prophethood per MGA, Maulvi Amrohi disagrees
Ahmadiyya leadership admitted (in the 1930’s) that MGA used lots of editors and ghost writers
Maulvi Abdul Karim lived exclusively with MGA on the 3rd floor of MGA’s house
Muhammad Ali lived exclusively within Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s house for almost 10 years, 1899–1909
Dr. Mir Muhammad Ismail (MGA’s brother-in-law) was fooled about MGA leading Tarawee or Tahujjad
The Causes of Internal Dissensions in the Ahmadiyya Movement, By Khwaja Kamaluddin, 1914
Maulvi Abdul Karim claims Prophethood per MGA, Maulvi Amrohi disagrees
In 1891, when MGA made his big claims, he denied prophethood–Mufti Sadiq was heavily involved
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was accused of claiming prophethood in the 1879–1884 era
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was considered a Kafir in 1884, before his wildest claims
Some rare books from the 1901-1902 era, which refute MGA’s claim to prophethood
Maulvi Sanuallah acknowledges that MGA claimed prophethood in Nov 1901
Mirza Sultan Ahmad, Son Of Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, On Finality Of Prophethood
“Eik Ghalti Ka Izala” aka “Correction of an Error” was re-published on March-1-1914
Hani Tahir explains Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s Prophethood, pre-1901 vs post-1901
A few months after becoming Khalifa, Mirza Mahmud Ahmad waffled on his father’s prophethood
MGA explains how he misunderstood his prophethood in 1880 and was confused for 20+ years
Noorudin didn’t care if Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed even law-bearing prophethood
“My beliefs about non-Ahmadi Muslims”, dated 18 August 1911 by Khwaja Kamal-uddin
http://alhafeez.org/rashid/abuse/abuse.htm
Tashhiz al-Azhan was a Magazine founded by Mahmud Ahmad in 1906, quotes and background info
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian
50 Pingback