Intro
I have researched the split in the Ahmadiyya movement very closely…somehow, Mahmud Ahmad and Muhammad Ali purposely avoided talking about Chiragh Din of Jammu (Jamooni) and his claim of prophethood which caused MGA to ex-communicate him and to organize a boycott against him.
What’s really interesting here is that MGA had just claimed prophethood in Nov. 1901, with the publishing of his announcement, “Eik Ghalti Ka Izala”. Amrohi had even written a letter to some people who didn’t quite understand this “change in belief” that MGA had just done, his letter can be found here.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Announcement dated 23/04/1902, Announcements, Vol 2
He said while criticizing a person named ‘Charag Deen’ who announced that he would reconcile Christianity and Islam: “We have no accord with Christianity, because it is all evil and wrong… How can we reconcile (with the Christians) while our religion and our holy book consider the entire Christianity to be filthy and evil?… Woe! He (Charag Deen) considered the Disgusting Christianity in the same degree with Islam!”.
Summary
Chiragh deen of jammu claimed prophethood and mirza boycotted charagh deen (ref: ruhani khazain, vol 18 page 242). MGA published an ad in rohani khazain about charagh deen jamu to inform everyone that he is no more in his community or in jamaat e ahmdiya. (ref: rohani khazain vol 18. page 239).
The scans
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1906
ROR of May 1906 mentions Chiragh Din and MGA’s prayer against all false prophets
See page 211.
ROR of June 1906 also mentions Chiragh Din
See page 251.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1907
Another source
See “Haqiqatul Wahy”, online english edition, page: 289
“”””Thus, first, Maulawi Rusul Baba, resident of Amritsar is worth mentioning who wrote a book in my refutation; he used very abusive language and lied out of love for this temporary life. Eventually, in keeping with the promise of God, he was destroyed by the plague. After him, there was another person named Muhammad Bakhsh, a Deputy Inspector at Batala, who girded up his loins for hostility and persecution. He too died of the plague. After him another person,
named Charagh Din of Jammu, arose. He claimed to be a Messenger. He referred to me as the Dajjal [Antichrist] and claimed that during a dream, Hadrat ‘Isa had given him his staff that he might kill this Dajjal with the staff of ‘Isa. He, too, along with both of his sons died of plague
on 4 April 1906 in accordance with my prophecy that was specifically about him and was published during his lifetime in my booklet Dafi‘ul-Bala’i wa Mi‘yaru Ahlil-Istifa’. Where did the staff of ‘Isa go with which he sought to kill me? And what happened to his ‘revelation’, namely اّنی لمن المرسلین [‘I indeed am of the Messengers’]? Alas! Most people pronounce their egoistic suggestions to be revelation prior to self-purification. This is why they eventually die in ignominy and disgrace.””””
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Links and Related Essays
The Causes of Internal Dissensions in the Ahmadiyya Movement, By Khwaja Kamaluddin, 1914
Maulvi Abdul Karim claims Prophethood per MGA, Maulvi Amrohi disagrees
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/13/what-is-arbain-a-book-by-mga-and-his-team-of-writers/
In 1891, when MGA made his big claims, he denied prophethood–Mufti Sadiq was heavily involved
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was accused of claiming prophethood in the 1879–1884 era
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was considered a Kafir in 1884, before his wildest claims
Some rare books from the 1901-1902 era, which refute MGA’s claim to prophethood
Maulvi Sanuallah acknowledges that MGA claimed prophethood in Nov 1901
Mirza Sultan Ahmad, Son Of Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, On Finality Of Prophethood
“Eik Ghalti Ka Izala” aka “Correction of an Error” was re-published on March-1-1914
A few months after becoming Khalifa, Mirza Mahmud Ahmad waffled on his father’s prophethood
MGA explains how he misunderstood his prophethood in 1880 and was confused for 20+ years
Noorudin didn’t care if Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed even law-bearing prophethood
Maulvi Muhammad Ahsan Amrohi lived exclusively in MGA’s house
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian
2 Pingback