Intro
As we continue to dismantle the Qadiani aqida, we have posted a clip from the famous Sheikh Assim Al hakeem wherein he categorically explains how 5:75 and 3:144 don’t mean that Eisa (as) is dead. The Sheikh explains how this verse speaks in generalities, not in specifics. Watch our previous video wherein the same Sheikh calls #qadianis as Kafirs. Watch his video from 8 years ago also. Check out Brother Omar explaining how Ahmadi’s translate of “Al-Rusul” in 3:144 is different from “Al-Rusul” in 5:75 (See the clip on TikTok and Twitter), in fact, Zafrullah Khan gave the same translation in his version of the Quran (See in the below).
Intro
The famous Sheikh Assim Alhakeem has had many beef’s with the #qadianis, mostly with Razi with #ahmadianswers. Recently, Razi has been trying to assert that even Sheikh Assim Alhakeem believes that ALL prophets (including Eisa) are included in 3:144. However, Razi is taking it out of context.
In 2024, the Sheikh explained this again. 3 Qadiani-Ahmadi Maulvi’s commented on the Sheikh’s video, see my review of that herein.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s
Qadiani-Ahmadi Maulvi’s get caught lying on Ahmadiyya Takfir – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyat #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #trueislam #ahmadianswers #ahmadiyyamuslimcommunity #ahmadiyya_creatives #ahmadiyyatthetrueislam #ahmadiyyatzindabad #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiyyamuslim #ahmadiyyatrueislam
#muslim #islam
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyat #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #qadiani #qadianikafirhai #toilet #islam #muslim #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiyyamuslims
Intro
The Quran clearly tells us that some prophets were killed. Watch my video explanation here. We will also show 2:61, 2:87, 2:91, 3;21, 3:112, 3:144, 3:181, 3:183, 4:155, 5:70 (That’s 10 verses) to prove how prophets had been killed in the past, it wasn’t a new thing, in fact, 3;144 of the Quran tells us that even if Muhammad (saw) was killed, it wouldn’t mean Islam is false. Furthermore, we all know how Yahya (As) was killed early on during his mission, MGA even admitted to it. In fact, in TUHFA-E-GOLARHVIYYAH, MGA admitted that the killing of a prophet is not a sign that any given prophet was a liar. However, after MGA died, this son, the Khalifa (Mirza Basheer ud din Mahmud Ahmad) wrote that prophets have never been killed, in fact, he promoted MGA’s 23-year condition for anyone’s prophethood to be good.
Check out Brother Omar explaining how Ahmadi’s translate of “Al-Rusul” in 3:144 is different from “Al-Rusul” in 5:75 (See the clip on TikTok and Twitter), in fact, Zafrullah Khan gave the same translation in his version of the Quran.
Continue reading “#Ahmadis oppose 3:144 of the Quran and thus don’t believe that prophets have been killed”
Intro
Jesus in India was published posthumously in the winter of 1908. It contains a false argument wherein it is argued that Eisa (As) was a traveler. MGA and his team of writers didn’t check the original arabic edition of Kanzul Ummul and instead relied on the urdu translation. Thus, they attributed this story to the wrong sahaba. This is ironic, since MGA quoted the wrong sahaba in this scenario and wasn’t corrected by his GOD. Furthermore, MGA and his team purposely mis-translated the story from Kanzul Ummul. Specifically, they mis-translated the part about Eisa (as) having to flee from his country. Furthermore, the author of Kanzul Ummul writes just below some of these hadith that these are inauthentic.
Bro Haji explained all of this properly herein. Read a similar essay herein.
Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and his team of writers got the sahaba wrong in “Jesus in India””
Intro
MGA and his team of writers stated that Eisa (as) was a travelling prophet (See Satt Bachan, Endnote concerning page 164, pp. A-B, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 10, p. 301-302, see also Hidden Treasures, 1895 or 1902 edition) and (See Jesus in India, online english edition, pages 62-63), however, this refers to his life before the crucifixtion, and not after it, furthermore, these hadith are mostly from Kanzul Ummul, which isn’t an authentic source of information. In “Jesus in India” (published in Oct-1908), MGA and his team quoted Kanzul Ummul, Vol. 2, page 34 (see the full ref in the below) and page 71 of the same volume. They also quoted Vol. 6, page 51 and mis-attributed this hadith to Abdullah Ibn Umar, when in reality, it was Abdullah bin Umar bin Aas (See Jesus in India, online english edition, pages 62-63). They also quoted Lisaan ul-Arab (See Jesus in India, online english edition, page 82).
Watch Bro Haji’s video on this for a clearer explanation (towards the end). Qurtubi gives a good explanation also (see the scans in the below), he says that Eisa (as) would sometimes be in Egypt (Misr) and sometimes in Syria and sometimes by sea. Also check out 23:50 and those detailed explanations therein.
Intro
As we all know, in 1891, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad presented a reference to Imam Malik wherein the imam wrote that Eisa (As) had died. However, MGA left out the most important detail, that is, Imam Malik believed that Eisa (as) died the death of sleep and was physically lifted (RAFFA) towards Allah (See the Bro Haji video for a detailed analysis) and will physically return and kill the Dajjal. Imam Suhaib Webb has quoted Imam Malik on this too, see herein.
Furthermore, it should be noted that some islamic scholars wrote that Eisa (As) died for a few hours and was then revived by Allah (this is a case of Israʼiliyyat). Obviously, Ahmadi sources will never mention this.
Watch Bro Haji’s video on this, he explained everything perfectly and with scans. You can also check out this twitter thread for additional data on Imam Malik, Eisa (as) and the death of sleep. MGA quoted Imam Malik in Nurul-Haqq, part 2, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 8, p. 294 and admitted that Imam Malik believed that Eisa (as) died at age 33.
In July 2025, we (Arise and Warn) observed that the website whiteminaret.org, managed by Zaryab Farooq and associates, attempted to argue that the quotes attributed to Imam Malik regarding the death of Prophet Essa (AS) are authentic. Notably, these reports lack any isnad (chain of narration) to substantiate their claims.
In an effort to deceive, the proponents provided a chain of narration connecting Ibn Rushd to Imam Malik. However, they deliberately mis referenced the source of this chain. They cited “Al-Bayan wa-al-Tahsil wa-al-Tawjih” (page 221) without specifying the relevant volume of this 20-volume work. Upon thorough investigation, we located the chain in volume 18, page 421 of the same book. Crucially, this chain pertains to a completely different report that is unrelated to the life or death of Prophet Essa (AS).
This deliberate misattribution of the chain to Imam Malik’s statement regarding Prophet Essa (AS) and the intentional mis reference of the book appear to have been employed to obfuscate the matter and lend unwarranted credibility to their claims. Continue reading “Imam Malik claimed that Eisa (As) died the death of sleep and would physically descend and kill the DAJJAL”
Intro
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad gave lots of ilzami jawab (allegatory answers). MGA was trying to say that per Muslims, Muhammad (saw) saw Musa (as) whilst on the Miraaj trip and even spoke to him. Thus, Muslims should believe that he also still alive, as well as the rest of the prophets and this is specifically because they were all there in the samaa wattay when Muhammad (Saw) led salaat. In fact, all prophets (all 124, 000) read prayers behind Muhammad (Saw). These scans are courtesy of @zafarim786.
Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad mocked Islam and asserted that we should believe that even Musa (as) is alive”
Intro
On tik tok, the Qadiani-Ahmadi community is trying their best to fool Muslims and do their tabligh. Recently, a famous tiktoker, @shazzybepreaching also as @theceoohilaal has come out and admitted to being a #qadiani. This has left the Muslim community on tiktok in shock, since most muslims are unaware as to who @qadianis are. Check out my tik tok account herein.
Continue reading “TikToker, @shazzybepreachin is a Qadiani-Ahmadi and thus, not a Muslim”
Intro
Just 13 days before MGA died, he was boasting about how he had outlived some of his opponents and was living a good life, there was no sign of any illness, nor was there any concern. In fact, the first few pages of Chashma-e-Ma‘rifat contain an announcement (see in the below) wherein MGA was boasting as such. Later on in the book, MGA discusses the prediction of Abdul Hakim of Patiala, the famous ex-qadiani.
MGA died during the early hours of May 26th, 1908, most likely at 1-2am. After MGA’s body was taken to Qadian, the Al-Badr published an edition of May 26th, 1908, and immediately fabricated some revelations which seem to indicate that MGA might die. These are a total fabrication (see in the below). This is proof that the Ahmadiyya ghost writers and editing team always fabricated revelations after-the-fact.
Continue reading “On May 15th, 1908, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was challenging the Muslims of British India”