MGA did Takfeer on the Muslims of the world many times, this is the second instance. And remember, MGA’s definition of hell is different, so he calls everyone as Kafirs and Mushriks, however, they can still make it to MGA’s heaven. We have created a full timeline of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and Takfir herein.
Nevertheless, we have posted the quote from 1907, via Haqiqatul Wahy in the below. MGA and his team of writers were asserting that the islamic belied that Eisa (As) hadn’t died yet, via 4:159 is equivalent to shirk. MGA claimed that the beliefs of Abu Hurraira (ra) would lead Muslims to shirk. Since Abu Hurraira (ra) specifically connected 4:159 with the physical return of Eisa (as).
Roohani Khazain, Volume 22, Haqiqat-Ul-Wahi, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, p.660
“…It is rude to say that Jesus didn’t die, it is indeed shirk al-akbar [major polytheism].”
The quote—English, see page 838
“””Allah is my Witness; I am amazed at their plight and their lack of reason and understanding! Do they not know that no human being is capable of presenting himself on the Day of Judgment unless he surrenders his soul and joins the ranks of the dead? What has gone wrong with them that they do not ponder that the Companions buried the Best of Mankind [the Holy Prophet] in dirt and his grave is still present in al-Madinatul-Munawwarah. Hence, it would be extreme disrespect
to say that ‘Isa did not die. Indeed, it amounts to extreme shirk, which undermines virtue and is totally opposed to reason. Rather, the fact is that ‘Isa died just like his brothers and contemporaries.”””
Via Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya, Vol.5, pages 540-541
“””Hence, the correct translation of the above-mentioned verse I quoted is, ‘Every person from among the People of the Book will, before his death, believe in the Holy Prophet, may peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, or in Hadrat ‘Isa.’ The word مَوِْتهٖ [his death] refers to the People of the Book, and not Hadrat ‘Isa. This is why in another reading of this verse the words are مَوِْتهِمْ [‘their death’]. Why would مَوِْتهِمْ [‘their death’] be present in the other reading if it referred to Hadrat ‘Isa? See Tafsir Thana’i, for it strongly confirms my statement. It also says that Abu Hurairah, may Allah be pleased with him, gives the same interpretation, though the author qualifies that Abu Hurairah was deficient in his comprehension of the Holy Quran and many muhaddithin [scholars of hadith] have criticized the soundness of his understanding.
Abu Hurairah had the aptitude to quote, but he was quite deficient in understanding and discernment. I contend that even if Abu Hurairah, may Allah be pleased with him, has interpreted it in this way, it has been a mistake on his part, as it has been proven by muhaddithin that in many instances Abu Hurairah ra is mistaken and stumbles in matters that pertain to understanding and discernment. It is an established norm that the opinion of just one Companion cannot be regarded as a valid argument per the law of the Shariah. The valid argument per the law of the Shariah is only the ijma‘ of the Companions ra, and I have already explained, that consensus of the Companions ra occurred concerning the point that all Prophets had died.
Keep in mind that in view of the alternative reading of the verse [‘before his death’], i.e. قَبْلَ مَوْتِهِمْ [‘before their death’]—which, according to the norms held by the scholars of Hadith, is tantamount to an authentic hadith, i.e. it is such a hadith that stands proven to be from the Holy Prophet, may peace and blessings of Allah be upon him—the mere opinion of Abu Hurairah is worth rejecting as it is inconsequential and worthless when compared to the words of the Holy Prophet, may peace and blessings of Allah be upon him. To insist on it can lead one to disbelief. Not only that, the statement of Abu Hurairah necessitates repudiation of the Holy Quran because time and again the Holy Quran says that the Jews and the Christians will continue to exist till the Day of Judgment and they will not be wiped out completely, whereas Abu Hurairah says that the Jews will be wiped out completely, and this is in clear contradiction to the Holy Quran. Anyone who believes in the Holy Quran ought to discard the statement of Abu Hurairah as a thing of little value. In contrast, the alternative reading of the verse, according to the norms held by the scholars of Hadith, holds the status of an authentic hadith—and here the alternative reading of the verse قَبْلَ مَوْتِهٖ does exist, as قَبْلَ مَوْتِهِمْ , which has to be taken as an authentic hadith—so in this case the statement of Abu Hurairah is, in fact, in contravention of both the Holy Quran and Hadith. فلا شكّ اّنہ باطل ومن تبعہ فاّنہ مفسد بطّال۔ [No doubt he is in the wrong, and anyone who follows him is a mischief-maker and a great liar].””
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Links and Related Essay’s
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #Ahmadiyyatakfir #takfir