Search

ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Search results

"above the law"

The entire Mirza family was above the law in British-India

Intro
I have written about this before.  The Mirza family was above the law in British-India.  The British never allowed for justice.  They called the rich people as innocent and declared the poor as guilty.  In-fact, in British-India, Indians couldnt ride in the same train-cars as Britishers.

I am posting a quote from Seeratul Mahdi, wherein it is stated that:

The quote
MIRZA,S FAMILY RELATIONSHIP WITH BRITISHERS
SEERATUL MASEEH PAGE NO210 PART-I
(218) stated to me by Mirza Sultan Ahmed thru Molvi Rahim Bakhsh MA that once when Davis sb was the district Administrative Officer, and his staff was stationed at Batala, one of the residents of Qadiyan who happened to be a hindu brahman and employed in district administration as patwari, had misbehaved with Taya jan ie Mirza Abdul Qadir, Taya sb immediately punished him physically . Matter was brought to the notice of sir Davis who imposed a sum of Rs 100.00 . Dada (the father of MGA) was in Amritsar at that time when He came to know of it he went to Egerton sb and informed him of the situation. Egerton sb exonerated Taya sahab without calling the case file on the basis of the statement.

The scan work
1

Conclusions
The British government was corrupt.  And they favored MGA’s entire family.  This is additional proof.  We have more here: https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2017/01/11/mirza-ghulam-ahmads-court-cases/

The Mirza family was above the law in British-India

12334

Intro
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad ran free in British-India, he was untouchable.  All of the judges in the Punjab knew Mirza Ghulam Ahmad personally and knew his entire family.  Mirza Ghulam Ahmad knew this and he kept pushing the limits of human decency since he knew that the British courts would never find him guilty of anything.

The evidence

From Life of Ahmad by Dard, page 17:

“””General Nicholson gave Ghulam Qadir a certificate, stating that in 1857 the Qadian family showed greater loyalty than any other in the district.””””

Who is General Nicholson?
“””Nicholson was best known for his role in the Indian Mutiny, planning and leading the Storming of Delhi. Famously dismissive of the incompetence of his superiors, he said, upon hearing of Colonel (later General Sir) Archdale Wilson’s hesitancy while on his deathbed, “Thank God I have yet the strength to shoot him, if necessary”. One famous story recounted by Charles Allen in Soldier Sahibs is of a night during the Rebellion when Nicholson strode into the British mess tent at Jullunder, coughed to attract the attention of the officers, then said, “I am sorry, gentlemen, to have kept you waiting for your dinner, but I have been hanging your cooks.” He had been told that the regimental chefs had poisoned the soup with aconite. When they refused to taste it for him, he force fed it to a monkey – and when it expired on the spot, he proceeded to hang the cooks from a nearby tree without a trial.””” (see Charles Allen, Soldier-Sahibs: The Men who made the North-West Frontier, London: Abacus/Time Warner Books UK, 2002 ed, various references between pp. 2-328).

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and his cousin ran around British-India breaking the law with impunity (1861)
There is the famous pension story, wherein MGA and his cousin ran off with their families money and spent it frivolously, MGA then admits that when they ran out of money, his cousin robbed some people….however, the British government looked the other way and forgave them. This was the very first instance of MGA and his family getting special treatment.  However, it wouldn’t be the last.  MGA was sent to work in Sialkot after blowing his fathers money and worked there for 3-4 years as punishment for what he did.

Some additional evidence

See Dard, pg. 17 and 18:

On June the 11th, 1849, Mr. J. M. Wilson, Financial Commissioner, Lahore, wrote from Lahore to Mirza Ghulam Murtaza:

‘I have persued your application reminding me of you and your family’s past services and rights. I am well aware that since the introduction of the British Government you and your family have certainly remained devoted, faithful and steady subjects and that your rights are really worthy of regard. In every respect you may rest assured and satisfied that the British Government will never forget your family rights and services which will receive due consideration when a favourable opportunity offers itself. You must continue to be faithful and devoted subjects as in it lies the satisfaction of the Government as well as your own welfare.’

A favorable opportunity???
There are many more attestations of a similar thrust, feel free to read Dard and peruse the. Nonetheless, the favorable opporunity was MGA’s claim to prophethood and his harrassment of his brethren in British-India.  MGA went to attack Hindus, Christians, Muslims and Sikhs, and the British government allowed him to do as he wished.

The Post Office case
In 1877 or 1878, Ahmadas wrote an article against the Arya Samaj, and in support of the superiority of Islam over other religions. He sent the manuscript in a cover open at the ends to the Vakil Press at Amritsar at the rate prescribed for newspapers. This was allowed under section 12 of the Post Office Act 14 of 1866. But in this packet he also included a letter
addressed to the manager of the press containing instructions about the article. Sending a letter in a packet was against the post office regulations. The punishment, according to the Government of India notification No: 2442, dated December 7th, 1877 section 43, was a fine of Rs. 500 or even imprisonment for six months (section 56 of Act 14 of 1866). (see Dard, page 83).

My commentary on this post office case
MGA was blatantly guilty, however, the judge knew MGA from his time working in Sialkot as well as his fathers service to the Brits, in fact, MGA normally was given a chair to sit on in any British court, whereas the rest of his opponents were not.  MGA should have been fined or sent to prison, however, he was given neither.

In 1899, the British govt ordered MGA to stop doing Mubahila
In a famous story recorded in Dard, see pages 617-620.  MGA was never properly investigated for the murder of Lekh Ram, and their is the famous story of Abdul Hamid, who claimed that MGA sent him to murder Dr. Clark.  MGA operated with impunity.  Nonetheless, in an outward show, the British govt. forced MGA to sign a petition promising that he would stop doing those stupid Mubahila challenges.

By 1902, the British govt forgot
MGA started doing Mubahila overseas..he attacked Dowie and Piggot and lied about all of those engagements.

1904, Karam Din Case
This is a case that Ahmadis will never fully disclose.  MGA was charged for defamation, however, its unclear how, and MGA lost the case….this was the only case that he ever lost. However, the data is hidden.  MGA was supposed to be arrested and taken into custody….however, the courts refused and MGA ended up beating the case on appeal.  Very fishy indeed.

Sanaullah in 1907, Dr. Khan in 1906
He started doing Mubahila again and the British Govt never said a word.

Conclusions
MGA and his family operated with impunity in British-India.  This is how he was able to spread his teams writings and beat cases wherein he was clearly guilty.

Links and Related Essays

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/01/13/mirza-sultan-ahmad-mgas-eldest-son/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/09/who-is-mirza-ghulam-muhi-ud-din-mirza-ghulam-ahmads-paternal-uncle-died-in-1866/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/24/mirza-imam-ud-din-the-cousin-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/16/the-punjab-chiefs-by-lepel-griffin-1890-edition-doesnt-even-mention-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/11/who-is-mirza-nizam-ud-din-1845-the-first-cousin-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/01/10/new-data-on-muhammadi-begum-found-2017/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/05/24/mirza-sultan-muhammad-and-wife-muhammadi-begum-lived-and-died-as-muslim-had-5-sons-and-two-doughters/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/07/29/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-wanted-muhammadi-begums-husband-to-be-killed/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/05/14/mirza-sultan-muhammad-from-patti-district-lahore-married-muhammadi-begum-mgas-niece-daughter-not-mga/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2017/01/10/new-data-on-muhammadi-begum-found-2017/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/02/14/in-terms-of-muhammadi-begum-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-guaranteeing-that-she-would-eventually-taqdir-e-mubra-be-married-to-him/

https://www.alislam.org/library/book/haqiqatul-wahi/

 

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/06/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-had-a-sister-that-was-also-crazy-and-had-crazy-dreams-just-like-mga/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/15/who-is-mirza-ghulam-murtaza-1791-1876/

https://archive.org/details/panjabchiefshis00massgoog/page/n70

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/15/who-is-mirza-ghulam-murtaza-1791-1876/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/01/11/the-entire-mirza-family-was-above-the-law-in-british-india/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/16/the-punjab-chiefs-by-lepel-griffin-1890-edition-doesnt-even-mention-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

Scans from Allen

Ahmadiyya “President” for Canada Abdul Aziz Khalifa is a former Lawyer banned to work as an lawyer in Canada for beeing part in a scheme for defrauding mortgage companies in granting Mortgages for the Ahmadiyya “Peace Village” housing complex in Vaughan Ontario

Intro
Ahmadiyya in peace village is a scam, we have written about it many times.  We found this article on reddit and have copied it in total.

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

Related Essays
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=peace+village

The data

As a standard propaganda measure, Ahmadis claim to hold very high moral standards. And their members can be publicly humiliated with expulsion for failings such as attending a wedding or the funeral of someone.

This however is just the case for Ahmadi footsoldiers. When it comes to highranking Ahmadis who bring benefit to the Ahmadiyya sect even through criminal means, they can get away with anything and are even awarded with high positions within the sect.

One of the highest ranking Ahmadi individual, the Ahmadiyya “President” for Canada Abdul Aziz Khalifa for example has been banned from practicing as a lawyer in Canada after it apparently emerged that he was part of a scheme to fraudulently obtain loans for the Ahmadiyya-Only housing complex in Vaughan Ontario. This however did not bar him from holding the highest Ahmadiyya Position in Ahmadiyya Canada.

Read the details here: http://eireislam.blogspot.com/2012/03/call-out-hypocrisy-shamed-lawyer-abdul.html

Call out Hypocrisy: Shamed Lawyer Abdul Aziz Khalifa, Canada Jamaat! on |

Salaam,

This is going to be the last post from me for a few weeks now. I have some matters that need my urgent attention and I must take a couple of weeks away from my duties here. I do not intend to be away for more than a few weeks however, if I have to be away longer than I have planned, I will let you all know. Yes yes before you start, no there are no issues and the Jamaat hasn’t scared me off and no one is in trouble, I just have other things that need seeing to. These ‘things’ are mostly work related. I have slacked off for far too long before and after the Christmas period and as the financial year is coming to an end, the pressure is on to get things in order and wrapped up. I would also advise that I will not be checking emails, so if you do need to contact me, please hold off for a few weeks. That said, I plan to change my email address and find one that works better with proxies as hotmail is an absolute nightmare. When it is set up I will then be able to reply to those that do email more often and more promptly. insha’Allah. Comments for all posts will now be locked to relieve my friend from her moderation duties, but I will allow comments for this particular piece so we can hear from our Canadian readers in particular.

As I don’t have the time to scan or censor any documents so in this instance, I will leave you with something that ties in nicely with the post I put up on Sunday RE: Canadian Expulsion Checklist.

A revert to Islam from Ahmadiyya in Canada emailed me a few months back and alerted me to the shady character of the Canadian branch of the Ahmadiyya Cult, Deputy President (Naib Ameer) Khalifa Abdul Aziz. His position within the Cult, for the benefit of those not in Canada and those not familiar with him, can be confirmed by clicking on this link. He requested that I write something up about this Khalifa character, to elucidate the very apparent hypocrisy and mistreatment of ordinary Ahmadis in the Canadian Jamaat.

Khalifa Abdul Aziz is a disbarred and convicted lawyer who lost his license to practise law in Canada due to financial fraud and misconduct, involving mortgages of more than 30 properties in Ontario. On doing some research and on asking around some contacts here in London, I am under the impression that this fraud allegedly involved the Ahamadiyya housing complex in Maple known as ‘Peace Village’. However, I must emphasise that I am unable to verify this, but this was told to me by a couple of sources here in London and a cross check with a relative in Canada seemed to confirm this.

A quick search of ‘Khalifa Abdul Aziz Canada’ on Google returned this:

Abdul Aziz Khalifa (1971), of the Town of Vaughan, was found guilty of professional misconduct for: participating in a dishonest, fraudulent, criminal or illegal scheme to obtain mortgage financing based on inflated purchase prices concerning 30 properties; failing to serve his mortgagee clients; acting for all the parties, namely the vendors, purchasers/mortgagors and the lenders/mortgagees, to several real estate transactions, where there was a conflicting interest without providing adequate disclosure to or obtaining the consent of his mortgagee clients and without advising all his clients that no information received in connection with these transactions could be treated as confidential vis-à-vis the other parties; and failing to disclose to his mortgagee clients his ongoing relationship with 8 individuals/companies and recommend that they obtain independent legal advice.
By Decision and Order dated June 20, 2006, the Hearing Panel ordered that:
 

     The Member be granted permission to resign his membership in the Law Society within 30 days, failing which he is disbarred.

     The Member pay costs of $1,000 within 30 days. 

(Counsel for the Society, Naomi Overend/ Member not present and not represented) 

(The Member's resignation became effective June 29, 2006) 

 http://www.lsuc.on.ca/with.aspx?id=636

The Ahmadiyya Jamaat Canada is co-run by a dodgy lawyer found guilty of financial fraud, involving a significant number of properties back in 2006, and he stills holds this position today! If you note from the above extract taken from the LSUC website, it states that ‘the member’s resignation became effective June 29 2006’, and so it seems Abdul Aziz Khalifa accepted his guilt and handed in his resignation. If he was not guilty and it was a misunderstanding, he would have fought the ruling to save his career and reputation but obviously not, because the odds were stacked up against him. For those Ahmadis that will say ‘but he wasn’t even Vice President in those days but was given the job afterwards, once he had repented’ please click here where you will be able to confirm that Abdul Aziz Khalifa held this position at the time of his conviction. He still holds this position today.

It’s funny when Ahmadi propagandists swear blindly that no senior member of the Ahmadiyya Cult has ever had run in with the law, let alone be convicted for fraud, and boast that all AhmadisAziz Khalifa, where it is alleged that the financial fraud in which he was found guilty of involved the world famous Ahmadiyya owned Peace Village. Er Hello, did this not set off alarm bells for the Canadian members? Why is it that the Canadian Cult Jamaat did not take action against him, and why was he allowed to continue in such a prominent position? His character is questionable but he has been given the authority to lead the Ahmadi people in Canada, how does that figure?

In the UK, we have Nasser Khan for example, whose wife was convicted of Perjury and no action has been taken against him but at least his wife’s misdemeanour did not involve the Jamaat as such! Canada is one of the biggest communities of the Ahmadiyya Cult worldwide, yet one of its most senior administrative leaders is a disbarred lawyer, found guilty of fraud and misconduct? Is that the best you can do? Does Mas know about Abdul Aziz Khalifa’s case? If so, why is the ‘Khalifa’ turning a blind eye and letting this man continue to lord it over the Canadian Ahmadis? Does Mas have any principles? Clearly not but you insist on selling him as the ‘Man of the Muslims’ and expecting people to buy it? Please! What an insult! You Ahmadis need to understand just because Mas ‘bhoot pyar karne waley hain’ (he is so loving) it doesn’t make him a Khalifa. Drop the love and pick up some reality because not only is he the worst leader of any group of people but he isn’t as loving as you think….

Abdul Aziz Khalifa, you pathetic hypocrite and nasty little man, you have absolutely no qualms in participating in the very public expulsion of members from the community for ‘participating in a marriage against the teachings of Nizaame Jamaat’, but you present a different face to western leaders of the State you live in. Abdul Aziz Khalifa, you are beyond contempt and a man with no integrity and morals, where you participate in the financial fraud involving 30 properties, but you present an image of being one where you are a member of an international community that boasts ‘loyalty to State’. Abdul Aziz Khalifa, you were found guilty of misconduct and were banned from practising law but you very proudly stamp your name on letters authorising the expulsion of innocent and law abiding citizens?!

You were banned in 2006 but in 2011 you kindly authorised this:

You should have expelled yourself while you were at it. Why is it that there is one rule for the likes of you whereas for ordinary Ahmadis with absolutely no power, are treated like lepers and are subjected to public expulsions, resulting in social boycotting and the like? Why is it that there is such a system in place in the first place, if it doesn’t apply to everyone? Why do you advocate such treatment of your fellow members but no action was taken against you, for a crime that resulted in you losing your job? This is serious! Why are you still in the Jamaat, let alone in such a position? Why was no action taken against you? Why did you not stand down, if you were a man of any principle? You are a disgrace and a hypocritical despot.

It is shocking to see just how many Ahmadis are accepting of such blatant hypocrisy. What is wrong with you? Forget what I believe, but if you believe this is Allah’s Jamaat and you love it so dearly, then why do you insist on turning a blind eye? It is up to you to keep your Jamaat clean because you quite clearly cannot rely on your administration to do it, because they need a good wash down themselves!Do the right thing. This is a disgrace. Shame on you all who allowed this man to continue while he shamelessly helps run your Jamaat with an iron fist. And you have the nerve to poke fun at the Muslim world for it’s fair share of tyrants and dictators but the difference is that this Muslims don’t claim to belong to a divine sect.

For those Canadians who have access to similar Jamaat documents or anything that the Jamaat would rather not go public, I suggest you set up something similar and start exposing these scumbags for what they really are. It is not that difficult and it would be a great shame and an utter injustice against your fellow people if you kept quiet about it. Your State should know exactly what kind of spiritual thugs they are wining and dining with. They are disgusting and Abdul Aziz Khalifa is probably not an exception.

That’s all from me for next few weeks. Try not to miss me too much!

In 1924, the Ahmadiyya Khalifa traveled from India to England and stopped in Egypt, Damascus and why?

Intro
The family of Mirza Basheer uddin Mahmud Ahmad was above the law in British India.  His travel dates were July 12th, 1924 to November 24th, 1924 (see Tarikh e Ahmadiyya)(See also ROR of 2008).  As soon as he returned to Qadian, he got all the reports of the “goings-on” while he was away.  He received reports that his wife #2, Amtul Hai (age-24) was writing letters to various newspapers and telling them how bad her husband was.  At this blog, we think that the British government had recently destroyed the Ottoman Empire and deposed of the most influential Islamic leader in that era and time and they were thus wanting to stop all islamic leadership via Khilafat.  The Ahmadiyya Khalifa was summoned to England by the Queen and other organizations and told about this new role in British India.  As soon as he returned to India, Zafrullah Khan became the official Ahmadi representative to the Queen.  The next time that the Khalifa left the Indian subcontinent would be in 1955.

Travel Dates
He left Qadian on 12 July with a party of 10 persons accompanying him. The party sailed from Bombay on the morning of 15 July and the ship reached Aden (Yemen) eight days later. The ship entered Port Said on the evening of 28 and the Khalifa stayed in Cairo for 3 days. He then proceeded to Jerusalem and Damascus.  Ahmadiyya sources have never told us what the Khalifa did in modern day Israel and Syria, it has remained a secret for almost 100 years.  This seems to be how and when he set up his Jamaat in Damascus, which failed and then moved to Kababir.  A year later, in 1925, he officially sent Jalal ud Din Shams to be a missionary in Damascus.

Nevertheless, he arrived in London on 22 August 1924  (he seems to have been travelling from July 28th to August 22nd) and stayed at 6 Chesham Place, Belgravia, SW1. In a report of the visit published in the Review of Religions October 1924 p. 371, it is written that “The news of His Holiness’s visit to London was published along with suitable notes in most of the important papers in London. The first public lecture which His Holiness gave in England is the one which His Holiness delivered in Portsmouth on 13 September”. The address in Portsmouth, at Piles Hall was delivered before a large audience and is entitled, “A Message from Heaven” (reproduced in The Review of Religions, Jan 2003).  The London Conference of Living Religions began on 22 September 1924.  The Khalifa’s paper on “The Ahmadiyya Movement” was presented on 23 September and was read out by Chaudhry Muhammad Zafrulla Khan.

At 4pm on 19 October 1924,  the Khalifa laid the foundation stone of the London Mosque with over 200 people of various nationalities and religious beliefs present at the ceremony. The Khalifa delivered a short address in which he explained that a mosque was a place to worship and serve God alone. A telegram dated 20 October 1924 from Maulvi Abdur Rahim Dard to Hadhrat Maulvi Sher ‘Ali in Qadian states that Hadhrat Khalifatul Masih said he hoped ‘that this mosque would help to remove all friction and strife and establish peace, amity and goodwill among men …’ (Review of Religions, November 1924).

Oct 20th to Nov 24th?
We have to assume that the Khalifa was travelling from England to British India, no details are available however.

Links and Related Essays

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/06/04/in-1955-the-ahmadiyya-khalifa-toured-europe-extensively-albeit-with-a-piece-of-metal-in-his-neck/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/03/12/ahmadiyya-officially-claimed-that-the-state-of-israel-is-temporary/

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Port+Said,+Port+Fouad,+Port+Said+Governorate,+Egypt/@31.1414554,31.6535258,9z/data=!4m5!3m4!1s0x14f99c3e939e6b99:0x4cae04550f7d4cb3!8m2!3d31.2652893!4d32.3018661

“Akhbaar Al-Qabas”. August 8, 1924. Retrieved October 1, 2016.

The life and achievements of Hadhrat Khalifatul Masih II(ra)



https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/02/23/mirza-basheer-uddin-mahmud-ahmad-had-20-children-with-7-wives/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottoman_Caliphate

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/02/24/amatul-hayee-or-amtul-hai-the-daughter-of-nooruddin-and-the-wife-of-the-2nd-khalifa-mirza-basheer-uddin-mahmud-ahmad-and-her-mysterious-death/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/05/16/the-review-of-religions-ror-of-november-1931-front-page-and-pages-290-291/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/05/10/kababir-an-ahmadiyya-community-in-israel-by-ray-register-1970-hartford-seminary-foundation-thesis-dissertation/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmadiyya_in_Syria

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/05/17/ahmadiyya-beliefs-and-experiences-by-hassan-bin-mahmood-odeh-an-ex-ahmadi-from-kababir-haifa-israel/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/10/28/ahmadis-in-the-israeli-military/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/05/24/ahmadi-mission-in-israel-as-written-in-the-pakistan-times-on-june-18th-1974/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/05/16/the-review-of-religions-ror-of-january-1932-pages-30-34images/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/05/09/review-of-religions-august-of-1932-factors-which-contribute-to-the-success-of-a-new-religion-and-their-application-to-the-ahmadiyya-movement/

The life and achievements of Hadhrat Khalifatul Masih II(ra)

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

What is “Raz-e-Haqiqat” in english as “A Hidden Truth” ???

Intro
“Raz-e-Haqiqat” in english as “A Hidden Truth” is an announcement that MGA and his team published in Nov of 1898.  It was translated into english for the first in 2016 by the Qadiani branch of Ahmadi’s and turned into a book.  However, this was never a book of MGA’s before 2016.  It was Published in Qadian at Ziya-ul-Islam Press, under the supervision of its Proprietor,
Hakeem Fazl-ud-Deen of Bhera, on 30 November 1898, Copies: 2,100 were made.  We are not sure if this and other announcements were published in any newspaper.  MGA went to court in the early part of 1899 and lied about many things, specifically, his newest prophecy, it came from MGA’s annoucement of 21 Nov 1898, MGA basically said that Batalvi would be humiliated by 15 Jan 1900.  However, the British government didn’t care about any of this, since during 1857, MGA’s family was the most loyal in all of the Gurdaspur district and helped the British government in their time of need, and thus, MGA was above the law, he ran free and terrorized his fellow Indians.  MGA even denied having a revelation about the fall of the British Government.

MGA says in this announcement
“”””I specifically publish this announcement for my community so that they should await the outcome of the announcement of 21 November 1898, published as a prayer-duel with respect to Sheikh Muhammad Husain of Batala, the editor of Isha’at-us-Sunnah as well as two of his associates. The period for this prayer-duel is set to expire on 15 January 1900.””””

Links and Related Essays
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/30/out-of-fear-from-ahmadis-and-mgas-fake-prophecies-batalvi-registered-to-buy-a-gun-1898-1899-but-was-denied/

https://www.alislam.org/library/books/A-Hidden-Truth.pdf

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/26/the-mirza-family-was-above-the-law-in-british-india/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/25/in-the-early-1890s-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-claimed-that-the-british-governments-control-of-india-would-end-in-8-years/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

The statement of Maulvi Nur-ud-Din in the case of Dr. Clarke vs. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (1897)

Intro
During MGA’s famous case vs. Dr. Clarke in Gurdaspur, many Ahmadi’s were called as character witnesses for MGA.  Noorudin was the top witness.   However, since MGA was above the law in British-India, since his father Mirza Ghulam Murtaza helped to kill the mutineers of 1857, MGA was given respite even when he was totally guilty.  We found this testimony in MGA’s book,. “kitab ul Barriya” (1897), in a Lahori-Ahmadi translation, pages 177-179.

Statement of Maulvi Nur-ud-Din, prosecution witness on solemn affirmation, 30th August 1897
Son of Ghulum Rasul, resident of Bherah, District Shahpur, Tribe Quraishi, age 50 years. Stated:
I have been a follower of Mirza sahib for a very long time, for years. I have never received the title of the angel of the right hand, nor of khalifa. I am not called the most venerable of all. Abdul Hameed does not belong to our clan. We are Quraishis and Abdul Hameed is a Gakhkhar. There is no connection. I did not receive any postage-due letter from Abdul Hameed. I take three types of postage-due letters: Those coming from home; or if someone posts with stamps but it becomes postage-due by mistake then I pay its charge; or I honour postage-due letters of book parcels. The other postage-due letters I return. I am acquainted with Abdul Hameed. He came to Qadian twice and had said to me: “Arrange for me to take the oath of allegiance to Mirza sahib.” I made a submission to Mirza sahib. He said: “I do not administer the oath of allegiance so readily, nor do I like such an oath where the affairs of the person taking the oath of allegiance are not fully known”. Abdul Hameed stayed for two or three days and went away. I do not remember when he came. I do not know after how much time he came again, but it was not after a long time. As for the second time I do not remember how many days he stayed. Mirza sahib dealt with Abdul Hameed neither strictly nor with love. Once Mirza sahib said: “Do not let strangers stay for long when it is not known how decent they are.” I do not know whether there is a follower of Mirza sahib in Bengal or not. There are two followers at Hyderabad, one at Bombay, none at Karachi, none at Kabul, none at Lucknow, one at Delhi. There are followers in the Punjab. I do not remember their number. Mirza sahib writes books. Some of his followers take away the books free, some pay the price and also make a donation. I think Mirza sahib can pay a reward up to 10,000 Rupees. As long as Yusuf Khan stayed at Qadian he stayed away from us. But we did not find anything wrong with him. Mirza sahib did not pay the fare to Abdul
Hameed. He had instructed to turn him out. He does not let useless people stay. As far as I know and remember I had given him 2 annas. Mirza sahib did not give him anything. I did not myself see Abdul Hameed working in the press. I had heard that he used to work. As for abuses, I had heard that he had abused Mirza sahib. He had not abused Mirza sahib in my presence. I cannot say about Abdul Hameed whether or not he was there on the day of the Jubilee. Burhan-ud-Din had come at the time of the Jubilee. He had told me: “This boy is not
good. You will get trouble from him”, that is, he will harm you. I do not know who had asked Abdul Hameed to go away. I had not said this.

On a question from the lawyer of the defendant: When Abdul Hameed first came to Qadian I got acquainted with him. He stayed where the common people, visitors or beggars etc. stay. The place is at a distance of a hundred yards from the house of Mirza sahib. Mirza sahib does not go there. I have been staying with Mirza sahib continuously for four years. He lives in privacy. He comes out only five times for the prayers and sometimes goes out for fresh air. He comes out at the times of the morning, midday, afternoon, sunset and night prayers. There is public gathering then. Everybody is present there. Nobody goes inside the house of Mirza sahib. I have never been there myself. Mirza sahib had given a general order that with the exception of sincere persons, other strangers should be turned out. When Burhan-ud-Din had said “this boy is not good” I had not talked to Mirza sahib about this. On the contrary, I had told Burhan-ud-Din:
“The wicked improve. Why do you think so badly of him?” He had said: “I have more experience of him”. Abdul Hameed never attended my lessons. He did not meet Mirza sahib at all. He suffers from venereal disease. I had treated him. When he came to Qadian again, I was at the same place. He was turned out after his second visit. Perhaps Burhan-ud-Din was not at that place at that time. This is highly probable. As for the expulsion of Muhammad Yusuf, I have just
heard it said that he was expelled. Actually he had gone himself. The writing, exhibit ‘F’, page 44 is about truth and falsehood, that anyone who does not follow truth will be destroyed by God, whoever he may be. This includes Mirza sahib also. This writing is not a prophecy. Whoever he may be, the end of the wicked and the liar is not good. The word at the end of the writing is ‘lie’, not ‘liar’. I know Muhammad Saeed who has become a Christian. He had been expelled from Qadian by Mirza sahib. Yusuf Khan and Muhammad Saeed used to live together at one place. They did not leave Qadian together. They had left separately. I do not know where the bathroom inside the house is situated. The mosque has a public bathroom. (On a question from the advocate): Mirza sahib has no closet inside the mosque. (On a question from the Court) Oath of allegiance was not taken from Abdul Hameed. I had not made him read any of the conditions of allegiance. (Exhibit ‘H’). Nur-ud-Din. Read out. Is correct. Nur-ud-Din.
Signature of the Judge

Links and Related Essays
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Clarke

http://www.ahmadiyya.org/bookspdf/bar/bar180-201-frm.htm

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/30/who-is-abdul-hameed/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/05/dr-clarkes-initial-comments-on-mga-sending-abdul-hameed-to-murder-him/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/05/a-e-martineau-district-magistrate-amritsar-his-arrest-warrant-vs-mga/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/05/captain-m-w-douglas-district-magistrate-district-gurdaspur/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/06/who-is-maulvi-burhanuddin-of-jhelum-1830-1905/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/05/the-statement-of-dr-clarke-on-solemn-affirmation-on-12th-august-1897-vs-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

http://www.ahmadiyya.org/bookspdf/bar/bar180-201-frm.htm

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/26/the-mirza-family-was-above-the-law-in-british-india/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Lekh

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Athim

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/08/even-in-1907-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-still-lusting-for-his-niece-muhammadi-begum/

http://www.ahmadiyya.org/bookspdf/bar/bar180-201-frm.htm

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/18/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-sent-abdul-hameed-to-murder-dr-clark-after-lekh-ram-was-murdered/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/06/anjam-e-athim-1897-quotes/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

 

Captain M.W. Douglas, District Magistrate, District Gurdaspur received Abdul Hameed and saved MGA

Intro
Captain M.W. Douglas, District Magistrate, District Gurdaspur was given a serious court case vs. MGA in 1897.  However, since MGA was above the law in British-India, since his father Mirza Ghulam Murtaza helped to kill the mutineers of 1857, MGA was given respite even when he was totally guilty.  Dr. Clarke had initially filed the case in Amritsar, where he lived, however, the courts told him that he was out of jurisdiction, the case was thus transferred to Gurdaspur.  This is the famous case of Abdul Hameed who was a nephew of the famous Ahmadi mullah, Burhan ud Din.  We found this testimony in MGA’s book,. “kitab ul Barriya” (1897), in a Lahori-Ahmadi translation, pages 142-143.

Captain Douglas’ initial comments

9th August 1897

To: Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, son of Mirza Ghulam Murtaza, Caste Mughal, resident of Qadian, sub-division Batala, District Gurdaspur.

Whereas we have been informed by the honourable Magistrate, District Amritsar, and this information is supported by the statements of Dr. Martyn Clarke and Abdul Hameed recorded by the respected officer and sent to us, that you have incited Abdul Hameed to kill Dr. Martyn
Clarke. Consequently there is apprehension that you are about to commit breach of the peace or about to perform an act which is likely to cause breach of the peace. Consequently you are commanded through this Order to present yourself on Tuesday 10th August 1897 during Court hours before the District Magistrate at Batala and explain the reason why you should not be required to deposit a personal surety of one thousand Rupees as penalty, with an undertaking of maintenance of public peace for a period of one year, and why a surety document written by two sureties for Rupees one thousand per surety as penalty be not required to be deposited.
Issued today, dated 9th August 1897, under our signature and seal of the Court.

Signed: District Magistrate, Gurdaspur.
No: 4. Summons to the defendant Under Section 152, Collection of Criminal Procedure Code In the court of Captain Douglas, District Magistrate

To: Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, son of Mirza Ghulam Murtaza, caste Mughal, resident of Qadian Mughlan, sub-division Batala, District Gurdaspur.

Your presence is essential in order to make reply to the accusation under Section 107 Criminal Procedure Code. Hence you are ordered through this document to present yourself in person or through a duly authorised attorney or as the case may be, at Batala, before the District Magistrate on 10th August 1897. Be strictly enjoined of this.

Signed: Magistrate, District Gurdaspur.

Links and Related Essays

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/06/who-is-maulvi-burhanuddin-of-jhelum-1830-1905/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/05/the-statement-of-dr-clarke-on-solemn-affirmation-on-12th-august-1897-vs-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

http://www.ahmadiyya.org/bookspdf/bar/bar180-201-frm.htm

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/26/the-mirza-family-was-above-the-law-in-british-india/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Lekh

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Athim

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/08/even-in-1907-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-still-lusting-for-his-niece-muhammadi-begum/

http://www.ahmadiyya.org/bookspdf/bar/bar180-201-frm.htm

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/18/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-sent-abdul-hameed-to-murder-dr-clark-after-lekh-ram-was-murdered/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/18/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-sent-abdul-hameed-to-murder-dr-clark-after-lekh-ram-was-murdered/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/04/05/when-the-athim-prophecy-was-about-to-expire/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/17/lekh-rams-murder-the-details-aryasamaj-lekhram/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/19/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-had-5-written-debates-no-oral-debates/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/04/03/the-punjab-mission-news-and-mirza-ghulam-ahmads-death-prophecy-vs-athim/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/06/anjam-e-athim-1897-quotes/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/10/16/mgas-nasty-poetry-vs-the-christian-abdullah-athim/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/06/13/after-mirza-ghulam-ahmads-lost-the-debate-with-athim-3-of-his-followers-left-ahmadiyya/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/17/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-vs-athim-through-the-lens-of-asif-m-basit-review-of-religions-2013/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/06/anjam-e-athim-1897-quotes/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

Dr. Clarke’s initial comments on MGA sending Abdul Hameed to murder him

Intro
In 1897, MGA sent an Ahmadi (Abdul Hameed) to murder Dr. Clarke.  Thus, Dr. Clarke submitted an official statement to the court of A.E. Martineau, District Magistrate, District Amritsar.  We found this testimony in MGA’s book,. “kitab ul Barriya” (1897), in a Lahori-Ahmadi translation, pages 140-141.  He issued another official statement later on in the case which is also reproduced here.  This case has to do with the FACT that MGA was sending his followers to murder those whom against he (MGA) had issued death prophecies.  MGA was above the law in British-India, hence, he was employing every dirty tactic which he knew to prove his prophecies to be true.

Statement of Doctor Martyn Clarke
I am a medical missionary and live in Amritsar. On 15th July Abdul Hameed came to me and said: “I am a Brahmin of Batala. Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani made me a Muslim. I remained with him as a student for seven years, and arrived at the conclusion that he was a very bad man. Now I want to leave him and become a Christian”. I admitted him. His story did not appeal to me. I started making investigations about him. I came to know that this story was absolutely false. His name was Abdul Hameed, not Abdul Majeed as he had stated. Nor was he a Brahmin of Batala. In fact, he was a born Muslim of the Jhelum area. His paternal uncle, Burhan-ud-Din Ghazi, is a well known religious fanatic. His entire family are zealous followers of Mirza Qadiani. This young man had lived in Gujrat, like those seeking the Christian religion. He stole forty Rupees of his paternal uncle and wasted them in vice. Thereupon his uncle sent him to Mirza Qadiani. I personally went to Beas. Then I enquired from him. He openly admitted before five witnesses that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad had sent him to kill me. He was looking for an opportunity to smash my head with a stone or something similar when he found me asleep or in some other condition. He wrote all these events of his own accord. I produce this written paper which he signed in the presence of eight witnesses. I have known Mirza sahib since the time of the debate which took place in the summer of 1893. I had taken a major part in the debate. This debate took place between him and a very important Christian Abdullah Atham who is dead. I presided over the meeting and on two occasions had acted as debater in place of Mr. Atham. Mirza sahib was deeply aggrieved. Afterwards he predicted the death of all those
who had participated in the debate, and my contribution had been tremendous. Since then his attitude towards me has been very hostile. After the debate the centre of special attention was Mr. Atham. Four separate attempts were made to kill him. During the last two months of the period fixed for his death, a special twenty four hour police guard was posted at Ferozepur. He had to flee from Amritsar to Anbala and from Anbala to Ferozepur, because of the attempts made on his life. These attempts have been generally attributed to Mirza sahib. After his death, I have been in view. In many a veiled manner I have been reminded of this prophecy in Mirza sahib’s books. For this the greatest effort has been the one explained by Abdul Hameed. After Lekhram’s death in Lahore which everybody attributes to Mirza sahib, I had a special reason to believe that some sort of an attempt would be made to kill me. I had gone on leave of absence for three months. On my return, Mirza sahib at once came to know about my arrival and Abdul Hameed reached me. I have sufficient reasons to believe the statement of Abdul Hameed and also to believe that Mirza sahib intends to do harm to me. It has always been the technique of
Mirza sahib that he predicts the death of his opponents.

Signature: A.E. Martineau, District Magistrate.
Read out. Accepted. Signature: A.E. Martineau, District Magistrate.
Statement of Abdul Hameed: I had myself written the sheet of paper presented by Dr. Clarke, and signed it.
Signed by Judge as above

Links and Related Essays
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/05/the-statement-of-dr-clarke-on-solemn-affirmation-on-12th-august-1897-vs-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

http://www.ahmadiyya.org/bookspdf/bar/bar180-201-frm.htm

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/26/the-mirza-family-was-above-the-law-in-british-india/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Lekh

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Athim

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/08/even-in-1907-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-still-lusting-for-his-niece-muhammadi-begum/

http://www.ahmadiyya.org/bookspdf/bar/bar180-201-frm.htm

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/18/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-sent-abdul-hameed-to-murder-dr-clark-after-lekh-ram-was-murdered/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/18/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-sent-abdul-hameed-to-murder-dr-clark-after-lekh-ram-was-murdered/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/04/05/when-the-athim-prophecy-was-about-to-expire/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/17/lekh-rams-murder-the-details-aryasamaj-lekhram/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/19/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-had-5-written-debates-no-oral-debates/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/04/03/the-punjab-mission-news-and-mirza-ghulam-ahmads-death-prophecy-vs-athim/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/06/anjam-e-athim-1897-quotes/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/10/16/mgas-nasty-poetry-vs-the-christian-abdullah-athim/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/06/13/after-mirza-ghulam-ahmads-lost-the-debate-with-athim-3-of-his-followers-left-ahmadiyya/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/17/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-vs-athim-through-the-lens-of-asif-m-basit-review-of-religions-2013/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/06/anjam-e-athim-1897-quotes/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

 

Out of fear from Ahmadi’s and MGA’s fake prophecies, Batalvi registered to buy a gun (1898-1899), but was denied

Intro
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was really close friends with Batalvi going back to his childhood days, in fact, they even shared some of the same teachers.  However, MGA began praying for people to die as early as 1880, nevertheless, by 1884 he was at odds with the ulema of India in terms of his claim of getting divine revelation.  By 1889, MGA had turned on Muslims as he claimed that Esa (As) was dead and never returning and indicating that he (MGA) was an Esa (as) and others could also come.  By 1893, he was telling the world that Lekh Ram would die violently, he was thus murdered in Lahore and was still alive until he got to the Mayo Hospital in Lahore and the Ahmadi doctor who just so happened to be on duty let him die (March 6th,1897).  Athim was also given many death threats and eventually died of old age, which MGA argued fulfilled his prophecy.  MGA beat the case, the same way he beat all of his cases, with the help of the British government.  Kashful Ghita was published by the Ahmadiyya jamaat in 1898 in english.  In this book MGA denied that he was publishing a death prophecy, he fell back and said it was just a prayer.  Furthermore, he denied ever having a dream/ilham which indicated the end of the British Government within 8 years, however, by 1929, many Ahmadi’s came forward and admitted that MGA did in-fact have this dream/ilham, thus proving that MGA lied in his book.  The British courts dropped the case vs. MGA and forced him and Batlalvi to sign a 6 clause declaration, wherein both of them agreed to stop insulting each other in the press and to stop doing death prophecies aka Mubahila’s.  Thus, the British government ordered MGA to stop his silly death prophecies again.  This was because of the help that MGA’s father gave the British in 1857, hence, MGA was above the law in British India. Even when MGA was totally guilty of breaking the law, the Brits pardoned him.  MGA had some insults written about Batalvi in his newspaper also (the al-Hakam, however, in court MGA denied any connections to that newspaper).  Batalvi never engaged MGA ever again.

Oct-November of 1898
Some Muslims of India ask Batalvi to officially engage MGA in a Mubahila (see Dard page, 604–608).  On November 10th, 1898, Muhammad Baksh of Lahore (manager of the Ja‘far Zatalli, Tajul Hind Press), along with a colleague of his, Abul Hasan Tibbati, published a reply to the Ahmadi’s of Patiala, Simla, Allahabad, Batala, Amritsar, Lahore, Bhera, Sialkot and to MGA.

October 1898
MGA’s house is raided and searched by Inspector Rana Jalal-ud-Din Khan, who had arrived in
Qadian under the command of the Superintendent of Police and surrounded MGA’s house. The Superintendent and the Inspector then climbed up to the roof of the mosque much to the consternation of Maulana Abdul Karim Sialkoti who was present on the roof and witnessed
this police action (see Mujadid e Azim, abridged english version).

MGA responds to the question of Mubahila with Batalvi
November 21st, 1898

“”””If I am, really a liar and an impostor as Muhammad Husain and his friends declare me
to be, then let me be disgraced. But if it is not so, O God, then bring disgrace upon them as
they have tried to bring disgrace upon me. Let them be disgraced within the next 13 months—
December 15th, 1898, to January 15th, 1900.””” (see Dard, page 605)Dard claims that MGA published an announcement, however, we haven’t found it as of yet.

MGA’s death prophecy vs. Batalvi is now official
MGA and Ahmadi’s were now praying that some disgrace happen to Batlavi in the in next 13 months.  This was against the order that MGA had just signed with the British government, Via Judge Captain Douglas wherein he promised to stop making “death prophecies” and “disgrace predictions”.

November 30th, 1898
On November 30th, 1898, MGA issued another leaflet in which he instructed his followers to observe patience under every kind of provocation. They should purify their hearts and stick to their ways of humility, meekness and love. They should persevere in prayer and wait for the judgement of God promised in his leaflet dated November 21st, 1898.

Breach of peace by MGA on December 1st, 1898?
There was an apprehension of a breach of the peace and that therefore MGA and Maulawi Muhammad Husain should both be bound over to keep the peace under section 107, Cr. P. C. Muhammad Husain, he said, had bought a sharp dagger made at Bhera which he showed as his weapon of self-defense. The Gurdaspur police endorsed the report and confirmed the allegation that MGA was violating the order of Capt. Douglas which prohibited him from making such prophecies.

Dec 5th,1898
On December 5, 1898, Batalvi applied for an arms licence for a pistol on the plea that his life was in danger on account of the prophecy made by MGA, Batalvi argued that MGA was getting his death prophecies fulfilled by his fanatical followers, thus Batalvi’s life was in danger. The case was fixed for hearing against MGA on January 9, 1899.

MGA gets an official notice to appear in court on Jan 9th, 1899
MGA came to know about the case instituted against him between December 10 and 15, 1898 and this book was published on December 27, 1898, in which he assured the Government and acquainted them with the peaceful principles of his Jama‘at. In this book, he also drew the attention of the authorities to the abuse and vituperation to which he was being subjected by
Maulavi Muhammad Hussain Batalvi and his friends. In the defense statement filed with the District Magistrate of Gurdaspur on January 27, 1899 (see Hidden Treasures).

The Kashful-Ghita was thus published
Dard tells us that MGA and his team wrote as follows:

“”””To recapitulate, five charges have been brought against me in this case: (1) that I habitually make prophecies of death or injury to others, (2) that I have disregarded the terms of the notice signed by me in Dr. Clark’s case by publishing a prophecy on November 21, 1898, (3) that I pre-arrange the fulfilment of my prophecies or make secret attempts to fulfil them afterwards, (4) that my writings are harsh and provocative, and (5) that my prophecy of November 21, 1898, is likely to cause a breach of peace.

My reply to them is:

(1) that no such prophecy was ever been published without the consent of the person about whom it was made and that it is only after much persistence on his part that such a course had been adopted,

(2) that the notice in question contains no prohibition against making a prophecy,

(3) that this was only a suspicion, not having the slightest evidence in support of it, and that the good conduct of my followers, the high moral tone of my teachings and the absence of any such assertion on the part of those about whom the prophecies were made, are strong proofs to reject such a supposition completely,

(4) that my writings are not provocative in the least, and this becomes clear on comparison of the
writing of the two parties, and

(5) that the prophecy had been made and fulfilled without causing any breach of peace.”””” (Life of Ahmad by A.R. Dard, online edition of 2008, pp. 633-634).

However, MGA lied about his 8-year prophecy of demise about the British Government
In roughly 1895, MGA saw a dream that he interpreted to mean that the demise of the British government would happen in 8 years.

Jan 9th, 1899 at Gurdaspur
MGA reached the court compound at about 10 o’clock, and waited till noon. The lawyer engaged by Maulawi Muhammad Husain could not come that day and at his telegraphic request the hearing was postponed by Mr. J. M. Dowie to January 11th, 1899.  The attitude of the magistrate (Dowie) appeared to be stiff. In a note he asked the parties to show cause why they should not both be bound over for a period of 12 months and also furnish security of Rs. 1,000 each (see Dard).

Jan 11th, 1899 at Gurdaspur
The hearing began on the 11th at Gurdaspur. MGA was represented by Mr. W. Browne, Sh. Fadl
Din, Sh. Ali Ahmad and Khwaja Kamal-ud-Din. Mr. Browne admitted that his client had issued the following: Ishtihar dated 1.11.1898 (b) Ishtihar dated 3.1.1899 (c) Ishtihar dated 6.1.1899 (d) Kashful Ghita (e) Ishtihar dated 7.1.1899. Maulawi Muhammad Husain admitted in court that he had published in his paper.

Batalvi’s comments in terms of MGA were discussed
1—-“”””That the Qadiani is a Dajjal of this time, a second Musailma, perfidious, deceiver, cheat,
liar and impostor, and that he is the enemy of the faith of Islam and all other heavenly faiths.””” (Vol. 16, No. 1, p. 6.).

2—“””Had we been under Muslim rule, we would have given you (Ahmadas) a proper reply. We
would have at once cut off your head with a sword and made you a dead body”””. (Vol. 18, No. 3, p. 95).

3—“””Otherwise He would send down the severest punishment upon you and drive you to
destruction””” (Vol. 15, No. 1, p. 15. See also Vol. 18, No. 7, p. 215).

4—-“””‘If you are a man and have any courage, then prove both your claims in an assembly of
learned men—you will not come into the field—I challenge you to a Mubahala. Come out into the field of Mubahala and take an oath”””. (Vol. 14, No. 12 p. 338).

5—-“””Have pity on the creatures of God and give up stratagems. Either accept Islam—or prove by means of a controversy or a Mubahala that these articles of faith which you profess do not
lead to Kufr.”””” (Vol. 18, No. 3, p. 77 See also Vol. 17, No, 12, p. 384; Vol. 18, No. 4, p. 132).

6—-“”””Having expressed many a time my readiness to have a Mubahala with him, I prevented his having recourse to a challenge for Mubahila. I showed the mischief contained in the conditions added by him to a Mubahila—when these machinations of his were broken and he was left helpless he devised another plan which he published in his Ishtihar of May 19th, 1897,
viz. both parties should pray to God without coming into the presence of each other. This
showed clearly that he was unable to have a Mubahila with me in my presence, and that
therefore no one should go to him in Qadian. I accepted this method also.””” (Vol. 18, No. 7, p.
197).

MGA’s comments in court at Gurdaspur
MGA stated in court that the prophecies about the Rev. Abdullah Athim and Pt. Lekhram had been made at their written request and with their consent.

Muhammad Bakhsh, who was a prosecution witness at Gurdaspur
He stated that he had been at Batala from 1893. In his opinion there was real danger to Muhammad Husain from MGA. Sayyid Bashir Husain, Police Inspector, also appeared in court and deposed that there was real danger to peace and that there had been strong suspicion against MGA in the matter of the murder of Pt. Lekhram. There was no suspicion against Muhammad Husain. The houses of MGA’s enemies were also searched when Pt. Lekhram was
murdered (See Dard).

January 13th, 1899 at Gurdaspur
MGA presented over 50+ witnesses to the court, however, the court complained that these were too many.

January 17th, 1899 at Gurdaspur
After asking MGA to reduce his amount of witnesses a second time.  The case continued.

January 27th, 1899 at Dhariwal

MGA presented the court with a 20-page letter in english (See Dard, 614-634).  MGA defended himself against all allegations.  Nevertheless, the case was extended.

Feb 3rd, 1899
MGA is sent a letter from the British courts that he might be forced to pay 1000 rupees as guarantee that he would keep the peace and thus not cause a “breach of peace”, which was against the law.

February 14th, 1899
MGA and his team wrote another letter begging to not have to pay the 1000 rupees and full of flattery.  (See Dard, pages 635-638).

February 24th, 1899
The Judge makes a final decision on the case, he forces MGA and Batalvi to sign a 6-clause declaration, wherein they will not be able to insult each other or make prophecies about each other (see Dard).  The case ends with this declaration.

The 6-clause declaration
(1) I will abstain from publishing any prophecy which implies or might reasonably be
considered to imply that any person will suffer disgrace or be an object of the Divine displeasure.

(2) I will abstain from publishing any appeal to God requesting that He will, by disgracing any person or by granting a sign that any person is an object of the Divine displeasure, show who is right and who wrong in any matter of religious controversy.

(3) I will abstain from publishing as an inspired message any statement which implies
or might reasonably be held to imply that any person will be disgraced or is an object of the
Divine displeasure.

(4) I will abstain from employing in any controversy with Mirza Ghulam Ahmad or any
friend or follower of his any abusive epithet or injurious expression and from publishing any
writing or picture which might cause him pain. I promise not to use with reference to him or
any friend or follower of his such expressions as Dajjal, Kafir, Liar, Kadiani. (note: Kadiani
spelt with a means cheat. J. M. Dowie). I will publish nothing with refererce to his
private life and family relations which might reasonably cause him pain.

(5) I will abstain from challenging Mirza Ghulam Ahmad or any friend or follower of his
to resort to any appeal to God (Mubahala) for the purpose of showing who is right and who wrong in any controversy. I will not challenge him or any friend or follower of his to make
any prophecy with reference to any person.

(6) I will to the utmost of my power induce any persons over whom I have influence to act
on their part in the manner in which I have promised to act in clauses 1,2,3,4,5′.

A six clause declaration?

A reference to this case in Seeratul Mahdi

“””This case registered against him for maintenance of Public Law keeping Arms and Ammunition under section 107 of criminal procedure code. The court of Mr dowie Deputy Commissioner Gurdaspur exonerated hazrat sb being bailable offence on 24 february 1899. The case was filed on the application of Molana Muhammad Hussain Batalvi and on the report of in-charge Police station Batala on 1st December 1898. Detail published in Al-Hakam March 1899.”””

Links and Related Essays

https://www.alislam.org/library/books/A-Hidden-Truth.pdf

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/30/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-lies-about-his-relationship-with-his-newspaper-al-hakam/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/25/in-the-early-1890s-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-claimed-that-the-british-governments-control-of-india-would-end-in-8-years/

http://www.aaiil.org/text/books/mga/kashfulghita/kashfulghitaenglish.pdf

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/26/the-mirza-family-was-above-the-law-in-british-india/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/18/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-sent-abdul-hameed-to-murder-dr-clark-after-lekh-ram-was-murdered/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/18/when-athim-didnt-die-in-15-months-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-and-company-made-excuses/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/17/lekh-rams-murder-the-details-aryasamaj-lekhram/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/26/did-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-claim-to-be-the-messiah-in-1889/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/28/a-discourse-with-the-imaginary-messiah-mirza-of-qadiyan-1889-ishaat-us-sunnah-khayali-masih-mirza-qadiyani-se-guft-o-gu/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/09/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-considered-a-kafir-in-1884-before-his-wild-claims/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/31/batalvi-sent-some-of-his-children-to-qadian-for-schooling/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/25/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-vs-molana-muhammad-hussain-batalvi-and-muslims-leaders-in-british-india-in-august-of-1891/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/05/30/nikama-nabi-or-the-useless-prophet-by-babu-ghulam-mustafa-sb-son-of-muhammad-hussain-batalvi/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/01/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-vs-batalvi-1891-1892-era-mga-sent-10-lanats-on-batalvi/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/19/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-had-5-written-debates-no-oral-debates/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/15/mirza-ghulam-ahmads-debate-with-batalvi-summer-of-1891-was-stopped-by-the-british-govt-on-mgas-behalf/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/08/30/batalvi-ka-anjam-by-mir-qasim-ali-1931/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/24/batalvi-calls-mga-a-drunkard/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/10/the-fatwa-e-kufr-vs-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-1891/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/02/17/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-quoted-and-commented-on-178-in-1884-in-the-braheen-e-ahmadiyya-vol-4-he-then-connected-178-with-the-return-of-the-messiah/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/02/03/in-1884-before-his-wildest-claims-mga-defined-inni-mutawafeeka-wa-raffa-as-i-shall-give-you-full-reward-and-shall-raise-you-towards-me/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/09/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-accused-of-claiming-prophethood-in-the-1879-1884-era/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/09/muhammad-hussain-batalvi-gave-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-a-glowing-review-in-1884/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/06/17/nooruddin-urged-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-to-make-the-claim-of-being-like-the-messiah-1882-1884-era/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/25/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-vs-molana-muhammad-hussain-batalvi-and-muslims-leaders-in-british-india-in-august-of-1891/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/16/the-queen-of-the-princely-state-of-bhopal-invested-heavily-1878-into-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-and-his-braheen-they-were-disappointed-by-the-product/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/01/11/mirza-ghulam-ahmads-court-cases/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/25/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-claimed-that-the-rule-british-government-in-india-will-end-in-8-years/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

 

Up ↑