ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
MGA’s confrontation with Pir Mehr Ali Shah (14 April 1859 – May 1937) started in roughly 1899. Pir Mehr Ali Shah had a book (“Shams ul Hidaya”, 1899) vs. MGA published in May of 1899. It was printed at the Mustafa’i Press, Lahore in Ramadan 1317 A.H.

Maulawi Nur-ud-Din read a few pages of this book on February 17th, 1900, and wrote a letter to Pir Mihr Ali Shah the next day. It was written in this book that if anyone wanted to say anything about this book he must refer to authentic commentaries such as Ibni Jarir and Ibni Kathir and also to the true Hadith or he must base his arguments upon the Holy Quran, which should be acceptable to the great and learned people who are masters of language and rhetorics (page 8). Though the book is written in Urdu, yet the writer has occasionally employed Arabic also to show his learning. So, Maulawi Nur-ud-Din asked the Pir eleven questions in his letter (see Dard). But this book, “Shams ul Hidaya” wasn’t totally written by Pir Mehr Ali Shah, in fact, one of the disciples of the Pir wrote much of, and this was admitted to by the Pir himself. Maulavi Muhammad Ghazi had actually written the book, as Noorudin asked for references, the Pir told Noorudin that he should ask Maulavi Muhammad Ghazi.

Nevertheless, in roughly 1900-1902 (while beefing with Pir Mehr Ali Shah), MGA began claiming that only he knew the authenticity of any given hadith. MGA also claimed that he believed in his own wahi that same way that he believes in the Torah, the Gospel and the Holy Quran (See “Arba’in, online English edition, page 159). Thus, MGA was declaring repeatedly that his God had sent him as the Promised Messiah and has informed him which particular hadith is authentic and which hadith is not, and He has bestowed on him the correct understanding of the Holy Quran, then why should he engage with these people? Check out Bro Imtiaz’s video on this too.

In 1900-1901, Maulvi Muhammad Ahsan Amrohi published a book entitled, “Shams-i-Bazigha” which was vs. Pir Mehr Ali Shah. The name means ‘Rising Sun’. It was directed at Mehr Ali Shah, and according to the latter, was full of errors. This book seems to be totally missing from Ahmadiyya websites.

MGA alleged that prayers were combined in Qadian for 2 months, Dec-15-1900 to 2-15-1901, just for MGA, just to be easy for MGA, and MGA alleged that this is in the hadith, i.e., that prayers would be combined for the Messiah, Allah makes it easier for him (See Al-Hakam, vol. 5, no. 6, dated 17 February 1901, pp. 13-14 and Malfuzat-3, online English edition, page 107).

On February 23, 1901, “I’jazul-Masih” is published. This book deals with MGA’s beef with Pir Mehr Ali Shah as well as a full commentary of Surah Fatiha, the first chapter of the Quran. In this book, MGA criticizes Egypt, MGA blames Moses-as why he did not call for the destruction of Egypt and its removal from existence, as the previous generations perished and were removed from existence, all of this just because a sheikh criticized his book. In this book, MGA clearly says that the Quranic verses (61:6) and all biblical verses in terms of the “Ahmad” are about himself, the latter-day Messenger/Messiah (See the scans in the below). In March-1901,
Pir Mehr Ali Shah responds with Saif-e-Chishtiya’i, in this book, he makes fun of some of the Arabic phrases used in I‘jazul-Masih and alleged that some of the material is plagiarized and
further alleged that the Revelations of the Promised Messiah are no more than confused dreams. The Pir also made an allegation that MGA had been plagiarizing from Maqamat-e-Hariri. Saif-e-Chishtiyai played a major role in MGA’s famous court case of 1903-1904 vs. Maulvi Karam Din.

On Sep-15-1902, Tohfa-e-Golarhviyyah is published by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and his team.

Maulvi Sanaullah mentioned Pir Mehr Ali Shah in his famous book of 1923, “Tahrik-e-Mirza“.

Continue reading “Pir Mehr ‘Ali Shah and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad” →

Intro
In BA-4, MGA had a revelation wherein his God told him that he was Persian (See page 372, online english edition), Batalvi backed him up in his newspaper in 1885-1886.

In 1891, after MGA made his wildest claims, he quoted 62:3 of the quran and the relevant hadith and claimed himself to be Persian.

In 1900, MGA claimed to be Persian, of our paternal grandmothers were from the righteous and noble descent of Sadat [Holy Prophet’s descendants from his daughter Hadrat Fatimah (Arbai’in, online English edition, page 31).

In 1901, MGA again claimed to be Persian, it comes from MGA’s announcement of prophethood in 1901 via “Eik Ghalti Ka Izala” (see pages 14-16). In this book, MGA was arguing that he was the Mahdi, this opposed all of MGA’s arguments on the Mahdi to date, MGA had previously written that all the hadith on the Mahdi were fake. MGA was arguing that he was Persian and from the progeny of Fatima and gave a reference to his revelation from the early 1880’s wherein MGA was laying his head on Fatima’s thigh like a child of hers. MGA gave the narration from a collection of hadith called Kanzul ummul. However, the full narration has never been given nor has it ever been checked for accuracy. It’s in Kanzul Ummul, vol. 12, Hadith 34132, 34133.

In 1903, MGA made the same lie about being Chinese in Tadhkiratush Shahadatayn (see ref in the below).

In 1907, In the online english edition of Haqiqatul Wahy (see pages 103-104-154), MGA alleges that his family lied when they told the British Government (via the Punjab Chiefs [1865 edition]) that they were Mongolian. MGA says that his God told them that they were Persian, not Mughal (Mongolian).

After MGA died, in Oct. of 1908, Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya V-5 was published and MGA claimed to be (see pages 487-488) Mughal by ethnicity, on the basis of my paternity but some of my grandmothers were from among the Sadat [progeny of the Holy Prophet sas]. But Almighty God declares me to be of Persian ethnicity on my paternal side, and a Fatimite on the maternal side, and only what He says is the truth.

Bro Haji had found an interesting blunder by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad.On a side note, MGA disliked the name Fatima and saw it as a sign of sadness and pain. MGA also disrespected Fatima’s (ra) children, Hassan and Hussain. MGA also disrespected Ali (ra). MGA even called the killing of Maulvi Abdul Latif as greater than that of Imam Hussain.

In June of 2025, Maulvi Razi and his team of paid Maulvi’s got caught lying by Adnan Rashid (2:44:40 timestamp) and Bro Imtiaz about many things (see the clips on TikTok and twitter). Maulvi Razi got caught mispresenting Ahmad Reza Khan and Shah Wali Ullah. And about MGA being persian.

Continue reading “Was Mirza Ghulam Ahmad a Mongolian or Persian?” →

Intro
In this video, Agha Wasim alleges that these people (see in thebelow) helped to arrange the funeral of Allama Iqbal and that they had ties to the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s. This was in Lahore, Pakistan on April 21, 1938.

Chaudhary Muhammad Hussain, Mian Nizam ud Din, Mian Ameer-ud-Din, Syed Mohsin Shah, Khalifa Shija-ud-Din, Maulana Ghulam Rasul Mahr or Abdul Majid Salik. (reference under construction).

Continue reading “Did Qadiani’s organize, help or even participate in the funeral of Allama Iqbal?” →

Intro
Syed Mohsin Shah was an eminent advocate and political activist and close friend of Sir Muhammad Iqbal. His son, Nasim Hasan Shah was a Pakistani jurist and served as Chief Justice of Pakistan. He is best known for his role in the verdict against Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, the first democratically elected Prime Minister of Pakistan, which resulted in the death penalty in 1979.

He attended the funeral of Sir Muhammad Iqbal.

Continue reading “Who is Syed Mohsin Shah?” →

Intro
In this clip (see on tiktok and twitter), Mirza Masroor Ahmad says that MGA’s era is 1000 years, 1000 years of Khilafat, the final 1000 years of life on Earth. Interestingly, Mirza Tahir Ahmad said the same thing in 1982. Moreover, in the late 1950’s and early 1960’s, Mirza Bashir Ahmad wrote that the khilafat in their Jama‘at will not remain in its pure form forever but will degenerate into a hereditary institution after the first four khalifas.

Continue reading “Mirza Masroor Ahmad says that MGA’s era is 1000 years, 1000 year’s of Khilafat, the final 1000 years of life on Earth” →

Intro
In the below, I review this debate. Check out my video on this too.

—-It is interesting here how Umar didn’t quote the “Marham-i-Eisa” which was invented by MGA.

—-The name Yuz Asaf was never uttered. What about the Gospel of Barnabas?

—-Umar argued that the Torah said (Deuteronomy-21) that anyone hung from a tree is accursed, this means that Ahmadi’s see Eisa (As) as accursed (naozobillah), since Ahmadi’s allege that Eisa (as) was hung on a cross (tree).

—At 1:06:29, Tahir starts, he argues that it is the Quranic position that Jesus (as) survived the crucifixtion, not the Ahmadi position. Tahir said that whatever Muslims choose to believe is on them! Tahir alleges that Jesus’ (as) followers in India eventually became Muslim. Tahir argues that the actions of Jesus (as) supersede his words? Hain? He then gives the same arguments as Umar. Tahir discards the testimony by Peter and the other disciples, since these were received via divine revelation. Hain? But that’s what MGA said.

—-at 2:08:49, Tahir Nasser says that Adam (as) was also born of a virgin. Hain? The clip is on twitter and tiktok. See 3:59 (3:60 in the Qadiani Quran).

—Did MGA ever mention the Bhavishya Purana ?

Qadiani writers had also tried to explore the Sanskrit sources to support this myth. They quote an extract from the Bhavishya Maha Purana by Sutta. It may be stated here that the Puranas are eighteen in number. They are purely mythical in nature and are characterized as popular
sectarian compilation of mythology, philosophy, history and law. The earliest Purana was probably compiled around 4th Century A.D. Bhavishya Purana was printed for the first time in Bombay in 1910 under the order of Maharaja Partap Singh of Kashmir.

Continue reading “Tahir Nasser and his little brother vs. David Wood and Apostate Prophet–November-2024” →

Intro
In a small village called Kot Karam Bakhsh, Tehsil Daska (south of Sialkot), a Qadiani-Ahmadi place of worship was spotted many weeks ago. The Qadiani-Ahmadi’s were told to remove the minarets and mehrab a few weeks ago. However, the Ahmadi’s refused, which led to police to take action and remove the minarets and mehrab.

In reality, the Ahmadiyya Movement wants more and more of these incidents, as they continue to beg Western governments for asylum. They even have super-Kafirs like Yasser Latif Hamdani have also commented on this.

Continue reading “Ahmadi place of worship in Kot Karam Bakhsh, Tehsil Daska, had it’s minarets and mehrab removed Nov-2024” →

Intro
Yasser Latif Hamdani became a major supporter of Ahmadi’s in roughly 2014 (he was born a shia, hence the shaved face), he also seems to have came to the USA/UK in 1998 and graduated college in 2002, it is unclear how he immigrated to the USA. He seems to have novel and verbal knowledge about Ahmadiyya, not a thorough study like the writers and researchers on this blog. He recently said that he comes from an Ahmadi family.

In this episode of Rights Watch (June-2025), Yasir Latif Hamdani and the host talked about the ban on Ahmadi’s from celebrating Eid and performing the Qurbani. Yasir Latif Hamdani mentioned Ord-XX and specifically, 298b and 298c. Yasir Latif Hamdani said that 298c doesn’t allow Ahmadi’s to pose as Muslims. Yasir Latif Hamdani also explained that in 2025, Ahmadi’s were stopped from performing Eid and Qurbani, this had never been done officially since 1984. Yasir Latif Hamdani mentioned a court ruling from 2018 which seems to have triggered all of this wherein it was adjudged that Ahmadi’s should wear different clothing.

Yasir Latif Hamdani then alleges that the Pakistani Supreme court had previously ruled (See the Tahir Naqqash case [PLD 2022 SC 385]) that Ahmadi’s could pray inside their places of worship (or their homes) and this was a precedent. Yasir Latif Hamdani also mentioned the new judgement by Justice Qaiz Faiz Issa in 2024.

In the end, Yasir Latif Hamdani said that the Pakistani government is reliant on the USA, the west and trade deals and these can be revoked at any time. This is called the “International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights”. Yasir Latif Hamdani seems to be arguing that Pakistan will be punished if they continue to enforce Ord-XX.

In 2014, Yasser Latif Hamdani wrote about #Ahmadis and the The All India Kashmir Committee (AIKC) in that same era (it’s totally deleted by 2025). Dr. Mohammad Iqbal nominated and voted for QK2 to become president of the AIKC in 1931. Iqbal had been an Ahmadi over 30 years at this point in his life and he opened the door for the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s to challenge the government of the Dogra’s. The British government was even asked by the Dogra’s to arrest the Qadiani-Khalifa, since he was living in British territory, (British-India), but the British declined. Even Shaikh Abdullah became an Ahmadi and was a paid employee vs. the Dogra government. Even Shaikh Abdullah’s new wife became a Qadiani-Ahmadi in 1935. All of this allowed Ahmadiyya to spread quietly in Kashmir. The Khalifa visited many times from 1921 to 1929. As president QK2 asked all members of AIKC to take oath of confidentiality, i.e. whatever is spoken in meeting it will remain secret. This was done to give confidence to speakers to speak freely. But instead of keeping minutes of meeting secret, QK2 himself was providing information to Viceroy. Dr. Iqbal came to know about this when two Muslim office clerks in Viceroy office showed the original file to Dr. Iqbal. That was the origin of Dr. Iqbal turning away and against MGA. Or this is what is said. By 1935, Iqbal had “outwardly” told the world that Ahmadi’s are a dangerous organization and should be separated from Islam just like the Sikhs were officially separated from Hindus by the british government in the 1920’s. Remember, Iqbal never admitted to being an Ahmadi for the majority of his life, and he remained close friends with the Lahori-Ahmadi’s until he died.

Continue reading “Yasser Latif Hamdani is a super-Kafir who is paid to support Ahmadiyya” →