Intro
In the 1882-1884 era, MGA claimed that many verses of the Quran were also revealed onto to him. In the Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya, Vol. 4, MGA gave over 20 verses of the Quran and claimed that they had also been revealed to him (MGA). MGA was immediately called a Kafir by the leaders of the Ahl-e-Hadith sect, only Syed Muhammad Hussain Batalvi took MGA’s side as he tried to reassure the Ahl-e-Hadith Muslims that MGA was not claiming prophethood. As MGA claimed to be equal to Muhammad (saw)(nauzobillah), in 1901, he quoted this verse in “Correction of an Error” as he argued that this appearance was the second coming of Muhammad (saw)(nauzobillah) via Baruz.

In 1904, in MGA’s personal notebook of revelations, MGA claimed that the Quran, 108:1 (108:2 in the Ahmadi quran) was also revealed to himself. One last point, this notebook of revelations was never published during MGA’s life, it only appears in Tadhkirah.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

The revelation from the 2009 online english edition of Tadhkirah, page 683
December 8, 1904
Friday, the Day of ‘Id [Festival].

[Arabic] Surely, We have given you abundance of good. (surah al-Kauthar, 108:2)

[Notebook of the Revelations of the Promised Messiah, p. 33]
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Other Quranic verses that MGA claimed for himself in 1884
——48:28, 61:09 and 9:32
——-21:107
——-10:16
——17:8
——18:83

After the publishing of the 4th volume of Braheen e Ahmadiyya in late 1884, MGA was called a Kafir by the leaders of the Ahl-e-hadith sect, who had just helped MGA marry an Ahl-e-Hadith girl. MGA was so bold, he began claiming that many verses of the Quran had been also revealed onto himself.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

48:28, 61:09 and 9:32 in “Eik Ghalti Ka Izala” 1901
On the second page, MGA quotes a revelation of his which is similar to three verses of the Quran, 48:28, 61:09 and 9:32 (that would 48:29, 61:10 and 9:33 in Ahmadiyya Quran’s). MGA never specified the verse number, we have to assume all 3 were revealed to him.

MGA says:

“””Even in Brahin-e-Ahmadiyya, which was published some 22 years ago, these words appear in no small number. For instance, one of the Revelations found in Brahine- Ahmadiyya reads:

“”””””””””””””””””””””””””””””He it is Who has sent His Messenger, with guidance and the Religion of truth, that He may make it prevail over all other religions.”””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””

(See Brahin-e-Ahmadiyya, p. 498)(See also “Eik Ghalti Ka Izala”, online english edition)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

48:28, 61:09 and 9:32 in Braheen e Ahmadiyya Vol. 4
The exact same reference is on page 374. The Ahmadiyya editor’s erroneously listed it as verse 61:10, it would be 61:09 in the non-Ahmadi Quranic numbering system. 9:32 is another similar verse. In fact, 61:09, 48:28 and 9:32 are all almost identical to each other. MGA even claimed that these verses were prophecies about his own coming. See page 379 also, the first part of the 3 verses is quoted by MGA.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

The reference from the 2009 online english edition of Tadhkirah
See page 92.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

61:09 (61:10 in the Ahmadiyya Quran’s) is quoted in Khutbah Ilhamiya
Interestingly enough, the same verse is quoted by MGA in Khutbah Ilhamiya.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Other Quranic verses that MGA claimed for himself in 1884
——48:28, 61:09 and 9:32
——-21:107
——-10:16
——17:8
——18:83
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
108:1 in Correction of an Error, online english edition

After quoting 62:3, MGA says:

“””There is a beautiful subtlety of expression in this verse. While it clearly mentions the people who will be counted among the Companionsra, it does not expressly mention the person who was to come as the Buruz, i.e., the Promised Messiah, and through whom those people would come to be counted among the Companions of the Holy Prophetsa and considered to be under his guidance. This deliberate omission is intended to signify that the Buruz in his own right would be a non-entity, therefore, his Prophethood or Messengership in the form of Buruz would not break the Seal of Finality. This is why the verse treats him as a non-entity and presents the Holy Prophetsa in his place. The appearance of a Buruz has similarly been promised in the verse:

Surely We have given thee abundance of good.—Al-Kauthar, 108:2

It means that in his time Kauthar would be manifested, i.e., springs of spiritual blessings will flow freely and a great number of people will become true adherents of Islam. This verse looks with disdain at the need of physical progeny and promises, instead, progeny by way of Buruz. Although God Almighty has blessed me with the honour that I am both an Israelite and a Fatimite, and I partake of both bloods, I still give precedence to the spiritual relationship, which is that of Buruz.”””
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1917

In Muhammad Ali’s famous commentary of 1917, he didn’t connect MGA to 108:1. Muhammad Ali was a honest and decent man, and he knew it was wrong to do so.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1988

Malik Ghulam Farid’s 5-volume commentary also connects MGA to this verse.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
2018

Malik Ghulam Farid’s 5-volume commentary also connects MGA to this verse.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Links and Related Essay’s
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2020/01/27/in-1884-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-claimed-that-the-quran-21107-was-also-revealed-to-him/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/09/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-considered-a-kafir-in-1884-before-his-wild-claims/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/02/17/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-quoted-and-commented-on-178-in-1884-in-the-braheen-e-ahmadiyya-vol-4-he-then-connected-178-with-the-return-of-the-messiah/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2020/01/28/in-1884-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-claimed-that-the-quran-6109-4828-and-932-was-also-revealed-to-him/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/29/khutbah-ilhamia-quotes-the-revealed-sermon-april-11th-1901/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2020/01/27/in-1884-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-claimed-that-the-quran-1016-was-also-revealed-to-him/

A Misconception Removed

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/11/28/in-1884-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-indirectly-denying-quran-349-as-he-denied-the-miracles-of-esa-as/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/09/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-considered-a-kafir-in-1884-before-his-wild-claims/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/02/17/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-quoted-and-commented-on-178-in-1884-in-the-braheen-e-ahmadiyya-vol-4-he-then-connected-178-with-the-return-of-the-messiah/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/02/09/during-the-writing-of-braheen-e-ahmadiyya-mga-masked-his-beliefs-he-was-already-asserting-that-esa-as-died/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/14/what-is-maseel-e-maseeh-the-like-of-the-messiah/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/10/27/sir-syeds-view-on-esa-as/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/16/the-queen-of-the-princely-state-of-bhopal-invested-heavily-1878-into-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-and-his-braheen-they-were-disappointed-by-the-product/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/26/did-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-claim-to-be-the-messiah-in-1889/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/14/mga-confuses-all-of-his-readers-in-1891-as-he-claimed-to-be-the-promised-messiah/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/06/nusrat-jehan-begum-and-other-women-didnt-get-into-to-mgas-bait-in-1889-and-after-were-they-illiterate/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/17/ahmadiyya-leadership-lied-about-the-first-bait-ceremony-in-1889/

http://www.aaiil.org/text/articles/reviewofreligions/raw/reviewreligionsenglish1908.pdf

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/09/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-accused-of-claiming-prophethood-in-the-1879-1884-era/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam