ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
Ahmadi’s cry persecution all the time, they do for asylum visas to the West.  We have covered this topic extensively.  Since the Beginning of the Ahmadiyya Sect, the Ahmadiyya founder Mirza Ghulam and his followers call Christians “Isai” becouse they follow Isa, which was supposedly Jesus’s Name.

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad titled some of his books that way And they use “Isai” whenever they refer to christians. For Example:

“Eik ‘Isa’i Kei Tin Sawal Aur Unkei Jawaba = Three Questions by a Christian and their Answers “

“Siraj-ud-Din ‘Isa’i Kei Char Sawalon Ka Jawab = Four Questions by Mr. Sirājuddīn, a Christian, and their Answers ”

Links and Related Essays
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/08/ahmadiyya-and-human-trafficking-to-germany/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Pakistani+Christianshttps://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/03/abdul-sami-zafar-tells-the-inside-story-on-the-may-29th-1974-rabwah-train-attacks/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/08/10/wonder-why-we-call-them-qadiani/

Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

Intro
Ahmadi’s have been harassing people since 1879, as MGA published the first volume of his Braheen series. Kashif Chaudhry is the number 1 Ahmadi troll for the past 4-5 years.

The story

Cynthia D Ritchie is popular on social media for portraying Pakistan’s soft image. While many admire the fact that a foreigner—a woman at that too– cycles freely in an otherwise conservative society, there are others who have taken exception to her hard-hitting tweets at ‘pseudo-liberals’ and those who mock her.

Cynthia took to Twitter and slammed Yasir Latif Hamdani, a lawyer who wrote an opinion piece in The Daily Times against her. In his piece, Hamdani referred to Cynthia as a ‘shady operative’ who arrived in Pakistan and declared herself as resident expert on Islam by making a negative statement against Ahmadis.

The piece got Cynthia’s attention (not in a good way) and she took to task Hamdani (understandably) but also Raza Rumi, editor of The Daily Times.

There were some who took her threat lightly, prompting her to tweet this.

@dailytimespak @shehryar_taseer I WILL take this to the highest levels possible.

Libel is a serious matter.

One bc is already being investigated in USA. His job is on the line.

You all are fucking with the wrong bitch. https://t.co/yJqtjPQvJU

— Cynthia D. Ritchie (@CynthiaDRitchie) December 31, 2018

The controversy grabbed eyeballs on micro-blogging site Twitter with many siding with Cynthia and spawning the hashtag #ISupportCynthia. Cynthia’s name was subsequently removed from the opinion piece but she was still infuriated.

In between the Twitter jibes and ‘You’ve messed with the wrong bi**h shots, Cynthia continued to portray a positive side of Pakistan.

She ended up abusing Raza Rumi as well in a tweet (which she has now deleted).

“F**k you Raza Rumi, you t**t,” she wrote in a tweet and all bets were off.

Here’s why she did it though.

Yes, part of the irony is that I’d apologized to Rumi a day or two before, for sharing a picture of him with @theRealYLH & KashifMD (YLH & Kashif both cyber bullies). And then I find out he edits the heinous article about me, written by YLH who is no Pakistani Patriot. Upsetting. https://t.co/IsT87fVCh1

— Cynthia D. Ritchie (@CynthiaDRitchie) January 1, 2019

She even gave props to the people who were instrumental in trending #WeSupportCynthia

The apology

A couple of hours later, Cynthia realized she had made a mistake by abusing Raza Rumi and in a mature way, apologized to him in a tweet.

Raza Rumi, who had demonstrated maturity by being silent all the time, finally responded to calm the Twitter storm. He appreciated Cynthia’s offer to reconcile over a cup of coffee sometime and in turn, informed Twitterati about his first day of the new year.

Enters the idiot

Farhan Virk, a social media celebrity (of sorts) in Pakistan known for operating various fake accounts, trolling the PTI’s opponents and harbouring jingoistic opinions, saw fit to involve himself in the dispute. He claimed that Cynthia had no right to abuse Raza Rumi as he had gotten shot for his views against the Taliban.

Not only that, he recorded a ridiculous video in which he urged Pakistanis to dissociate themselves from Cynthia as ‘We (Pakistanis) despite our difference of opinion with each other, should not allow a foreigner to abuse one of us.”

Hain? Why, Virk, why?

Cynthia responds to the troll by telling him to make a sandwich

She proceeded to say she didn’t even know who Virk was. Ouch.

The troll apologizes

It was then that Farhan Virk came across ‘thousands of documentaries’ that Cynthia had done to highlight and promote the positive side of Pakistan and apologized to her in a tweet. He took his words back and deleted all his tweets against her. Sigh.

So, that was all. And Cynthia went back to celebrating the new year.

The only good thing to come out of the Twitter spat—hilarious tweets

Stray observations—why does Cynthia love to tag the State Department in her every tweet? Why did she say ‘You all are fuc***g with the wrong b**ch?

Well, as usual, Twitter doesn’t let such things slide. And it didn’t.

The saga seems to be over. For now. Toning it down a notch, we’d like to end with the question–did they really mess with the wrong woman, though?
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Links and Related Essays

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Kashif

https://natcour.com/story/228090/cynthia-ritchie-has-a-meltdown-on-twitter/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/18/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-sent-abdul-hameed-to-murder-dr-clark-after-lekh-ram-was-murdered/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/04/05/when-the-athim-prophecy-was-about-to-expire/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/17/lekh-rams-murder-the-details-aryasamaj-lekhram/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/19/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-had-5-written-debates-no-oral-debates/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/04/03/the-punjab-mission-news-and-mirza-ghulam-ahmads-death-prophecy-vs-athim/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/06/anjam-e-athim-1897-quotes/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/10/16/mgas-nasty-poetry-vs-the-christian-abdullah-athim/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/06/13/after-mirza-ghulam-ahmads-lost-the-debate-with-athim-3-of-his-followers-left-ahmadiyya/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/17/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-vs-athim-through-the-lens-of-asif-m-basit-review-of-religions-2013/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/06/anjam-e-athim-1897-quotes/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Lekh+Ram

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/05/dr-henry-martyn-clarkes-legal-statement-vs-mga-in-the-court-of-the-district-of-gurdaspur/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/30/who-is-abdul-hameed/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/05/dr-clarkes-initial-comments-on-mga-sending-abdul-hameed-to-murder-him/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/05/a-e-martineau-district-magistrate-amritsar-his-arrest-warrant-vs-mga/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/05/captain-m-w-douglas-district-magistrate-district-gurdaspur/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/06/who-is-maulvi-burhanuddin-of-jhelum-1830-1905/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/05/the-statement-of-dr-clarke-on-solemn-affirmation-on-12th-august-1897-vs-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

http://www.ahmadiyya.org/bookspdf/bar/bar180-201-frm.htm

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/26/the-mirza-family-was-above-the-law-in-british-india/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Lekh

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Athim

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/08/even-in-1907-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-still-lusting-for-his-niece-muhammadi-begum/

http://www.ahmadiyya.org/bookspdf/bar/bar180-201-frm.htm

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/18/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-sent-abdul-hameed-to-murder-dr-clark-after-lekh-ram-was-murdered/

_____________________________________________________________________________________________Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

Intro
Ahmadiyya is playing a game of asylum. They fake asylum cases and then suck Ahmadi’s dry of their money. We have a video from Orya Maqbool, wherein he goes through many important documents and explains the asylum game that Ahmadi’s are playing. This isn’t the first time that Ahmadi’s have been accused as such. Even Pakistani-Christians have accused Ahmadi’s of faking asylum just to come to the West. Even Ahmadi’s have confessed about this asylum game.
Continue reading “Ahmadiyya and human trafficking to Germany” →

Intro
Zafrullah Khan colluded with the British Colonists before and after WW-1 and WW-2. In fact, he was the Ahmadi voice in parliament and he sided with the British in many situations. He hurt Pakistan and made sure that that “British-interest” were of the highest priority, he even represented Palestine and made sure that they lost all cases. He secretly wrote the Lahore Resolution in 1940, as London was bombed and the British feared that they would soon lost India to Japan.
Continue reading “The failed marriages of Muhammad Zafrullah Khan (1893-1985)” →

Intro
In August of 1897, the case of Dr. Clarke and the British government vs. MGA was in full swing.  Lekh Ram had died just a few months earlier, and it seemed like some fanatical Ahmadi’s had planned the murder. Nevertheless, a few months later, Abdul Hameed showed up at Dr. Clarke’s location in Amritsar in the guise of wanting to convert to Christianity. Soon after showing up, he confessed that MGA had sent him to murder Dr. Clarke. However, after the case started, and trial began, Abdul Hameed seemed to have totally recanted the story and blamed the Christians at Amritsar and Beas for scaring him into such a testimony, i.e. that MGA sent him to commit murder. In the below, we have extracted Yusuf Khan’s testimony in this case to Abdul Hameed via Ahmadi sources. We found this testimony in MGA’s book,. “kitab ul Barriya” (1897), in a Lahori-Ahmadi translation, pages 197-198. After Abdul Hameed recanted, MGA gave this specific testimony.  Furthermore, MGA was never under oath, hence, his testimony can’t be taken seriously.

Continue reading “MGA’s final remarks in court in the case of Dr. Clarke (1897)” →

Intro
In 1893, he was a worker at Qadian and an Ahmadi, he was the assistant of Muhammad Saeed who was in-charge of the library at Qadian (sounds like MGA’s library)(See his court testimony in Kitab al Barriya). He told the British courts that he was currently a Christian and was an Ahmadi in 1893 and was part of the debate with Athim. He confessed that left Ahmadiyya and became a Christian 1 year after this famous debate (March-1894). He even told that MGA prophesied that Athim would be bitten by a snake. He also confessed that one time after the debate, news had reached Qadian that Dr. Clark was sick, and MGA immediately prophesied about the death of Dr. Clark too (this was not published).

In late July-1897, Maulvi Burhan-ud-Din Ghazi’s paternal nephew (Abdul Hameed) showed up at the Church/School/mission of Dr. Clark and confessed to have been sent to commit murder. On 1 August 1897, Dr. Henry Martyn-Clark filed a lawsuit of attempted murder against Mirza Ghulam Ahmad with Deputy Commissioner Montagu William Douglas in Ludhiana. The case of Dr. Clarke and the British government vs. MGA was in full effect. Lekh Ram had died just a few months earlier, and it seemed like some fanatical Ahmadi’s had planned the murder. Nevertheless, a few months later, Abdul Hameed showed up at Dr. Clarke’s location in Amritsar in the guise of wanting to convert to Christianity. Soon after showing up, he confessed that MGA had sent him to murder Dr. Clarke. However, after the case started, and trial began, Abdul Hameed seemed to have totally recanted the story and blamed the Christians at Amritsar and Beas for scaring him into such a testimony, i.e. that MGA sent him to commit murder. In the below, we have extracted Yusuf Khan’s testimony in this case to Abdul Hameed via Ahmadi sources. We found this testimony in MGA’s book,. “kitab ul Barriya” (1897), in a Lahori-Ahmadi translation, pages 197-198. After Abdul Hameed recanted, Yusuf Khan gave this specific testimony.

He disappeared in all literature after 1897.

Continue reading “Yusuf Khan (an Ex-Ahmadi) testified vs. MGA in the case brought by Dr. Clarke in 1897, he left Ahmadiyya and became a Christian” →

Intro
In August of 1897, the case of Dr. Clarke and the British government vs. MGA.  Lekh Ram had died just a few months earlier, and it seemed like some fanatical Ahmadi’s had planned the murder.  Nevertheless, a few months later, Abdul Hameed showed up at Dr. Clarke’s location in Amritsar in the guise of wanting to convert to Christianity.  Soon after showing up, he confessed that MGA had sent him to murder Dr. Clarke.  However, after the case started, and trial began, Abdul Hameed seemed to have totally recanted the story and blamed the Christians at Amritsar and Beas for scaring him into such a testimony, i.e. that MGA sent him to commit murder.  In the below, we have extracted Dr. Clarke’s response to Abdul Hameed, via Ahmadi sources.  We found this testimony in MGA’s book,. “kitab ul Barriya” (1897), in a Lahori-Ahmadi translation, pages 195-197.  After Abdul Hameed recanted, Waris Din gave his testimony.

20th August 1897. Statement of Waris Din witness on oath
Son of Ihsan Ali, caste Christian, resident of Jandiala, age 39 years. Stated:

When Muhammad Bakhsh, officer incharge police station, went to Anarkali to fetch Abdul Hameed, and the constable Bahadur Singh was about to sit in the carriage, the officer incharge said: “The driver is a sweeper. Do not sit besides him”. Then I went in the evening, and
the officer incharge police station said: “The boy cannot be handed over now”. When Abdul Hameed wrote the confession at Beas, Doctor sahib was sitting in front of the table like the Magistrate is sitting in the court just now, and Abdul Hameed was sitting in front. On his right were sitting Abdur Rahim, Prem Das and Dyal Chand, and on the left was the deponent. On the right side they were first Prem Das, second Dyal Chand and third Abdur Rahim. I had heard that the boy had told the lawyer that he had met a man at Amritsar when he had gone there first. At Anarkali, Batala, Nihal Chand had told me that anther person also was party at Amritsar to the consultation about murder. Then I enquired from Abdul Hameed and he told me the name
of Qutb-ud-Din and gave the address of the shop. Perhaps the date was the 12th of this month, it was evening time. He had not described the appearance to anyone.

(On a question from the lawyer of the defendant) Formerly I was a Muslim. I became a Christian in 1874. I am only casually acquainted with Doctor sahib, there is no connection. I inspect the schools on behalf of the Mission. The boy had first written the document and then again copied it. Dyal Chand had brought pen, inkpot and paper. The document written by Abdul Hameed had not been read out. It had been written in my presence, and also copied. There had been a mistake the first time, so it was copied again. The words “harm” and “kill” were written by Abdul Hameed himself. The confession does not bear my signature. Abdul Hameed was copying when the postmaster and others came. It was about to finish. All of us were sitting on the
mat in the dining room. Only Doctor sahib was not on the mat. He was in the chair. Doctor sahib was sitting by a side of the table and we people were seated in front of him. Doctor sahib said to Abdul Hameed: “Give in writing whatever you are saying”. And he had written without any hesitation. I had come to Batala during the case.  When Doctor sahib went away, I had stayed behind. I came here at night. I have borne the travelling expenses myself. While coming to
Amritsar from Beas the boy was kept at Rai Vind (It is Sultan Vind in the English version) and I had remained there with him. First we had gone to Doctor sahib’s residence and then to Sultan Vind. I accompanied him to the residence and when the statement was made before the Deputy Commissioner then also I had gone along with him.

Waris Din.
Read out. Accepted correct.
Signature of the Judge.
Continue reading “Waris Din’s legal statements in the case of Dr. Clarke vs. MGA” →

Intro
In August of 1897, the case of Dr. Clarke and the British government vs. MGA. Lekh Ram had died just a few months earlier, and it seemed like some fanatical Ahmadi’s had planned the murder. Nevertheless, a few months later, Abdul Hameed showed up at Dr. Clarke’s location in Amritsar in the guise of wanting to convert to Christianity. Soon after showing up, he confessed that MGA had sent him to murder Dr. Clarke. However, after the case started, and trial began, Abdul Hameed seemed to have totally recanted the story and blamed the Christians at Amritsar and Beas for scaring him into such a testimony, i.e. that MGA sent him to commit murder.  In the below, we have extracted Mr. Le Marchand’s interview with Abdul Hameed, via Ahmadi sources. We found this testimony in MGA’s book,. “kitab ul Barriya” (1897), in a Lahori-Ahmadi translation, pages 194-195. Mr. Lemarchand gave the testimony, which enabled MGA to be exonerated in this serious case. MGA mentions this also in Lecture Ludhiana, see page 30.

Statement of Mr. Lemarchand, District Superintendent Police, on solemn affirmation, 20th August 1897

On the 13th the District Magistrate told me that he was not completely satisfied with the statement of Abdul Hameed and it was necessary to enquire further. Before Dr. Clarke left, I enquired from him as to how I could call Abdul Hameed. He gave me the address of Munshi Nihal Chand that I should write to him to call the man. On the 14th Muhammad Bakhsh, Deputy Inspector, Batala, returned to Batala from Masanian and I sent him to Nihal Chand with a letter. When he brought Abdul Hameed, I was very busy. I ordered Muhammad Bakhsh, Deputy Inspector, to keep that boy in his supervision outside, under the tree. I also ordered Inspector Jalal-ud-Din to guard him. I know that both these officers are certainly not followers of Mirza
sahib of Qadian. When I finished my work I called Abdul Hameed. I could see where they were sitting under the tree. After about two hours I called only Abdul Hameed. Both officers brought him. Before bringing Abdul Hameed the Inspector said to me: “If you are not free, Abdul Hameed may be sent back to Anarkali, because he wants to go, and does not disclose the truth of the case”. Then I said: “Bring him before me”. When he came, he told the same story as he had deposed earlier about Mirza sahib sending him to Amritsar for the murder of Dr. Clarke. I wrote two pages and said to him: “I want to know only the truth. Why are you wasting time for nothing?” As this was said, Abdul Hameed fell on my feet and burst into tears. He seemed to be
very repentant and said: “I shall now state truly what really happened”.  Then in my presence he made the statement which I wrote word for word as he spoke, and which is before the court. Then I sent a telegram to the Deputy Commissioner and brought the witness to Gurdaspur. Ever since the statement was written, he lives in my compound, and comes and goes as he likes. This morning Abdul Hameed said to me: “A man — (Abdul Ghani, on being reminded the witness said about the name that this was the name) — has told me that I should again give the same testimony as the first testimony, else I would be arrested”. My servants had seen that man. When Abdul Hameed came to tell me, it was found that Abdul Ghani had left the compound. Dr. Grey had enquired from me. He has written me a letter which is submitted here, exhibit ‘Y’. Signature in English. Read out. Is correct. Accepted.
Signature of the Judge.
Continue reading “Statement of Mr. Lemarchand, District Superintendent Police in the Dr. Clarke vs. MGA case” →

Intro
In August of 1897, the case of Dr. Clarke and the British government vs. MGA. Lekh Ram had died just a few months earlier, and it seemed like some fanatical Ahmadi’s had planned the murder. Nevertheless, a few months later, Abdul Hameed showed up at Dr. Clarke’s location in Amritsar in the guise of wanting to convert to Christianity. Soon after showing up, he confessed that MGA had sent him to murder Dr. Clarke. However, after the case started, and trial began, Abdul Hameed seemed to have totally recanted the story and blamed the Christians at Amritsar and Beas for scaring him into such a testimony, i.e. that MGA sent him to commit murder. In the below, we have extracted Dr. Clarke’s response to Abdul Hameed, via Ahmadi sources. We found this testimony in MGA’s book,. “kitab ul Barriya” (1897), in a Lahori-Ahmadi translation, pages 183-194.
Continue reading “Dr. Clarke responds to Abdul Hameed, after Abdul Hameed recants” →