ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
In Tadhkirah (the 2009 online edition), Ahmadi authors date this announcement as from 1888 (See page 164) however, in the announcement it is clearly written as August of 1885. In 1885, MGA predicted that his cousins would suffer a severe calamity in 31 months, however, 31 months had expired by February of 1888 and thus this prophecy failed. This seems to be an early case of Ahmadi’s lying about announcements and their publish dates. This prediction was about MGA’s own cousins, who had opposed MGA after the death of Mirza Ghulam Murtaza, and thus took Mirza Ghulam Qadir and MGA to court over the land that was given to Mirza Ghulam Murtaza. Since he was given 1/5th separately. MGA’s cousins won the case, thus, when Mirza Sultan Ahmad came into power (1883) he immediately transferred the land to his cousins (see Dard, page 69-70). This would come to play out in the case of the wall in 1901.

The quotes
“”””I received a revelation concerning Mirza Imam-ud-Din and Nizam-ud-Din, that:

Within thirty-one months they would encounter a great misfortune.

I understood this to mean that a man or a woman from among their close relatives would die which would cause great sorrow and division among them. This would happen within thirty-one months from today which is Sawan 23, 1942 [Bikrami], August 5, 1885. Written on August 5, 1885.”””” [Announcement of March 20, 1888, Majmu‘ah Ishtiharat, vol. 1, p. 144](see the 2009, online edition of Tadhkirah, page 164).

_____________________________________________________________________________________________Links and Related Essays

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/18/who-is-mirza-ghulam-kadir/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/16/the-punjab-chiefs-by-lepel-griffin-1890-edition-doesnt-even-mention-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/18/who-is-mirza-ata-muhammad-died-in-1814/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/16/who-is-murad-bibi/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/16/nuzul-ul-masih-or-the-descent-of-the-messiah-published-posthumously-in-1909-and-quotes/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/16/the-punjab-chiefs-by-lepel-griffin-1890-edition-doesnt-even-mention-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/01/11/the-entire-mirza-family-was-above-the-law-in-british-india/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/08/even-in-1907-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-still-lusting-for-his-niece-muhammadi-begum/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/08/mir-nasir-nawab-the-father-in-law-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/11/who-is-mirza-nizam-ud-din-1845-the-first-cousin-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/24/mirza-imam-ud-din-the-cousin-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/01/13/mirza-sultan-ahmad-mgas-eldest-son/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/29/22-dancing-girls-were-brought-to-qadian-by-the-mirza-family-1848-ish/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/11/who-is-mirza-nizam-ud-din-1845-the-first-cousin-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/09/who-is-mirza-ghulam-muhi-ud-din-mirza-ghulam-ahmads-paternal-uncle-died-in-1866/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/07/the-punjab-chiefs-1909-edition-officially-states-that-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-born-in-1839/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/16/the-punjab-chiefs-by-lepel-griffin-1890-edition-doesnt-even-mention-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/26/the-mirza-family-was-above-the-law-in-british-india/

https://www.alislam.org/library/books/Life-of-Ahmad.pdf

_____________________________________________________________________________________________Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

Intro
In May of 1888, MGA’s cousins and near relations gave a letter which was from MGA to Mirza Ahmad Beg to some Christian missionaries and those missionaries had this letter published in the famous Nur Afshan magazine (published from Lahore). Another announcement was published on July 10th and then on July 15th, 1888. It should be noted that all of these announcements have already been tampered with and have thus been backdated to fit the Ahmadiyya narrative of death to their opponents. The announcement of July 10th, 1888 was also mentioned in “Sabz Ishtihar”, in english as “The Green Announcement”, see page 8 and 19. In fact, MGA was already connecting his marriage to Muhammadi Begum with the Promised Son prophecy of Feb 20th, 1886. MGA was indirectly asserting that the Promised Son (Musleh Maud) would be born from his 3rd marriage (with his niece, Muhammadi Begum), see also Ainah-Kamalate Islam (1893).
Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s announcement of May10th, July 10th and July 15th, 1888 vs. Muhammadi Begum and her family” →

Intro
Dear readers, as we all know, Ahmadi women are not allowed to vote in the Ahmadiyya Jamaat, they are only allowed to vote for women in their “women’s only auxillory” aka Lajna. However, in the mid-1950’s, the Ahmadiyya Khalifa reserved one seat for women in terms of electing the next Khalifa. The Khalifa carefully picked from his wives and installed the Lajna President. We are not sure how this played out in 1965, 1982 or 2003, since the voting is all private.
Continue reading “Can Ahmadi women vote for the Khalifa?” →

Intro
This was never a book of MGA. This is simply a collection of some of MGA’s letters and announcements that he paid to get published in 1893. However, its unknown where these announcements were published, in terms of what newspaper.
Continue reading “What is “Hujjat-ul-Islam” in english as “A Conclusive Argument in Favour of Islam”” →

Intro
Syed Muhammad Hussain Batalvi (1840-1920) was a contemporary of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad in the Punjab. They were both born during the last 8-9 years of Sikh rule (1840’s) and were under the Ramgharia Misl, which was annexed into the greater Sikh Empire in roughly 1816 by Ranjit Singh. They were both educated by the same teachers as British rule began in roughly 1850. Their parents also knew each other, when MGA’s family went to Batala, they always stayed at the ancestoral home of Syed Muhammad Hussain Batalvi.

In 1878, Batalvi started the Ishaat us Sunnah magazine and gave MGA space to market his new book-series, the Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya.

In 1884, when MGA wanted to get married, Batalvi had a list of young girls with him and shared it with MGA, this is how they found out about the daughter of Mir Nasir Nawab. The Ahl-e-Hadith grew weary of MGA in late 1884 and some even called MGA a Kafir, since MGA was boasting about divine revelations in his book series (the Braheen), neverthless, Batalvi stuck up for MGA yet again.

In 1884-85, via his newspaper, Ishaat us Sunnah, Batalvi gave MGA an exhaustive review and supported MGA’s work via the Ahl-e-Hadith. Batalvi famously wrote that a book like this had never been written in the history of Islam, however, he didn’t know about the future.

By 1889-1890 they became enemies, since MGA claimed to be the second coming of Esa (as).
In 1891, afull blown war breaks out between MGA and Batalvi. They arrange to debate each other in Ludhiana, however, MGA requests the British government to intervene and save him. This debate lasted for twelve days, from 20 July – 31 July 1891. The venue was the ‘Masjid Awanan’ (Awana’s Mosque) at Ludhiana. This was a written debate, wherein someone other then MGA read out MGA’s (alleged) writings. The written papers of both sides were later published by MGA as Al-Haq Mubahathah Ludhiana (Urdu). [i.e. Truth: the Ludhiana Debate]. Batalvi goes around the Punjab and gets the majority of the Ulema to pass a Fatwa of Kufr on MGA.

In, October-1891, Batalvi shows up to Delhi and assists Nadhir Hussain in his almost debate with MGA, which is broken up by British police.

From June-1891 to March 1892 due to chasing mirza, Batalvi was not able to publish any editions of the Ishaat us Sunnah (see scan in the below).

In 1893, MGA prophecies that Batalvi would acknowledge MGA as a believer (Muslim) before his death.

In 1897, Batalvi was a witness against MGA in the famous Dr. Clark murder case (see his testimony in the below). MGA alleges to have seen Batalvi naked in a dream, and they embraced each other, and that they would eventually reconcile (See Siraj-e-munir, online English edition, page 143).

They organized debates with each other and jousted from their magazines until 1899, when the British government stepped in and absolved MGA and forced Batalvi to never insult MGA ever again (by calling him kafir or otherwise)(1898).

He seems to be silent vs. MGA from 1899 until MGA died. However, in 1906-1907, MGA was allegedly getting revelations from his God about Batalvi and how MGA’s god would show him the truth just before his death (about MGA, how MGA was true)(See Haqiqatul Wahi, online English edition). MGA was also alleging that he had prophecied in the “Barahin” (1879–1884) that Batalvi would declare himself (MGA) to be a disbeliever. MGA also recalls Batalvi’s father, (Sheikh Rahim Bakhsh) visited him at Qadian at a time when MGA was seriously ill with dysenteric colic. For as many as sixteen days and passed blood in stools with sever pain. MGA mentions Maulawi Nadhir Husain of Delhi, and his student Maulawi Abu Sa‘id Muhammad Husain of Batala and how they started the famous Fatwa of Kufr on MGA in 1891.

After MGA died, BA-5 was published and MGA mentions how Batalvi was a witness against him in the famous Dr. Clark murder case. MGA also responds to some comments of Batalvi, which appeared in the Paisah Akhbar issue dated 19 June 1905. It seems that Batalvi commented on MGA’s doomsday earthquake prophecy and how MGA was lying about its existence in the Barahin series (1979-1884). MGA even wrote poetry vs. Batalvi.

In 1910, his sons were found at Qadian, later on they recanted and left Ahmadiyya.

In 1919, the Al-Fazl magazine alleges that an Ahmadi interviewed him.

In 1920, he died.
Continue reading “Who is Syed Muhammad Hussain Batalvi? 1840-1920” →

Intro
Chaudhry Fateh Muhammad Sial (1887–1960)(also spelled Fateh Muhammad Sayyal) was a companion of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and the first Ahmadi missionary sent from India, under the leadership of Hakeem Noor-ud-Din, the first Khalifa of the Ahmadiyya movement. Ahmadiyya sources claim that he was a student at the Talim ul Islam High School at Qadian.

In the June-1914 edition of the english ROR, his name was spelled as Chowdhery Fateh Muhammad Sayal, M.A., he seems to have written a joint article with the soon to be Khalifa (and his close friend) Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad. He returned to British-India in 1921 (he left England on June 11th, 1921, see Moslem Sunrise, page 20), and by 1923 was working as the secretary of the tabligh, education and missionary departments. In 1922, his eyesight issues were reported to the Khalifa.

In 1934, he murdered another ahmadi murrabi, Maulvi Muhammad Amin and got away with it (See also ROR of Dec-1935 and Khosla’s judgement), this was before the rape allegations of Bashir Ahmad Misri and murder of Fakhur ud Din Multani (1937)(See Bashir Ahmad, “Ahmadiyya Movement, British-Jewish Connections” and with the sub reference of “Tahrik-e-Arar”, page 89). This is most likely mis-spelled, it should be “Tehrik-e-Ahrar”, or some variation of that. In 1947, he might have killed Sikhs during the partition ad was arrested and then later released.

His son, Chaudhri Nasir Ahmad Sial became a son-in-law of Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad when he married his daughter Sahibzadi Amtul Jameel aka Bibi Jameel in the 1950’s or 60’s.
Continue reading “Who is Fateh Muhammad Sial?” →

Intro
“Raz-e-Haqiqat” in english as “A Hidden Truth” is an announcement that MGA and his team published in Nov of 1898. It was translated into english for the first in 2016 by the Qadiani branch of Ahmadi’s and turned into a book. However, this was never a book of MGA’s before 2016. It was Published in Qadian at Ziya-ul-Islam Press, under the supervision of its Proprietor,
Hakeem Fazl-ud-Deen of Bhera, on 30 November 1898, Copies: 2,100 were made. We are not sure if this and other announcements were published in any newspaper. MGA went to court in the early part of 1899 and lied about many things, specifically, his newest prophecy, it came from MGA’s annoucement of 21 Nov 1898, MGA basically said that Batalvi would be humiliated by 15 Jan 1900. However, the British government didn’t care about any of this, since during 1857, MGA’s family was the most loyal in all of the Gurdaspur district and helped the British government in their time of need, and thus, MGA was above the law, he ran free and terrorized his fellow Indians. MGA even denied having a revelation about the fall of the British Government.
Continue reading “What is “Raz-e-Haqiqat” in english as “A Hidden Truth” ???” →

Intro
Dear readers, here at this blog, we love Mahershala Ali. However, we are triggered when Ahmadi’s try to use him for marketing purposes. Mahershala Ali is not a traditional Ahmadi by any means. He was not born an Ahmadi and simply converted since he loved his girlfriend (who is an ahmadi female). He has 2 younger brothers and they are not Ahmadi. His father was also a soul train dancer. Pakistani-Ahmadi’s are hard core, they don’t like Mahershala and feel that he is embarrassing Ahmadiyya. In fact, the Khalifa doesn’t allow Ahmadi’s to go to weddings wherein there might be dancing and has threatened Ahmadi women with ex-communication if they fail to do full Hijab. Another actor got alcohol all over Mehershala, in fact, he got alcohol in his mouth and etc. There are 2 videos of relevance, the dancing is in the second one.
Continue reading “Mahershala Ali loves dancing, doesn’t promote Humanity First, and lets people drink around him” →

Intro
After Batalvi was ordered by the British government to stop cursing and offending MGA, the Ahl-e-Hadith seem to have asked Maulvi Sanaullah to engage MGA. MGA issued a death prophecy for Sanaullah, but he survived for approximately 40 years after the death of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. There was a ‘reverse’ death prophecy that the Mirza would die within Amritsari’s lifetime, which happened almost a year after the publication of these dual prophecies. This book was published in July of 1928. Maulana Sanaullah Amritsari was an Ahl-e-Hadith (Wahabi) Muslim from British India, he was born into a family of Kashmiri descent. He was born on June 12, 1868 and died on March 15, 1948 in Sarghoda, Pakistan.  He was a major opponent of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and the early Ahmadiyya movement. Sanaullah Amritsari served as the general secretary of Markazi Jamiat Ahle Hadith Hind form 1906 to 1947. He was also the editor of the “”Ahle Hadees”” magazine. He moved to Pakistan at the Partition, losing his son in the process, and himself dying in Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan, in 1948, after suffering from a stroke. Syed Muhammad Hussain Batalvi was also an Ahl-e-Hadith scholar who beefed with MGA uptil about 1902, Sanaullah seems to have stepped up for the Ahl-e-Hadith of India as they battled vs. Ahmadiyya. In 1907, he refused to enter into a Mubahila challenge vs. MGA, instead, MGA prayed that if he was a false prophet, he would die in the lifetime of Sanaullah.  He had many debates and arguments with various Ahmadi leaders, he eventually wrote many books, the most famous book in terms of his battles with Ahmadiyya is Ilhamat-e-Mirza (1928)– a critical account of the ‘revelations’ of Mirza. He was also the main editor and owner of a monthly magazine called, “Muraqqa-Qadiani” which lasted from 1907 until MGA died in May of 1908. Its articles were compiled in the shape of book titled “Muraqqa Qadiani” published in 1917.

Some quotes from Ahmadi.answers website

“Since this humble one is not in actuality or like yourself a prophet, messenger, the son of God, or claim to receive revelation, therefore I dare not accept such a challenge.” (Illhamat-e-Mirza, Edition 2, Page 85).

“This statement of his itself shows that he only believed a Prophet can do such a challenge and has clearly himself stated that he dares not to accept a challenge” (Illhamat-e-Mirza, Edition 2, Page 85).
Continue reading ““ilhamat-e-Mirza: in english as “The Revelations of Mirza” (1928) by Sanaullah Amritsari” →