Intro
On 10-2-1891, MGA was in Delhi and was cornered. He seems to have published an announcement full of lies from the house wherein he was staying. It is unknown as to what newspaper this announcement was published. Nevertheless, MGA had already denied prophethood in 4 books, Victory of Islam, Elucidation of Objectives, Izala Auham Part-1&2. However, MGA denied the physicality of the Miraaj in Izala Auham Part-1 and denied it via this announcement. MGA also claimed to believe in all of the creed of Ahl-e-Sunnah-wa-Jamaa, which was a lie, since MGA denied the physical descent of Esa (as), MGA also denied a claim of being Esa (as) the son of Mary. 10 years later, MGA claimed to be a prophet, in a sneaky way. MGA quoted 48:29 and claimed that this verse was about him. Later on, MGA would claim that an ummati can be a nabi, thus, contradicting himself and inventing the Ummati Nabi.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________The announcement in Urdu

Ishtaharaat-Vol 1 p 230-231
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

A brief summary of the announcement in english
“I AM NOT CLAIMENT OF NABWAT, AM NOT DENIER OF EXISTANCE OF MIRACLES,
ANGELS, AND LAILA TUL QADAR. I AM BELIEVER OF ALL THOSE BELIEFS WHICH ARE
INCLUDED (PART OF) ISLAMIC AQAIADS. SAME AS I BELIEVE ALL THOSE BELIEFS WHICH
ARE OF JAMAAT ALHL SUNAT WAL JAMAAT. I EXCEPT ALL THOSE THINGS WHICH ARE
PROVEN BY QURAN AND HADITH. AFTER SYEDNA WA MAOULANA HAZRAT MUHAMMAD
MUSTAFAA SAW, KHATAM A MURSALEEN, ANY CLAIMENT OF NABWAT AND RISALAT, IS A
LIER AND KAFIR. MY FAITH IS THAT WAHI STARTED WITH HAZRAT ADAM SAFEE ULLAH,
AND FINISHED AT MUHAMMAD SAW.”

There is para of Arabic after this. Some Arabic words are of Islamic shahada, I am not sure that
ALL are part of Quran?

After Arabic para, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad goes on to say “ALL be witness to this declaration (my
declaration above) , Allah is all knowing and all hearing and is first witness, that I have faith in all those beliefs, having faith and accepting those beliefs, a kafir can be accepted as muslim. A
person (ghair Mazhabi) can be announced a Muslim straightaway, after accepting these beliefs
(above mentioned). I have faith (imaan) in all those articles along with what are mentioned in the Holy Quran and Authentic Hadiths. I DO NOT CLAIM TO BE EISA IBN MARYAM AND I AM NOT BELEIVER OF TRANSMIGRATION OF SOULS (tanasukh).
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Links and Related Essay’s

Who is Syed Muhammad Hussain Batalvi? 1840-1920

The concept of the Ummati-Nabi

Why do #Ahmadis use 17:93 of the Quran to disprove the physicality of the #Isra and #Miraaj?

In 1884, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed that the Quran 48:29 was also revealed to him

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad denied the physicality of the Miraaj in 1890/1891 in Izala Auham and in 1893 in Humamatul Bushra

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s debate with Syed Nazeer Hussain of Delhi in 1891

The Causes of Internal Dissensions in the Ahmadiyya Movement, By Khwaja Kamaluddin, 1914

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/02/06/zikr-e-habib-by-mufti-muhammad-sadiq-1936/

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad vs. Molana Muhammad Hussain Batalvi and Muslims leaders in British-India in August of 1891

MGA lost the debate with MOLVI MUHAMMAD BASHIR BHOPALI (1891)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syed_Nazeer_Husain

The Queen of the Princely state of Bhopal invested heavily (1878) into Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and his Braheen–they were disappointed by the product

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/07/03/mirza-ghulam-ahmads-mubahila-in-1889-with-syed-muhammad-hussain-batalvi/

Mirza Ghulam’s Ahmad lecture in Amritsar (Nov–1905) was not a Lecture, it was a riot!!!

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s debate with Batalvi (summer of 1891) was stopped by the British govt on MGA’s behalf

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad spoke with a terrible stutter and Ahmadiyya leadership lied about it..they called it a stammer

Mir Nasir Nawab, the father-in-law of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad

MGA lost the debate with MOLVI MUHAMMAD BASHIR BHOPALI (1891)

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad had 5 written debates, NO ORAL Debates

In 1891, when MGA made his big claims, he denied prophethood–Mufti Sadiq was heavily involved

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=ghos

thttps://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/11/05/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-embarrassed-noorudin-in-1891/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam