ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
It is also spelled as Ayyamus Sulah was written in 1898 and was published in Jan. of 1899 (See Maulvi Muhammad Ali in 1915, “Prophethood in Islam”, page 537) per Ahmadiyya sources (see Hidden Treasures). In English, the title translates as “Age of Peace”, this is an urdu book of about 200 pages and published from the Diya’ul-Islam Press, Qadian.

However, Dr. Basharat Ahmad tells us in his famous Mujadid-e-Azim that it was published in both Persian and Urdu. The Persian edition was published on August 1, 1898, but the Urdu edition was not published until January 1, 1899, because of the need to provide answers to some additional questions in the book. The Qadiani-Ahmadi’s haven’t given this info in their hidden treasures book. This book is mostly about the plague that had already hit British-India. Hani Tahir has also covered this topic in-depth herein. In this book, MGA claimed that the Punjab would not be hit with plague as long as MGA was there and among the people of the Punjab.

MGA also quoted the famous hadith from Sahih Muslim wherein Eisa (as) has repeatedly been called “Nabi-Ullah” and called it fabricated (See Ayyam-us-Sulh, p. 74; RK, vol. 14, p. 309 and See Bro Imtiaz, 3:18:10).
Continue reading “Ayyam-us-Sulh, quotes and background info” →

Intro
The Barahin-e-Ahmadiyya Vol. 1&2 was published in 1880 (the exact month is unknown). We have found many announcements from Majmoo-e-Ishtihaarat, Collection of Advertisements.

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was the classic punjabi fraudster. He had promised the Muslims of the Indian sub-continent 300 arguments in favor of Islam in roughly 1878. However, he only delivered one argument, and that argument was his claim of prophethood, which immediately got him declared as a Kafir by the ulema in India.

The Ahl-e-Hadith Muslims of North India tore up the Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya and sent it back to Qadian in that state (1884-1885 era), these were the Muslims who had invested heavily in the publishing of the Barahin. MGA stopped at one argument and even that was incomplete, see the quote in the below. In 1886, in Surmah Chashmay Arya, MGA again asserted that the Barahin was ready to be published, however, funds were needed. For the next 20 years, this promise remained broken. In 1906-1907 (See Haqiqatul Wahy), MGA and his team of writers of spoke about the creation of Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya Vol. 5. However, it was not completed or published in MGA’s life.

After MGA died, Noorudin (who was the main ghost writer) wrote BA-5 and had it published in October of 1908, he added that MGA promised 50 volumes and 50=5. MGA didn’t write this at all. In fact, BA-5 isn’t even a continuation of BA 1-4, it is altogether a new book and in-fact contains 3-4 small booklets which were mashed together to create BA-5, one of which is Nusrat ul Haq and at least 40 pages of nonsensical poetry. Continue reading “Announcements about Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya 1879–1882” →

Intro
We all know how MGA claimed that in 300 years from 1903, all of the world would become Ahmadi. We also know how MGA said that as a result of the plague, people of all religions would die in staggering numbers and Ahmadi’s would take over the world in this manner. We have found another reference from the english-Review of Religions of November 1912, see page 475-477. In this essay, Ahmadiyya editors (Maulvi Sher Ali was the main editor in 1912) write that MGA received a revelation back in 1883, which was published in the Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya vol. 4 of 1884 (See page 401, online english edition)(its posted in the below). In 1883, MGA didn’t clarify as to whose “mouth” this was, he waited 24 years to clarify, and even then he lied (see the Al-Badr ref in the below for 1907). This is part of MGA’s claim of God which he kept denying and masking and is a rip off of the Bahai’s. In this same era (1907), MGA was getting weird revelations which seem to indicate that he was the Son of God, and we all know how in 1893, MGA had the famous revelation/dream wherein he thought he was God.

After MGA died, and via Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya Vol. 5 (see page 199, online english edition), MGA claimed that 3:55 was about him and it meant that: “”those who are outside of this Jama‘at shall continue to diminish day by day. All the Muslim sects that are outside this Jama‘at will decline by the day, and will either enter this Jama‘at or become extinct, just as the Jews declined until only a very few are left. The same will be the end of the opponents of this Jama‘at. The people of this Jama‘at will prevail over others in number and in the strength of their faith.””

In the ROR of Dec-1933, the 2nd Khalifa tells the world that Ahmadiyya must continue grow. It cannot decline. The ROR of Jan-1942 has an essay on the Future of Ahmadiyya and claims that Ahmadiyya will spread, it boasted that the more opposition is faces, the more it will grow.
Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad said that all sects of Islam, all other religions would decline everyday and Ahmadiyya would grow until it takes over the world” →

Intro
Humanity First is under the supervision of the Khalifa, Mirza Masroor Ahmad, however, it is discreet and secret. In the USA, the Khalifa’s brother, Mirza Maghfoor Ahmad is in-charge. The Management team is informal, in reality, the Khalifa is running the organization from the UK and has his cronies in each country carrying out his orders. Ahmadi’s always cry of persecution, however, humanity first operates freely in Pakistan. The Mirza family went out of their way and bribed the United Nations via the UK and gained Special Consultative Status with the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations. However, this was all done fraudulently, Humanity First is basically a tabligh arm of the Mirza family aka Ahmadiyya INC. These same people his money in Panama and got caught during the leaking of the Panama Papers a few years ago. Nevertheless, the Mirza family is using their non-profit status as a method to spread Ahmadiyya, not to genuinely help people. Even the Catholic church has spread throughout the world using similar methods. They have even admitted to raping little boys, and still aren’t shut down. In fact, half of Africa is Christian, and this happened just in the past 200 years, via Christian missionaries, free schools, hospitals and medicine. Ahmadi’s have a lot to hide however, since MGA prayed for the plague to kill off the majority of the world. Further, Humanity First might have been in-concert with Ahmadi-Maulvies who were spreading lies about the number of Ahmadi conversions in the mid-90’s early 2000’s.
Continue reading “Is Humanity First distributing hand sanitizer now?” →

Intro
As soon as MGA began writing in the Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya, he immediately denied the miracles of Esa (as) as given in the Quran. However, in that book series, he avoided Quran 27:16–22, which discusses how Solomon and David (as) were given a special favor by Allah and allowed to communicate with animals, like birds and ants, in fact, it seems that MGA never commented on these specific verses in his entire life. He did call himself Solomon (as)(nauzobillah) in BA-4 (page 239) and even said:

“””Thus, We taught those Signs to Sulaiman [Solomon], meaning my humble self””.

However, its unclear what MGA was getting at or setting up. It’s important to note that in 1886, MGA confirmed that Muhammad (saw) did miraculously split the moon, which was changed later to an eclipse of sorts. Similarly, MGA agreed with the common concept of Jinn in Islam.

By 1890, in Izala Auham, MGA denied the physicality of this miracle of the Miraaj. MGA copied Sir Syed’s entire playbook when it came to denying miracles and the unlimited abilities of Allah. In the same book, MGA discusses Chapter 27 again, however, the verses are 43-46-ish. Which was the small miracle of making glass appear to be invisible, in Izala Auham, MGA and his team wrote:

“””It appears that this miracle of Jesus was purely intellectual like the miracle of Solomon. History reveals that in those days people were inclined towards the useless pursuit of sleight of hand, which astonished the common people.””. Thus, MGA accused the Jewish prophets of God of deceit. In the below, we have presented all the quotes in terms of Solomon (As) and his miracles in the earliest sources of Ahmadiyya.

In 1906-1907, on page 25 of the online English edition of Haqiqatul Wahi, MGA argued that Allah can hear plants, minerals and animals talking.

In the 1960’s, via Tafseer-e-Kabeer, Mirza Basheer ud din Mahmud Ahmad argued that “the ants” was a name of a human tribe, that the ant mentioned was their queen.

In 1917, Maulvi Muhammad Ali totally denied all the miracles of Solomon in his English commentary of the Quran. Finally, this story started from the Torah (see Proverbs), the Quran simply confirmed it like it confirmed the physical ascension of Idris (as) aka Enoch. Just like it confirmed that Esa (as) flew up to heaven and sat down at the right hand of God.

In the 2018, 5-volume Official Commentary of the Quran by Malik Ghulam Farid, it is argued that this verse does not mean the valley of ants as is generally misunderstood but the valley where a tribe named Naml lived. In Qamus under the word برق we have الابرقة من میاہ النملة i.e. Abriqah is one of the springs of Namlah. So Naml is the name of a tribe just as Mazin ( مازن ) which means the eggs of ants is the name of an Arab tribe. In Arabia it was not an uncommon practice that tribes were named after animals and beasts such as Banu Asad, Banu Taghlab, Banu Kalb, Banu Naml, etc. Moreover, the use of the words ادخلوا (enter) and مساکنکم (your habitations) in the verse lends powerful support to the view that Naml was a tribe, since the former word is used only for rational beings and the expression مساکنکم (your habitations) has been used in the Quran exclusively for human habitations (29:39; 32:27). Thus نملة means a person of the tribe of النمل ; a Namlite. The said Namlite was possibly their leader and had ordered the people to get out of the way of the army of Solomon and enter their houses.

Continue reading “In 1890, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad denied the miracles of Solomon (as) communicating to Ants via Quran” →

Intro
A group of Ahmadi’s who were living in Lahore, British India in 1913 got approval from the Khalifa (Noorudin) to publish this magazine. It was another Ahmadiyya magazine, there were just a few at the time, the english ROR, the urdu ROR, the al-Badr was shut down by the British government towards the end of 1913, and the Al-Hakam. In the early part of June-1913 the first edition of the “Paigham-e-Sulh” was issued from Lahore, and towards the middle of the same month the Al-Fadl (6-18-1913)(also spelled Al-Fazl) made its appearance from Qadian (See ROR of Jan-1940 also). Sayyid Inamullah Shah was a manager of the Paigham-e-Sulh, as was Babu Manzur Ilahi. The archives can be found here.
Continue reading “The Paigham-e-Sulh magazine, background info and some important quotes” →

Intro
These are some interesting documents in the history of the split in Ahmadiyya. These two articles were published in the “Pagham-e-Sulah”, “Message of Peace” in english, magazine (which was owned by Lahori-Ahmadi’s). Both of these tracts were published about the
middle of November 1913. They followed one another with an interval of one or two days. The first tract had four pages and the second eight pages. Both of them instead of bearing the name of the writer were anonymously subscribed to “one who invited Ahmadis to the last Will of the Promised Messiah”. These 2 essay’s (Izharul Haq No. 1 and Izharul Haq No. 2) reached most places packed in printed covers belonging to the office of the Paigham-e-Sulh. Following this, Babu Manzur Elahi, and Syed Inamullah Shah, manager of the Paigham-i-Sulha, expressed agreement with the views embodied in this tract; and in an open letter addressed to “Ansarullah”, held this organisation to blame. Naturally, then, the Ansarullah replied by bringing out a similar tract entitled Khilafat-i-Ahmadiyya. This tract was published on November 23, 1913. In the appendix of this tract we read:

“If we fail to express our thanks to Hazrat Khalifatul Masih I, it would be the height of ingratitude on our part. In spite of his old age, and great pressure of his duties as head of the Movement, he read the MS of this tract then gave permission for it to be published with a kind promise of prayer in furtherance of the aim and purpose of the tract.” (See “Truth Prevails” by Qazi Muhammad Nazeer).

In “Izharul Haq” the point was argued that Qudrat-i-Thania in Al- Wasiyyat could not mean the Institution of Khilafat, since the Khalifa, in any case, would be a human being, with a limited span of life, while the Promised Messiah had stated that the Qudrat-i-Thania would stay with the Jama’at forever. One answer given in Khilafat-i-Ahmadiyya was that this expression stood
for a chain of successive Khalifas, which was the interpretation given by the Promised Messiah himself. To support this view a quotation was given from Al-Wasiyyat, where the manifestation of two powers is mentioned, with a specific reference to Hazrat Abu Bakr, as an instance of how Qudrat-i-Thania worked after the death of the Holy Prophet, to promote the emergence of Hazrat Abu Bakr as the first Khalifa.

The Khalifa, covered these article/tracts in 1922 in some detail, however, he refused to publish copies (see “Truth About the Split” by Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad, online english edition of 2007). Muhammad Ali also covered them and also refused to publish copies. A reply was published under the direction of Noorudin (per Qadiani sources) in the form of two tracts. The first was named Khilafat-e-Ahmadiyya (published by the Anjuman Ansarullah, Qadian), and was a reply to the tract Izharul Haq No, 1. The second was named Izhar-e-Haqiqat (published by the Anjuman Ansarullah, Qadian), and furnished a reply to Izharul Haq No. 2. Both these tracts were shown to and were corrected by Hadrat Khalifatul Masihra. At one place, Hadrat Khalifatul Masihra added these words: “A thousand shames upon the Paigham-e- Sulh, which in publishing its letter delivered to us a declaration of war and cast the apple of discord.” After the publication of these tracts everything was quiet for some time. The manager of the Paigham-e-Sulh and Babu Manzur Ilahi had to sue for Hadrat Khalifatul Masih’s pardon and the whole affair seemed to have closed. The basis of the objection in “Izharul Haq” was that Qudrat-i-Thania had been visualised in Al-Wasiyyat as everlasting, while a Khalifa, being a human being had only a limited span of life. The answer given in Khilafat-i-Ahmadiyya, page 17. was that the Promised Messiah had himself written “And after me, there would be other personalities who would be manifesters of the Qudrat-i-Thania.” In “Izharul Haq II”, thirty holes where picked in the Khilafat of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih I. The reply to this was “lzhar-i-Haqiqat”, which said, among other things, that these were the plots and conspiracies beginning to be hatched against the Institution of Khilafat, in the days of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih I himself.(See “Truth Prevails” by Qazi Muhammad Nazeer).
Continue reading “What is Izharul Haq No. 1 and Izharul Haq No. 2” →

Intro
The Quran confirms lots of stories from the Torah and Bible, one such example is that of Idris (as), the Torah said that he physically ascended to heaven and so did the Quran (see 19:56-57). In terms of Esa (as) 4:158 corresponds directly with Mark-16:19 and proves that Esa (as) did in fact, physically ascend to heaven and then sit down next to Allah. Even the billboard at the Yuz Asaf shrine indicates the same connection. MGA was totally silent on 19:56-57 and Idris (as) aka Enoch, specifically as it had to relate to his physical ascension to heaven and his death in heaven.
Continue reading “Mark 16:19 of the Bible confirms 4:158 of the Quran” →