Search

ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Thorough research work on the Ahmadiyya Movement, #ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyat #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome

Month

October 2021

“Karamatus-Sadiqin” (1893), Quotes and background info

Intro
“Karamatus-Sadiqin” (The Miracles of the Truthful) is an Arabic-only book (with some portions in Urdu) by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and his team of writers in 1893. It was published from the Punjab Press, Sialkot, it is about 122 pages. This is from the era when Noorudin mad moved in at Qadian, and thus there were 5-6 consecutive arabic books ascribed to MGA. This is Arabic book #3. This is also the book wherein MGA argued that if anyone gives an oath, it must be taken literally, not metaphorically. This is connected to Muhammad (Saw) and his oath, when he said that Eisa (as) bin Maryam (as) would physically descend (see 4:159 and the famous hadith).

The book comprises four qasidahs (a poetic composition -639 verses) of commentary on the surah al-Fatihah in Arabic, written within a week. He then invited Maulavi Muhammad Hussain Batalvi to test his knowledge by an open competition of literary character. Maulavi Muhammad Hussain Batalvi wrote about everything in the Isha‘atus-Sunnah, no. 8, vols. 190-192.

This book seems to have been written in response to Maulavi Muhammad Hussain Batalvi’s article, in his journal, Isha‘atus-Sunnah. Batalvi told the world that MGA could barely read and write in Arabic. Lekh Ram is also mentioned in this book and Muhammadi Begum. In this video, a silly Ahmadi Maulvi talks about “Karamatus Sadiqin”.

Continue reading ““Karamatus-Sadiqin” (1893), Quotes and background info”

Mawahibur-Rahman (1903), Quotes and background information

Intro
Mawahibur-Rahman (Bounty of God) is an Arabic only book written in late 1902 and published on January 15th of 1903 by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and his team of writers (See Hidden Treasures). It is about 144 pages and was published from Qadian via the Diya’ul-Islam Press. Quotations from this book appeared in the Jan-Feb-March edition of the 1923 ROR. This book could also be spelled as Mawahib-ur-Rahman.

In 2023, it was fully translated into english by the Qadiani’s. Maulvi Sanaullah‘s visit to Qadian and his engagement with MGA is documented in this book. Syed Muhammad Hussain Batalvi is also mentioned as well as his review of the Barahin in the 1880‘s. Karam Din is also mentioned in this book. Zatalli is also mentioned herein. The Marham-i-Eisa is also mentioned.

In the 1901-1902 era, the editor of an Egyptian Journal, al-Liwa’, Mustafa Kamal Pasha (died in 1908), criticized the action of MGA in directing his followers not to get themselves vaccinated against the plague. The paper argued that such a course of action was against the teachings of the Holy Quran, which says: “And cast not yourselves into ruin with your own hands” (Al-Baqarah, verse 196).

This book also discusses the famous defamation case of Maulavi Karam Din vs. MGA.

In this book, MGA and his team of writers seem to discuss the miraculous birth of Eisa (as) and the merits therein. Noorudin had contradicted MGA as he wrote in his biography that it is not mandatory to believe that Esa (as) didn’t have a father. MGA also says that Eisa (as) had no children and nor did Yahya (as).

Zafrullah Khan tells us in his biographical book on Noorudin as follows:

“”The birth of Jesus (as) without a father had been a somewhat controversial question. Maulawi Nur-ud- Din had held the view that Jesus had a father. The Promised Messiah (as), in his book Mawahibur Rahman, announced that it was part of his doctrine that Jesus (as)
had been born without a father. On reading this Maulawi Sahib discarded his view and fell into line with the view propounded by the Promised Messiah (as). He frankly confessed this change of view in his book Nur-ud-Din.”””(see “hazratmaulvinoorudeen” by Muhammad Zafrullah Khan, 2nd edition, published in 2006, page 100).

Continue reading “Mawahibur-Rahman (1903), Quotes and background information”

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad changed his clothes barely once a week

Intro
MGA never did wudhu, nor did he bathe on Friday’s (which is Sunna). We have went through Ahmadiyya literature and fail to find example of MGA bathing or performing wudhu. We have also found a report (see in the below, reported by Mufti Muhammad Sadiq in the 1920’s)) wherein MGA was having a conversation with Shaikh Rahmatullah (who would become a Lahori-Ahmadi in 1914) wherein MGA clearly told Shaikh Rahmatullah that he only changes clothes once a week.

We also know that MGA would wear big jackets in the summer time (which is brutal in Qadian), MGA also bragged about wearing 2 yellow garments, and his excessive urination problem, you can thus visualize the lower garment being yellow, based on his urination, diabetes, dizziness, diarrhea and many others.

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad changed his clothes barely once a week”

Affaf Azhar has issued a legal notice vs. The Ahmadiyya Movement in Canada, Lal Khan Malik

Intro
Affaf Azhar has hired legal counsel via “The Law Offices of Hasnain Saeed” in Scarborough, Ontario, Canada. In this letter, it is mentioned how Lal Khan Malik, President of the Ahmadiyya Movement in Canada, published a letter of defamation about Affaf Azhar in mid September of 2021.

The story started as follows, in early 2021, Affaf Azhar was working a human rights project in Malaysia (remotely, while in Canada) and came to know about 5000 Ahmadi’s and how they were stuck in immigration camps in Malaysia and living in the worse conditions. Affaf Azhar also mentioned how 50+ Ahmadi’s had committed suicide in these conditions. She began to make videos about this and she created Whatsapp groups in an attempt to help Ahmadi’s. This caused the Ahmadiyya Movement to attack her, thus, in April of 2021, the Ahmadiyya Movement sent a letter of warning to Affaf Azhar. In this letter, she was told that her chanda would not be accepted and her status as an ahmadi was thus altered. However, Affaf Azhar had left Ahmadiyya a long time ago. Affaf Azhar seems to have attended the Durham Oshawa, Ontario Canada jamaat, it is listed on the letter. 5 months later, Lal Khan Malik sent out his infamous letter to Ahmadi’s to avoid Affaf Azhar and her human rights work.

Just yesterday, she published an official letter (see in the below) and is asking the Ahmadiyya Movement to cease and desist with their defamation. She is also asking for a letter of apology. This letter was also published on Maria Ahmad’s facebook page.

Just a few weeks ago, she interviewed on Zouq e Tanqeed youtube channel. This and other interviews with Noman Alam seem to be what triggered the Ahmadiyya Movement in Canada to act against her. You can see additional interviews of Affaf Azhar here.

Watch Noman Alam and Affaf Azhar explain how they have been told about Ahmadi girls getting raped in Malaysia, and how the Khalifa knows about it and how Ahmadi office holders in Malaysia know about it and have also joined the raping of Pakistani-Ahmadi girls in Malaysia. Noman Alam tells the world that Malaysian Ahmadi officer holders have been raping Pakistani-Ahmadi girls and passing them around. Whenever an ahmadi girl tries to complain about it, they are threatened with visa refusal and thus silenced. The Ahmadiyya Movement is complicit in all of this. Noman Alam tells how the refugee chairman for the Ahmadiyya Movement in Malaysia is Kamran ul Mulk (could also be spelled as Noman Mulk) (see at the 49:53 mark). He is not an Ahmadi, however, he has been appointed by the Ahmadiyya Movement to represent Ahmadiyya to the United Nations and other NGO’s. He has totally made a business out of refugee’s and etc. Noman Alam explains how Kamran is working in cahootz with the leadership of the Ahmadiyya Movement in Malaysia and has made lots of money through his consulting services.

Noman Alam and Affaf Azhar explain how over the past 10 years, the Khalifa, Mirza Masroor Ahmad had told Pakistani-Ahmadis to leave Pakistan and get visit visa’s to Malaysia and many other places (unofficially). This has caused roughly 5000 Pakistani-Ahmadi’s to be stuck in Malaysia in 2021. In fact, their lives have been destroyed by the Ahmadiyya Movement, they have been living in extreme poverty, their daughters have been raped, and they still have to give chanda. Recently, Affaf Azhar and Noman Alam did a video program with Zouq e Tanqeed youtube channel. In this video, they explained how Ahmadi’s are stuck in Malaysia, along with 5000 Pakistani Christians and Atheists. Affaf Azhar is an ex-Ahmadi (and a free thinker), the host of this program is a Christian. It was this video and other work that Affaf has done which has caused the Ahmadiyya Movement in Canada to openly attack her via an official letter.

You can read the full history of Ahmadiyya in Malaysia herein. In 2016 and 2017, the Pakistani Christian community of Canada had a huge public spat with Ahmadiyya, see herein. It should be noted that in 2018, the Malaysian government officially told the Ahmadiyya Movement of Pakistan to stop sending #Ahmadis to Malaysia.

Continue reading “Affaf Azhar has issued a legal notice vs. The Ahmadiyya Movement in Canada, Lal Khan Malik”

Per Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, the Quran left in 1857 and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad brought it back

Intro
In Aug-2025, Bro Imtiaz explained this in detail (see 43:19). Allah told us in the Quran that he will make sure it is preserved (see 15:9, 15:10 in the Kadiani Koran).

In 1891, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed that the Quran left earth in 1857, as Muslim soldiers rebelled against British rule in India. In Izala Auham, MGA quoted 23:18 (23:19 in the Ahmadi Quran), the second half of it. “””and surely it is We Who determine its taking away””, MGA claimed that this verse equals 1274. In some type of weird mathematical method (see Izala-e-Auham, p. 657, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 3, p. 455), MGA connects this to 1857, MGA also connected 62:3 with this. Ironically, ahmadi scholars haven’t connected 23:18 (23:19 in the Ahmadi Quran) to the return of Muhammad in the 14th century as the messiah. Nevertheless, MGA goes on to quote 61:9, and claims that this verse related to himself, the Messiah, son of Mary, of the time. Thus, MGA denied that Allah would preserve the Quran.

Per the research of Damon Stengel (and confirmed by AFCB), in 1906-1907 (via Haqiqatul Wahi, online English edition, page 798), Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was claiming to have brought a Zilli-Quran. This is in the Arabic portion of the book and thus, the original wording is in Arabic. In Arabic, MGA and his team wrote, “wawallah linah zilloo fasahat alquran”.

This gives us another piece of info to connect to MGA bringing a new Quran (Kitab ul Mubeen, the clear book), after the Quran left in 1857. In 1880-1882, via Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya-3 (see page 97), MGA quoted 5:15 (5:16 in the Qadiani Quran) and tried to explain how divine light descends on prophets via wahi/ilham, this was in references to “Kitab ul Mubeen”. In the same era, MGA was claiming that the “Kitab-Ullah” are the words of his (MGA’s) mouth, 20 years later, in roughly 1907, MGA said that this was Allah’s mouth.

In the 1990’s, Mirza Tahir Ahmad said that the “Promised Messiah”, will be revealed the Quran again (see the clip on TikTok and Twitter)(See Bro Imtiaz explaining this at 3:36:40), this is per 3:81 of the Quran (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran). Mirza Tahir Ahmad says that the Quran will again descend (nazul) on the Messiah, and the Messiah has never heard of it. Mirza Tahir Ahmad also said that Messiah will become “Shareek” with Muhammad (Saw)(naozobillah) in this regard.

Continue reading “Per Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, the Quran left in 1857 and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad brought it back”

The “islam after Ahmadiyya” youtube channel

Intro
In roughly 2014-2015, an ex-ahmadi and his wife ran this youtube channel named, “islam after Ahmadiyya”. Archived.

Continue reading “The “islam after Ahmadiyya” youtube channel”

Is the Ahmadiyya Jamaat responsible for bad Ahmadi’s??

Intro
We often hear comments from apologists claiming things like:

  1. It’s the people, not the Jamaat.

  2. If your parents are bad, it’s them, not the Jamaat (recent link).

  3. If your marriage went bad, it was your partner, not the Jamaat.

  4. If a Jamaat official acted despicable, it was them, not the Jamaat.

All of these are presented in attempts to separate Jamaat from ethical and moral issues. I find that deeply problematic. Religion insists on providing a superior moral compass. RationalReligion.co.uk is filled with such articles and Murabbi Farhan Iqbal sahab (u/farhaniqbal1) has even written a book (link) reportedly arguing against some supposed notion of atheist morality.

Let’s deconstruct how Mirza Tahir Ahmed sahab discussed morality:

“””The vacuum created by the non-existence of God is suddenly filled by man’s ego. It is a very naive and extremely ignorant philosophy … Ego, selfishness and the total commitment to serve one’s own ends grow stronger and all-powerful.

Societies, which are built with the bricks of such individuals, always remain egoistic and self-oriented. There is no logic left in being beneficial to others without an ulterior motive. There is no external reference point left in the form of a beneficent God, who is the only binding and meeting point of all forms of creation.” ( “Islam’s Response to Contemporary Issues”, passage taken from article link)”””

We can clearly see that Mirza Tahir Ahmed sahab begins by blaming atheism for personal moral corruption and extends it outwards to the moral depravity of entire societies. If nothing else, this shows that Mirza Tahir Ahmed sahab believed atheism to be a powerful idea that changes the individual who holds onto it and has a powerful, directly observable effect.

If atheism has such a powerful effect, why does the highly organized Ahmadiyya Jamaat not have even a comparable effect? Why should Jamaat not take responsibility of the moral ineptitudes and behavioral issues of it’s members? Isn’t a purpose of religion exactly improving it’s subscriber’s moral condition (as can be read in several books in Ruhani Khazain)?

So my dear Ahmadi apologist friend, while most people on this sub do not blame Ahmadiyyat for most of the personal trauma they face at the hands of Ahmadis, that does not imply an automatic superiority of Ahmadiyyat. It rather indicates the futility of Ahmadiyya morality in the view of exAhmadis.

If we change lens to religious instead, Ahmadiyyat is fully at blame, fully responsible where believers (including both high frequency practicing and low frequency practicing) misbehave. The behavior of individuals is indicative of the potency and persuasion of the moral framework (which is so frequently criticized, in the case of atheism, by Ahmadi writers. Like this one by Athar Warraich at Rational Religion, link). If anything, Ahmadi writers would do well to abandon such arguments like exAhmadis abandoned them.

Continue reading “Is the Ahmadiyya Jamaat responsible for bad Ahmadi’s??”

The Shams ud Din Challenge (2021)

Intro
Our brother, Shams ud Din has the Ahmadiyya Jamaat worried. They already told his cousin, Yahya Khan (the pharmacist) that he must start an open war with him. This has been going for 2-3 years. Recently, Shams ud Din seems to have posted 3 questions as a challenge to Ahmadi’s. Shams ud Din’s cousin, Yahya Khan wasted over 10 hours of video discussing terms of a debate that he doesn’t want to have. Yahya Khan should have simply given the answers to these questions. However, he is being told what to do from behind a curtain, the Ahmadiyya Jamaat is in-fact telling him what to do. The issue is that MGA quoted 23:50 in terms of Yuz Asaf= Eisa (as), and thus, told a huge lie. There are no hadith about 23:50 or any additional corroborating info from any islamic source that connects 23:50 with Yuz Asaf. 

Continue reading “The Shams ud Din Challenge (2021)”

My first ever video on Zaitoon FM

Intro
About 14 months ago, I did my first interview on Zaitoon FM, you see the tik tok clip herein. The full video can be found herein too.

Continue reading “My first ever video on Zaitoon FM”

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑