Intro
In 1900-1901, MGA and his team of writers began asserting that MGA=Muhammad (saw)(Nauzobillah). This happened in “Khutbah ilhamiya” (published in November 1901) and “Correction of an Error” (published in November 1901). In “Correction of an Error”, MGA even quotes 62:3 (62:4) and thus claimed to be the second coming of Muhammad (Saw)(nauzobillah). After the split of 1914, the Lahori-Ahmadi’s rejected MGA’s claim of prophethood and all the parallels that he made to Muhammad (saw). In the below, we have found yet another quotation from the infamous book, “Kalimat ul Fasl” (1916) wherein MGA is described as on equal footing with Muhammad (Saw) (naozobillah). However, this is what the Qadiani-Ahmadis believed. There are many other instances from this era which prove my assertion. This was also explained in this video.
1. Zaheeruddin was claiming that MGA was a law-bearing prophet in 1911.
2. MGA abrogated jihad in 1900 and was thus a law-bearing prophet (see Nuzhat haneef).
3. MGA=Muhammad and vice versa
4. MGA was the person allah spoke about in the famous “Ismuhu-Ahmad” verse of the Quran.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________The Quote
(Kalimat-ul-Fasl , P. 113, by Mirza Basheer Ahmad Qadiani)(1916)
“Every messenger was granted accomplishments and perfections according to his capacity and performance in varying degrees, but the Promised Messiah (Mirza Ghulam) was granted prophethood when he had attained all the accomplishments of the Prophethood of Muhammad(SAW) and was qualified to be called a shadow prophet. Thus, this shadow prophethood did not make the steps of the Promised Messiah lag behind, but it pushed them forward to such an extent that it brought him on equal footing with the holy Prophet(SAW).”
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Some additional quotes from this era, and from Ahmadis
1. “His messengers (rusuluhu) is encountered in the Quran or in a declaration of faith, Ghulam Ahmad must be considered one of them. Belief in him is a part of Islamic faith and is, as such, necessary for the attainment of salvation (madar-i najat)” (“Nabi-ullah Ka Zahoor” aka “Appearance of the Prophet of Allah” (1911) by Muhammad Zahir al-Din, see pages 8, 71 and 99)(From Friedman, page 152, 2003 edition).
2. “If the Promised Messiah is rejected or considered in his claim (heaven forbid!) a liar and a cheat—the inevitable result will be the loss of prophethood of Muhammad….as well” (“Nabi-ullah Ka Zahoor”: aka “Appearance of the Prophet of Allah” (1911) by Muhammad Zahir al-Din, see page 80)(From Friedman, page 152, 2003 edition).
______________________________________________________________________________________________1901, from Khutbah Ilhamia
Khutbah-e-Ilhamiah, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 16, P. 271-272; Khutbah-e-Ilhamiah, P. 181
“One who denies that the mission of the Prophet(SAW) is related to the 6th thousand (13th century) as it was related to 5th thousand (6th century), denies the truth and the text of the Quran and is among the zalemeen (gone astray). The truth is that the spiritual power of the holy Prophet(SAW) at the end of the 6th thousand (13th century in Mirza Ghulam), i.e. these days, is MUCH STRONGER, MORE COMPLETE and STRONGER than in THOSE EARLY YEARS . Nay, it is like the fourteenth (moonlit) night (full moon).”
1901, from Khutbah Ilhamia
“And Allah sent down upon me the bounty of the Holy Prophet and made it perfect; and he drew towards me the kindness and generosity of the merciful Prophet, so that I became one with him. Thus, he who joins my group, joins the group of the companions (Sahaba) of my Leader, the best of messengers. It is not hidden from those who have the ability to think that this is what the words “Akhareen Menhom” (others of them) mean. The person who makes a difference between me and the Mustafa has neither seen me nor recognized me.” Khutba-e-Ilhamiah, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 16, P. 258 – 259.
The scan work
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1904
Urdu-ROR, page 105
Listen to Dr. Syed Holy Spirit explain it herein (40:21 mark). In this scan, Ahmadi’s say MGA is Muhammad (saw)(naozobillah).
Scan
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1906
–He is hired as an editor of the Al-Badr by Mufti Muhammad Sadiq (who had just became the editor). He is paid 15 rupees per month and moves to Qadian. He was offered the same deal by the editor of the Al-Hakam, Shaikh Yacub Ali Irfani, however, he turned it down, citing a conflict of interest.
–He then writes some poetry wherein he calls MGA as greater than Muhammad (saw)(Naozobillah), it gets published in the Ahmadiyya newspaper Al-Badr (See the 1974 NA proceedings page 785 (pdf page 410) and the Al-Badr of Oct. 25th, 1906. The poem is as follows:
Urdu:
“Mohammad phir uttar aaye hain hum main
Aagay say hain barah kar apni shaan main”
English:
“Muhammad has appeared among us again,
He is in greater glory than before.”
Scan work of Al-Badr
PDF of Al-Badr, Oct. 25, 1906
Albadr 25 Oct 1906[1947]
(See the Al-Badr issue of October 25, 1906 and ‘Kya Maulvi Muhammad Ali Sahib Sarasar Ghalt Aur Baybuniyad Ilzam Wapas Lain Gay?’ published in August 13, 1944 issue of Al-Fazl).
Scan from 1944
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1914
In October of 1914, After Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad became Khalifa (march 1914), his writers and editors began to write articles in the English ROR claiming that Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad was the Musleh Maud. They also admitted that in Khutbah ilhamiya, MGA asserted that he was the same very Muhammad that had came many years ago.
______________________________________________________________________________________________1915
“The entity of the promised Masih (Mirza), in the sight of Allah is the entity of the Holy Prophet (SAW). In other words, in the records of Allah there is no duality or difference between the promised Masih and the Holy Prophet (SAW). Rather they both share the same eminence, the same rank, the same status and the same name . …”. (Al-Fazl, Qadian, vol.3, No.37, dated 16th September 1915, as cited in Qadiani Mazhab page 207, 9th edition, Lahore)
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1942
Ibn Hazam is mentioned in the ROR of Jan-1942, MGA claimed in Malfuzat that Ibn Hazam claimed to have become Muhammad (Saw) (naozobilah), and MGA was claiming that same.
MGA argues that anyone can become like Muhammad (Saw) (astagfarullah).
The ROR of Feb-1942 reports that Maulana Zillur Rahman gave a speech on Jan-11-1942 in terms of the second coming of Muhammad (Saw)(astagfarullah) at the Ochterloney Monument at the Calcutta Maidan. He said that the second coming of Muhammad (Saw)(astagfarullah) was to be more comprehensive and more extensive from the point of view of propagation of Islam than his first advent. He also said that if the people of Bengal would repent and become Ahmadi, maybe the impending Japanese invasion would be avoided.
______________________________________________________________________________________________Links and Related Essays
http://wiki.qern.org/ha-walters-the-ahmadiya-movement/chapter-ii-2-the-distinctive-claims-of-ahmad—the-expected-mahdi
Noorudin didn’t care if Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed even law-bearing prophethood
Click to access splitahmadiyyamovement.pdf
“Islami Qurbani” by Qazi Yar Mohammed (1920) Printed at Riaz-e-hind Press, Amritsar, District KANGRA
http://wiki.qern.org/ahmadiyya/organisations/qadiani-claimants/abdullah-timapuri
The Causes of Internal Dissensions in the Ahmadiyya Movement, By Khwaja Kamaluddin, 1914
Maulvi Abdul Karim claims Prophethood per MGA, Maulvi Amrohi disagrees
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/13/what-is-arbain-a-book-by-mga-and-his-team-of-writers/
In 1891, when MGA made his big claims, he denied prophethood–Mufti Sadiq was heavily involved
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was accused of claiming prophethood in the 1879–1884 era
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was considered a Kafir in 1884, before his wildest claims
Some rare books from the 1901-1902 era, which refute MGA’s claim to prophethood
Maulvi Sanuallah acknowledges that MGA claimed prophethood in Nov 1901
Mirza Sultan Ahmad, Son Of Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, On Finality Of Prophethood
“Eik Ghalti Ka Izala” aka “Correction of an Error” was re-published on March-1-1914
A few months after becoming Khalifa, Mirza Mahmud Ahmad waffled on his father’s prophethood
MGA explains how he misunderstood his prophethood in 1880 and was confused for 20+ years
Noorudin didn’t care if Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed even law-bearing prophethood
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam
6 Pingback