Intro
At 2:34:44, Bro Imtiaz explains how MGA called Saadullah as a “Mohannas”.
As soon as MGA made his wild claims of Messiah-ship in late 1890, many Muslims came forward and challenged MGA to debates and etc. Maulvi Sa’dullah was one such Muslim he was a convert to Islam from Hinduism and worked as the school master at the Christian Mission School at Ludhiana. Ahmadiyya sources claim that MGA made a prophecy about Sa’dullah in a book called “Anwar-ul-Islam” (Urdu) which was published in 1894, 3 years after MGA had his initial altercation with Sa’dullah.
In 1897, MGA wrote some poetry vs. Sa’dullah to the effect that God should make a decision between them, he also called Sa’dullah as the son of prostitutes (Ibn Bagha). Adnan Rashid discussed this also (Check out Part-2 herein [“Zarrayatul baghaya” and “Waladul Haraam” are discussed] and on the Dawah wise channel).
In Feb-1907, After Sa‘dullah of Ludhiana died (he died in Jan-1907), MGA mentioned him in the Al-Hakam, vol. 11, no. 7, p. 12, dated 24 February 1907 (See also Malfuzat-9, online English edition, pages 146-148). MGA and his team of writers quoted MGA’s poem from Anjam e Athim wherein Sa‘dullah of Ludhiana was referred to as “ibn bagha” (son of zina). In this utterance, MGA alleges that Sa‘dullah of Ludhiana had indirectly entered a Mubahila with MGA which caused Sa‘dullah of Ludhiana to die 10 years later. In Dec-2025, Maulvi Razi alleged (24:20 time stamp) that MGA wrote that when he used “ibn bagha” for Sa‘dullah of Ludhiana in 1898, MGA meant “sarkash insan”. In 2023, here razi claims mga translated “ibn e baghay” as “sarkash insan” (9:33 timestamp).
As Haqiqatul Wahi was published (May-1907), MGA claimed that Sa’dullah died of plague and mubahila. MGA also purposely left out his poetry wherein he called Sa’dullah as the son of prostitutes (ibn Bagha)(See page 446 and 450 of the Appendix of Haqeeqat-ul-Wahi (RK- 22, Urdu) and see pages, 554, 559 and 564 of the English edition). Mirza Bashir Ahmad claims that Muhammad Ali advised MGA to leave this out, in fear of legal recourse, i.e. the son of Sa’dullah might have sued for defamation. Dard tells us it was Khwaja Kamal-ud-Din and not Muhammad Ali however (See the al-Hakam, volume 38, number 7, February 28, 1935, pages 3–4, narrating the eye-witness accounts of Maulavi Muhammad Ibrahim Baqapuri, via the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah and via Seeratul Mehdi, page 31 part 1).
On Nov-10-1907, MGA and his team of writers published an announcement in the Al-Hakam and Al-Badr of Nov-10-1907 (See the scans in the below)(Via Majmua Ishtiharat, V-3, pages 461-467). Bro Imtiaz explained it in full detail herein (1:19:40). This announcement is about Maulvi Sanaullah, the death of Mirza Mubarak Ahmad and a new promised son (Musleh Maud?). In this announcement, MGA says that people are showing happiness at the death of Mirza Mubarak Ahmad. MGA says that people are saying that the death of Mirza Mubarak Ahmad is a sign that MGA lost a Mubahila (with Abdul Hakim Patialvi and Maulvi Sanaullah).
However, by 1935, Mirza Bashir Ahmad said: The lawyer was Khwajah Kamal-ud-Din. In al-Hakam, volume 38, number 7, February 28, 1935, pages 3–4, narrating the eye-witness accounts of Maulvi Muhammad Ibrahim Baqapuri (see the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah). Sa’dullah is also mentioned in the ROR of March-1935.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________1894
Maulvi Sa’dullah writes a book vs. MGA entitled: “Shahab-e-Thaqib bar Masih-e-Kadhib” which means that “Fire shall descend upon this false Messiah”. MGA claims that this book was written 4 years before MGA (there is a small math issue here) predicted Sa’dullah’s death (1897) (see Haqiqatul Wahy, online english edition, page 555).
Some quotes from poems in “Shahab-e-Thaqib bar Masih-e-Kadhib”
See Life of Ahmad, online english edition, page 431, Ahmadi sources tell us Mir Nasir Nawab published a response to Maulvi Sa’dullah (see Dard)
‘Listen, O prophet of Qadian, accursed, shameless and Satan incarnate Just as a Qalandar makes his bear dance by repeating to it the words,
“May thy grannie die”, we are now determined to make you dance a similar dance.’
Again:
There have been many immodest and shameless persons in the world, but your shamelessness has surpassed all. It will be very difficult for you to save your beard, head and moustache, for the barber must now shave you clean.”
Again :
MGA quoted this book in Haqiqatul Wahy, see pages 556-558
This is from a poem that Sa’dullah wrote vs. MGA in persian, Sa’dullah quoted 69:45 of the Quran also:
“”””The translation of these verses—which he addresses to me in his book—is the following:
It has been ordained by God that He would seize you and cut your jugular vein and then, after your death, this, your false Movement, will be destroyed. And although you people say that
trials do indeed come, on the Day of Judgment and even in this world you will die a death of loss and frustration.
If he had falsely attributed even a trivial statement to Us (al-Haqqah, 69:45).
You will suffer humiliation everywhere and there is no honour for you here or in the Hereafter.
Sa’dullah wrote additional poetry in his book, and MGA quoted it
Sa’dullah called these as supplicatory couplets as”Qadiul-Hajat” in english as “The Provider of all Needs”:
“””O my Self-Sufficient Lord! You bestowed upon me the darlings of my heart,
But some of them you snatched back.
God my Lord! Grant me a better substitute, and help me, by Your grace,
to eradicate worries and distress.
O my Gracious Lord! Each one of my wives and children is the delight of my eyes.
My heart is full of acute pain and grief,
On account of the death of my dear ones!””””
Ahmadiyya sources claim that MGA made a prophecy to the effect that Sa’dullah’s lineage will be child less
In typical MGA fashion, Ahmadiyya sources claim that in 1894, MGA made a prophecy to the effect that Sa’dullah’s lineage will be cut off. However, in Islam this is not proper. In fact, the lineage of Muhammad (saw) was purposely cut off. Thus, MGA and his team are out of line making such an assertion.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________1893-May, in MGA’s book, “Sachai Ka Izar” or “The Truth Revealed” in english
In this book, MGA wrote Maulvi Sa’dullah’s name and invited him for Mubahila (see page 20).
______________________________________________________________________________________________
The Quote from Anwar ul Islam (1894)
In Haqiqatul Wahy, MGA lists this prophecy as sign #167 of his truth. He quotes Anwar ul Islam as follows:
[Surely, it is your enemy who is without issue.]
This ilham of MGA is actually a quranic verse, 108:3. However, this alleged ilham is not specific to anyone. The Ahmadiyya team of editors is guilty of lying to the masses. The keyword here is “abtar” which MGA made a point of in Haqiqatul Wahy. The original verse, as given to Muhammad (saw) is properly elucidated here.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ In 1894, Sa’dullah already had a son ages 15-16
Per Ahmadiyya sources, Sa’dullah already had a son, thus this entire prophecy is fake (see Haqiqatul Wahy). By 1907, when Sa’dullah died, this son was 28-29 years old. He was Sa’dullah’s only son, per Ahmadiyya sources. MGA claims that Sa’dullah’s only son has yet to have had a child, thus, this prophecy is fulfilled. However, he was only 28-29 years old. MGA goes on to assert that Sa’dullah’s son is unmarried and thus there is something very wrong about this entire scenario.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Dard tells us that Sa’ dullah’s son died in 1927 without children
“”Sa‘dullah’s son lived for about 20 years after him; he was married and his wife outlived
him but he died without issue, on 12-7-1926 at Koom Kalan (Ludhiana).”” (see Dard). We seriously doubt this report.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________1897, poetry vs. Sa’dullah in Anjam-e-Athim, MGA called him the son of a prostitute
In typical MGA fashion, he continued his tirade vs. Sa’dullah.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1897
Siraj-e-Munir
See page 15
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1907
Feb-1907
Al-Hakam, vol. 11, no. 7, p. 12, dated 24 February 1907
Malfuzat-9, online English edition, pages 146-148
Malfuzat-Urdu
Al-Hakam, vol. 11, no. 7, p. 12, dated 24 February 1907
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Al-Hakam-vol.-11-no.-7-p.-12-dated-24-February-1907.pdf
In Feb-1907, After Sa‘dullah of Ludhiana died (he died in Jan-1907), MGA mentioned him in the Al-Hakam, vol. 11, no. 7, p. 12, dated 24 February 1907 (See also Malfuzat-9, online English edition, pages 146-148). MGA and his team of writers quoted MGA’s poem from Anjam e Athim wherein Sa‘dullah of Ludhiana was referred to as “ibn bagha” (son of zina). In this utterance, MGA alleges that Sa‘dullah of Ludhiana had indirectly entered a Mubahila with MGA which caused Sa‘dullah of Ludhiana to die 10 years later. In Dec-2025, Maulvi Razi alleged (24:20 time stamp) that MGA wrote that when he used “ibn bagha” for Sa‘dullah of Ludhiana in 1898, MGA meant “sarkash insan”. In 2023, here razi claims mga translated “ibn e baghay” as “sarkash insan” (9:33 timestamp).
As Haqiqatul Wahi was published (May-1907), MGA claimed that Sa’dullah died of plague and mubahila. MGA also purposely left out his poetry wherein he called Sa’dullah as the son of prostitutes (ibn Bagha)(See page 446 and 450 of the Appendix of Haqeeqat-ul-Wahi (RK- 22, Urdu) and see pages, 554, 559 and 564 of the English edition). Mirza Bashir Ahmad claims that Muhammad Ali advised MGA to leave this out, in fear of legal recourse, i.e. the son of Sa’dullah might have sued for defamation. Dard tells us it was Khwaja Kamal-ud-Din and not Muhammad Ali however (See the al-Hakam, volume 38, number 7, February 28, 1935, pages 3–4, narrating the eye-witness accounts of Maulavi Muhammad Ibrahim Baqapuri, via the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah and via Seeratul Mehdi, page 31 part 1).
_____________________________________________________________________________________________1907-–Haqiqatul Wahy
MGA quotes his poetry from 1897, however, he purposely leaves out the lines wherein he calls Sa’dullah the son of a prostitute (Ibn Bagha). Mirza Bashir Ahmad blamed Muhammad Ali.
MGA also mentions Sa’dullah as Sign#188 in Haqiqatul Wahy
Just a few pages after mentioning the idea that Sa’dullah’s lineage had been cut off, MGA goes on to assert that Sa’dullah’s death was even predicted by MGA himself. MGA calls Sa’dullah as Munshi Sa‘dullah of Ludhiana. MGA was claiming that he published an announcement about the death prophecy vs. Sa’dullah, however, no such announcement exists, he also claims that Sa’dullah verbally cussed at MGA and slandered him and predicted MGA’s death, however, none of that data has ever been seen.
Muhammad Ali advised MGA to leave out the Ibn Bagha and other quotes out of Haqiqatul Wahy, MGA also mentions this in HW. However, by 1935, Mirza Bashir Ahmad said: The lawyer was Khwajah Kamal-ud-Din. In al-Hakam, volume 38, number 7, February 28, 1935, pages 3–4, narrating the eye-witness accounts of Maulavi Muhammad Ibrahim Baqapuri (see the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah).
Seeratul Mehdi, page 31 part 1.
(42) stated to me by shaikh Abdurehman misri that once Hazrat sb (MGAQ) kept sitting after zuhur prayer in masjid of qadiyan…an. Few days ago hazrat sb has written that Saadullah will remain without progeny. His son that is alive today, is impotent, will surely not be able to take his name ahead. This humble self says that saadullah was worst enemy of hazrat sb and used to talk bad against him. But before publishing this ” ishtihar” molvi Muhammad Ali advised hazrat sb that publishing such ishtihar would be against law. He said if Saadullah filed a suit in the court we would not be in a position to prove impotency of his son. Hazrat sb did not agree, when molvi Muhammad Ali insisted on his advise, hazrat sb,s face turned red he got infuriated and said “when a prophet gets himself armed and comes to battle field, he does not disarm him”.
The scan
______________________________________________________________________________________________1907
Nov 5–10th
https://www.youtube.com/live/DfhILeVkb64?si=2NLeWq3Ma9XeG5_G
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2025/07/24/mirza-ghulam-ahmads-announcement-of-nov-5-1907-is-about-sanaullah-the-death-of-mirza-mubarak-ahmad-the-prophecy-vs-abdul-hakim-khan-patialvi-and-a-new-promised-son/
On Nov-10-1907, MGA and his team of writers published an announcement in the Al-Hakam and Al-Badr of Nov-10-1907 (See the scans in the below)(Via Majmua Ishtiharat, V-3, pages 461-467). Bro Imtiaz explained it in full detail herein (1:19:40). This announcement is about Maulvi Sanaullah, the death of Mirza Mubarak Ahmad and a new promised son (Musleh Maud?).
In this announcement, MGA says that people are showing happiness at the death of Mirza Mubarak Ahmad. MGA says that people are saying that the death of Mirza Mubarak Ahmad is a sign that MGA lost a Mubahila (with Abdul Hakim Patialvi and Maulvi Sanaullah). MGA and his team of writers tell a bold face lie and allege that MGA has tried to make the children of his opponents as signs of truth (1:22:09). However, this is a lie, in Jan-1907, a Muslim opponent of MGA named Saadullah died and MGA had prophecied that he not have children. In 1906-1907, via “Haqiqatul Wahi”, MGA mentions Abdul-Haqq Ghaznavi 6 times (see pages 306-307). MGA specifically under sign #92, and sign #159 (page 444). MGA alleges that Maulawi Abdul Haqq Ghaznavi had no children and thus lost the Mubahila (see page 445). MGA alleged that Maulawi Abdul Haqq Ghaznavi‘s brother died and he married the widow and she is now pregnant. MGA argues that in contrast, he was given 4 sons and hundreds of thousands of rupees (page 551).
Also in this announcement, MGA alleges that he knew 2-3 years ago (1904-1905 era)(Kayn Burse) that Mirza Mubarak Ahmad would die young (1:25:09). MGA then alleges that he has already announced that this child would not survive. MGA also alleges that when his God told him that Mirza Mubarak Ahmad would die, MGA’s God also said that those will be bitter days in his life (like sad and shameful)(1:26:18). MGA alleges, besides these, there were many additional revelations which were explicit/clear/open about the impending death of Mirza Mubarak Ahmad. MGA alleges that many years ago he predicted the death of Mirza Mubarak Ahmad in newspapers like Al-Badr and Al-Hakam. These prophecies were clear and without a shadow of doubt that Mirza Mubarak Ahmad would not reach the age of adulthood and would die as a minor (it was destined, muqarram).
Also in this announcement, MGA alleges (via Bro Imtiaz, 2:31:52) that when Mirza Mubarak Ahmad died (9-16-1907), MGA’s god sent him another fresh revelation about a boy who will be just like Mirza Mubarak Ahmad, a replica. This was because MGA’s God didn’t want his enemies to be happy, and it will be as-if Mirza Mubarak Ahmad never died. However, MGA died himself about 8 months later. MGA then says that his God will make his children a very powerful people (2:39:10).
Also in this announcement, MGA mentions the prophecy vs. Dr. Abdul-Hakim Khan (from Patiala)(via Bro Imtiaz, 2:42:29) and how it started in July 1907 and was for 14 months (scheduled to end in Sep-1908). MGA says that his life will be prolonged, and he will win (see the “Age Prophecy“). MGA told Ahmadi’s to memorize and print this announcement (2:49:37) and post it on their walls. MGA also says that he knows the deaths of his close relatives (bahot qareeb mutalaqeen 2:52:34) is nearing.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1922
In the Khalifa’s book, “”A Present to His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales””, the Khalifa mentions how the son of Maulvi Sa’dullah still has no children. However, this is unverified and thus dubious.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1935
He is mentioned in the ROR of March-1935, his insulting poetry vs. MGA is quoted.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1945
Maulvi Farzand Ali (aka Khan Sahib M. Farzand Ali) has an essay in the ROR of Oct-1945, this essay was about Maulvi Sa’adullah or Saadullah or Sa’dullah of Ludhiana.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ Links and Related Essays
The “Zarrayatul baghaya” insult by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was meant for Muslims
Who is Maulvi Farzand Ali? – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
Click to access A-Present-to-His-Royal-Highness.pdf
Click to access The-Truth-Revealed.pdf
Click to access Haqiqatul-Wahi.pdf
https://www.alislam.org/library/book/truth-about-ahmadiyyat/opponents-promised-messiah/
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/15/mirza-ghulam-ahmads-debate-with-batalvi-summer-of-1891-was-stopped-by-the-british-govt-on-mgas-behalf/
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/05/28/nurul-haqq-part-1-quotes-and-background-data/
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/02/20/hani-tahir-describes-mirza-ghulam-ahmads-vulgar-writings/
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam
18 Pingback