ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was not capable of reading (since he was blind by age 40-50) and writing (since his right arm was broken), nor was he capable of leading prayers (salaat), he never led a Khutbah Juma or an Eid Khutbah (a few times, after the main Eid speech, MGA made comments, these were mostly unintelligible ramblings, which were edited and created into books). His main ghost writer and manager was Noorudin, who was a capable imam, Noorudin was a member of the Ahl-e-Hadith and his followers of his own before he met MGA. Another Ahl-e-hadith imam that MGA hired was Syed Muhammad Ahsan Amrohi, who moved to Qadian in 1891, he edited most of MGA’s books and newspapers, he was not a student of Noorudin, however, he knew MGA from MGA’s relationship with the Ahl-e-Hadith imam’s of Bhopal. Maulvi Abdul Karim was a student of Noorudin and he was at Ludhiana for the bait ceremony of 1889, he moved to Qadian in 1890-1891 and became the main imam at Masjid Mubarak and Masjid Aqsa. Mufti Muhammad Sadiq was another inside man, he worked in the letters department and became the editor of the Al-Badr in 1905, when the owner died of plague. Another inside worker was MIrza Khuda Bakhsh, another pupil of Noorudin. The final point is that all of these “insiders” lived together in MGA’s house, they were thus able to plan the mission of Ahmadiyya, while MGA did nothing all day. Here are some additional names of the main ghost writing team, Maulvi Abdul Karim, Maulvi Mufti Muhammad Sadiq, Maulvi Sher Ali and Hakim Fazl Din of Bhera. Some other people who came independently, yet still joined MGA’s team was Maulvi Muhammad Ahsan Amrohi.

Also read about how “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and his team of writers got the sahaba wrong in “Jesus in India”.
Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and his team of writers/readers/editors/researchers/imams” →

Intro
MGA, his close family left Qadian for Lahore on 27th April 1908 and arrived in Lahore on the 29th. This was the first time that MGA had left Qadian since November of 1905. This was summer and the plague wasn’t raging as it had been in the winters of 1902–1908. Noorudin, Syed Muhammad Ahsan Amrohi and Mufti Muhammad Sadiq came a few days later, in fact, the entire office of the Al-Badr was also moved to Lahore. MGA’s entourage arrived at Ahmadiyya Buildings, which was owned by Dr. Syed Muhammad Hussain Shah, on the 29th of April, 1908, MGA and his family, (wife, 2 sons, 2 daughters, many attendants). Initially, he was staying at the house of Khwaja Kamaluddin (also on the property of Dr. Hussain), however, after just a few days, MGA moved to a different house of Dr. Syed Muhammad Hussain, this happened most likely because the women didn’t get along with each other. Nevertheless, congregational prayers (led by someone other than MGA) would be offered on the rooftop of Khawaja Sahib’s (Aziz building) house. During the first few days, MGA and his family leisured around the house and etc. There was a narrow lane between two-houses and they were linked thru a wooden bridge at the upper part. When MGA and his family moved out, while Molvi Nuruddin and Ahsan Amrohi and other Mullahs remained at Aziz building. It is reported in Badr, 30th April 1908 (p. 6), that an Eid Milad-un-Nabi function was held at Ahmadiyya Buildings, Lahore, on 14th April. Noorudin led the Eid Khutbah, as he normally did. MGA received many visitors, in the next 30-40 days. On the evening of May 25th, 1908 (Sunday), MGA went out for a small sight-seeing adventure with his wife only, no kids. As soon as MGA returned and had dinner, he had an attack of diarrhea.
Continue reading “The death of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad from Ahmadi sources” →

Intro
Dear readers, we have come across the testimony of a young Ahmadi girl from the UK wherein she explains how she was sexually assaulted at the Khailun-lir-Rahman riding club, which is at the Ahmadiyya property in Islamabad, Farnham a small town in Surrey. She claims that she was sexually assaulted by the horse-riding teacher, who is an Ahmadi for 2 years. She came out to the police and the case has been under investigation for about a year now. In that period, a number of other girls from the Jamaat have also come forward to speak about their experiences of abuse with the same instructor. The official website for this school has been shut down, it was https://khailul.rehman.club/. Instagram page – Khail.ul.rehman.club – or email them on khail.ul.rehman.club@gmail.com. This is nothing new from the Mirza family, even Bashir Ahmad Misri accused Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud of sexual assault in Qadian, which led to an Ahmadi murdering Fakhr-ud-Din Multani in 1937. Such incidents have been rampant in Rabwah as well where minors have been assaulted by khuddam etc etc. But jamaat there brushes it under very well.nor do People dare to speak about it because it’s a taboo ironically whilst under the observation and knowledge of Amoomi, but in highly complex and Conservative societies In the Subcontinent such things are still taboo despite lots of Effort by State and Social activists to highlight the wrath of innocent minors subject to thirst of Sexually Frustrated, Perverts who have Usually been abused in their past by someone.

Well almost a year ago they did Nab a Food vendor who was caught red handed luring a minor girl into maintaining intimate relationship, filmed the acts and blackmailed her in return for sexual favours and money even then he later had a breaking when she maybe chose to speak he upload their Videos on all major porn hosting websites (Yes this happened in Rabwah) The girls family Brought in civil administration police and Everything but Jamaat wanted to mask their Respect so they held the guy in their captivity

Connecting the threads to subcontinent and Punjabi society angle is very relevant in such Problems because they form the basis of why such heinous crimes don’t surface (Even Jamaat and its people are a My friend Leave no stone Unturned make sure this gets heard. Mirza Nasir had advised Ahmadi’s to buy horses in anticipation of WW-3, see herein.

Continue reading “Sexual Abuse at the Ahmadi owned Khailun-lir-Rahman riding club in Farnham, Tilford, England” →

Intro
Mirza Khuda Bakhsh was a pupil of Noorudin and must have been ordered by Noorudin to move-in with MGA at Qadian and help MGA respond to letters, read out newspaper to MGA and many other clerical duties. There were a few others like Mualvi Abdul Karim, who also moved in 1890-1891. Syed Muhammad Ahsan Amrohi also moved in in this time period. Maulvi Noorudin moved in with MGA in 1893, after he was hired from his job in Jammu. Mufti Muhammad Sadiq also came and went into MGA’s house with respect and ease since 1889. Maulvi Muhammad Ali moved-in with MGA in roughly 1889. MGA‘s in-laws also lived exclusively with him in his mansion, they are Mir Nasir Nawab and his entire family. Khwaja Kamal ud Din was MGA’s main lawyer, there were many others who formed up this team, the number is mostly like 20+.

Continue reading “Mirza Khuda Bakhsh also lived exclusively with Mirza Ghulam Ahmad at Qadian” →

Intro
What is Lecture Ludhiana? In Oct-1905, MGA and his immediate family travelled to Delhi, on the way back from Delhi, they stopped in Ludhiana and Amritsar. In our opinion, MGA did not give this lecture, he went to Ludhiana and just like Delhi, no speeches were given. The English review of religions doesn’t give any indication that MGA was on tour in Oct-Nov of 1905 (See the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah, pages 758-761). In the Al-Hakam of September-1906, the editor claims that MGA was in Delhi, Ludhiana, Amritsar and gave speeches in the Oct-Nov timeframe. This alleged lecture was  included into Ruhani Khuzain of 1984 and continued into Ruhani Khuzain (2008 edition)(See Malfuzat-8, online English edition, pages 89-155, and via Al-Hakam, vol. 10, no. 31, p. 8, 9, dated 10 September 1906, Al-Hakam, vol. 10, no. 32, p. 2, 3, dated 17 September 1906, Al-Hakam, vol. 10, no. 33, p. 4, 5, dated 24 September 1906, Al-Hakam, vol. 10, no. 34, p. 3, dated 30 September 1906, Al-Hakam, vol. 10, no. 36, p. 4, 5, dated 17 October 1906, Al-Hakam, vol. 10, no. 37, p. 3–4, dated 24 October 1906, Al-Hakam, vol. 10, no. 41, p. 4–6, dated 30 November 1906, Badr, vol. 2, no. 51, p. 4–18, dated 20 December 1906).

MGA had serious problems giving public speeches and leading prayers, he normally had someone on his team would lead these for him, in fact, MGA proved this weakness of his in 1889, his inability to give a public speech at the Aligarh University in 1890 is major clue. Furthermore, the fact that “Philosophy of the Teachings of Islam” was actually a speech delivered by Maulvi Abdul Kareem, who also led salaat at Qadian, since MGA never led Salaat in his life. Furthermore, MGA would claim that the hadith which stated that Esa (as) would pray behind the imam, signified how MGA would never lead prayers. Thus, Maulvi Abdul Kareem was the speech-guy and the Imam of the mosque in Qadian, since 1891, before that, there is no records of MGA leading Salaat as an Imam. Further, Noorudin and Amrohi would fill in as needed and were most likely also the chief ghost-writers for Ahmadiyya Inc.

In this book, MGA and team of writers claimed to have 300,000 Ahmadi’s in their ranks.
Continue reading “What is Lecture Ludhiana by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (1905)?” →

Intro
In 1890-91, in Izala Auham (see the refs in the below), MGA argued over and over again that a prophet could never be a follower of another prophet. MGA and his team of writers quoted the Quran, 4:64 (4:65 in the Ahmadi Quran) as evidence. In fact, in the same book, MGA claims that his God called him an Ummati and Nabi in the Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya (about 7-10 years earlier), however, he didn’t give the exact reference. In the same year (1891 in Delhi, see the announcement here), MGA published an announcement to the effect that anyone who claims to be a prophet is a Kafir, obviously, MGA only meant a prophet like all the prophets mentioned in the Quran (independent-prophets). It should be noted that MGA also used the phrase “Bara-e-Rast” (persian)(direct) Prophet (see the full quote in the below), this was used interchangeably for many years (per Bro Imtiaz). Bro Imtiaz told me that nowadays (2025), Ahmadi Maulvi use “Mustaqil” for non-law bearing direct prophets. They are also using “Haqiqi-Nabi” for law bearing prophets. Bro Imtiaz also explained how an “Ummati-Nabi” is the opposite of the “Bara-e-Rast” Prophet.

However, 10 years later, after the publishing of ‘Eik Ghalti Ka Izala”, Nov. 1901, MGA and his team totally abandoned this view. They claim that MGA discovered that an Ummati can become a Prophet (see Haqiqatun Nubuwwat by Mirza Mahmud Ahmad and Qaul al Fasl {1915}, see also Qazi Muhammad Nazeer, 1966, “Truth Prevails”), he also claimed to be greater and better than Esa (as) in this exact time frame.

The other important fact to understand here is that all 124,000 prophets that were mentioned in the Quran were “independent” prophets, in others words, Allah made them prophets and they only followed the will of Allah and they all had the ability to create new laws and abrogate old ones. The prophethood that MGA discovered in 1901, never existed in the Quran, Torah or Bible, since all of those prophets were “independent”. By 1903, MGA said that only he was allowed this title of Nabi in the entire Ummah (See RK, v. 20, p. 45; starts at approximately middle of the page; Tadhkirah-tush-Shahaadatayn; published 1903). At the end of 1905, in “The Will”, MGA claims that some Muslims (he was only speaking about himself) have been able to become Ummati and Nabi (see English ROR of Jan. 1906, see pages 31-32).

In 1906-07, in Haqiqatul Wahy, MGA again asserted that he was both an Ummati and a Nabi, and he was the only one the entire ummah of Muhammad to achieve this. After MGA died (October of 1908), in the Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya Vol. 5, Noorudin wrote that MGA was always an Ummati and had become a Nabi. However, as soon as Khwaja Kamaluddin returned from England he gave a speech which was turned into the an urdu-only book, “Ikhtalayfaat-e-Silsilaa-e-Ahmadiyya kay Usbaab”. Khwaja Kamaluddin’s quotes “Tuhfatul-Muluk” (A Present to Kings) by the Khalifa, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad which seems to have been written in the summer of 1914. This book was published on Dec 24th, 1914, during the Qadiani Jalsa. It was the first ever book about the split in the Ahmadiyya Movement, in it, Kwaja Kamaluddin emphatically died the prophethood of MGA and takfir against non-Ahmadi’s.

The Khalifa, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad wrote Qaul al-Fasl in January of 1915 and Haqiqatun Nubuwwat in March of 1915, wherein he quoted 7:35, 4:69, 2:5 and 61:6 as verses from the Quran wherein MGA was explained as a prophet to come. MGA had never used these verse to argue pro-prophethood. Nevertheless, Muhammad Ali responded in (December of 1915) and wrote “Prophethood in Islam”  and ripped the Qadiani belief that MGA was an Ummati-Nabi. These conversations would continue uptil 1923, then they died off for about 10 years.
Continue reading “The concept of the Ummati-Nabi” →

Intro
Recently, #coronavirus is ripping through the #Ahmadiyya Jamaat, however, MTA has been ordered to suppress all data on #Ahmadi’s who are dying of #covid19. Another Ahmadi has also died from the London area, his name was Rana Naeem Ahmad or Rana Naeem ud Din Ahmad. On October 26th, 1984, he murdered 2 people in-front of 100’s of witnesses, he shot a 3rd person who survived with life long injuries (see at the 8:28 mark onwards). Mirza Tahir Ahmad explained the whole scenario is his Friday Sermon of Feb 21st, 1986. These people were removing the Kalima from an Ahmadi mosque in Sahiwal, Punjab Pakistan. Interestingly, Rabwah times purposely didn’t tell us how many people he killed, this proves that this news outlet, even though outwardly unofficial, has sympathies with Ahmadi’s and the Mirza family. On MTA, they admitted that Rana Naeem in-fact shot 2 people and injured another. They also admitted that the police had already came to protect this Ahmadi masjid (per the order of Qazi Ayaz Ahmad) and had even placed police officers the evening before the shooting. Qazi Ayaz Ahmad had also told Muhammad Ilyas Munir that the Muslim Imams of the local area had requested him to remove the Kalima a week before the event, however, he had refused to do so.Thus, Muhammad Ilyas Munir and Rana Naeem Ahmad knew of the impending trouble. Moreover, an Ahmadi had also tipped off the local Imam, Muhammad Ilyas Munir (who lived in an adjoining apartment with the Ahmadi mosque, Rana Naeem was also living in the mosque in a separate room) of an impending issue. This young Ahmadi who tipped off the police was a silent Ahmadi, he had Pakistani friends, but he never told them he was an Ahmadi. Nevertheless, this Ahmadi insider had a friend tell him that the Jamia Rasheeda, which was close to the local Polytechnic College had tipped him off, thinking he was a Sunni-Muslim. This Ahmadi insider immediately reported this to the Ahmadi cleric, Muhammad Ilyas Munir. Thus, Ahmadi’s knew of an impending issue and refused to abandon this mosque (even for a few days, most likely because they were ordered to stay by the Mirza family), they also refused to erase the Kalima from their mosque, in fact, they have never complied with this law and willfully removed all the Kalima’s from their places of worship in Pakistan, nor have they removed the minaret’s. In this case and many others, Pakistani-Muslims were peacefully removing the Kalima, there was no reason to shoot them, in fact, Ahmadi’s should have allowed it per the law. Muhammad Ilyas Munir tells us that he heard the first shot fired and came to see what was going on, he was sound asleep or was pretending to be asleep. He says that as he approached the scene, another shot went off, he claims Rana Naeem was yelling at the Pakistani-Muslims, “who are you to remove the Kalima”. He then says he heard the 3rd shot and was inside the mosque now. He saw that Ahmadi’s and Muslims were scurrying to leave the mosque. After the incident, Rana Naeem claimed that he initially fired a few shots into the air, however, this is a lie and part of the Ahmadi cover-up story. If he had really shot 4-5 times, it would have been noted by Muhammad Ilyas Munir, however, he only heard 3 shots. Muhammad Ilyas Munir then shut the door of the Masjid and noticed 1 dead man on the floor, the other must have died in the hospital. It was time for Fajr, Muhammad Ilyas Munir then led the Fajr salat, with a dead body close by. He then noticed that another Pakistani-muslim was lying dead in the roadway, or he was about to die (he was moving a little bit still). There was a Christian hospital across the street from the Ahmadi masjid where the shooting happened, the police scooped up the dying Pakistani-Muslim and took him into the hospital. Eight months later in October 1985, before a special military tribunal sentences were handed out. Death sentences were handed down to Mohammad Ilyas Munir, Ahmadiyya missionary and Rana Naeem-uddin Ahmad, custodian of Sahiwal Mosque. Four other Ahmadis were sentenced to imprisonment of 7 years each. The sentence of the tribunal were sent to General Ghulam Jilani Khan (Governor of Punjab) for ratification. General Jilani felt that there was a clear miscarriage of justice as Rana Naeem Sahib was clearly acting in self-defence and none of the other accused had been at the scene. Gen Jilani decided to raise the matter when Zia next came to Lahore. Eventually Gen. Jilani explained his doubts to Zia and asked him for his instructions. Zia contemptuously shrugged his shoulders and barked “Hang them”. Rana Naeem ud din and Mohamed Ilyas Munir were incarcerated and spent the next five years on death row awaiting the gallows. On a number of occasions the death warrant was even issued and they were both moved to the death cell; only for it to be rescinded following legal appeals. By December 1988 of that same year the civilian government of Benazir Bhutto was in place, and shortly thereafter in one of its first acts, it commuted all death sentences to that of life imprisonment. Both Rana Naeem ud Din and Mohammed Ilyas Munir were moved from death row and following appeals in the civilian courts had their convictions quashed and they were both subsequently released. They both immediately moved to the UK.
Continue reading “Rana Naeem Ahmad was an Ahmadi and a double murderer in 1984, then celebrated by his Khalifa” →

Intro
For years and years, we have been quoting MGA and other Khalifa’s in our discussions with Ahmadi’s on the internet. However, the fact of the matter is that Ahmadi’s are trained to take the suggestions/arguments of their current Khalifa above MGA and his sons and grandsons. This is how the Mirza family controls Ahmadi’s in 2020. Another piece of evidence is as follows, the 2nd Khalifa banned cinemas and listening to the radio/music (See Mirza Tahir Ahmad, “A Man of God” by Ian Adamson). There is more, MGA said 10,000 Jews were killed in Medina for instance. Khalifa 4 said it is even possible the incident might not have occurred. K-2 believed in face veil. Khalifa Rabi said it’s not Islamic.
Continue reading “Ahmadi’s don’t follow Mirza Ghulam Ahmad or the previous Khalifa’s, they only follow their current Khalifa” →