ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
On June 24th, 2021, #Ahmadis from the Chak 57 JB Khiala Kalan, Faisalabad, Punjab began jousting with the local Muslims and trying to do tabligh and etc. This village is located approximately 10 miles north of Faisalabad city and has a sizeable Ahmadi community. A week earlier an identical incident happened at Chak 261 RB Udhowali, Faisalabad, Punjab. This seems to have led to the Muslims reporting that the Ahmadiyya place of worship at Chak 57 JB Khiala Kalan had minaret’s, a mihrab and the Kalima written on it and this was in violation of the law in Pakistan. Those muslim’s then reported this to the police in a polite and professional manner. The police then came and removed the illegal islamic symbols. Even in 2019, we wrote about the Ahmadiyya place of worship in Murad. A similar demolition happened at Chakwal a few years ago, in fact, Ahmadi’s even murdered a few Pakistani Muslims in the incident. The Ahmadiyya movement has stolen mosques from Muslims from back in British-India, those incidents are also bubbling. In 1984, Ahmadi Mullah Rana Naeem murdered 2 unarmed Muslims who were trying to paint over the Ahmadi Kalima at an Ahmadi “place-of-worship” in Lahore. Zia gave him the death penalty, however, they were given special treatment in the jail and they were eventually released from prison after Zia died they moved to London, UK. Its important to note that Zia didn’t execute these Ahmadi’s.

The Ahmadiyya press spun this and claimed that this is an incident of persecution. However, after 1984, per law, #ahmadis are not allowed to have these 3 distinct islamic symbols on their places of worship. The Ahmadiyya hierarchy has refused to remove them and keeps re-building them. They are doing this on orders from the Khalifa himself (Mirza Masroor Ahmad). The Khalifa then directs the movement to use these instances as evidence of asylum claims to the west. Continue reading “Ahmadiyya place of worship in Chak 57 JB Khiala Kalan, Faisalabad, Punjab had its Islamic symbols removed on 6-24-21” →

Intro
In 1884, after BA4 was published, MGA was immediately called a Kafir by a few of the Ahl-e-hadith ulema of North India. They accused MGA of claiming prophethood in the Barahin. Two brothers Maulana Abdullah and Maulana Muhammad Ludhianvi issued a decree of excommunication against Mirza immediately after he issued first volumes of Barahin Ahmadiyya (See Tarikh e Ahmadiyya).

MGA remained silent, however, MGA’s close friend and fellow ahl-e-hadith Muslim Syed Muhammad Hussain Batalvi came to MGA’s aid in his own newspaper, the “Isha‘atus-Sunnah” of winter 1884. In his newspaper he defended MGA to those who were doing Takfir on him, He argued that MGA was not really claiming prophethood, it was all a mis-understanding.

In 1902, MGA mentions this incident in “I’jaz-e-Ahmadi”, in english as “Miracle of Ahmad” (see page 14), he mentions 3 ahl-e-hadith imam’s who called him Kafir: Muhammad, Abdul Aziz and Abdullah. MGA explains that they called him Kafir since MGA had named himself as Eisa (As) and ascribedall the prophecies of Eisa (as) onto himself. Maulvi Muhammad Hussain Batalvi argues on behalf of MGA and told Muhammad, Abdul Aziz and Abdullah (ahl-e-hadith imam’s from Ludhiana) that they were wrong with their assertions, since MGA was also claiming that Eisa (As) would physically return in the same book. However, time would tell, MGA was lying. He lied about his prophethood the same way.

MGA never said a word about this topic until 1891. In January of 1891, MGA claimed to be the Messiah and again denied prophethood. However, this time, Syed Muhammad Hussain Batalvi  was at the forefront of the Takfir vs. MGA. MGA kept on denying his prophethood for 10 years, until 1901, wherein he finally claimed prophethood in a sneaky way and backdated it to 1880, when he first published the Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya vol. 1-2.

Nevertheless, in the below, we have made the 156 page review by Syed Muhammad Hussain Batalvi from 1884 available as a free download.

Continue reading “Muhammad Hussain Batalvi’s 156-page review of the Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya (1884) free download” →

Intro
Ahmadi’s don’t follow the writings of MGA in many cases. The case of Adam (as) is yet another. In 1895, MGA wrote in Arya Dharam that Eve was created from the rib of Adam (as)(see Sahih Bukhari in the below). 2 years later in 1898, in Kitab ul Barriya, MGA was claiming that he was born with a twin sister, however, this seems to be a lie. It seems that MGA was creating a back story. About 10 years later, MGA was asserting that Adam (as) was created as a twin (see the full quote in the below). Later on, in Malfuzat, MGA and his team of writers seems to have given additional data on Adam (as) not being the first man. Watch my video on this here. This belief is totally unislamic. In the Quran, 2:35-36, proves that Adam (as) was living in Jannah (heaven) with Allah. Allah then created Eve. Allah then sent them both to Earth, through the 7 heavens.

The Ahmadiyya belief that Adam (as) wasn’t the first human comes from 1947 and the publishing of Tafsir-e-Kabeer. The introduction to that commentary had a long entry wherein the Khalifa (Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad) wrote that before Adam (as) there were humans already on the planet (in 1985, this intro was turned into a separate book, “Introduction to The Study of the Holy Quran and published from the UK, you can view the 2016 online english edition herein). He continued and claimed that the humans who were already on the planet were Jinn, since they hadn’t evolved fully. This is blasphemy and totally against Islam. Obviously, the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s were indirectly agreeing with the theory of evolution (Darwinism). They took all of this from Sir Syed Ahmad Khan who most likely denied the traditional creation story in Islam.”

The islamic perspective is as follows, Adam (as) and Eve were the two first humans on Earth. Allah them brought animals, fruit, sugar, chocolate, all in pairs. This is what the verses of the Quran mean when taken together. There are about 9 verses in the Quran which refer to Allah creating in pairs. However, this doesn’t contradict the idea that Adam (as) was not born a twin. Tafsir ibn Kathir tells us that Allah created Eva (as) from the rib (bone and blood) of Adam (as). Allah created everything from dust, its all the same ingredients, just look at the table of elements, they prove that Allah can make a human from another human easily. Tafsir Ibn Kathir is an amazing classical book on Tafsir. Ibn Kathir tells us that Allah created a single soul, i.e. Adam (as) and then created Hawa aka Eva from the rib of Adam (as).  

Verses which prove that humans were made in pairs after Adam (as) was sent to Earth are as follows: 78:8—–“””And We created you in pairs”” and 53:45, 51:49, 55:52, 43:12, 42:11, 36:36, 35:11 and 39:6.

Continue reading “In 1947, the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s began claiming that humans existed on Earth before Adam (as) of the Quran” →

Intro
We continue to catalog the inside workers of the Mirza family. We have found yet another inside man who works directly for the Mirza family, his name is Shajar Ahmad Farooqi. Akber Chaudhary mentioned him 10 years ago via his financial analysis of the jamaat. He seems to be a major player in the Ahmadiyya global business model. He is one of 9 trustees on the roster for the The Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat International (AMJI). He is also a trustee for the Mirza Sharif Ahmad Foundation (1 of 5). It should be noted that Mirza Masroor Ahmad’s name isn’t on any legal documents in terms of ownership of the Ahmadiyya movement.
Continue reading “Who is Shajar Ahmad Farooqi? The #qadiani bookmaker?” →

Intro
Mirza Tahir Ahmad was a vicious mullah. In 1982, while in Spain, while there were no more than 20 Ahmadi’s in the entire country, Mirza Tahir Ahmad openly complained about #ahmadis not paying proper chanda. This proves that Mirza Tahir Ahmad wanted to rob #ahmadis of all of their money. See his Friday Sermon of 9-10-1982, in this Khutbah, first, he talked down to the camera man who was taking his photo’s and ordered him to stop taking photos. He cried when he mentioned Mirza Nasir Ahmad, then he goes on to rant about Ahmadi’s not paying proper chanda (24:48 mark). You can watch the tik tok  clip herein. This proves that #ahmadis are in-fact required to pay chanda and if they can’t, they must show their payroll stubs to the Mirza family.
Continue reading “In 1982, and while in Spain, Mirza Tahir Ahmad was complaining about proper chanda giving” →

Intro
Muslims on tik tok have been exposing Ahmadi’s over and over again, I have tried to archive as much as possible on my IG and Tiktok account. In some of the video’s, @browniesaadi goes over the case of @shazzybepreaching also as @theceoohilaal as he come out and admitted to being a #qadiani. Check out my tik tok account herein.

In a funny way @browniesaadi called MGA as Mirza tutty (shit), which is hilarious in urdu/punjabi/hindi. He is referring to how MGA died after having an explosion of diarrhea.
Continue reading “Check out @browniesaadi on tik tok and his comments on #qadianism” →

Intro
It seems that just after MGA died, Noorudin wrote a book about MGA’s death entitled, “Wafat e Masih Maud”. It was published on Saturday, June 14, 1908. This seems to be connected with the Friday sermon by Noorudin on June 5th, 1908.

Nooruddin admits that the enemies of Ahmadiyya were alleging MGA had died of cholera. In fact, he even said that if MGA had died of cholera, that he still died the death of a martyr, however, he seems to have forgot that MGA had recently told Maulvi Sanaullah that he would die of cholera and that it was a curse from god.

However, we have found independent sources (the Vakil newspaper) in this time frame that claimed that MGA had died of cholera, in Urdu as Haiza. Even Farquhar wrote the same in 1915. This is also the word that was used by MGA’s father-in-law, Mir Nasir Nawab in the 1920’s as he narrated to Shaikh Ali Yacub Irfani his autobiography. This Khutbah by Noorudin was his second Friday Sermon after becoming the Khalifa at Qadian. Further, MGA was sitting on mobile toilet (chowkee) just minutes before he died, he died on Brandereth Road in Lahore. You can read MGA’s death story here from Ahmadi sources only.

Continue reading ““Wafat e Masih Maud” by Maulvi Noorudin (1908)” →

Intro
In 2000, Mirza Tahir Ahmad (MTA) denied that Yahya (as) was killed and even asserted that he escaped and lived in Greece and died, however, MTA didn’t give any references (See on tiktok and twitter).

MGA mentioned the prophet Yahya (as) a few times in his writings. We have cataloged those instances in the below, its should be noted that MGA called Yahya (As) as a shaheed in 1891 and allegedly, in 1907, via Malfuzat-9 (published in 2024)(this is undated and might not be in the Urdu editions), MGA called Yahya (as) as a shaheed and even compared his qatal with the qatal of Syed Ahmad in Kashmir by the Sikhs.

It should also be noted that per Ahmadiyya theology, true prophets of Allah were never killed, however, this is incorrect, per 2:61, 2:87, 2:91, 3;21, 3:112, 3:144, 3:181, 3:183, 4:155, 5:70 (that’s 10 verses).

In 2021, in shameful way, Mirza Masroor Ahmad alleged that prophets had been killed and this rule only applies to the first or last prophet in a system or if Allah gave them a wahi about protection.

In 2025, Bro Imtiaz highlighted all of this in this video.
Continue reading “#Ahmadis believe that Yahya (As) died in Greece” →

Intro
The Quran exonerated prophets from the descriptions of them in the Torah and Bible. Allah told us in the Quran that prophets were good people, and they never willfully committed sins. The Quran also told us that prophets were not poets, thus, Muhammad (saw) was not a poet (36:70, see Tafsir Ibn Kathir)(See 26:224-227 also). Nevertheless, we aren’t arguing that Muslims can’t be poets, however, we are arguing that Muhammad (Saw) and all other prophets and messengers were not poets, it is not befitting of them. Furthermore, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad began writing poetry in his very first book, the Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya vol. 1-2, and continued to do so throughout this career. In fact, MGA and his team concocted many arabic poems that Ahmadi’s memorize and recite at meetings and ijtema’s (qaseedah). Ahmadi’s recite MGA’s poetry proudly (urdu nazams), however, they forget that MGA considered himself to be the perfect reflection of Muhammad (saw)(second coming of Muhammad (Saw)), however, not in the case of poetry, this is very ironic. In fact, in 1892, MGA and his team of writers wrote their famous “Qasidah”, which is long arabic poem that al Ahmadi’s are encouraged to memorize.
Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was a poet, and prophets are never poets!!!!” →