Intro
Lalah Sharampat Ra’i (aka Lalah Sharampat Khatri [See Haqiqatul Wahy], also called Sharampat, the Aryah aka Lala Shrampat)(born 1911 Bikrami or 1855 A. D. and died December, 28th: 1932 A.D., was the Secretary of the Samaj at Qadian, See Dard) was a Hindu resident of Qadian in the 1870’s (until at least 1907). He had a brother named Lala Bisambar Das.
MGA mentioned him indirectly as a witness of his signs in 1880-1882 via his book Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya Vol. 3 (see online english edition, pages 218, 220 and 224). The english editors added the name Lalah Sharampat in the new english translation in 2014, it was never in the original Urdu. However, Lalah Sharampat was illiterate and barely understood what MGA was saying, thus, MGA used them in a deceptive and thought that no one would try to audit these witnesses. As soon as the prophecy was announced by him, Sharampat whom he had quoted as a witness, declared: “Ghulam Ahmad is a liar and an anti -Christ. I never heard this prophecy from him (See Anthology of Pandit Lakhram Takzib·i· Baraheen-i Ahmadiyya, via “Qadiyaniat: an analytical survey” by Ehsan Elahi Zaheer (1984) 21st edition free download – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog). Interestingly, in 1923, in Seeratul Mahdi, an anonymous Hindu is quoted over and over again. MGA also claims to have hold Sharampat before hand about Duleep Singh. Lala Malawamal was a close friend of Lala Sharampat, they were both from Qadian, these are the 2 Hindu’s that MGA mentions in Barahin-e-Ahmadiyya 1-4, the 3rd is Bishandas Brahman (See Haqiqatul Wahy). MGA also claims that Lalah Sharampat and Lala Malawamal were the witnesses in this famous revelation, that became a ring that All Ahmadi’s wear, “Is Allah not sufficient for his servant”. MGA also claims that he prophecied the death of his father (Mirza Ghulam Murtaza) and these 2 were the witnesses. (See “Qadian Kei Aryah Aur Hamm”, in english it would be “The Aryas of Qadian”). MGA also alleges that he prophecied the assassination of Dayanand, and Lalah Sharampat was the witness.
However, a few years later (1885), Lekh Ram came to Qadian and spoke to Lalah Sharampat Ra’i and his friends and they confirmed that they were never witnesses to any signs of MGA, you can read all of this in “Kulliyat Arya Musafir” by Lekh ram (1885), check out the scans in the below.
Nevertheless, (via Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya Vol. 3 see online english edition, pages 218, 220 and 224) MGA claims that 12 years earlier (roughly 1870), Lalah Sharampat’s near family member (Bishambar Das, Dard claims that this is the brother of Sharampat) went to jail with Khush Hal Chand. However, it should be noted that Bishambar Das and Khush Hal Chand were in jail, and Lalah Sharampat was not. Lalah Sharampat seems to have been fighting the case on appeal. At that point, in roughly 1870, Lalah Sharampat asked MGA to show a sign in terms of the result of this case, MGA then alleges to have gotten a dream wherein the result of the case was disclosed to him. At that point, they left each other, MGA then alleges that at night (of the same day?) he got a dream wherein it was allegedly revealed to him that Bishambar Das’ sentence would be reduced by 1/2 but he would not be acquitted; and that his companion (Khush Hal Chand) would serve out the whole of his sentence and he would also not be acquitted. MGA then alleges that he announced this dream to a large number of people and informed Lalah Sharampat Ra’i of it the same day. Ironically, MGA claims to have been in Qadian when the court announced the verdict, and claimed to be in some mosque, however, in 1870, there were no mosques in Qadian. In the same book (Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya Vol. 3 (see online english edition, pages 218, 220 and 224), MGA relates another dream wherein Lalah Sharampat is the witness, MGA alleges that he saw in a dream that someone had sent him fifty rupees towards the cost of publishing the “Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya”. An Aryah (Lalah Sharampat) also saw a dream that someone had sent MGA a thousand rupees for the same purpose. He related his dream to MGA and MGA immediately told him of my dream and said to him: ‘Nineteentwentieths of your dream is false; this is a consequence of your being a Hindu and outside the pale of Islam.
In 1883-1884, MGA mentioned Sharampat by name in Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya Vol. 4 (see page 430) and related the same story. MGA alleged that he got some type of revelations in June of 1883 about the impending death of Dayanand, however, this was never published anywhere. MGA claims to have told the Arya’s of Qadian (which indirectly includes Sharampat), however, this is a lie, this was another “after-the-fact” prophecies that MGA always did.
By 1887, MGA was also calling Sharampat a witness in his “after-the-fact” death prophecy vs. Dayanand (see Shahna-e-Haqq, p. 43, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 2, p. 382, via the 2019, online english edition of Tadhkirah, see page 135).
By 1906-1907, the beef was on again in Qadian between the Arya Samaj of Qadian and MGA. While MGA and his team were writing “Haqiqatul Wahy”, they mentioned Sharampat 27 and repeated all of the old info and added a new prophecy, i.e., that MGA told Sharampat that Mirza Ghulam Qadir (MGA’s brother) would die in 1883. In the same book “Haqiqatul Wahy”, MGA admitted that Sharampat and Malawamal had published advertisements against MGA and called MGA a liar and a fake. After MGA died, BA-5 was published and MGA alleged that Sharampat was his close friend in the 1870’s and even went with MGA to get the “Barahin” published.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1882
Lalah Sharampat Ra’i (also called Sharampat, the Aryah) was a Hindu resident of Qadian in the 1880’s (until at least 1907). MGA mentioned him indirectly as a witness of his signs (MGA never gave his name) in 1880-1882 via his book Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya Vol. 3 (see online english edition, pages 218, 220 and 224). The english editors added the name Lalah Sharampat in the new english translation in 2014, it was never in the original Urdu. Nevertheless, MGA claims that in 12 years earlier (roughly 1870), Lalah Sharampat’s near family member (Bishambar Das) went to jail with Khush Hal Chand. However, it should be noted that Bishambar Das and Khush Hal Chand were in jail, and Lalah Sharampat was not. Lalah Sharampat seems to have been fighting the case on appeal. At that point, in roughly 1870, Lalah Sharampat asked MGA to show a sign in terms of the result of this case, MGA then alleges to have gotten a dream wherein the result of the case was disclosed to him. At that point, they left each other, MGA then alleges that at night (of the same day?) he got a dream wherein it was allegedly revealed to him that Bishambar Das’ sentence would be reduced by one-half but he would not be acquitted; and that his companion (Khush Hal Chand)would serve out the whole of his sentence and he would also not be acquitted. MGA then alleges that he announced this dream to a large number of people and informed Lalah Sharampat Ra’i of it the same day. Ironically, MGA claims to have been in Qadian when the court announced the verdict, and claimed to be in some mosque, however, in 1870, there were no mosques in Qadian. In the same book (Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya Vol. 3 (see online english edition, pages 218, 220 and 224), MGA relates another dream wherein Lalah Sharampat is the witness, MGA alleges that he saw in a dream that someone had sent him fifty rupees towards the cost of publishing the “Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya”. An Aryah (Lalah Sharampat) also saw a dream that someone had sent MGA a thousand rupees for the same purpose. He related his dream to MGA and MGA immediately told him of my dream and said to him: ‘Nineteentwentieths of your dream is false; this is a consequence of your being a Hindu and outside the pale of Islam.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1884
In Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya Vol. 4 (see page 430), MGA mentioned Sharampat by name and related the same story. MGA alleged that he got some type of revelations in June of 1883 about the impending death of Dayanand, however, this was never published anywhere. MGA claims to have told the Arya’s of Qadian (which indirectly includes Sharampat), however, this is a lie, this was another “after-the-fact” prophecies that MGA always did.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1885-1887
Pandit Lekhram proved that :-
—No agreement was signed with Mirza by hindus.
—No prophesy was made by Mirza qadiani and Nothing regarding death or calamity to Mirza Nizamdin was mentioned by Mirza Ghulam qadiani before these hindus.
—Mirza Ghulam Qadiani fabricated a false story to catch up the opportunity on the death of Mirza Nizam Din’s daughter. Further, one wonder as to how the death of daughter of Mirza Nizam, obviously a muslim, can be the sign of truthfulness of Islam?
The book can be read herein. Kulliyat Arya Musafir is a book of about 700 pages, Musafir means traveler. It is a collection of all the books of Lekh Ram, All his 33 works have been collectively published under the name Kulyaat e Arya Musafir, by Mahashe Keeshat Dev manager Sattya Dharam Parcharak Haridwar, at the Printing Press of Rai Sahib Munshi Gulab Singh Mufeed aam Press Lahore (1903). Kulliyat Arya Musafir, Part III, pp. 493-499, printed at the Mufid-e-‘Am Press, Lahore, 1904; Publisher: Manager, Satya Dharam Parcharak Press,
Hardwar District Saharanpur (See Dard).
Dard tells us (page 159) that Lekh Ram and the Arya Samaaj issued a special leaflet was issued at the Chashma Nur, Amritsar on July 27th, 1886, in which Ahmad was threatened with murder within three years. However, this was not a threat, this was in retaliation to MGA’s mubahila-challenge. MGA seems to have issued the same type of death prophecy vs. , unfortunately, the Ahmadiyya editors seem to have erased the data. Based on this admission by Dard, MGA should have died by at least 1890-1891. And thus all of these “death-threats” that were issued back and forth came to an end in 1890-1891 (See Kulliyat Arya Musafir by Lekh ram, 1886 also). On August 13th, 1885, Mirza Imam Din had issued a leaflet in which he had denounced MGA. (See Kulliyat Arya Musafir pp. 414-415 via Dard). This book was mentioned in the ROR of May-1941.
Pandit Lekhram had published an Ishtihar that Mirza sb is telling a lie that he made agreement and prophesied regarding Loss of Mirza Nizam Din. The said ishtihar is available in his book Kulliyat Ariya Musafir Vol-3 (see scans in the below).
The scan work
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1887
Shahna-e-Haqq, p. 43, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 2, p. 382, via the 2019, online english edition of Tadhkirah, see page 135
“”Concerning Pandit Dayanand, Lalah Sharampat was informed two months before his demise that his end was very near. Actually, in my vision I had seen him dead.””
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1896-1897
“Qadian Kei Aryah Aur Hamm”, in English it would be “The Aryas of Qadian”
Page 14, online english edition
MGA alleges that Lalah Sharampat and Lala Malawamal published an announcement wherein they called MGA a liar.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1901
See Dard
“””In view of this Nawab Muhammad Ali Khan of Malerkotla (born 1870, died February 10th, 1945) was requested to bring with him his phonograph when he came to Qadian. It was a new and novel thing. Sharampat Ra’i was eager to see it; so Ahmadas asked Nawab Sahib on November 20th, 1901, to bring his phonograph. He wrote a short poem for the occasion and Maulawi
Abdul Karimra (born 1858 and died October 11th, 1905) read it out to have it recorded. At about 4.30 p.m. Ahmadas wrote a note to Sharampat saying that if he, Malawa Mal and his friends wanted to see the phonograph they should come to his house. On getting this information Sharampat and a number of other Hindus and Muslims of the village came there.””
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1906
See Hidden Treasures
Qadian Kei Aryah Aur Hamm
English Version: The Aryas of Qadian
Ahmadiyya sources allege that Aryas of Qadian disrupted their mini-Jalsa of Dec-1906. On top of that there were repeated contentions by Lalah Sharampat Ra’i and others that they had never seen any heavenly sign of MGA, all of MGA’s assertions were lies.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1907
Sharampat is mentioned by MGA and his team of writers 27 times in “Haqiqatul Wahy”. MGA repeats the old stories from Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya and adds a new story, that he told Sharampat about the impending death of Mirza Ghulam Qadir (MGA’s brother).
MGA and his team also published Qadian Kei Aryah Aur Hamm and mentioned how Sharampat and other Hindu’s denied seeing any miracles of MGA.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1908
After MGA died, BA-5 was published and MGA alleged that Sharampat was his close friend in the 1870’s and even went with MGA to get the “Barahin” published.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1909
Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 18, page 532, Nuzul ul Maseeh
https://www.youtube.com/live/LHlHj4c9msE?feature=share
MGA says that he knew that Dayanand was gonna die 3 months before he died (Oct-1883) and MGA told Lalah Sharampat was told about it.
Scan
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s
Qadian Ke Arya Aur Hum (The Aryas of Qadian) – AhmadiPedia
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and Dayananda, the full history – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
“Kulliyat Arya Musafir” by Lekh ram (1885), quotes and background info – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
Who is Mirza Ghulam Qadir (1833-1883) ? – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
Lekh Ram vs. the Ahmadiyya Movement – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
The #AnonymousHindu in Seerat ul Mahdi (1923 edition) – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
Who is Lala Malawamal? – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
Who is Lala Bisambar Das? – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #ahmadianswers #ahmadiyyamuslimcommunity #ahmadiyya_creatives #ahmadiyyatthetrueislam #ahmadiyyatzindabad #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiyyamuslim #mirzaghulamahmad #qadiani #qadianism
3 Pingback