Intro
In Oct-2025, I engaged @bajwasaabjee on 69:44 (69:45 in the Kadiani Koran) and the implications of the verse on Yahya (as)(See the clip on TikTok and Twitter). @bajwasaabjee kept asserting that Muslims believe that anyone successful in life has the help of God, this is false and he knew that Muslims don’t believe this.
Continue reading “Who is the Ahmadi TikToker @bajwasaabjee?”
Intro
Shams ud Din explains how the shooter at the Ahmadiyya temple in Rabwah was an ex-Qadiani and the Ahmadiyya Movement has told ALL Ahmadi’s to remain silent about this (See the clip on TikTok and Twitter). Shams ud Din explains how Shoaib bin Zaighum had converted to Ahmadiyya with the idea of getting asylum abroad, however, this was a lie, and he wasn’t able to get asylum, he then retaliated as such.
Intro
In Oct-2025, Bro Imtiaz debated Azim Saifi on prophets after Mirza Ghulam Ahmad.
In this debate, Bro Imtiaz quoted:
1. “Eik Ghalti Ka Izala” (1901), RK-18, pages 214-215.
2. Urdu ROR-Mar/Apr-1915 aka Kalimatul Fasl, page 116.
3. RK-17 [Tohfa Golarvia], pages 318-319).
4. Malfuzat-5, page 58. Via the Al-Hakam, vol. 3, no. 1, dated 10 January 1899, pp. 6-9 (See Malfuzat-2, online English edition, pages 1-8).
5. Qaul al Fasl, via Anwar ul Aloom, jild-2, page 270 (1915).
6. Mirza Bashir Ahmad and his book, “The Truth about Khatme Nubuwwat” (see page 11).
7. Tashishazul Adhan-8, page 25, (Aug-1917).
8. —At 3:31:55, Bro Imtiaz quoted Tohfah Golarhviyyah, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 17, p. 244
9. RK V. 22, p. 406-407)(See page 120, online English edition, Haqiqatul Wahi)(At 2:11:14) and his sons’ interpretations confirm that Mirza Sahib is the “only specified individual (fard makhsus)” in the Ummah to be called Nabi.
10. Taryaq ul Qulub (V. 15, p. 477-478) states that after his death, no complete (Kamil) person will be born from a mother’s womb. At 2:35:22.
11. At 3:50:57, Bro Imtiaz points how Azim Saifi called Abu Bakr (ra) a Rasul but a non-prophet, just like MGA did in Shahadatul Quran, RK-6, page 319, see page 26 of the online english edition of Shahadatul Quran.
Continue reading “Per the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s, Muhammad (Saw) did Tasdiq of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad”
Intro
It seems that Beaconhouse National University in Lahore, Pakistan, there will be a conference on “The History of Atrocities on Qadianis.” A talk with Arafat Mazhar (on twitter as @ArafatMazhar) and Dr. Waqas Sajjad at SB Auditorium, at 12:30 on Tuesday.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
QADIANI,S AGGRESSIVE ACTIVITIES IN LAHORE, PAKISTAN.
QADIANI PROPAGANDA AGAINST PAKISTANI GOVERNMENT AND MUSLIMS CONTINUES.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s
Beaconhouse National University (BNU)
https://x.com/summandar01/status/1980323233489363094
ArafatMazhar 🤖 (@ArafatMazhar) / X
https://x.com/arafatmazhar?lang=en
https://www.bnu.edu.pk/faculty/dr-waqas-sajjad
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #mirzaghulamahmad
Intro
A video has surfaced (from Apr-2025) from an Ex-Ahmadi in Germany wherein she is accusing the Ahmadiyya Jamaat in Germany of instances of domestic violence and sexual assault that also involved some in the leadership and have been covered up by the Jama’at.
Intro
In the 1920’s, Ahmadi leadership, including Mirza Mahmood Ahmad (the 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa) and Sir Zafrullah Khan, proposed the “new blasphemy law” to India’s Viceroy, Lord Irwin. They also rallied to free Ilm-ud-Din, the first blasphemy killer (1929), and criticized his conviction through their publication, Al-Fazl.
This fact is accepted By Hazrat Mirza Tahir Ahmad in his book Murder in the Name of Allah in the 1990’s.
Intro
Pakistani politician and former federal minister Chaudhry Fawad Hussain tweeted about how the Ahmadis participated with great enthusiasm in the massacre of Sikhs in Sialkot during the time of partition, and if they get the opportunity even now, they will do the same!! The All India Muslim League received its biggest financing from Ahmadis and Ismailis…
Historical government documents alleging Ahmadi involvement in communal violence in East Punjab in 1948 and pointed to their support for Ilm-ud-Din, who killed a book publisher in British India over alleged blasphemy were also posted. This story could also be linked to another story wherein the 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa talked about problems with the Sikh community in 1948.
Intro
In a recent TikTok livestream, Ahmadi’s can be heard arguing amongst themselves over the specific terminology of prophethood which was used by MGA, like Haqiqi Nabi and Ummati Nabi. Bro Imtiaz gave commentary herein. The issue is that Mirza Basheer uddin Mahmud Ahmad clearly wrote in Al-Qaulul Fasl, page 12)(As quoted in “Truth about the Split”, online edition, pages 196-197, https://www.alislam.org/library/books/Truth-about-the-Split.pdf).
At 35:17, an Ahmadi uncle (@favourite49) comes on and suggests that Ahmadi’s write a letter to huzoor about this confusion, i.e., Haqiqi Nabi or Ummati Nabi? The Ahmadi uncle vouches for “Tahir-Bhai” (Tahir Amjad) and announces to the world that he is a knowledgeable person who sits with other knowledgeable people. Further, his father and brothers have been murrabis and etc. It seems that Tahir Amjad holds the position that prophethood has ended and has offended other Ahmadi’s. The Ahmadi uncle adds that if there is a contradiction with something that the Qadiani-Ahmadi 2nd Khalifa wrote, then only a sitting Khalifa can solve the case. At 36:52, the Ahmadi guy (bombastic) admits to being confused about is MGA a Haqiqi Nabi or Ummati Nabi? At 37:34, the same Ahmadi admits that on many instances, an Ahmadi comes on and argues contrary to other Ahmadi’s, specifically, in terms of more prophets after MGA or not.
They also played a clip wherein Mirza Tahir Ahmad called MGA an ummati nabi (43:28 timestamp) vs. the criticism of the Lahori-Ahmadi’s and was issuing weird challenges. The Lahori-Ahmadi’s have been arguing for 100+ years that MGA never called himself an “Ummati-Nabi”, which is accurate. MGA famously called himself an Ummati from one angle and a Nabi from another (See Haqiqatul Wahy, online english edition, page 37)(See Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya Vol. 5, online english edition, pages 403-404).
Specifically, the phrase “haqiqi-nabi” is discussed (51:50 time stamp). At 57:00, an Ahmadi comes on and says that he wants to place this confusion in front of the Khalifa. The confusion is over the use of the word “haqiqi-nabi”. Is MGA is “Haqiqi-Nabi” or not, or in what sense? Interestingly, these common Ahmadi’s admitted to not having read any books and only heard arguments at ijtema’s and jalsa’s.
At 1:01:51, an Ahmadi comes on and says that MGA claimed to be a “ghair-haqiqi-nabi” and to say otherwise is incorrect.
Intro
In 1944 (the scan has been removed from Ahmadiyya websites), the 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad was questioning a revelation of MGA from March-1908, wherein MGA was described as “King of the Aryas” (Aryan ka badhshah). The 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad said if that Indian Muslims separate from Hindu’s and create Pakistan, this would disprove MGA revelation and make MGA “The King of Pakistan” instead. He seems to have been against the creation of Pakistan (See Al-Fazl, June 8-1944). In Oct-2025, a Muslim confronted Ansar Raza on this topic and Ansar Raza refused to answer (see the clip on twitter).
Continue reading “Did Mirza Ghulam Ahmad fail to become “The King of the Aryas”? 1944″