Intro
This was the second Jalsa at Qadian under the Khilafat of Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad. The only reference to this Jalsa is via a speech of the Khalifa which was converted into the controversial book by the Khalifa which was published a few months later as “Anwar-i-Khilafat”. This jalsa was also mentioned in the ROR of February-1916. The Jalsa lasted 5 days, from Dec-24–28. Ahmadiyya sources allege that 4000 people attended, of which 300 were ladies.
Continue reading “The 1915 Jalsa at Qadian”
Intro
Anwar-i Khilafat is a book which is the text of a speech delivered by the 2nd Khalifa, Mirza Basheer-ud Din Mahmud Ahmad at the December 1915 annual Jalsa at Qadian. It was published a few months later in 1916. In this book, the Khalifa argued most emphatically that the prophecy of Jesus about the coming Ahmad, referred to in the Quran in 61:6, does not apply to the Prophet Muhammad but to Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. The 2nd Khalifa also discussed John 14:26 and its connections to Muhammad (saw) being “the Paraclete”.
He also continues to deal with the points of difference between his followers and the Lahori Ahmadis. The first issue that he raises in this connection is the interpretation of the prophecy about the coming Ahmad. This book is available online at the Qadiani website in the collection Anwar-ul-‘Uloom, v. 3, no. 5 from the link http://www.alislam.org/urdu/au/?j=3. Anwar-i Khilafat was mentioned in the Jan-Feb-March-1923 edition of the ROR.
Intro
Watch my video explanation on this. In 1902, in the arabic only book, “Ijaz ul Ahmadi“, MGA and his team began to use the Quranic verse, 23:50 to argue that Esa (as) traveled to Kashmir and was given refuge as such. Before 1902, in the 1882-1884 era, MGA and his team of writers were indirectly denying the miracles of Esa (as), however, they didn’t comment specifically on 23:50, instead, they commented on 3:49 and totally denied all the miracles of Esa (as). Nevertheless, NO scholars in Islam have ever written such a thing, its a total lie. 100% of the scholars on Islam had always connected 23:50 (23:51 in the Qadiani Quran) with the birth of Esa (As), in fact, the verse start off explaining how Mary and Esa (as) were made as a sign. The sign was the miraculous birth of Esa (as) without a man, this is unanimously accepted by 100% of the scholars of Islam. Furthermore, the verse explains how both Mary and Esa (as) were given refuge on an elevated land wherein there were valleys, water springs and water flows. When we check the classic Tafsir’s on Islam, Suyuti, Ibn Kathir, Tabari, Ibn Abbas and etc, they all confirm that this verse is in relation to the birth of Esa (as) and they give the location as Damascus and the flatlands around it. Thus, this is just another embellishment of the Mirza family. Furthermore, Ahmadi writers began to assert that Yuz Asaf=Jesus. Ahmadi’s also believe that Mary was buried in Pakistan as it borders with Azad Kashmir, since they knew it wasn’t just Esa (As) who was given refuge, but also Mary. In 1907, in Haqiqatul Wahy (online english edition), MGA also called the British Government as Rabwah (see page 849), since they gave him refuge and etc.
Finally, Rabwah is the Arabic word used to describe where refuge was given to Mary and Esa (As), In 1948, Ahmadi’s used this word to name their private city in Pakistan, however, by 1997 or so, it was officially changed to Chenab Nagar. One last thing, both main groups of Ahmadi’s, Lahori’s and Qadiani’s reject the miraculous birth of Esa (As). The Lahori-Ahmadi’s say that Esa (as)’s biological father was Joseph, and the Qadiani’s call Mary a type of hermaphrodite and thus call it a normal occurrence (nauzobillah), thus, they both violate this verse of the Quran. Also see 19:16 of the Quran all the way to 19:34, thus, the birth of Esa (as) as related in 23:50 is always connected to 19:16-34.
In 1996, Mirza Tahir Ahmad told Ahmadi’s that even if this grave is not that of Eisa (as), it makes no difference. Mirza Tahir Ahmad knew that MGA used 23:50 in terms of Yuz Asaf= Eisa (as), however, he chose to downplay that. This was never stated before him. Watch the full video here. Mirza Tahir Ahmad did this since he had heard that Suzanne Olsson (check out her facebook page) was planning on conducting DNA testing on the Yuz Asaf grave site. Mirza Tahir Ahmad got scared and began planning for a situation wherein “if” it was proven that the body and gravesite were less than 500 years old. You can listen to Suzanne Olsson herein explaining how she had gotten permits from the government of India, however, abruptly, it was all stopped. There is also a video of local Kashmiri’s who claim that Yuz Asaf came from Egypt and is not Eisa (As). You can watch the full video herein, its from Bj Witelus‘ youtube channel. Check out Suzanne Olsson’s website herein. Also, check out how Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and his team of writers fraudulently claimed that Eisa (as) was a travelling prophet, and thus, made it to India. The weird old man from “Moeen Ul Mahdi” youtube channel says he lived in Murree after the 1974 NA assembly declared Ahmadi’s as non-Muslim and he says he saw people over by the shrine of Mary.
Continue reading “In 1902, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad argued that the Quran, 23:50 referred to Esa (as) and Maryam traveled to Kashmir”
Intro
Tafsir al-Tustari is the famous Tafsir from Sahl al-Tustari, it can be found on altafsir.com in an abridged version. We can’t find 4:157-159, 3:55, 5:117 and others, however, 39:42 is commented upon and special notice was given to Esa (as), Rafa is considered a physical ascension and thus, it is proven that yet another scholar of Islam believed that Esa (As) hadn’t died yet and was set to return in spectacular format.
39:42 in Tafsir al-Tustari
“””God takes the souls at the time of their death, and those that have not died, in their sleep…He said:When God takes the souls (anfus) to Himself, He extracts the luminous spirit (rūḥ nūrī) from the subtle substance (laṭīf) of the dense natural self (nafs al-ṭabʿ al-kathīf). The taking up [of souls] (al-tawaffī) in God’s Book is of three kinds: the first is death (mawt), the second, sleep (nawm), and the third, ascension (rafʿ). Death is as we have just mentioned. Sleep is as [described] in His words: and those that have not died, in their sleep, which means that He also takes unto Himself (yatawaffā) those who have not died, in their sleep (manām). [God also] said, It is He who takes you at night [6:60] meaning, in sleep. Ascension (rafʿ) is mentioned in relation to Jesus 
, to whom God said, ‘O Jesus, I am gathering you and raising you to Me’ [3:55]. Thus when a person dies, He [God] removes (yanziʿu) from him the subtle substance (laṭīf) of the luminous spiritual self (nafs al-rūḥ al-nūrī) [separating it] from the subtle substance (laṭīf) of the dense natural self (nafs al-ṭabʿ al-kathīf), and by this [luminous spiritual self] he comprehends things (yaʿqilu al-ashyāʾ), and is given the vision (rūʾyā) in the heavenly kingdom (malakūt). However, when a person sleeps, He extracts from him the subtle substance of the dense natural self, not the subtle substance of the luminous spiritual self. Therefore, when the sleeping person awakens, he recovers a subtle breath (nafas laṭīf) from the subtle substance of the spiritual self, for if this were to part from him, it would leave him without motion (ḥaraka), and lifeless (mayyit). Thus, the dense natural self has a subtle substance (laṭīfa) and likewise the spiritual self has a subtle substance (laṭīfa). The life of the subtle substance of the natural self is by virtue of the light of the subtle substance of the spiritual self (nūr laṭīf nafs al-rūḥ). The spiritual life of the subtle substance of the spiritual self (ḥayāt rūḥ laṭīf nafs al-rūḥ) is by virtue of remembrance [of God] (dhikr), just as He has said: rather they are living with their Lord, provided for [by Him] [3:169], that is, they are sustained by remembrance, due to what they attained through the subtle luminous self.””””
Links and Related Essay’s
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sahl_al-Tustari
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/02/23/christ-and-the-crucifixtion-by-todd-lawson/
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/04/28/tanwir-al-miqbas-min-tafsir-ibn-abbas/
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/09/20/tawaffa-in-242-and-415/
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/09/18/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-and-4159-4160-in-the-ahmadiyya-qurans-before-the-death-of-jesus-as/
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/04/28/mujahid-ibn-jabr-arabic-%D9%85%D9%8F%D8%AC%D9%8E%D8%A7%D9%87%D9%90%D8%AF%D9%92-%D8%A8%D9%90%D9%86%D9%92-%D8%AC%D9%8E%D8%A8%D9%92%D8%B1%e2%80%8e%e2%80%8e-645-722-ce-tafsir-on-4157-to-4159/
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/05/10/st-john-of-damascus-and-his-tract-heresy-of-ishmaelites-confirms-the-substitution-theory-749/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swoon_hypothesis
http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=587&Itemid=59#3
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzspz1z5gz4
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Abu-al-Qasim-Mahmud-ibn-Umar-al-Zamakhshari
https://www.google.com/search?q=Who+is+Todd+Lawson&oq=Who+is+Todd+Lawson&aqs=chrome..69i57.5047j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian
Intro
This verse also tells us that the enemies of Eisa (as) never even touched him (kafaf-ta), they never even put a scratch of Eisa (as)(See Tafsir ibn Kathir). Also check out the substitution theory and how it came from Ibn Abbas herein. In 1905, MGA quoted this verse and called his Ahmadiyya Movement as “Bani Israel” and quoted half of 5:110 (5:111 in the Kadiani Koran). (See Badr, vol. 1, no. 3, p. 2, dated 20 April 1905, via Malfuzat-7, page-178 online English Edition). Check out Dr. Ali Ataie explaining this verse herein (16:53 time stamp).
In 1901, MGA alleged that it was revealed to him that Eisa (as) fell into a state of swoon and was not actually dead (See Malfuzat-3, page-27, Al-Hakam, vol. 5, no. 6, dated 17 February 1901, pp. 7-8, as narrated by Sahibzadah Miyan Mahmud Ahmad Sahib in Tashhidh-ul-Adhhan). MGA also denigrated the “substitution theory” and said that Allah doesn’t make deals with criminals (inferring 5:115 of the Quran).
5:110 also tells the world how Esa (as) brought the dead to life (with the permission of Allah), and how Esa (as) healed the lepers. MGA denied these miracles very early on in his career, in fact, before he claimed to be the Messiah. Allah also tells the world that Esa (as) spoke while in the cradle and he would speak in middle age (wakala)(see 3:46 also)(this phrase only appears twice in the Quran, both times for Esa (as), thus proving that Esa (as) would physically return, and he will know the Quran and hadith and be a just judge and convert all Christians and Jews to Islam.
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was purposely silent on many verses of the Quran which prove the physical descent of Esa (as). We have covered this here. In terms of 3:48, in this verse, Allah specifically says that he will teach Esa (as) the “Kitab” and the “Hikma”, which literally translates as the book and the wisdom. This phraseology is also used when Allah speaks of Muhammad (saw). Further, this phrase Kitab (book) means the Quran in most cases (see Chapter 2:2 as an example).
In the 5-volume official English commentary of the Quran by Malik Ghulam Farid, he argues that in 5:67 (5:68 in the Qadiani Quran)(the arabic phrase is Kafaf-too), Muhammad (Saw) was also promised protection, however, it never happened, he also quoted 5:11 (5:12 in the Qadiani Quran)(the arabic phrase is Fakafa) and argued that the early Muslims were promised protection too and it also never happened (naozobillah).
In Nov-2025, the True Islam UK youtube channel streamed and at 1:56:00, Maulvi Raheel mentions 5:110 of the Quran, Allah restrained (kafaftoo) the children of Israel from touching Eisa (As) and his mother. Maulvi Raheel infers that Allah protected Eisa (as) from death only. He then quotes 5:67 of the Quran.
Intro
Watch my video explanation here. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was purposely silent on many verses of the Quran which prove the physical descent of Esa (as). We have covered this here. In terms of 3:48, in this verse, Allah specifically says that he will teach Esa (as) the “Kitab” and the “Hikma”, which literally translates as the book and the wisdom, Allah also said the Torah and Injeel. However, in 1898-99, in Ayyam-us-Sulh (see the full quote in the below), MGA claimed that Eisa (as) had Jewish teachers that taught him the Torah.
This phraseology is also used when Allah speaks of Muhammad (saw)(see 62:2). Further, this phrase Kitab (book) normally means the quran (see Chapter 2:2 as an example) when Allah is speaking to Muhammad (saw). Moreover, verses of the quran like 2:129, 2:151, 4:113, 62:2, 3:164, 4:54, 3:81, 2:231 and 5:110, prove that the Kitab and Hikma are simply the revelations and guidance given to prophets. Also, in 5:110, Allah says that he taught Esa (as) the “Kitab” and “Hikma”, and the Torah and Injeel. This seems to assert that via the divine revelations of Esa (as) and via Allah teaching him directly (like Adam (as) was taught), Allah would teach Esa (as) the quran and hadith so that upon his second return, he would be able to be a judge (see Bukhari)(Allah says this twice in the Quran)(See the Tafsir of Suyuti). Finally, in the same verse (5:110), Allah tells the world that Esa (as) spoke while a baby and he would speak in maturity (which means about 40), thus proving that Esa (as) would physically return and know the quran and hadith and be a just judge and convert all Christians and Jews to Islam.
Continue reading “3:48 of the Quran proves that Allah will teach Esa (as) the Quran, just like Allah taught Adam (as) many things”
Intro
We have argued over and over again how humans were initially created in heaven and were sent to Earth by Allah (only Adam and Eve). We have also proved that in Islamic theory, it wasn’t only Adam (As) and Eve who traveled between Heaven and Earth, in fact, this was always possible, however, with the permission of Allah, in between heaven and Earth are the cosmos (samaa).
In 55:33, Allah explains how he purposely trapped humans on Earth. In fact, Allah has purposely placed the cosmos (samaa) with 7 layers and thus so far away that humans will never develop the technology to reach heaven. Allah emphatically says that without his permission, no human can travel from Earth to heaven. Moreover, he dares the Meccan’s to try in 55:33. Finally, 5:17 proves that Heaven is a parallel universe and there is in-between space between Heaven and Earth that humans will never be allowed to breach with any technology, only allah can allow it. One last thing, Allah’s powers are unlimited. This is a standard, which Ahmadi’s are violating (see the Quran, 65:12, and 35:1, and many others). Finally, Allah is “Lord of all the worlds”, “Rubbil alameen”, this phraseology appears in the quran 44 times, thus proving that our universe isn’t the only one in existence. Furthermore, MGA claimed that humans couldn’t reach space and the moon.
In Nov-2025, via a “True Islam UK live stream”, at 1:58:40, Maulvi Raheel mentions the moon landing. At 2:00:00, humans can’t go beyond Earth, except with the permission of Allah! At 1:59:45, Maulvi Raheel quoted 55:33 (55:34 in the Kadiani Koran) and argued that Allah said that without the permission of Allah, no one can leave Earth. Raheel alleges that this means that humans have to take food to space. What a lie! In this verse, Allah is talking about the Van Allen radiation belt and how it has trapped humans on Earth.
Continue reading “55:33 of the Quran proves that Adam (As), Idris (as), Esa (as) and Muhammad (saw) could travel from Earth to heaven with Allah’s permission”
Intro
We have found an expose’ of MGA and Sikhism and have posted in the below. They have also made a video.
In 1895 (Sep-30), MGA allegedly visited Dera Baba Nanak to look at the Chola Sahib and was accompanied by Maulawi Nur-ud-Din, Maulawi Muhammad Ahsan Amrohi, Munshi Ghulam Qadir Fasih, Sh. Abdur Rahim, Sayyid Muhammad Ismael, Maulawi Abdul Karim, Sh. Rahmatullah Gujrati, Mirza Ayyub Baig, Mir Nasir Nawab and Sh. Hamid Ali (See Dard, pages 451-452).
MGA also claimed to be the second coming of Guru Nanak.
Continue reading “Uncloaking Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s Guru Nanak”
Intro
Allah called it “Fatah-Mobina” in 48:1 of the Quran, this destroys all Qadiani argument on this topic (Check out Brother Imtiaz explaining it here on the Dawah Wise youtube channel). Chapter 48 of the Quran covers the entire incident of the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah. When Allah called it “Fatah-Mobina”, it hadn’t been completed, in fact, only the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah had been signed, Moreover, Muslims hadn’t performed Hajj or Umra. Nevertheless, Allah was already calling it a victory. Make sure to check out Tafsir ibn Kathir on this topic (Chapter 48). Bro Imtiaz has explained it very well herein too.
It seems that MGA started arguing that the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah was a situation wherein Muhammad (saw) misunderstood information from Allah only after he lost in his prayer duel with Athim. We have found the reference in MGA’s writings, it’s from Maktubat-e-Ahmad, Volume-2 and Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya V-5, page 251, Online English Edition. This letter was written to Nawab Sardar Muhammad Ali Khan and MGA was discussing the failed prophecy of the death of Athim in 15 months. MGA was trying to create a parallel between his failed prophecy and an alleged failed prophecy by Muhammad (Saw) (nauzobillah). There is a note at the end of this letter, which seems to be from the editors, they claim that this letter has no date and no envelope. The editors claim that this letter is from September 1894.
Maktubat-volume-2 was published after MGA died in 1912. Thus, we think it was added later. The ROR of April-1940 mentions The Treaty of Hudaybiyyah and alleges that Muslims took Bait before they set out. In 1988, in the famous 5-volume commentary of the Quran, Malik Ghulam Farid asserted that Muhammad (saw) had a vision/dream and it didn’t come to fruition. He quotes Ibn Hisham, which isn’t an authentic source of information on Islam (see page 2937).
In 2026 (Apr), during the famous debate, Maulvi Raheel Ahmad alleged that many parts of “Barahin” were not wahi. Bro Imtiaz disproved this easily by quoting MGA wherein he stated, “every single word out of my mouth, my entire life, I said with the command of Allah, I didn’t say anything from myself” (See the clip on TikTok and Twitter). Bro Imtiaz than asks was this also with the command of Allah? Maulvi Raheel Ahmad was “la-jiwab”. MGA also said every single word that he writes is from Allah. Moreover, on the one hand MGA is quoting verses of the Quran about the alleged death of Eisa (as), on the other hand, MGA alleges that the death of Eisa (as) was such a secret, that it wasn’t known to any single human being before MGA. This is a contradiction. Further, in 1891, MGA said that if anyone goes against the ijma of the sahaba they are cursed (maloon). Then, in 1891, MGA says that the ijma of the sahaba is that Eisa (as) has passed away, but in 1884, MGA said that Eisa (as) was alive. thus, MGA cursed himself. How can MGA be a prophet? MGA also said that if anyone believes that Eisa (As) is alive in heaven and will phyically return, he is a denier of “Khatm-e-Nubuwwat”, thus, MGA called himself as a denier of “Khatm-e-Nubuwwat”, how can this type of person be a prophet? Maulvi Raheel didn’t give any answer. In the end, Bro Imtiaz asked Maulvi Razi to clarify what exactly was “ijtihad” of the prophet (saw) in the story of the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah. Bro Imtiaz explains how in order to defend the mistakes of MGA, these #Qadianis accuse Muhammad (Saw) of making mistakes (naozobillah). Who do Ahmadi’s love more?
Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed that at the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah many sahaba (companions) left Islam”