ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
Qadiani and Lahori-Ahmadi’s both deny 3:46 of the Quran. However, MGA’s writing’s on these verses are missing. 3:46 of the Quran and 5:110 prove that Esa (As) will physically descend close to the Day of Judgment (see 43:61). In both verses, the same phraseology and words are used to explain how Esa (as) spoke in the cradle (fil mahdi) and will speak at manhood (wakala). The phrase wakala or wakalan only appears in the Quran twice, and both times in reference to Esa (as), thus proving that Esa (as) will physically descend and give wisdom via his speech.

Tafsir ibn Kathir confirms this. In fact, Ibn Kathir presented a hadith from Abu Hurraira, wherein he relates that Muhammad (saw) said that Eisa (as) spoke in the cradle.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________MGA on 3:46 and 5:110

It seems that MGA never commented on these verses.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tafsir Ibn Kathir on 3:46
http://m.qtafsir.com/Surah-Aal-e-Imran/%60Isa-Spoke-When-He-was-Still-i—

_____________________________________________________________________________________________Malik Ghulam Farid, in the 5-volume official commentary on the Quran

In terms of 3;36, in the 1988 edition of this 5-volume commentary, Farid claims that in Lane’s Lexicon, wakala means middle age (see page 396), he then quotes Thalabi’s famous commentary on the Quran wherein this scholar writes that this phrase wakala means between the ages of 40-55.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Links and Related Essay’s

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Tha%27labi

39:42 of the Quran disproves all #ahmadi arguments on the death of Esa (as)

5:110 of the Quran proves the second advent of Esa (as)

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2020/04/04/ahmadiyya-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-and-the-physical-raffa-of-idris-as-aka-enoch-as/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/10/18/mgas-strange-beliefs-on-the-birth-of-adam-as/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/11/06/review-of-religions-may-and-june-of-1939-professor-clement-lindley-wragges-interview-of-mga-from-1908/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/01/25/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-and-his-team-went-back-and-forth-in-terms-of-if-jesus-had-a-biological-father-or-not/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/07/noor-uddin-secretly-disagreed-with-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-on-the-birth-of-esa-as/

http://www.muslim.org/books/f-ahm-mv/ch12.htm#u

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/10/18/mgas-strange-beliefs-on-the-birth-of-adam-as/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/02/muhammad-ali-the-lahori-ahmadi-denies-the-miraculous-birth-of-esa-as-in-1917/

http://www.muslim.org/sa-case/evidence/s16.htm

Professor Raig Meets The Promised Messiah

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad quoted and commented on 17:8 in 1884 in the Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya, vol. 4, he then connected 17:8 with the return of the Messiah

During the writing of Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya, MGA masked his beliefs, he was already asserting that Esa (as) died

What is Maseel-e-Maseeh? The like of the Messiah?

Sir Syed’s view on Esa (as)–1882

The Queen of the Princely state of Bhopal invested heavily (1878) into Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and his Braheen–they were disappointed by the product

Friedman errs on Ishaat us Sunnah volume numbers and the corresponding year

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/14/mga-confuses-all-of-his-readers-in-1891-as-he-claimed-to-be-the-promised-messiah/

Nusrat Jehan Begum and other women didn’t get into to MGA’s bait in 1889 and after–were they illiterate?

Ahmadiyya leadership lied about the First Bait ceremony in 1889

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was accused of claiming prophethood in the 1879–1884 era

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clement_Lindley_Wragge

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Sadiq

Account of Professor Clement Lindley Wragge

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Zikr-e-Habib

Related ROR archives
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/05/16/the-review-of-religions-ror-of-november-1931-front-page-and-pages-290-291/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/05/16/the-review-of-religions-ror-of-january-1932-pages-30-34images/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/02/03/a-misconception-removed-by-mga-from-1901-published-in-english-in-the-ror-of-1922/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2020/08/11/ahmadis-dont-believe-that-adam-as-was-the-first-man/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/22/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-denied-the-physicality-of-the-miraaj-in-1890-in-izala-auham/

here: http://www.thecult.info/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=387

http://www.thecult.info/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1601&p=15867&hilit=miraj#p15867

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/01/20/quotes-from-izala-auham-1890/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/10/28/izaala-auham-quotes-1891/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/29/khutbah-ilhamia-quotes-the-revealed-sermon-april-11th-1900/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/06/27/ahmadis-have-always-lied-about-the-publish-dates-of-izala-auham-1890/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/22/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-denied-the-physicality-of-the-miraaj-in-1890-in-izala-auham/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/09/18/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-and-4159-4160-in-the-ahmadiyya-qurans-before-the-death-of-jesus-as/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/08/18/muhammad-ali-writes-that-izala-auham-was-published-in-september-of-1891/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/25/mirza-tahir-ahmad-tells-the-world-in-the-90s-that-izala-auham-was-published-in-june-1891/

https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmXoypizjW3WknFiJnKLwHCnL72vedxjQkDDP1mXWo6uco/wiki/Mohammadi_Begum.html#cite_note-begum-8

B.A. Rafiq, “Truth About Ahmadiyya, online version, https://www.alislam.org/library/book/truth-about-ahmadiyyat/suspension-of-jihad/, Retrieved on 6-7-19).

Per Islamic theory, Adam (As) was created in heaven and placed on Earth, thus proving that travel between Earth and Heaven is possible

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/02/23/christ-and-the-crucifixtion-by-todd-lawson/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/04/28/tanwir-al-miqbas-min-tafsir-ibn-abbas/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/04/28/the-tanwir-al-miqbas-tafsir-and-the-substitution-theory-of-esa-as/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/09/20/tawaffa-in-242-and-415/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2020/05/17/in-1880-before-the-publishing-of-the-barahin-i-ahmadiyya-series-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-already-knew-that-he-was-the-second-coming-of-esa-as/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/09/18/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-and-4159-4160-in-the-ahmadiyya-qurans-before-the-death-of-jesus-as/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2020/07/20/3942-of-the-quran-disproves-all-ahmadi-arguments-on-the-death-of-esa-as/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/02/03/in-1884-before-his-wildest-claims-mga-defined-inni-mutawafeeka-wa-raffa-as-i-shall-give-you-full-reward-and-shall-raise-you-towards-me/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/09/18/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-and-4159-4160-in-the-ahmadiyya-qurans-before-the-death-of-jesus-as/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/04/28/mujahid-ibn-jabr-arabic-%D9%85%D9%8F%D8%AC%D9%8E%D8%A7%D9%87%D9%90%D8%AF%D9%92-%D8%A8%D9%90%D9%86%D9%92-%D8%AC%D9%8E%D8%A8%D9%92%D8%B1%e2%80%8e%e2%80%8e-645-722-ce-tafsir-on-4157-to-4159/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/05/10/st-john-of-damascus-and-his-tract-heresy-of-ishmaelites-confirms-the-substitution-theory-749/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swoon_hypothesis

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/04/26/salaaboo-in-2071-proves-the-substitution-theory-for-esa-as/

http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=587&Itemid=59#3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzspz1z5gz4

https://www.britannica.com/biography/Abu-al-Qasim-Mahmud-ibn-Umar-al-Zamakhshari

https://www.google.com/search?q=Who+is+Todd+Lawson&oq=Who+is+Todd+Lawson&aqs=chrome..69i57.5047j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

http://m.qtafsir.com/Surah-Aal-e-Imran/%60Isa-Spoke-When-He-was-Still-i—