ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
The mirza family has been lying about its growth in Africa since at least the 1930’s. This was nothing new for the Mirza family, since they were lying in 1902-1904 era and claimed to have swelled its ranks to over 100,000-400,000 total Ahmadi’s. After WW-1 and WW-2, the Ahmadiyya movement was given money by the British government to build schools and etc in british colonies of Africa, this is how the Mirza family was able to send missionaries and start schools and hospitals. Nevertheless, the Khalifa announced his annual convert figures during the #JalsaUK2020, and suprisingly, he gave a country by country breakdown for the first time ever. We were thus able to do the math and see where the bulk of converts have came from, and its the continent of Africa (90% of converts). However, this has been going on since the 1930’s, the Mirza family has been announcing ridiculously high numbers of converts to Ahmadiyya in African nations. This is a total lie!!!!!!!!!!!!  Why is the Mirza family lying about converts to Ahmadiyya in african nations? Easy…to keep #ahmadis pacified, in fact, I know many #ahmadis personally who still think that #ahmadiyya is growing, even though the facts show otherwise
Mirza Masroor Ahmad seems desperate, Ahmadiyya is dying, even the number of converts from America (101) is a lie, at best they have gotten 5-10 people to convert and from them, 6-7 will leave.

Continue reading “90% of converts to Ahmadiyya have always been fabricated as from African nations” →

Intro
The Mirza family and the Ahmadi mullahs have a long history of lying about their number of converts. However, for the first time ever, the Khalifa, Mirza Masroor Ahmad announced the number of converts from America, Canada, Germany and the UK in any single year (starting at the 1:03:07 mark). Even though the Khalifa has finally announced bait figured per country and an overall number of 112,179, which is down almost 400% in contrast to 2018-2019, these are all still lies. Especially in Africa, people aren’t willfully converting to Ahmadiyya anywhere in Africa, they may only be converting for free school and medical attention. In fact, Fisher described Ahmadiyya in Africa as a British-Maritime-Implantation, in fact, wherever the British government went, Ahmadiyya mullahs tagged along and the Mirza family got paid. To read the history of how Ahmadiyya mullahs/Mirza family have lied about converts see here. What’s interesting here, most Ahmadi’s think that Ahmadiyya is growing….however, the numbers don’t lie. If you look at Africa, almost 100,000 converts to Ahmadiyya from Africa. In fact, that is roughly 90% of all converts to Ahmadiyya. We are left with 12,000 (10%). Of the remaining 10%, Asia comprises 3-4% (3000-4000k people). That leaves about 7-8% from Europe, Australia and the entire western hemisphere. Converts to Ahmadiyya in Pakistan weren’t even discussed. Finally, even these numbers are lies, that Africa number is a sham equal to that of Lance Armstrong. Furthermore, that leaves barely 12,000 converts to Ahmadiyya in one year, we suspect that the number is really 1000 in total, 1000 humans converted to Ahmadiyya in the 2019-2020 Ahmadiyya fiscal year. Read our full analysis on the growth of Ahmadiyya from 1889 to 2020 here.

Finally, it should be noted that even Ahmadi mullah’s have admitted that no one is converting to Ahmadiyya in Canada, only fake conversions for marriage.
Continue reading “Barely 100 American’s converted to Ahmadiyya from July 2019 to July 2020” →

Intro
The entire ulema, Shia and Sunni believe that Esa (as) left planet earth at roughly age 33 (see Tafsir Ibn Kathir). In 1891, when MGA made his wild claims, he was also asserting that Esa (As) died and was buried in Galilee (Al-Khaleeli)(See Izala Auham, Roohani Khazain vol.3 p.353-354), which is modern day Israel. MGA also connected 5:117 to this scenario.

About a year later, in 1892, MGA began to say that Esa (As) lived to age 120 and indirectly quoted the saying of Aisha, which was also recorded in Kanzul Ummul (See Nishan Asmani, page 19)(MGA was quoting Tabrani [spelled as Tibrani] and Al-Hakam). See our full refutation of this Tabrani quote herein.

In 1895, in Satt Bachan, MGA and his ghost writers wrote that Esa (as) lived an additional 87 years after the event of crucifixtion, that would make his age at death to be 120, since Esa (As) was 33 at the event of crucifixtion (and again he quoted Tabrani). In 1898, in “Raz-e-Haqiqat” (A hidden Truth) and Ayyam-e-Sulh, MGA and his team again wrote that Esa (as) lived til he was 120, but now they were claiming that he died in Kashmir. Continue reading “Esa (as) didn’t live til age 125 or 120, Ahmadiyya people are wrong!” →

Intro
Some silly #ahmadis think that Sirhindi supported the prophethood of MGA, that is a total fabrication, Sirhindi believed that 1/46th of prophethood remained and =muhadas, which was exactly what MGA claimed from 1880 to 1900.

However, in 1901, MGA claimed to be an Ummati Nabi and back dated it to 1880. Nevertheless, we have an important study on Sirhindi Hwand have archived it in the below for future discovery. He wrote about Shia’s and how he thought they were Kafirs, he wrote about the 73-sect hadith. Sirhindi also holds that the Qur‘an, the Sunnah o f the Prophet, the Ijtihad and Ijm a‘ (concensus of opinion o f the jurists) are the only means to determine what things are halal (legal) or haram (illegal) and what acts are right or wrong.
Continue reading “Shiekh Ahmad Sirhindi did Takfir on Shia’s and said that all prophethood was law-bearing” →

Intro
Ahmadi’s are academically dishonest, its a cycle, their clerics are to blame. Nevertheless, after the split of 1914, the Qadiani’s began to reference Ahmad Sirhindi (mujadid of the 11th century and Mujaddid Alf-i-Thani)(A Naqhshabandi Sufi and Hanafi). Ahmad Sirhindi and other Sufi’s like Ibn Arabi only considered prophethood as law-bearing, like 99% of Muslims, however, they allowed for 1/46th of prophethood, and also called it a form of prophethood via dreams and etc (non-law-bearing prophethood). In contrast, MGA claimed to be an Ummati-Nabi, whereas Ibn Arabi and Sirhindi were equating prophethood=muhaddas.

The highly regarded Sheikh Ahmed Sirhindi had proclaimed himself to be the mujaddid/reformer for the next one thousand years (“mujaddid alif thani”) (Friedmann 2000). Per Muhammad Ali, MGA quoted Sirhindi in terms of the definition of a Muhadas in 1891, in MGA’s letters (Maktubat-1, letter-27 and Maktubat-2, page-99, Via Muhammad Ali, “The Last Prophet”, page 50-51) and in Izala Auham (see page 915, older edition). Muhammad Ali argued (1916) that MGA had quoted Sirhindi before MGA had claimed prophethood. Nevertheless, in the letters of Sirhindi, there is ample proof of the fact that he believed that prophethood had ended.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

MGA on Sirhindi

1891
Izalah Auham, p. 915, quoted from Maktubat Ahmadiyya, vol. ii, p. 99

“Let it be known to you, O friend, that God sometimes communicates with a person face to face and such persons are from among the prophets, and sometimes the communication takes place with some of these perfect ones who, although they are not prophets, are their followers. And when a person is honoured with this kind of communication (kalam) in abundance, he is called a muhaddath. And this (divine communication) is not of the kind of inspiration called ilham nor is it that which has been called ‘ilqa fil rau’, which is a sudden suggestion made directly to the heart of the inspired one, nor is it the kind of communication which takes place through the agency of the angel. Such communication is addressed to the perfect person (al-insan al-kamil). And God with his blessing distinguishes whomsoever he pleases.” (Per Muhammad Ali, MGA quoted Sirhindi in terms of the definition of a Muhadas in 1891, in MGA’s letters (Maktubat-1, letter-27 and Maktubat-2, page-99, Via Muhammad Ali, “The Last Prophet”, page 50-51) and in Izala Auham (see page 915, older edition).

1907
Haqiqatul Wahy

“””The truth is what the Revered reformer of Sirhind [Mujaddid Alfe-Thani] has recorded in his Maktubat:

Though some individuals from among this ummah [i.e. the Muslims] are honoured with converse and address with the Divine and will continue to be so honoured until the Day of
Judgment, yet the individual who is so honoured with this converse and address abundantly and to whom the unseen is disclosed abundantly, is called a Prophet.””” (see online english edition).

Malfuzat, v. 10. p. 155 
(as quoted and translated by Zahid Aziz in his debate with Tahir Ijaz)

MGA says there, referring to Hazrat Mujaddid Alif Sani, that whoever has dreams and revelations in abundance is called muhaddas.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Sirhindi on prophethood
(See Maktubat Imam Rabbani, Hakikat Ketabevi, Istanbul, 1977 Maktub # 301 pp. 636-639)

“Bismillah al-Rahman al-Rahim. After the praises (due to Allah) and the salutations (due to the Holy Prophet). My son, Amanullah ought to know, Prophethood (nubuwwah) is about closeness to Allah which does not have even a remote connection to the idea of “zill”. It ascends to Almighty Allah and descends towards the creation. This closeness in essence belongs to the Prophets –on them be the peace and blessings- and this rank (mansab) is exclusive to those godly men –may the peace and blessings be upon them. And the Leader of Mankind (i.e. the Holy Prophet) –on him be the peace and salutations- is the final seal of this rank. After his descent ‘Eisa will follow the shar’iah of Khatam al-Rusul –on them both be the peace and salutations. The point here is that followers also have their share. And by the way of inheritance the followers also find their share from the wisdom, gnosis and wonders of this station (‘uloom o ma’arif wa kamalaat aan maqam).

So for the followers to attain the wonders of prophethood (kamalat nubuwwat) by way of following and inheritance after the coming of the Last Prophet –on him and his followers and all the prophets be the peace and salutations- is not in contradiction to his finality. So be not of those who doubt.”

After this Imam Rabbani discusses how one may find his share from this blessed inheritance. And towards the end of the letter he writes;

“One must know that attaining to this blessing is direct for the prophets –on them be the peace and blessings. And for the companions (sahaba) of the prophets who attain this wealth though inheritance and following it is through the prophets –on them be the peace and blessings. Those who received this wealth after the prophets and their companions are rare although it is possible that someone else may also be blessed with this wealth through inheritance or by having followed.

I think this wealth was available to the earliest tabi’in, and was given to the senior taba’ tabi’in too. Thereafter this wealth became extinct till it came to the second millennium after the Holy Prophet –on him and his followers be the peace and blessings. Even now this wealth has become visible through following and succession. And the last of the times have been made akin to the earliest days.”

(See Maktubat Imam Rabbani, Hakikat Ketabevi, Istanbul, 1977 Maktub # 301 pp. 636-639)

In his book Al-Musawwa Sharh al-Muwatta‟, a commentary on the famous book of Islāmic law by Imām Mālik, under the section “The Ruling of the Khawārij, the Jahmiyya and their likes”57, Shah Wali Allah al-Dehlawi writes:

وكذلك من قال ف الش خٌ نٌ أب بكر وعمر مثلًَ ل سٌا من أهل الجنة مع تواتر الحد ثٌ ف بشارتهما أو قال: ان النب -صلى عل هٌ وسلم-
خاتم النبوة ولكن معنى هذا الكلَم أنه لَ جٌوز أن سٌمو بعده أحد بالنب ،ً وأما معنى النبوة وهو كون الإنسان مبعوثاً من تعالى إلى الخلق
مفترض ال اعة معصوماً من الذنوب ومن البقاء، على الخ أ ف مٌا رٌى فهو موجود ف الْئمة بعده ، فذلك هو الزند قٌ . وقد اتفق جماه رٌ
المتأخر نٌ من الحنف ةٌ والشافع ةٌ على قتل من جٌري هذا المجرى و أعلم

“””Similarly, whoever claims concerning the two shaykhs [Abu Bakr and Umar] for example that they are not [to be] the inhabitants of Paradise, even though it is mass narrated in the hadīth that they were given the good news [of entering Paradise]; or whoever states that the Prophet is the seal of Prophethood, but that this term means that no one after him can be named a “prophet”, and that as for that meaning of prophethood which is [a human sent by Allah to the people, obedience to whom is required, protected from sins and remaining in error] that, this (meaning of) prophethood can still be found in the leaders of the Community after him; then this person is a heretic (zindīq). Furthermore, the majority of the later Hanafī and Shāfi’ī scholars are unanimous in agreement that such a person deserves capital punishment, and Allah knows best.””” (Via Farhan Khan, “With love to Ahmadis”).
_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Adil Hussain on Sirhindi and MGA

“””Friedmann explained Ibn al-‘Arabi’s concept of legislative— 33 prophets (anbiya tashrV) and non-legislative prophets (anbiya la tashri’a lahum). Legislative prophets were those who brought some type of scripture or legal code to mankind, whereas non-legislative prophets simply reinforced the previous scriptures that had already been revealed. Although Ghulam Ahmad did claim to be a nonlegislative prophet, he acknowledged that no other legislative prophet could come after Muhammad and that the Qur’an was the last scripture. Friedmann showed how
Ghulam Ahmad believed that non-legislative prophets would continue to come in the Islamic tradition, albeit in a capacity that was subservient or spiritually inferior to Muhammad who was khatam al-nabiyyin (seal of the prophets)”””.(See Adil Hussain)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Ahmadi sources quote Sirhindi out of context

In this connection, I would place before you a passage from the writings of the well known Mujaddid Alf-e-Thani, Hazrat Sheikh Ahmad Faruqi Sirhindi (died 1034 AH), who is a recognized authority among the different sects of Ahle-Sunnat (Hanafi, Deobandi, Barelavi). In his Maktubat, he states:

“””Following the advent of Hazrat Muhammad, the Chosen One, the Seal of the Prophets(sa), the attainment of the attributes of prophethood by his followers as subordinate or by way of inheritance, will in no way conflict with his status as the Seal of the Prophets. So do not be amongst the doubters”””. (Maktubat Imam Rabbani, Book 1, Maktub no. 301, vol. 5, p. 141)

Links and Related Essay’s
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmad_Sirhindi

Finality of Prophethood

http://198.23.49.155/qadis/ti/za-nov30.htm

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2020/04/12/the-concept-of-the-ummati-nabi/

English author uses word “apostle” for Sayyid Ahmad Barelvi

Click to access A-Misconception-Removed.pdf

http://www.maktabah.org/en/item/62-maktubat-imam-rabbani-shaykh-ahmed-sirhindi

https://books.google.com/books?id=3QjPDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA686&lpg=PA686&dq=Ummati+Nabi&source=bl&ots=fk0uRPujFk&sig=ACfU3U1SDQymXhEopA2JDlz3j068ocTtWA&hl=en&ppis=_e&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiUpsO58ODoAhVFsp4KHZOuDvI4ChDoATAEegQIDBA3#v=onepage&q=Ummati%20Nabi&f=false

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/05/01/muhammad-saw-is-prophet-124000-esa-as-is-prophet-number-123999/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/09/30/maulvi-sanuallah-acknowledges-that-mga-claimed-prophethood-in-nov-1901/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/09/30/mga-explains-how-he-misunderstood-his-prophethood-in-1880-and-realized-it-later-on/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/09/26/ahmadiyya-and-469-everything-you-need-to-know/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/08/03/ahmadiyya-scholars-wrote-about-469-in-1908/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/09/30/maulvi-sanuallah-acknowledges-that-mga-claimed-prophethood-in-nov-1901/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/10/16/the-causes-of-internal-dissensions-in-the-ahmadiyya-movement-by-kwaja-kamaluddin-1914/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/08/01/prophethood-among-the-followers-of-muhammad-by-maulana-sayyid-muhammad-ahsan-of-amroha-oct-1913-in-tashhizul-azhan/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/05/20/an-ahmadi-claimed-prophethood-in-late-1901-or-early-1902-and-was-boycotted-by-ahmadis-chiragh-din-of-jammu-jamooni/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/09/30/maulvi-abdul-kareem-claims-prophethood-per-mga-maulvi-amrohi-disagrees/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/13/what-is-arbain-a-book-by-mga-and-his-team-of-writers/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/04/23/in-1891-when-mga-made-his-big-claims-he-denied-prophethood-mufti-sadiq-was-heavily-involved/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/09/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-accused-of-claiming-prophethood-in-the-1879-1884-era/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/09/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-considered-a-kafir-in-1884-before-his-wild-claims/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/26/some-rare-books-from-the-1901-1902-era-which-refute-mgas-claim-to-prophethood/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/09/30/maulvi-sanuallah-acknowledges-that-mga-claimed-prophethood-in-nov-1901/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/12/mirza-sultan-ahmad-son-of-hazrat-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-on-finality-of-prophethood/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/11/eik-ghalti-ka-izala-aka-correction-of-an-error-was-re-published-on-march-1-1914/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/01/16/hani-tahir-explains-mirza-ghulam-ahmads-prophethood-and-pre-1901-vs-post-1901/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/11/21/a-few-months-after-becoming-khalifa-mirza-mahmud-ahmad-waffled-on-his-fathers-prophethood/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/06/27/do-ahmadis-believe-in-the-same-kalima-as-muslims/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/09/30/mga-explains-how-he-misunderstood-his-prophethood-in-1880-and-realized-it-later-on/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/02/23/noorudin-didnt-care-if-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-claimed-even-law-bearing-prophethood/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam

Intro
Esa (as) is still alive, he will die when he returns (see 4:159). Dr. Zeki Saritoprak wrote an amazing essay on 4:159 and other issues with the life of Esa (As).
Continue reading “The Eschatological Descent of Jesus: Muslim Views by Dr. Zeki Saritoprak” →

Intro
Before British-India, the vast majority of Desi Muslims lived their lives based on Hanafi Fiqh, since this was the legal position of the Mughal empire. The British empire came and made sects within Islam and thus divided those that they ruled. Shaykh Mohammad Yasir is semi-famous Hanafi scholar on Islam. He covers Waffa, Raffa, 5:117, 4:159 and 39:42 and many others. He mentions a book by a Kashmiri imam (Anwar Shah) which had 101 hadith which proved that Esa (as) would return. Shah Wali ullah held the same views, as did Sirhindi and all other Hanafi Muslims, even the Sufi’s. Watch my video explanation of 39:42 here. In 39:42 (39:43 in the Qadiani Quran), Allah tells the world that WAFFA can mean other than death (and 6:60). In these verse, even #ahmadi authors agree that WAFFA doesn’t mean death. Historically, Chapter 39 was revealed at Mecca, and one of the earliest uses of WAFFA by Allah has he explained the “taking” of something, in this case souls (See page 2267). Quranically, Allah is allowed to do anything, since allah has power to do all. Muhammad Hijaab explained the same concept in his video on the subject. Furthermore, MGA refused to discuss this verse from 1880 to 1906. Finally in 1906, in Haqiqatul Wahy, he discussed the verse and still he didn’t mention how WAFFA in this verse doesn’t mean death, instead it means a taking, thus, opening the door for WAFFA in 3:55 and 5:117 to mean NOT DEATH, but a taking. In fact, in 1884, MGA was translating WAFFA as a taking (not death), however, deep in MGA’s heart and brain, he knew that he was the second coming of Esa (as) and was thus pretending to hold the common islamic beliefs, i.e., that Esa (as) was alive in heaven. One last thing, 4:159 proves that Esa (as) hasn’t died yet. Watch my video explanation of 39:42 here. Also, watch this hanafi scholar (Shaykh Mohammad Yasir is semi-famous Hanafi scholar on Islam) explain how 39:42 proves that Esa (as) was captured by Allah and hasn’t died yet.

Continue reading “Hanafi Fiqh on the physical return of Esa (as)” →

Intro
Pir Sirajul-Haqq Nu‘mani was a  toilet attendant of MGA, he was the brother-in-law of Maulvi Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi (See Mujadid e Azim, abridged English version) and came from a family of Pirs, he would regularly massage MGA’s back, legs and neck (see Tadhkirah) he permanently moved to Qadian in 1882 and became a toilet attendant of MGA and main scribe (1882–1900 era).

It seems that before 1889, sometimes, Pir Sirajul-Haqq Nu‘mani would lead the prayers in Masjid Mubarak (since MGA never led prayers) and one time read out a Persian poem about MGA after Ruku.

Pir Sirajul-Haqq Nu‘mani even tried to arrange a written debate between MGA and Gangohi, but MGA would not do an oral debate.

He was a worker around Qadian in the 1901 era (see Dard).

Al-Bushra, an old manuscript, which seems to have been an unpublished collection of revelations that were collected by a close companion of MGA named Pir Sirajul-Haqq Nu‘mani. Parts of it are still written in the 2009 online edition of Tadkhirah. On the title page, it says Manzoor Elahi special Assistant of Mirza Ghulam Qadiani has compiled all of his revelations from the day of his appointment to the day of his death, during the khilafat of Molvi Nooruddin and published it from Qadian in Jan 1914.

He wrote an early biography on MGA in 1915 called Tadhkiratul Mahdi. He also seems to have had a nephew which was a she-male and even has a picture with MGA.

Continue reading “Who is Pir Sirajul Haq Nu’mani (1855—1935)?” →

Intro
MGA seems to have always thought that Tuesday’s were unlucky days (See Seeratul Mahdi-1923, Narration #11). In this story, Nusrat Jehan Begum (MGA’s widow in 1923) told her son, Mirza Bashir Ahmad that MGA disliked Tuesday’s and related a story about the birth of MGA’s daughter, Mubaraka Begum and how she was about to be born on a Tuesday, but MGA prayed that the birth be delayed (since MGA disliked Tuesday’s and saw them as bad luck). The birth was thus delayed and Mubaraka Begum was born on a Wednesday night. Dard didn’t give an exact date of birth either (see Dard, page 565).

“Narrated to me Hz Mother Sahba, that hz Masih Moud (mgaq), among days of the week, considered Tuesday as ” not a good day” (like Friday the 13th considered by some as unlucky day). Further narrated by Hz Khalifa sani (k2) that when my sister Mubaraka begum was about to be born, it was Tuesday, Therefore, hz Sb prayed that to be born after Tuesday so, she was born after Tuesday on Wednesday night.”
________________________________________________________________________________________________Links and Related Essay’s

qarchives.com/misc/Seeratul_Mahdi_1.pdf

Who is Nawab Mubaraka Begum 1897-1977? – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Who is Nawab Mubaraka Begum 1897-1977?

Who is Mirza Bashir Ahmad? – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Who is Mirza Bashir Ahmad?

The 1923 edition of Seeratul Mahdi – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

The 1923 edition of Seeratul Mahdi

Who is Nusrat Jehan Begum (1868–1952), the second wife of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad? – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Who is Nusrat Jehan Begum (1868–1952), the second wife of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad?

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #mirzaghulamahmad