ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
We have found a rare reference in the story of the Musleh Maud. It seems that in 1916, via the Pagham e sulh, the Lahori-Ahmadi openly surmised that maybe, Mirza Sultan Ahmad (the eldest son of MGA) was the Musleh Maud (see “The Noble Son” by Jalal ud Din Shams, 1957, see page 51). After MGA died, in June-July of 1908, MGA’s son, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad writes in his magazine that the “Promised-Son” doesn’t have to necessarily be a biological son of MGA. However, as soon as Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad became Khalifa, he forced his closest followers to begin writing essays wherein he would be connected with the Musleh Maud, and he remained silent. This started after a Qadiani wrote an article in May 1914 in the magazine Tashhiz-ul-Azhan, published from Qadian, trying to prove that Mirza Mahmud Ahmad was the Musleh Maud whose coming had been prophesied by the MGA. A few weeks later, Muhammad Ali wrote “Al-Muslih al-Mau‘ud” and claimed that none of the then living sons of MGA fulfilled the prophecy of being Muslih Mau‘ud and the Musleh Maud would come at the end of the 300 years from 1908 and thus, would turn 3 into 4. The 1944 edition of this book can be found on the Lahori-Ahmadi website, it is only in Urdu. A few weeks after that in the English Review of Religions for September-1914 (see pages 330-337), unknown Ahmadi authors were straight up claiming that the Khalifa, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad was the Musleh Maud, without question.

Nevertheless, in early 1916, while Mirza Sultan Ahmad was working in Lahore as “Additional Judge and Magistrate” Lahore, he seems to have begun working with the Lahori-Ahmadi’s and denying all types of prophethood’s. What’s odd is that his sons seem to have been living in Qadian and seem to have converted to Qadianism (Mirza Aziz Ahmad and Mirza Rashid Ahmad), their mother was the daughter of the infamous Mirza Imam ud Din (MGA’s cousin). Its unclear where and when she died. Mirza Sultan Ahmad was in his 60’s at this time. His essay in the Pagham e Sulh can be found herein, it is dated as 1-23-1916. Sheikh Muhammad Jan of Wazirabad read this article and immediately wrote to the manager/editor of the Pagham-e-Sulh and had his own essay published on 2-3-1916 wherein he remembered a vision from MGA’s father-in-law (the famous Mir Nasir Nawab), which claimed that Mirza Sultan Ahmad was the one to make 3 into 4 (the musleh maud prophecy)(see “The Noble Son” by Jalal ud Din Shams, 1957, see page 49). Sheikh Muhammad Jan seems to have been super friendly with both sides of Ahmadi’s (Qadiani’s and Lahori’s), however, he never got into any bait. The Qadiani-Ahmadi’s immediately responded on 2-15-1916 via the Al-Fazl, it seems that Mir Nasir Nawab, interpreted this to mean that he came to occupy a seat in the Ministry of the Princely State of Bahawalpur and nothing more.

Continue reading “In 1916, the Lahori-Ahmadi’s were claiming that Mirza Sultan Ahmad was the #Muslehmaud” →

Intro
After the election of Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud in March of 1914, the Pagham-e-Sulh commented many times and were trying to unify with the Khalifa, see the quotes in the below (see “The Noble Son” by Jalal ud Din Shams, 1957.

Continue reading “Quotes from the Pagham-e-Sulh, after the Split of March-1914” →

Intro
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad admitted to take bath’s at a pond in Qadian (see scan in the below). Via Seeratul Mahdi, Maulvi Muhammad Ali would also bathe in this pond and even almost drowned once. This pond seems to have been mentioned by Mirza Aziz Ahmad in the ROR of Oct-1942. The ROR of Jan-1943 tells us that there was a pond that surrounded Qadian on 3 sides, he also mentions a Banyan Tree.

Even in 2021, Ahmadiyya Mohalla was totally flooded. Qadian does experience flooding, when flooding happens, the wells and ponds fill up.

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad loved to take a bath in nasty pond at Qadian” →

Intro
After MGA wrote Raz-e-Haqiqat and lied to the world about Yuz Asaf (1898), MGA and his team decided to send Khalifa Nur ud Din to Mohalla Khanyar, Srinagar, Kashmir on a fact-finding expedition. You can listen to our sister Pious Spirit explaining this in her video on the Shamd ud Din RB channel (at 18:58 she explains Maulvi Abdullah). This is very odd, since it seems like Maulvi Abdullah left Ahmadiyya shortly after his letter was published in Raz-e-Haqiqat. Ahmadiyya sources tell us that in 1899, MGA and his team began writing the famous “Jesus in India” (it was published as incomplete book after MGA died in 1908). MGA published an announcement entitled, Al-Ishtihar al-Ansar (Announcement – the Helpers) on October 4, 1899 (See Mujadid-e-Azim, online english abridged version, page 835. However, in this announcement, MGA was telling the world that Khalifa Nur ud Din Jamooni had already went to Mohalla Khanyar, Srinagar, Kashmir and obtained the testimony of 556 ulema (see the Friday Sermon of Mirza Masroor Ahmad of 5-25-12 at the 33:28 to 35:19 mark, we have condensed this into a tik tok too)(see also Mujadid-e-Azim, online english abridged version.

In 2012, Mirza Masroor said it was 560 ulema. Dard also mentions this announcement of 10-4-1899 (see pages 684-685). Dard claims that the expedition didn’t leave until 11-12-1889, thus contradicting the Lahori-Ahmadi’s. Nevertheless, 3 years, MGA and his team published “Al-Huda Wa-Tabsirato Liman Yara” (arabic only) and claimed that Khalifa Nur ud Din had 72 witnesses and even wrote their names who were supposedly testifying that Yuz Asaf= Eisa (as). In fact, in “Al-Huda Wa-Tabsirato Liman Yara”, MGA and his team of editors claimed that claimed that 100,000 people are witnesses that Yuz Asaf = Eisa (as).

In 1945, Maulvi Abdullah popped back into the story. He seems to have written a letter to Qadian wherein he stated that the letter which he wrote to MGA had been interpolated by MGA and his team of writers, he was a Bahai at this point and wanted to set the record straight (see all the scans in the below). Maulvi Abdullah said that he wrote this letter in response to an article by the Al-Furqan of 1944, wherein it was argued that generation after generation of Muslims believed Yuz Asaf= Eisa (as)(see Pious Spirit at the 47:56 mark). Nevertheless, Maulvi Abdullah says that the Khalifa never responded to his letter. However, in an Ahmadiyya newspaper, “The Furqan” of February 1946 (see page 40), (see Pious Spirit at the 36:25 mark), the Khalifa wrote that the denial of Maulvi Abdullah makes no difference in the case of Yuz Asaf = Eisa (as), many companions of MGA went on a fact finding expedition and also confirmed that Yuz Asaf = Eisa (as). The Khalifa continued that this knowledge {that Yuz Asaf = Eisa (as)} has been passes down through many generations of the families that live in Mohalla Khanyar. Thus, the 2nd Khalifa was claiming that MGA was wrong as he quoted Maulvi Abdullah’s letter in Raz-e-Haqiqat. Maulvi Abdullah goes on to state that the majority of the Muslims and ulema of Kashmir consider MGA to be a Kafir. At the end, Maulvi Abdullah seems to have been a rogue-Lahori-Ahmadi, he did eventually convert to Bahaism before he died. Maulvi Abdullah also says that the list of 72 witnesses was his work, and not that of Khalifa Nur ud Din, thus, proving that MGA and his team fabricated the expedition of Khalifa Nur ud Din, moreover, in those survey’s that were given out, it was never written that Eisa (as) was buried in Yuz Asaf’s grave, thus, destroying the Ahmadiyya position. Maulvi Abdullah also seems to have gotten 55 of the 72 to attest to the fact that they don’t believe that Yuz Asaf= Eisa (as) (see Pious Spirit at 22:04).

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZM85ghbnW/

Continue reading “Khalifa Nur-ud-Din lied about 72 witnesses and 570 ulema of Kashmir believing that Yuz Asaf=Eisa (as)” →

Intro
We are posting this as a news story from Qadian. A few months ago, the same youtube channel reported extreme flooding in the Ahmadiyya Mohalla of Qadian. In this report, you will see Hindus and Sikhs dancing and Ahmadiyya advertisements of homeopathy. You can listen to an Ahmadi mullah of Qadian, Maulana Mubasher giving a speech of unity herein. In this video, which is from 2020, you can see Ahmadi’s free mixing with Hindu’s and Sikh’s.

Continue reading “The latest news from Qadian–October–2021” →

Intro
Mirza Tahir Ahmad was a vicious mullah! He robbed Ahmadi’s blind and seems to have invented new beliefs within Ahmadiyya. He was the first Ahmadiyya Khalifa to call Maryam a hermaphrodite. He even claimed that iblis was a human and not a Jinn. He even went to far as to claim that heaven (jannah) was here on earth and not anywhere else, and thus, there is no afterlife (at the 1:24:30 mark, this is a lecture by Syed Dr. Holy Spirit). MGA started all of this nonsense as he copied from Sir Syed Ahmad Khan’s tafsir and claimed that Adam (as) wasn’t the first human.

Nevertheless, on 9-14-1990, during a question and answer session, Mirza Tahir Ahmad told the questioner that the first ever human on Earth was a woman from Africa (see at the 50:27 mark, by Dr. Holy Spirit). In addition to this, Mirza Tahir Ahmad was claiming that Adam (as) and his followers were kicked out of Jannah, which was on Earth and not in the skies, beyond the Samaa Wattay (as 99% of Muslims believe). Mirza Tahir Ahmad even quotes a hadith from Muhammad (Saw) wherein he alleged that Muhammad (saw) said that there were 100,000’s of Adam’s (astagfarullah)(Mirza Tahir Ahmad quotes ibn Arabi). Finally, it should be remembered that the second Khalifa wrote that humans came from Jinn in 1947, which made it into all of his commentaries.

Continue reading “Mirza Tahir Ahmad said that a woman from Africa was the first human” →

Intro
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad hated Abu Hurairah and even called him a ghabi, since MGA couldn’t accept his commentary on 4:159 and the physical return of Eisa (As). Abu Hurairah was a companion of Muhammad (saw), a very famous companion indeed. He narrated more hadith than anyone in the history of Islam. It should be noted that Abu Hurayrah spent 2 years 3 months approximately in the company of Muhammad and went on expeditions and journeys with him. He is credited with narrating at least 5,374 Ahadith (see the noted of Imam Bukhari in his famous collection). In fact, most of the sahih hadith in terms of the return of Eisa (As) come from Abu Hurairah. In contrast to Hurairah, Prophet Muhammad’s closest companions are credited with far less hadith; Abu Bakr is credited with 142 hadith, Uthman ibn Affan with 146, Umar ibn Khattab with 537, Aisha with 2210, and Ali ibn Abi Talib with no more than 586 hadith.
MGA proved this to be true in 1891 as he claimed that sahih hadith told that the Messiah/Mahdi would come in the 14th century.

MGA and his team of writers had also written in 1900-1902, via Tuhfa-e-Ghaznaviyyah, that all the companions were fools (nadaan), even Umar (ra)(astagfarullah), and this was because they all believed that Eisa (as) was alive in heaven (see Al-Milal wa al-Nihal) until Abu Bakr made his famous comment. It should also be noted that in Braheen e Ahmadiyya Vol. 5 (published after MGA died in 1908), MGA claimed that the beliefs of Abu Hurraira (ra) would lead Muslims to shirk.

Nevertheless, in the below, we have posted hadith from Abu Hurrairah wherein he relates that Muhammad (Saw) said to Muslims that in the latter days, many liars will appear who will quote hadith that have never been quoted before or simply don’t exist.

Continue reading “Abu Hurairah warned Muslims about Mirza Ghulam Ahmad” →

Intro
In 1915, the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s published an english commentary of the Quran (and ascribed to the 2nd Khalifa, who didn’t know english and failed his matriculation exam)(it was only 2 chapters and discontinued), this was done to counteract the Lahori-Ahmadi’s. This commentary was created to counteract the Lahori-Ahmadi’s. Muhammad Ali and the Lahori-Ahmadi’s published their famous commentary in 1917 and from London, England, the Nation of Islam used this commentary to create their kufr.

Just like his father (MGA), Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad never wrote anything. Malik Ghulam Farid (1897–1977), was a notable Ahmadiyya scholar who helped him and was part of team of ghost-writers. He was deputed the task of preparing various commentaries on the Quran, in urdu and english. His urdu commentaries were ascribed to the Khalifa, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad and appeared with only nine chapters along with an introduction in 1947, the Khalifa signed off on the introduction on 2-28-1947, thus it was published in late February from Qadian, British-India. An english commentary also appeared in 1947. Syed Muhammad Ahmad recalls flying an aircraft from Qadian to Lahore with a bag full of documents related to this english commentary of the Quran, which were almost lost of Shaikh Bashir Ahmad. Via the Moslem Sunrise of 4th Quarter-1950 (and 3rd Quarter of 1950), Khalil Ahmad Nasir is the editor of the Moslem Sunrise, as well as the new missionary-in-charge of the USA. Khalil Ahmad Nasir gave 2141 Leroy Place, N.W., Washington D.C., 2532 Center Ave, Pittsburgh, 613 Locust Street, St. Louis, MO and at 115 W. 116th St. Suite-2, NY, NY. Maulvi Shaikh Nasir Ahmad has an essay on “Islam and Peace”, they also allege that he graduated from the Punjab University in 1945. They also allege that he is the editor of an Ahmadiyya German magazine, “Der Islam”. In 1947, the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s published a partial english translation and commentary of the Quran from Qadian, there is a book review in the Moslem Sunrise of 4th Quarter-1950. 2 books of Sufi M.R. Bengalee are for sale in Muslim Sunrise, “Life of Muhammad” and “The Tomb of Jesus”. This english translation of the Quran was available for sale from1950 of the Muslim Sunrise until 1959.

The introduction of these commentaries are now a book called, “Introduction to the study of the Holy Quran”. This was the first instance of the Ahmadiyya movement (Lahori or Qadiani) arguing that there were humans on Earth before Adam (as) of the Quran arrived and were Jinn. Ahmadiyya sources claim that “Tafseer-e-Kabeer” was split into two parts. The first volume of “Tafseer-e-Kabeer”, which was nine chapters long with an introduction appeared in February of 1947 and from Qadian, British-India. Volume 1 part I, containing the introduction & the first two chapters (now Vol. 1), was reprinted in 1964, and volume 1 part II, dealing with the next seven chapters (now Vol. 2) was reprinted in 1965 in Pakistan. These Tafseer’s were most likely written by the paid Mullahs who worked directly for the Khalifa. The Khalifa didn’t have a full commentary written on the Quran, only about half, per the introduction of the 1988 edition of the 5 volume commentary by Malik Ghulam Farid (died in 1977), Mirza Basheer ud Din’s “Tafsir-e-Kabir” only covered Chapters 1, 2, 10-29 and 78–114, he missed Chapters 3-9 and 30-77, he missed 53 chapters and purposely, since most of the controversial verses about Jesus and prophethood were contained therein, as well as the famous verse of Ismuhu Ahmad and the famous verse of Chapter 62:3 that #ahmadis quotes as they claim that MGA was the second coming of Muhammad (saw)(nauzobillah).

The first edition of “Tafseer-e-Sagheer” was printed in Dec 1957. The final volume was published in 1979. Ahmadiyya sources claim that the first ever 5-volume english commentary was published in 1962 and an abridged version showed up in 1969, however, these are missing from the records.

In 1988, a new 5-volume commentary of the Holy Quran was published with Malik Ghulam Farid‘s name on it. He had died in 1977, thus, this was dubious. Nevertheless, this became the official commentary that all Ahmadi’s in the west read. In 2018, another 5-volume commentary was published and can be found on alislam.org.

Continue reading “In 1947, the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s published a partial english translation and commentary of the Quran from Qadian” →

Intro
Per Islam, prophets never leave any inheritance for their children after they die. Authentic hadith in Bukhari proves this. However, after MGA died, he left his property behind him as an inheritance for his children. Its unclear how much this was. It doesn’t seem to have been much. The Lahori-Ahmadi’s argued as such in the 1910’s as they denied the prophethood of MGA.

Nevertheless, in 1939, the 2nd Khalifa told Ahmadi’s that the him and his family were getting a stipend as soon as Noorudin became Khalifa. The 2nd Khalifa says that he was getting 60 rupees per month, this seems to be per child, we are unsure. It is also unclear when this stipend ended, if ever. It seems that the 2nd Khalifa (before his Khilafat) had enough money to hire servants and etc. This was all kept a secret until 1939.

Continue reading “Did Mirza Ghulam Ahmad leave an inheritance? Did the Mirza family get a monthly stipend after MGA died?” →