Intro
Dr. Abdul Hakeem Khan is a very controversial figure in the world of Ahmadiyya, especially in terms of how MGA began calling Muslims as Kafirs in 1906. Abdul Hakeem Khan was a follower of MGA since at least 1886 (See Haqiqatul Wahi), since MGA himself admitted to this fact. Abdul Hakeem Khan was most likely a follower of Noorudin and thus followed Noorudin to MGA in 1889 (see lots of scans herein).
He left Ahmadiyya publicly in 1906 and later predicted that MGA would die in 1908. His main beef with MGA was on 2:62 on Salvation. In 1906, he wrote a series of books vs. MGA entitled, Zikrul-Hakim, in one of these he discussed the death of Maulvi Abdul Karim. Further, he caused MGA to begin to do open Takfir of the Muslim world. Dr. ‘Abdul-Hakim Khan, also wrote a booklet “al-Masihud-Dajjal”, which refers to MGA. Dr. Khan accuses MGA of telling lies, he calls MGA a dajjal [deceiver], corrupt, and an embezzler. In his booklet, al-Masihud-Dajjal, he has listed a number of my ‘vices’. He calls MGA as selfish, egotistical, arrogant, Antichrist, Satan, ignorant, insane, great liar, lazy, corrupt, one who breaks his word, and an embezzler. Dr. Khan then toured the major cities of the Punjab like Lahore, Amritsar, and the rest, delivering public lectures and invariably ascribing all kinds of misdeeds to MGA, ridiculing MGA, and declaring
MGA to be dangerous to the world; more dangerous than even the Devil. This was not all, he also publicly announced in each lecture, in the presence of hundreds of people that God had revealed to him: ‘During the next three years, this man [i.e. me] would die on account of his being a liar and an impostor.’ On 14 August 1906, Maulawi Nur-ud-Din received another letter from Dr. Khan, wherein he says that God Almighty had informed him on 12 July 1906 about MGA’s demise to the effect that MGA shall die within a period of three years from this date (by 1909).
Haqiqatul Wahi is written in the summer of 1906, with just small portions written in 1907, Abdul-Hakim Khan is 64 times.
On Nov-10-1907, MGA and his team of writers published an announcement in the Al-Hakam and Al-Badr of Nov-10-1907 (See the scans in the below)(Via Majmua Ishtiharat, V-3, pages 461-467). Bro Imtiaz explained it in full detail herein (1:19:40). This announcement is about Maulvi Sanaullah, the death of Mirza Mubarak Ahmad and a new promised son (Musleh Maud?) and how local newspaper like the Akhbar-e-Aam and others are saying that MGA’s prophecies failed and biggest sign is the death of MGA’s 7 years old son, Mirza Mubarak Ahmad. Also in this announcement, MGA mentions the prophecy vs. Dr. Abdul-Hakim Khan (from Patiala)(via Bro Imtiaz, 2:42:29) and how it started in July 1907 and was for 14 months (scheduled to end in Sep-1908). MGA says that his life will be prolonged, and he will win (see the “Age Prophecy“). MGA told Ahmadi’s to memorize and print this announcement (2:49:37) and post it on their walls. MGA also says that he knows the deaths of his close relatives (bahot qareeb mutalaqeen 2:52:34) is nearing.
In 1908, May-26, MGA died.
However, after MGA died, in 1911, his son, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad quoted the famous letter to Abdul Hakim Patialvi and thus authenticated it.
In 1914 (May-16), Mirza Bashir Ahmad was listed as the editor of the Al-Fazl (see Bro Imtiaz, 1:21:35 time stamp)(see scan in the below). Mirza Bashir Ahmad wrote an article wherein he accused Khwaja Kamaluddin of starting this dispute on Takfir and now as a result of that, there are 2 sects. Mirza Bashir Ahmad alleges that it was only Abdul Hakim Khan who didn’t agree with the Takfir of MGA in 1906-1907, i.e., that every person who has heard of MGA and has refused to accept MGA, he is not a Muslim. Mirza Bashir Ahmad says that Abdul Hakim Khan was kicked out of Ahmadiyya for the crime of not agreeing with MGA’s takfir.
He died on June 1st, 1920 (see Tarikh e Ahmadiyyat, Vol 2, page 463).
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1896
He is mentioned in MGA’s famous list of 313 companions of MGA of 1896 (See Dard). He is listed as number 159, his name is written as Dr. Abdul Hakim Khan of Patiala.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1897
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1900
Some new information has emerged in terms of Dr. Khan of Patiala. In this video, Mirza Masroor tells the world that Noorudin supervised this Tafsir by Dr. Khan, nonetheless, they threw the book out since it might make their library filthy. MGA on 2:62.
His Urdu Tafsir—Tafseerul Quran BilQuran
The video
His Urdu Tafsir was published in 1900
qarchives.com/misc/Seeratul_Mahdi_3.pdf
pdf page 123/316
Narration no. 665
” Dr M Ismail narrated to me that Dr Abdul Hakeem Khan Murtadd used to see many dreams. The structure of his skull was such that he will get Ilham or dreams everytime he gets a nap or sleep. He used to come to qadian from the age when he was a student. Once he came to qadian after a long time on a long leave. Here he used to narrate his tafseer to mgaq everyday between maghrib and isha prayers, and expected parises.
The reasons and beleifs that he mentioned at the time he became murtad are now part of “ghair Mubaeen” (lahori group). ……….Once they proposed that there should be no mention of mgaq and ahmadiyyat in “review” (the magazine) instead, there should be general islamic essays to have more publication. Upon this mgaq showed his anger and said BY LEAVING ME OUT, DO YOU WANT TO PRESENT DEAD ISLAM? Abdul Hakim Khan wrote to mgaq that you’r servent of Islam not Islam itself but mgaq differed with this statement (and said) that his existence is the spirit of islam itself. ”
The scans
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1901
He donated towards the building of the Minaret ul Masih. He is listed as #33, his name is spelled out as Doctor Abdul Hakim Khan, Narnaul (Patiala State)[See Dard].
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1905
See page 44 of the ROR of 1905 to see the announcement of the english commentary of the Quran.
He writes an english commentary of the Quran, it seems to be the first ever by an Ahmadi.
His english Tafsir was published in 1905. The Holy Quran with a Commentary by Dr Abdul Hakim
On page 112 of this Tafsir, the Ahmadi author argues that Esa (As) was born from biological parents, this seems to confirm what MGA and his team wrote in 1891, in Izala Auham, i.e. that Esa (As) was raised by his father, Joseph. Muhammad Ali split in 1914 and his Tafsir was published in 1917 wherein he made the same argument, i.e. that Esa (As) was fathered biologically by Joseph and the Qadianis never objected.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1906
He quits Ahmadiyya and MGA writes private letters to him which are published by Dr. Khan the following year. In these private letters, MGA writes that all of those who reject him are non-Muslim, per Allah, even those Muslims who haven’t heard of MGA. His main beef with MGA is on the salvation of Non-Muslims. Dr. Khan argued that Christians and Jews didn’t have to follow Allah and were still allowed to get to heaven, if they were good people.
Dr. ‘Abdul-Hakim Khan, writes a booklet “al-Masihud-Dajjal”, which refers to MGA. Dr. Khan accuses MGA of telling lies, he calls MGA a dajjal [deceiver], corrupt, and an embezzler. In his booklet, al-Masihud-Dajjal, he has listed a number of my ‘vices’. He calls MGA as selfish, egotistical, arrogant, Antichrist, Satan, ignorant, insane, great liar, lazy, corrupt, one who breaks his word, and an embezzler. Dr. ‘Abdul-Hakim Khan also writes his series, Zikr ul Hakim.
Dr. Khan gets another book published, Zikr-ul Hakim, wherein he writes that Ahmadi’s are worshipping MGA. He also explains that he was a follower of MGA for 25 years, which takes us to 1881.
See ‘Abdul-Hakim’s booklet Dhikrul-Hakim, page 12, VIA Haqiqatul Wahi
“”There was one Maulawi, Muhammad Hasan Baig, a maternal cousin of mine who was bitterly opposed to your gracious self. I was informed concerning him, in a dream, that if he persisted in his opposition of the Messiah of the Age, he would die of plague. His residence was outside the city in a well-ventilated and commodious house. I had related this dream to his real brother, uncle, and other relatives. A year later, he did die of plague. “”
Zikrul Hakim No 4.pdf
Zikrul Hakim No 4
Zikrul Hakim no 4 exclusively consist of the letters written between Dr and Mirza Ghulam – the reason for the Dr abdul Hakim to write, collate this book was to let the world know -as to what happen between them. There was no internet/emails or telephones -that is how we communicate with people -and in those days the normal way of communication in that time was to write letters and the general understanding was that each party will publish those letters to let the world know “the facts” – as Mirza ghulam did not publish letters which were written to him by Dr Abdul Hakim – Dr took upon himself to publish them.
Summary
MIRZA AND AHKP-4
Qadiyanis published ISHTIHAR against me in and Albadar and did not publish my letters to MGA, so i published them. On 13th May, on the basis of a dream, I published that I take my BAIAT back till Mirza Qadiyani correct his mistakes. The articles about him in my tafsir would be termed as doubtful and if Mirza did not correct and announce his apology, I will break his BAIAT and would remove him from my tafseer. Since there is no chance of his correction and announcement of apology so I have removed articles mentioning him from my tafseers. These corrected pages have been sent to buyers for correction of tafseer with them.
I have repented from Allah s.wt. for accepting the claims of Masih e Maoud, Mehdi and Mujaddid by Mirza Qadiyani for the following reasons in brief.
1st: Excommunication of all muslims who do not believe in mirza, declaring them to be hell bound and saying that maintaining relationship with them is HARAM.He further says that Allah swt informed me that it is HARAM for u to offer prayer behind a denier, falsifier and a hesitant . Then He published in Alhakam dated 24th May, 1905, that he who marries his sons or daughters to non Ahmadi are out of my Jamaat.
In recent correspondence he expunged the condition of denier, falsifier and hesitant he kept writing to me that 1.3 billion muslims who do not believe in him are out of pail of Islam and are hell bound irrespective of fact whether Ahmadi tabligh reached to them or not. I Wrote to him that we may not excommunicate to those of Ummat e Muhammadia who do not excommunicate us.Ahmadis may be allowed to offer prayer with them. He got so infuriated on this that he declared me a MURTAD. (Heretic). And reply to me senselessly.
Second : The faith that deliverance depend only on accepting Mirza is a cursed theory. It not only negate the whole world but it also pose a challenge to the powers of Allah. Because the item most needed in world has been created in abundance by Allah s.wt.like air, water, so if deliverance depended on faith in mirza then Allah s.w.t. Would have created love. of Mirza in the human nature. : Demanding such iman was against Allah s.w.t ,s characteristic of Rahman
Third: This iman is against the characteristic of RAHIMIYAT Because deliverance would not be granted to one who does not believe in Mirza , means Allah is not Raheem
Fourth. It is also against the powers of Allah as Maliki Youmiddin .it suspends this power as deliverance not possible without acceptance of Mirza.
Fifth : This theory of Mirza is against all powers of Allah . So if u believe in above instructions of Mirza Your Kalima would be like this :
“LA ILAHA ILLALL MIRZA” because per Mirza basis of deliverance is not obeying Allah Swt but obeying Mirza Qadiyani.
The scan
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1906
May-30
Badr, vol. 2, no. 23, p. 3, 4, dated 7 June 1906, Malfuzat-8, page 377-383
True Belief in Tauhid can only be Attained by Believing in the Holy Prophet,
may Peace and Blessings of Allah be upon Him The Promised Messiah as said:
Tauhid [Oneness of God] descends from heaven. The people who hold malice toward the Holy Prophet, may peace and blessings of Allah be upon him (like Dr ‘Abdul-Hakim Khan, etc., who say that there is no need to believe in the Holy Prophet sas, and the Jews and Christians will be saved automatically), can never attain Tauhid. The entire Holy Quran is full of this. God Almighty removes the state of faith from within those who hold this belief.”””
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1906–July-Aug
Scans
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1906
July-16
Badr, vol. 2, no. 30, p. 4, dated 26 July 1906, Malfuzat-8, pages 414-415
16 July 1906
Dr ‘Abdul-Hakim
Dr ‘Abdul-Hakim was mentioned.
The Promised Messiah as said:
He has not only turned away from us but also turned away from Islam itself, and from the Holy Prophet, may peace and blessings of Allah be upon him. Truly, pitiful is the case of those maulawis and Muslims who claim to belong to Islam and yet speak in favour of and support such a man who does not even consider the Messengership of the Holy Prophet, may peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, to be necessary and for whom the existence or non-existence of the Holy Prophet sas is equal. It is a pity that because of malice towards me, these people act in such a way that they themselves oppose Islam”””.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1906
Sep
Badr, vol. 2, no. 37, p. 4, dated 13 September 1906; see also al-Hakam, vol. 10, no. 32, p. 4, dated 17 September 1906, Malfuzat-8, page 435
9 September 1906
Dr ‘Abdul-Hakim objects foolishly that I am just sitting around in one place; why am I not making rounds city by city? This is his mistake. If I had believed that travelling among countries could be beneficial, I would have done it. In the Noble Hadith, it is mentioned about the Dajjal [Antichrist] that:
لَََالَا یََیدََدانِِن لِِِاََلِاحََحدٍٍد لِِّّلقِِقتََتالِِلھِِھمْْم 1 . No one will have hands to fight with him. We cannot fight this Dajjal with earthly means because he has many worldly means. We must have some superior weapon he does not have; then, we can win. The love of the world dominates the people beyond all limits. This is what I want to remove, and this is indeed the most difficult task. It is written that the last thing that departs from the self is the love of the world. There is no way of success for us except by heavenly power.”””
______________________________________________________________________________________________
TO MIRZA GHULAM QADIYANI
FROM DR ABDUL HAKIM KHAN PATIALVI.
LETTER NO 7.
Zikrul Hakim page 40-42
HAZRAT MASIHUZZAMAN,
ASSALAMO ALAIKUM,
Last night before going to bed, I called my God and made my humble prayers and said O my God you say in Quraan that i would forgive every thing except shirk whereas your Masih e Maoud (mirza) says Allah will not forgive disbelieving in me and will forgive everything else. Now should i deny your words or the words of your Masih?
I said to my God O my Sustainer you have always ignored my weaknesses and forgave my mistakes. U also know that what ever good deeds I do are only for your sake and to please U. U always answered my prayers, assisted me sympathised to me. U r not cruel, harsh and ungrateful like Mirza Ghulam Qadyani.
To the core of my heart i am ever ready to accept truth but it is self praising, self worshipping and harsh Mirza who did not reply to me. So what should I do. After this submission i saw a dream that Colonel Fateh Muhammad Khan came to me Abdul Ghani khan is also seen and asking for treatment of his father,s appendicitis. He showed me a prescription containing many anti gastric medicines and told me that these medicines did not work. Then I told Fateh Muhammad Khan that Mirza had removed me from his Jamaat. It has been good for me that i have been removed from Jamaat for the sake of truth. Then in the dream I say who is mirza in front of Allah and say very soon thunderbolt might fall from sky on this jamaat and kill them all.
On the basis of this dream I am writing to you again that Moosa a.s ordered murder of those who committed shirk whereas you support such peoples of your Jamaat. Now I present comparison of your revelations with Quraan.
* In Your ilham you say, may God give me authority over fire. Quraan says Allah has the authority on everything and the rule on the day of judgement.
* Your ilham says about yourself Ya Shamsu wa Ya Qamaru. (Sun and moon) But i say your light has not illuminated even Qadiyan and your family.
* Quraan says All praise to Allah, whereas your ilham says Allah praises you in the heavens.
* You say people in France Italy and Columbia killed by earthquake due to my disobedience. On the contrary, your worst enemies and opponents like Molvi Muhaammad Hussain, Sanaullah Amritsari, Owner of Paisa Akhbar and Peshawari Group have not been killed despite their worst opposition.
For God sake you test yourself and your jamaat on this standrad as to how much u and jamaat worship Allah and how much do u worship a man. I request you to return my first letter as i want to publish this correspondence so that good natured peoples could benefit from this. If u do not return it, i will publish it with the help of my memory because i dont have its copy.
Was the tragic death of Molvi Abdul Karim not a sufficient cause for u to avoid making mockery of others agonies? but regretfully the childish attitude prevalent on u all the time has made u much proud, ignorant and heartless. It was you who used to make mockery of the miracles of Hazrat Essa a.s, now with excessive ilham and prophesies u have made a joke of yourself . The taste of Quraanic knowledge is absolutely missing from u and Jamaat. U could not present a single academic miracle which was the need of the hour. U could have written a miraculous commentary of holy Quraan that could have decided the differences and could have reformed peoples and provide guidance to the masses.
Wassalam
Humble self
Abdul Hakim Khan
Assistant Surgeon
From Tarauri, District Karnal India.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
TO MIRZA GHULAM QADIYANI
BY DR ABDUL HAKIM KHAN PATIALVI.
Zikrul Hakim NO. 4 page-28
IT IS VERY STRANGE THAT I WRITE TO U WITH UNAMBIGUOUS VERSES REFERENCE FROM QURAN BUT U DONT ADDRESS THEM IN YOUR REPLY RATHER SAY THAT ACTING UPON THESE QURAANIC COMMANDS IS PROHIBITED. I HAVE BEEN REQUESTING U TIME AND AGAIN THAT I MAY BE INFORMED OF THE VERSES OF QURAAN THROUGH WHICH WHOLE UMMAT E MUHAMMADIA HAS BECOME OUT OF THE PAIL OF ISLAM IRRESPECTIVE OF THE FACT WHETHER OR NOT THEY HAVE BEEN PREACHED UPON. DOES THE OBLIGATION OF TABLIGH TO THE WHOLE MUSLIMIS FULFILLED BY SITTING IDLY IN QADIYAN AND PUBLISHING FEW ISHTIHARS ?. NOW THEY HAVE BECOME INFIDEL AND LIABLE TO BE CHARGE SHEETED? EVEN ALLAH SWT DECLARE THE KILLING OF INNOCENT MOMIN AS KUFR. AT THE MOMENT U R TURNING UR FACE AWAY NOT ANLY FROM QURAAN BUT FROM LOGIC AND COMMON SENSE. WHAT A TIME IT WAS WHEN U CRITICISE MOLVIS FOR EXCOMMUNICATION OF MUSLIMS AND USED TO QUOT THE SAYING OF IMAM THAT DONT EXCOMMUNICATE ONE WITH 99 REASONS OF KUFR AND ONE REASON OF IMAN. I AM ACTING ON THESE TEACHINGS BUT U HAVE DEFECTED. IT WAS YOUR SAYING THAT I GIVE PRAYERS IN RESPONSE TO ABUSES. I AM STILL ON THIS RELIGION BUT U DECLARE ME KAFIR AND MURTAD EVEN AFTER LISTENING TO MY PRAYERS AND SALAM. U ORDER MY EXIT FROM JAMAAT. U DO EXCOMMUNICATION OF UMMAT E MUHAMMADI WITHOUT REASON BUT I DONT DO THAT.
The scan
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
MIRZA CHARGE SHEETED BY DR ABDUL HAKIM KHAN PATIALVI.
LETTER TO MOLVI NOORUDDIN FROM DR ABDUL HAKIM KHAN PATIALVI.
ZIKRUL HAKIM PAGE 368-378
Dr. Abdul Hakim Khan Patialvi was a keen follower of MGAQ, remained in his jamaat for 20 years. Then he found wrongdoings of Mirza and violation of Quraanic teachings and commandments of Allah Swt by MGAQ and his Jamaat. He made correspondence with MGAQ and Molvi Nooruddin for reform and correction but both MGAQ and Nooruddin rejected his criticism. This correspondence is very lengthy contains heavy Arabic and Persian idioms and phrases, studded with Quraanic verses and ahadis. So it is not easy to be translated in english word to word in a short time. However, I have tried to present central idea of the correspondence as under:-
Subhanallah what a logic is this, Quraan teaches us to say salam but u deny and do not say salam to me in your letter. U termed my word of Basis of salvation (madar e nijat) as vague whereas your whole letter is vague.
I have always been the truth seeker. I am the same Abdul Hakim whose translation and commentary of Quraan has been greatly admired by Mirza Qadiyani. Whenever i read my tafseer to mgaq he could not advise a valuable points, he only said admiration. However i got valuable correction addition of points and advise from you whenever I read it over to u. He could not advise on the debate of Hazrat Suleman a.s and said I will explain it to u after consulting a book, WHICH WAS never found by him ever.
I took allegiance of Mirza in the hope of my spiritual and knowledge uplift which could not be achieved. Unfortunately, after my reform request, this very tafseer and my other books have been returned stuffed in gunny bag reached to me in a bad shape.
In the beginning Mirza sb used to say that I am only Maseel e Masih then a masih mehdi, sub ordinate prophet, better than all prophets and then Allah s son then Allah states his praise in the heavens thus committing shirk. Not only this he went to the extent of insulting other prophets and chosen persons.
His claim that earthquake in other parts of world have come due to my rejection, is also a foolish idea, how can Allah punish those with earthquake who have not even heard of MGAQ and his claims. It did not happen in the time of Harat Muhammad s.a.w that He was rejected and victimised by peoples of Makkah but peoples of other areas are killed.So Noorddin sb support of this argument of mirza does not suit to a person of your calibre.
I believe in Allah and his prophets alike as Quraan says کل امن با اللہ وملائکتہ وکتبہ ورسلہ لا نفرق بین احد من الرسلہ
But Mirza denied this verse when he said ” believing in Allah and prophets is of no use unless one does not believe in me. He published that God Says O Ahmed if u were not there I wouldn,t have created skies. He did hundreds of such things against Islam and Quraan. Few of which are described here as under:-
UNENDING BREACHES OF COMMITMENTS.
Donations were asked for, and mostly received for publishing baraheen and other books but books were not published as per commitment nor the money received as charity or Zakat was returned. Such money is being eaten up.
Excessive lies.
When there was no funds for publishing of baraheen why Reward Ishtihar of thousands of Rs were published. Why peoples were abused with Haramzada without Devine knowledge.
Abusive and obnoxious Language
Molvis who were opposing for the sake of Islam were called as waladul haram, (illegitimate), swine , cursed, satan, blind, etc etc
COMFORT LOVING AND MAN OF STOMACH
What Mirza do is that collect Chanda upto 700 or 800 per month arranged best food for himself and others, amber musk. Kewra, tonics, dry fruits and kernels are made available and used abundantly.
I to 1.5 mound was supplied daily from Lahore during the illness of Molvi Abdul Karim. Bivi sahiba had so much jewellery that Mirza has mortgaged his garden to her for a loan of Rs. 1000 cash and jewellery worth Rs. 4000, Traveled upto Dehli in upper class of train for the sake of Bivi sahiba only. Whereas Hazrat Muhammad s.A.w. Has spent a simple life in a small house, had food after 3 days mostly. Now tell me should I follow Hazrat Muhammad s.a.w or the comfortable life of Mirza Qadiyani.
SCHISM
Hazrat Muhammad s.a.w made the arabs pagan as brother to each others Today with his abusive language and false claims created a divide and schism that can not be repaired.
ABANDONING HAJJ.
Should we follow mirza on the issue of Hajj or the Quraan which instruct the rich men to perform Hajj.
ASKING FOR ZAKAT FOR HIS BOOKS.
He asked for zakat money for his books and sold them on highest price.
MAKING PHOTOGRAGHS.
SHOULD WE FOLLOW THIS SUNNAH OF MIRZA.
FALSE CLAIMS FOR SELF GREATNESS
HE SAID GOD SAYS TO ME THAT U r from me and Iam from u. To me u r like my son.
CONSTRUCTION OF MINARAT.
Construction minarat in Qadiyan is useless and waste of money and against ahadis.
BAHISHTI MAQBARA.
It is absolutely against islam and Quraan and an insult to the prophets and quraam.o hadis.
INSULT OF JESUS CHRIST PBUH.
MIRZA HAS INSULTED HAZRAT ESSA A.S AND TERMED HIS MIRCLE AS JOKE.
BEGGARY
MIRZA IMPOSED MONTHLY CHANDA FOR EACH MEMBER in case of non payment his name will be struck down from bayaat.
I am ready to accept any true advise but cant tolerate with above mentioned ideas of mirza which are against Quraan o sunnah.
Humble self Abdul Hakim Khan
Now residing at Trouri District Karnal.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Below is almost a word for word translation of “”3 pages in two episodes page no 381-383″”
MIRZA AND AHKP-2
More so they declared 1.3 billion muslims, who were muslims since last 13 centuries, as kafir without doing tabligh. When only 3 to 4 lectures on toheed and greatness of Allah swt were delivered, ahmadis got disturbed. One namely Abdul Ghani Khan said to me from Jamaat side as to why I do not mention the name of Ghulam Qadiyani in my lectures. I said i have been describing the Hamd e bari which is the tafseer of surah Al hamd and haven,t come to the Rabbul Alameen, AlRahman iraheem maliki yomiddin as yet as only after that I would come to the praise of Muhammad s.a.w. Then i would present praise of Mirza Qadiyani. Some people said the praise of Allah and His Toheed was the mission of Mirza too, but this did not satisfy hard liner of jamaat and they increased hue and cry on the issue. One day Abdul ghani said while describing touheed e bari taala , u consider mentioning of Mirza Ghulam Qadiyani as shirk but i consider it a shirk if u describe praise of Allah and do not mention Mirza Qadiyani. This attitude made me sad.
I kept emphasising on the point that no body can be perfect until he follows all orders and injunctions of Quraan. To be stuck and remain adamant on one issue and leave the other is extreme ignorance. Quraan also supports this view point. Quraan says.” People chopped of Quraan into pieces” it says on other place” behold Allah,s rope and dont be divided”. Quraan says arrogance is the basis of Fasad. But the crazy followers of Mirza would not listen to the voice of Quraan.
By chance Molvi Mubarak Ali of Sialkot visited Patiala and started his Waaz. I requested him to stress on the points of greatness of Quraan, need for Quraanic teachings and following all Quraanic commands, in his sermons. It was my opinion that If we could succeed in creating love of Quraan in our Jamaat, that would resolve many problems. Or at least make Quraanic teachings as much popular in our jamaat as the Ishtahar of Mirza Qadiyani published in Akhbar Al badar and Alhakam. Molvi Mubarak Ali stressed the above points in his lectures. Qadiyanis immediately realised that these lectures were being delivered on my wish so they prevailed upon Him and soon Molvi sb started his lectures on same old pattern containing justifications of Mirza ,s prophethood from Qur’an and in all of lectures he proved Mirza to be a complete reincarnation of Muhammad S.A.W. This increased my displeasure and hopelessness.
Then khawaja Kamaluddin and Molvi Muhammad Ali sb, on the recommendations of Molvi Inshaullah Khan decided that from now on, only general islamic Articles would be published in Review of Religion Qadiyan and those containing special debates on Mirza Qadiyani would be published as special supplements for only qadiyanis or for those who request for such supplements. I felt great comfort on this decision and said to my self that there are high calibre intellectuals amongst the ahmadies. Now everything will be done according to Quraanic teachings and our message would spread all over world in a good manner. But this happiness could not last longer. Mirza,s fast lovers and hard liner created fuss and opposed the decision by making remarks about 1300 hundred old islam in AlBadar and Alhakam that should we present the dead islam to the world.
Summary
May i ask them as to how come there is nothing like Mari fat, or life present in Quraan? Do islam and Allah swt were given new life today by Mirza Qadiyani and were dead earlier. To cool of the fire of opposition by hard liners, Molvi Muhammad Ali has to re announce his belief and faith in Ahmadiyya انا للاہ و انا الیہ راجعون
In those days I applied for 3 months optional leave with the intention to move to Qadiyan and start my lectures on the Quranic topics according to its sequence. I was hoping to create Quraanic understanding amongst Ahmadis. But i could not remain patient and started correspondence on some important proposals with MGAQ. As a result of which Mirza Qadiyani ordered my IKHRAJ from his Jamaat.
This correspondence has been published separately under the title AZZIKRUL HAKIM NO 4. This book can be obtained from Manager Matba Azizi Tarouri District Karnal by sending money order of 1 anna. Mare Reading of this correspondence would reveal to the reader as to of what knowledge, vision and character is Mirza Ghulam Qadiyani.
I write to him something, he understands other, on each issue I present Quranic evidence and he rejects it holding it to be my personal opinion. He declares Muslims as kafir and the whole world to be hell bound without any reason. Declares Allah and Quraan as dead until it is without mirza ,s association. He urges that all calamities ie earth quakes, volcanic ruptures, accidents, epidemics, be that in Italy or Ecuador, or any where in the world, are happening due to my falsification and rejection by the inhabitants may they be aware of Mirza or not.
He does not considers the calamities as a result of disobedience of Allah and his prophet Muhammad s.a.w. He thinks Allah to be his orderly or a lunatic. (Nauzubillah) that is bent upon destroying the world out of the love of Mirza without thinking as to who are His actual falsifiers. Whenever there is a destruction anywhere in the world happens, Mirza and his followers feel pleasures saying this is another sign of Mirza’s truthfulness. They anxiously wait for the destruction of the world and death of opponents. The more is the destruction the more they enjoy.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1907
Jan-29
Al-Hakam, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 9, dated 31 January 1907, Malfuzat-9, page 116
29 January 1907
(Morning Walk)
The Result of Hurling Abuse, Slandering
Today, His Holiness the Promised Messiah, peace be on him, went out for a walk in the morning with his companions. On the mention of the apostate Dr ‘Abdul-Hakim, the Promised Messiah as said that, An Arya newspaper, despite its religious opposition to me, wrote that ‘Abdul-Hakim hurling abuse on me shows his contemptible nature. This behaviour is extremely inappropriate. One person commented that ‘Abdul-Hakim says, ‘What has happened to Ja‘far Zatalli who has been severely abusing Mirza [Ghulam Ahmad] Sahib that something would happen to me?’ The Promised Messiah as said: He should have taken heed from the examples of Padre Abdullah Atham, Lekh Ram, Charagh Din, resident of Jammu and others who contended with me in prayer duels…”
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1907
MGA publishes Haqiqatul Wahi, 1907, Abdul-Hakim Khan is 64 times. MGA denies calling his deniers as non-Muslims in any books of his or announcement. However, MGA cleverly doesn’t add private letters.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1907
July-6th
Badr, vol. 6, no. 28, p. 5–6, dated 11 July 1907, Malfuzat-9, page 301
6 July 1907
“”Maulawi Sanaullah, Ja’far Zatalli of Lahore, Dr ‘Abdul- Hakim and Ghaznawi—these gentlemen should pay attention to this most urgently””.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1907
July-21
Badr, vol. 6, no. 31, p. 6, dated 1 August 1907; see also al-Hakam, vol. 11, no. 28, p. 5, dated 10 August 1907, Malfuzat-9, pages 315-320
21 July 1907
The Final Verdict
There was mention of the revelation that Dr ‘Abdul-Hakim had published about the Promised Messiah as. The Promised Messiah as said:
This is the last stage. Allah the Exalted has created the means for the final verdict. The [following] Divine revelation is recorded at the end of Barahin-e-Ahmadiyya:
اِِاََّّنا فََفتََتحْْحنََنا لكََك فََفتْْتحًًحا مُُّّمِِبیْْینًًنا
We have granted you a clear victory. This is indeed that victory. Allah the Exalted will disclose such matters about this that people will realise that this is the final….”””
______________________________________________________________________________________________1907
Aug-1
Badr, vol. 6, no. 32, p. 8–9, dated 8 August 1907; see also al-Hakam, vol. 11, no. 29, p. 11, dated 17 August 1907, Malfuzat-9, pages 329-332
1 August 1907
The Truthful Makes a Claim First & then the Liar Follows
The recent Divine ilham [revelation] was mentioned:
اِِاِِّّنیْْی مُُمھِِھیْْینٌٌن مََّّمنْْن اََارََرادََد اهََهاََنتََتكََك
I shall humiliate him, who designs to humiliate you.
The Promised Messiah as said:
The person that has indulged in mockery in the most recent time frame is Dr ‘Abdul-Hakim who has written a letter containing very insulting language and has made a prophecy concerning my death. This Divine wahi [revelation] has also descended upon me many times before, but every time it descends in a new light. One should not be aggrieved by the opposition of such people. It was necessary that such people are also raised so that a distinction be made between the truthful and the liar. Such opponents have come into existence during the times of all the Prophets and such people were present even during the time of the Holy Prophet, may peace and blessings of Allah be upon him. But such types of people always appear afterwards. It is always the truthful one who appears first. Then seeing him, others copy”””.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1907
Aug-15
Al-Hakam, vol. 11, no. 30, p. 11, dated 24 August 1907, Malfuzat-9, pages 335-340
“”The practice of Allah is such that when someone appears as an Appointee of God then some people like ‘Abdul-Hakim and others put forward the claim of receiving ilham and say that they are Messengers as well, but such people present their claim after [the true claimant]. Observe that after our Noble Prophet, may peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, had already made his claim and it had become widely known then Musailimah al-Kadhdhab and others also made their claim. Similarly, these people started to present their claims after the passage of twenty-six to twenty-seven years of my claim.”””
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1907
Aug-18
Al-Hakam, vol. 11, no. 30, p. 4, dated 24 August 1907, Al-Hakam, vol. 11, no. 30, p. 4, dated 24 August 1907, Malfuzat-9, pages 343-344
The Audacity of Dr ‘Abdul-Hakim
The Promised Messiah as commented on the insolence and audacity of ‘Abdul-Hakim:
Thousands of people perish on account of their ego and arrogance. He has simply become so very brazen and has transgressed all limits. He has hurled upon me all the insults that man could possibly conceive. God has manifested many a great Sign right in front of his face, and he personally testified to their truthfulness. He remained a supporter of mine for up to twenty years. His letters are in my possession. He used to say that salvation can be attained without following our Noble Prophet, may peace and blessings of Allah be upon him. I advised him and warned him of his error, but he took offence to this. Eventually, his disease continued to increase with time and arrogance took root.
Satan had also been doomed on account of arrogance. ‘Abdul-Hakim ought to have come to Qadian when I stopped him, and ought to have benefited from my company and presented his doubts with humility. Such filth can only be cleansed through Prophets, but he opined that there is no need to follow Prophets. He should have come with humility, and I would have prayed and would have addressed his doubts as well. He had published one of his dreams too in which he says to a person that I had erased his name from among those who have pledged allegiance. Now, if there were truly objections in his heart, he should have separated himself, not that I should have cut him off. It was another matter if he had left my Movement considering it evil, but I have myself cut him off from the Jama‘at. He accepts in his writings that I myself have removed his name from among those who have pledged allegiance.”””
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1907
Aug-23
Al-Hakam, vol. 11, no. 31, p. 13, dated 31 August 1907; also, Badr, vol. 6, no. 36,
p. 6, dated 5 September 1907, Malfuzat-9, pages 355-356
23 August 1907
(At the time of ‘Asr)
Dr ‘Abdul-Hakim’s Claim of being the Messiah
There was a discussion about the claim of Dr ‘Abdul-Hakim Khan, the apostate, being the Messiah. The Promised Messiah as said:
He names me the Dajjal [Antichrist]. It is odd that for twenty years he testified to the truth of the Antichrist and was subservient to him. Has there ever been a messiah who had been subservient
to the Antichrist for twenty years?
A Hindu has written about ‘Abdul-Hakim that, ‘No filthy word has ensued from the tongue of the one he had pledged allegiance to, but he [‘Abdul-Hakim] is so wretched that he abuses the one to whom he had pledged allegiance for twenty years.’
The Promised Messiah as said:
I desire to hear the response to the question that what kind of messiah is he who stays subservient to the Antichrist for twenty years? How strange is this that he was true, he was a messiah and also a messenger but spent twenty years under an oath of allegiance to the Antichrist, and continued to testify to the truth of the Antichrist and related true dreams, visions and revelations in the support of the Antichrist.
‘Abdul-Hakim writes to someone about a person, ‘I have seen this dream that this person will die of the plague as he has rejected the true messiah,’ and then he claims that this dream is true.
On this point a person said to the Promised Messiah as, ‘This fact would have been in his heart that Your Holiness is in reality the true Messiah.’
The Promised Messiah as said:
His heart is corrupted. Like Musailimah al-Kadhdhab [the Great Liar], he first accepted then rejected.
خَتَمَخَتَمَ اللّٰهُاللّٰهُ عَلٰىعَلٰى قُلُوْبِهِمْقُلُوْبِهِمْ1
also means the same. There existed the like of Musailimah al-Kadhdhab before but there is no likeness of this person.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1907
Sep-11
Al-Hakam, vol. 11, no. 33, p. 9–10, dated 17 September 1907, Al-Hakam, vol. 11, no. 33, p. 2, dated 17 September 1907, Malfuzat-9, pages 373-378
A [Subtle] Point
The apostate Dr [‘Abdul-Hakim] has determined the reason for the death of the late Maulawi ‘Abdul-Karim and the late Babu Muhammad Afzal to be the opposition to his commentary. On this, Munshi Ahmad Din, Appeal Writer, of Gujranwala, mentioned a wonderful point that, ‘Dr Sahib himself has become an opponent of his own commentary.’
The Claim of Dr ‘Abdul-Hakim Khan
The Promised Messiah as said:
The person [‘Abdul-Hakim] who considers himself to be the messiah, a messenger, claims to be a mercy for all the worlds, I wish to ask him has there ever been an instance that such a person should have been a follower of the Antichrist for twenty years? For which action of his is this punishment and what evil act has he committed that he remained in the bond of allegiance with the Antichrist? He bore so much humiliation and abasement that he was the follower of Satan for twenty years. Present such an example from the time the world came into being that a person who is the messiah, and also a messenger and then remained in the bond of allegiance with the Antichrist for twenty years.
(After Zuhr Prayer)
The Mistake of Dr ‘Abdul-Hakim
Hadrat Hakimul-Ummat [Sage of the Ummah—Maulawi Noor-ud-Deen], may his Lord protect him, mentioned a letter of the apostate, Dr ‘Abdul-Hakim Khan in which he writes, ‘Mistakes were made by
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1907
Majmua Ishtiharat, v-3, page 467
Scan
_____________________________________________________________________________________________1907
Nov 5-10th
scan _ISHTIHAR AFTER DEATH
Al-Hakam and Al-Badr of Nov-10-1907
https://www.youtube.com/live/DfhILeVkb64?si=h6L7lWDlIFKOWrlT
On Nov-10-1907, MGA and his team of writers published an announcement in the Al-Hakam and Al-Badr of Nov-10-1907 (See the scans in the below)(Via Majmua Ishtiharat, V-3, pages 461-467). Bro Imtiaz explained it in full detail herein (1:19:40). This announcement is about Maulvi Sanaullah, the death of Mirza Mubarak Ahmad and a new promised son (Musleh Maud?) and how local newspaper like the Akhbar-e-Aam and others are saying that MGA’s prophecies failed and biggest sign is the death of MGA’s 7 years old son, Mirza Mubarak Ahmad.
In this announcement, MGA says that people are showing happiness at the death of Mirza Mubarak Ahmad. MGA says that people are saying that the death of Mirza Mubarak Ahmad is a sign that MGA lost a Mubahila (with Abdul Hakim Patialvi and Maulvi Sanaullah). MGA and his team of writers tell a bold face lie and allege that MGA has tried to make the children of his opponents as signs of truth (1:22:09). However, this is a lie, in Jan-1907, a Muslim opponent of MGA named Saadullah died and MGA had prophecied that he not have children. In 1906-1907, via “Haqiqatul Wahi”, MGA mentions Abdul-Haqq Ghaznavi 6 times (see pages 306-307). MGA specifically under sign #92, and sign #159 (page 444). MGA alleges that Maulawi Abdul Haqq Ghaznavi had no children and thus lost the Mubahila (see page 445). MGA alleged that Maulawi Abdul Haqq Ghaznavi‘s brother died and he married the widow and she is now pregnant. MGA argues that in contrast, he was given 4 sons and hundreds of thousands of rupees (page 551).
Also in this announcement, MGA alleges that he knew 2-3 years ago (1904-1905 era)(Kayn Burse) that Mirza Mubarak Ahmad would die young (1:25:09). MGA then alleges that he has already announced that this child would not survive. MGA also alleges that when his God told him that Mirza Mubarak Ahmad would die, MGA’s God also said that those will be bitter days in his life (like sad and shameful)(1:26:18). MGA alleges, besides these, there were many additional revelations which were explicit/clear/open about the impending death of Mirza Mubarak Ahmad. MGA alleges that many years ago he predicted the death of Mirza Mubarak Ahmad in newspapers like Al-Badr and Al-Hakam. These prophecies were clear and without a shadow of doubt that Mirza Mubarak Ahmad would not reach the age of adulthood and would die as a minor (it was destined, muqarram).
Also in this announcement, MGA alleges (via Bro Imtiaz, 2:31:52) that when Mirza Mubarak Ahmad died (9-16-1907), MGA’s god sent him another fresh revelation about a boy who will be just like Mirza Mubarak Ahmad, a replica. This was because MGA’s God didn’t want his enemies to be happy, and it will be as-if Mirza Mubarak Ahmad never died. However, MGA died himself about 8 months later. MGA then says that his God will make his children a very powerful people (2:39:10).
Also in this announcement, MGA mentions the prophecy vs. Dr. Abdul-Hakim Khan (from Patiala)(via Bro Imtiaz, 2:42:29) and how it started in July 1907 and was for 14 months (scheduled to end in Sep-1908). MGA says that his life will be prolonged, and he will win (see the “Age Prophecy“). MGA told Ahmadi’s to memorize and print this announcement (2:49:37) and post it on their walls. MGA also says that he knows the deaths of his close relatives (bahot qareeb mutalaqeen 2:52:34) is nearing.
Scans
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1907
Nov
Majmua Isteharat volume 3, page 461
According to Mujmoa Ishteharat volume 3, page 468
Advertisement was printed on 13 x 16 size poster paper and put up on November 5, 1907. The article was also published in Al Hakam volume 11, number 40, dated November 11, 1907 pages 3 thru 6. The article was also published in Al Badr number 46, volume 6, dated November 10, 1907 pages 3 thru 6
“”And for the sake of the path, it has forced me that I am in charge of making things known and not denying them, and to establish the listeners on those matters that will strengthen their faith and increase their knowledge and establish them on the right path. be done It should be clear that I have read in the first column of this week’s Akhbar Aam that some short-sighted people have expressed great joy over the death of my son Mubarak Ahmed. Rather, in some other newspapers, this incident has been shown with a lot of force, and it has been painted as if it proves that one of them is victorious in the fight. We do not want to write more in this place because God Almighty is sufficient to punish falsehood.
It should be clear that I have not entered into such a relationship with anyone that would make the children of another party false in such a way that if the son of that party dies, he will remain a liar, but I always want him to be the same. The person whose sin is destroyed. He who has slandered God or the righteous.””
Scans
November 10, 1907
Yalash told MGA that he will have a new son who will replace Mubarak Ahmad and it says taza wahi.
Scan
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1907-Dec-17
(Elane-Haq wa Itmam-ul-Hujja wa Takmila, Dr Abdul Haqim Khan, pp. 7-8 [second edition])
The age of the Promised Messiah – Part II
“Mirza will die of lung disease.”
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1908–Feb
The age of the Promised Messiah – Part II
“On 16 February 1908, I received a revelation, ‘Mirza will die by 21 Sawan [the fifth month of the Bikrami calendar corresponding to July-August] 1965 [corresponding to 4 August 1908].”
When Abdul Hakim published the above prediction, the Promised Messiahas was writing his book Chashma-e-Marifat. He stated:
“In response to his prophecy, Allah Almighty has conveyed to me that he himself would be cast into torment and Allah will annihilate him and I shall remain secure from his mischief.” (Chashma-e-Marifat, Ruhani Khazain, Vol. 23, p. 337)
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1908–May
The highlighted part shows that on May 19, 1908 MGA was asked about Abdul Hakim Patialvi’s prophecy about MGA’s death. MGA said that God would manifest who is on the truth.
Ahmadi’s try to show that this was MGA’s final response because the Badr publishing date says 24 May, 1908; however the highlighted portion shows that it was actually stated by MGA on May 19, 1908.
MGA’s final statement was signed on May 20, 1908 in Chashma e Maarifat where he said Abdul Hakim had promised MGA’s death by August 1908 but himself would die.
Scan
MIRZA AND DR ABDUL HAKIM KHAN PATIALVI.
BOOK CHASHMA E MARIFAT PAGE NO 336-337
MIRZA WRITES :-
“””SIMILARLY MANY ENEMIES AMONG MUSLIMS STOOD AGAINST ME AND WERE KILLED. NOW THERE APPEARED ONE LAST ENEMY KNOWN AS DR ABDUL HAKIM KHAN PATIALVI. HE IS A DOCTOR FROM PATIALA HE CLAIMS THAT I WOULD BE KILLED IN HIS LIFE UPTO 4TH AUGUST 1908, AND THIS WOULD BE A SIGN OF HIS TRUTH FULLNESS AND HE CLAIMS IT IS A REVELATION TO ME FROM ALLAH SWT. HE DECLARES ME AS KAZZAB, DAJJAL AND KAFIR.
HE TOOK MY ALLEGIANCE AND REMAINED MY FOLLOWER FOR 20 YEARS.BUT WHEN I GAVE HIM AN ADVISE HE DEVIATED. THE ADVISE WAS GIVEN JUST FOR ALLAH,S SAKE WHICH WAS THAT HE WAS OF THE FAITH THAT ONE CAN GET DELIVERANCE IN THE WORLD HEREAFTER WITHOUT ACCEPTING HAZRAT MUHAMMAD S.A.W. I TOLD HIM THAT THIS BELIEF IS AGAINST ISLAM AND MAJORITY OF THE ELDERS OF ISLAM.BUT HE TURNED A DEAF EAR TO IT, FINALLY I REMOVED HIM FROM MY JAMMAT.THEN HE PROPHESIED THAT I WOULD BE KILLED BY 4TH AUGUST 1908 IN HIS LIFE TIME. BUT COUNTERING HIS PROPHESY, GOD HAS INFORMED ME THAT HE HIMSELF WOULD RECEIVE AZAB AND GOD WOULD KILL HIM AND WILL PROTECT ME FROM HIS EVIL.SO THIS IS THE CASE WHICH IS NOW IN THE COURT OF ALLAH FOR DECISION.”””
The scan
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Chashma-e-Ma‘rifat, p. 322, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 23, p. 337, see also the 2009 online edition of Tadhkirah
“””The Promised Messiahas stated in response: In response to his prophecy, Allah the Almighty has conveyed to me that he himself would be cast into torment and Allah will annihilate him and I shall remain secure from his mischief.”””
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1908-May-20
MIRZA AND DR ABDUL HAKIM KHAN PATIALVI.
BOOK CHASHMA E MARIFAT PAGE NO 336-337
MIRZA WRITES :-
“””SIMILARLY MANY ENEMIES AMONG MUSLIMS STOOD AGAINST ME AND WERE KILLED. NOW THERE APPEARED ONE LAST ENEMY KNOWN AS DR ABDUL HAKIM KHAN PATIALVI. HE IS A DOCTOR FROM PATIALA HE CLAIMS THAT I WOULD BE KILLED IN HIS LIFE UPTO 4TH AUGUST 1908, AND THIS WOULD BE A SIGN OF HIS TRUTH FULLNESS AND HE CLAIMS IT IS A REVELATION TO ME FROM ALLAH SWT. HE DECLARES ME AS KAZZAB, DAJJAL AND KAFIR.
HE TOOK MY ALLEGIANCE AND REMAINED MY FOLLOWER FOR 20 YEARS.BUT WHEN I GAVE HIM AN ADVISE HE DEVIATED. THE ADVISE WAS GIVEN JUST FOR ALLAH,S SAKE WHICH WAS THAT HE WAS OF THE FAITH THAT ONE CAN GET DELIVERANCE IN THE WORLD HEREAFTER WITHOUT ACCEPTING HAZRAT MUHAMMAD S.A.W. I TOLD HIM THAT THIS BELIEF IS AGAINST ISLAM AND MAJORITY OF THE ELDERS OF ISLAM.BUT HE TURNED A DEAF EAR TO IT, FINALLY I REMOVED HIM FROM MY JAMMAT.THEN HE PROPHESIED THAT I WOULD BE KILLED BY 4TH AUGUST 1908 IN HIS LIFE TIME. BUT COUNTERING HIS PROPHESY, GOD HAS INFORMED ME THAT HE HIMSELF WOULD RECEIVE AZAB AND GOD WOULD KILL HIM AND WILL PROTECT ME FROM HIS EVIL.SO THIS IS THE CASE WHICH IS NOW IN THE COURT OF ALLAH FOR DECISION.”””
The scans
MGA signing off
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1908-June
Ahle Hadith, 12 June 1908
“But, we expected this to happen soon, as had been announced by Dr. Abdul Hakim of Patiala. The doctor had stated, ‘My revelation concerning Mirza of Qadian, which may kindly be published, is that: (1) The Mirza will die on the 21st day of Saavan, 1965 (4th August, 1908) of a fatal disease. (2) A distinguished woman of the family of Mirza shall also die.’ [Weekly Ahle Hadith: 15.5.1908]. However, we cannot refrain from saying what is true. Had the doctor stopped at what he had stated before, that is, his prediction of Mirza’s death within fourteen months and not fixed a specific date as he has done then those objections could have never been raised as are being raised today by the Paisa Akhbar of the 27th, wherein it is stated that had the prophecy been left as, ‘up to the 21st of Saavan’ and not altered to, ‘on the 21st of Saavan’ it would have, indeed, been wonderful. But alas, his revelation that Mirza will die on the 21st of Saavan, that is 4th of August, has been published in the Ahle Hadith issue of 15th May, 1908. We wish that he would have left his earlier revelations unaltered, without giving a specific date. Then there could have been no excuse.”
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1914
Al-Fazl, May-16-1914
In 1914 (May-16), Mirza Bashir Ahmad was listed as the editor of the Al-Fazl (see Bro Imtiaz, 1:21:35 time stamp)(see scan in the below). Mirza Bashir Ahmad wrote an article wherein he accused Khwaja Kamaluddin of starting this dispute on Takfir and now as a result of that, there are 2 sects. Mirza Bashir Ahmad alleges that it was only Abdul Hakim Khan who didn’t agree with the Takfir of MGA in 1906-1907, i.e., that every person who has heard of MGA and has refused to accept MGA, he is not a Muslim. Mirza Bashir Ahmad says that Abdul Hakim Khan was kicked out of Ahmadiyya for the crime of not agreeing with MGA’s takfir.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1915
Kalimatul Fasl, pg 125
1915-March/April, Urdu-Review of Religions
In July-2025, at 1:11:19, Bro Imtiaz explains how Mirza Bashir Ahmad quoted the letter to Dr. Abdul Hakim Khan Patialvi wherein it is written that every such individual who has heard MGA’s message and has not accepted MGA, they are not a Muslim. Mirza Bashir Ahmad says that this quote of MGAQ solves many problems, firstly, MGAQ was told via ilham that those who reject you is not a Muslim and this is an order that MGA should consider those who reject him as Non-Muslim.
This was repeated again in Dec-2025. There are 6 points (48:00 time stamp):
1–via ilham, MGA was told that whomever denies him is not a Muslim.
2–MGA kicked out Abdul Hakim Khan because he considered non-Ahmadi’s as Muslims.
3–Calling non-Ahmadi’s as Muslim is a dirty belief (habees)
4–whomever holds this aqida his chance at “Rahmat elahee” is closed.
5–whomever denies MGA is denying clear cut verses of the Quran, he turns his face away from the Quran.
6–whomever says that the deniers of MGA are good people, his heart is in the hand of Satan.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1917
Seth Abdullah Alladin wrote “The Claims and Teachings of Ahmad, the Promised Messiah and Mahdi” published as a second edition in 1917, from Secunderabad, India, which is central India. This proves that Ahmadiyya had spread to deep South Central India by 1917. The title of this book also lists how there is an Ahmadiyya Jamaat book depot in Ceylon (slave island), which is modern day Sri Lanka. His father devoted a large part of his wealth to the Mirza family (see page 53), he seems to have converted to Ahmadiyya in the 1910’s. In 1922, he wrote a translation of the Quran in english, a sort of translation with hadith, however, he only picked certain verses of the Quran. His PDF version of the same book, republished in 1918 can be downloaded here. The Imam Of the Age by Seth Abdullah Allah Din (1918). In this book, he even quotes MGA’s letter of Takfir to Dr. Abdul Hakim Khan. A 1916 version of the same book can be found here: Claims and Teachings of Ahmad (1916).
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1918
His apostacy is mentioned in the Aug-Sep-1918 edition of the ROR.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1920
Tarikh e Ahmadiyyat, Vol 2, page 463
He died on June 1st, 1920 (see Tarikh e Ahmadiyyat, Vol 2, page 463).
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1923
https://www.reviewofreligions.org/21980/review-of-religions-january-february-march-1923-edition/
The Jan-Feb-March edition of the ROR mentions the apostacy of Dr. Khan.
He is mentioned by Maulvi Sanaullah in his famous book, “Tahreek-e-Mirza”.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1940
He is mentioned in the ROR of Jan-1940.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1943
In the ROR of March-1943, Sayyid Zayn al ‘Abidin Waliullah Shah explains how he freely moved into and outside of the house of MGA (1904-1907 era). He remembers when the plague hit Qadian and how MGA would use different chemicals to clear his house and the boarding house where all the students slept. He recalls how his father (Dr. Abdul Sattar Shah) asked MGA if he could visit a town that has already been hit with plague (in 1905) and MGA refused and cited the famous hadith wherein Muhammad (Saw) clearly said to never a visit a place where plague was raging. Sayyid Zayn al ‘Abidin Waliullah Shah alleges that the plague at Qadian only hit the Non-Ahmadi homes and Hindu’s (this is a lie, the editor of the Al-Badr Muhammad Afazl, died of plague). Sayyid Zayn al ‘Abidin Waliullah Shah then alleges that his parents had came to Qadian and were given a room in MGA’s house (the room is used in 1943 by a wife of the 2nd Khalifa). He alleges that the next door neighbor was a non-Ahmadi and someone died of plague in their house, which was only separated by MGA’s house by a wall. He also alleges that MGA gave a short speech. He mentions MGA’s beef with Maulvi Sanaullah, as well the famous Ahmadi apostate Dr. Abdul Hakim Khan.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
2016
From Mirza Masroor Ahmad’s Friday Sermon of 22-Jul-2016
“”When Abdul Hakeem announced his renunciation of Ahmadiyyat, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih I called upon his students and asked them to take out Abdul Hakeems’s commentary from his library so that Allah Almighty be not unhappy or angry to me because of that. Although it was the commentary of the Holy Quran and the commentary of several verses were written in consultation with Hazrat Khalifatul Masih I but still he ordered such an action because he had left the religion and so the wrath of Allah is on him. Some people make an objection that when there is sort of a punishment from the Jama’at towards someone or some action has been taken, then that person says that the action taken against me is wrong and presents a comparative situation where other people have not been penalized.This objection is not something new. In every era, such objections have arisen. People do it today and have been doing it in the past too. Therefore, mentioning such people Hazrat Musleh Maud(ra) says that the fact of the truth is that in order to keep the system right there is one circle of unity and oneness. Hazrat Musleh Maud(ra) says that certain things due to their particular trial (fitna) are considered very significant due to the specific situation. Due to the trial which is instantly there, sometimes the actions are taken in a very different way. But the people who criticize the decisions they do not consider this and are simply very fond of criticizing. Many people say like this and then they gather supporters, thus these punished people are not aware. What methods should be adopted for spreading the word of God (tabligh) and how shall this be done? Regarding this Hazrat Musleh Maud(ra) has mentioned that at this time the preaching work is done through distribution of pamphlets and brochures but these pamphlets cannot be carried for long due to their weight. ……”””””””””””””
______________________________________________________________________________________________
The age of the Promised Messiah – Part II
https://www.alhakam.org/the-age-of-the-promised-messiah-part-ii/
The age of the Promised Messiah – Part II
About two and half years before his demise, the Promised Messiah, peace be upon him, foretold in his booklet, Al-Wasiyyat (The Will) that the time of his passing was near. Moreover, he announced in various periodicals of the Ahmadiyya Jamaat, presenting countless revelations of God Almighty that his time of departure was close and he had been promised an age of around eighty years.
In the presence of all these prophecies and divine visions, it is impossible for a noble person to deny the truthfulness of the Promised Messiah and Imam Mahdi, Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmadas of Qadian.
In spite of all that, certain opponents of the Promised Messiahas consider his demise to be a sign of their truth and suggest that his death happened according to their (own) prophecies.
One such person was Mian Abdul Hakim of Patiala. Mian Abdul Hakim Patialvi remained a follower of the Promised Messiahas for 20 years.
Once, he wrote a letter to the Promised Messiahas and enquired whether a person who did not believe in the prophethood of the Holy Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, but acted righteously and had faith in the unity of God, would be pardoned?
In response, the Promised Messiahas stated that this belief was absolutely evil because God Almighty had established His authority upon mankind through the Holy Prophetsa and thus, whosoever did not believe in him would not be forgiven as virtuous deeds could not be performed without submitting to the Holy Prophetsa.
Thereupon, Mian Abdul Hakim became enraged and left no stone unturned to abuse and accuse the Promised Messiahas as false. He did this to the extent that 12 months after the publication of Al-Wasiyyat, observing the revelations and prophecies of the Promised Messiahas about his close demise, Abdul Hakim predicted the death of the Promised Messiahas and stated:
“Allah Almighty told me in a revelation on 12 July 1906, ‘Mirza is a transgressor, a great liar and a cheat. The mischievous shall be annihilated before the truthful and the prescribed time period was conveyed to be three years.” (Elan-e-Haq wa Itmam-ul-Hujja wa Takmila, Dr Abdul Haqim Khan, p. 4 [second edition])
In reply to this, the Promised Messiahas issued an announcement on 16 August 1906 under the title, “May Allah help him who is truthful.”
It was published in his book, Haqiqatul-Wahi:
“Against this is the prophecy conveyed to me by God Almighty about Mian Abdul Hakim Khan, Assistant Surgeon, Patiala in the following words:
خدا کے مقبولوں میں قبولیت کے نمونے اور علامتیں ہوتی ہیں۔اور وہ سلامتی کے شہزادے کہلاتے ہیں۔ ان پر کوئی غالب نہیں آسکتا فرشتوں کی کھینچی ہوئی تلوار تیرے آگے ہے۔ پر تو نے وقت کو نہ پہچانا نہ دیکھا نہ جانا۔ ربّ فرّق بین صادق و کاذب۔ انت تریٰ کلّ مصلح و صادق۔
[Those accepted by God carry with them incidents and signs of acceptance. They are known as the princes of peace. No one can overcome them. The drawn sword of angels is in front of you, but you have not recognised nor seen nor appreciated the needs of the time. O my God, do create a distinction between the truthful and the liar. You recognise every reformer and truthful one.]” (The Philosophy of Divine Revelation, pp. 505-506)
Soon after the above announcement, God Almighty began to expose Abdul Hakim and he annulled his three year prophecy about the death of the Promised Messiahas, stating:
“Mirza did not become cautious at all by those [predictions which in view of Abdul Hakim were revelations]. So, Allah Almighty reduced ten months and eleven days from his three years’ punishment that was to be fulfilled on 11 July 1909, because of his impertinence and disobedience and [God] told me on 1 July 1907, ‘14 months from now, Mirza will be thrown in hell receiving the punishment of death.’” (Elane-Haq wa Itmam-ul-Hujja wa Takmila, Dr Abdul Haqim Khan, p. 6 [second edition])
Responding to the above statement, the Promised Messiahas issued an announcement on 5 November 1907 and stated:
“… And [God] said:
لکم البشری فی الحیٰوۃ الدنیا۔۔۔وضعنا عنک وزرک الذی انقض ظھرک ورفعنا لک ذکرک۔ انی معک ذکرتک فاذکرنی وسع مکانک حان ان تعان وتعرف بین الناس انی معک یا ابراھیم انی معک ومع اھلک انک معی واھلک انی انا الرحمان فانتظر قل یا خذک اللہ۔
“Meaning that glad tidings for you in this world and the Hereafter. Your ending will be good … We shall remove your burden which broke your back and we shall exalt your name. I am with you. I recalled you, so remember me as well and expand your abode. That time is near when you will be helped and your name will be called with honour and exaltedness in the people. I am with you, O Ibrahim and likewise, with the people of your house. You are with me and likewise, your people of the house. I am Merciful. Wait for my help and tell your enemy that God will take revenge from you. And stated in Urdu at the end:
میں تیری عمر کو بھی بڑھا دوں گا
“This means that those of my enemies who say that only 14 months of my age are left after July 1907 or prophesy my death within a certain time, I shall prove them false and increase your age as well, so as to demonstrate that I am God and everything is under His control.” (Badr, 10 November 1907, pp. 5-7)
The words, “I shall prove them false” and “increase your age” are of significant importance. It shows that the demise of the Promised Messiahas was due before 1 September 1908 in accordance with the revelations of Allah Almighty but in order to prove the enemy false, God gave the glad tiding of increasing his age.
It indicates that the glad tiding of increasing his age was to prove the falsehood of the opponents. Thereafter, according to Dr Abdul Hakim, God sent him another revelation on 30 November 1908 [he mistakenly wrote 1908 as other predictions before and after it, showed the year 1907 in a sequence];
“The foundation of Mirza will be uprooted.”
Then he received another one on 8 December 1907:
ولا یردباسنا عن القوم المجرمین
And one more on 17 December 1907:
“Mirza will die of lung disease.”
(Elane-Haq wa Itmam-ul-Hujja wa Takmila, Dr Abdul Haqim Khan, pp. 7-8 [second edition])
Once again, confused by the announcement issued by the Promised Messiahas on 5 November 1907, Abdul Hakim changed his prophecy and stated:
“On 16 February 1908, I received a revelation, ‘Mirza will die by 21 Sawan [the fifth month of the Bikrami calendar corresponding to July-August] 1965 [corresponding to 4 August 1908].”
When Abdul Hakim published the above prediction, the Promised Messiahas was writing his book Chashma-e-Marifat. He stated:
“In response to his prophecy, Allah Almighty has conveyed to me that he himself would be cast into torment and Allah will annihilate him and I shall remain secure from his mischief.” (Chashma-e-Marifat, Ruhani Khazain, Vol. 23, p. 337)
Then again, Abdul Hakim made alterations in his prediction and stated about the Promised Messiahas:
“… His boldness and transgression did not diminish … so the time limit of 21 Sawan 1965, corresponding to 4 August 1908 has been annulled as well.” (Elan-e-Haq wa Itmam-ul-Hujja wa Takmilah, Dr Abdul Haqim Khan, pp. 8-9 [second edition])
As per his practice, Abdul Hakim Khan could not adhere to his prediction of 4 August 1908, which was made by him on 16 February 1908 as a result of his so-called revelation. Many months later, Abdul Hakim announced another prediction about the Promised Messiahas through a letter dated 8 May 1908, in various newspapers.
We found two of those newspapers: The Daily Paisa Akhbar and Akhbar Ahl-e-Hadith, in which the following prophecy of Abdul Hakim was published:
“Mirza will fall prey to a fatal illness and shall die on 21 Sawan 1965 [i.e. 4 August 1908].” (The Daily Paisa Akhbar, 15 May 1908 and Akhbar Ahl-e-Hadith, 15 May 1908)
Hence, Abdul Hakim annulled all of his previous predictions and announced that in his view, God had revealed to him the exact date of the demise of the founder of the Ahmadiyya Jamaat, i.e. 4 August 1908.
On the contrary, the Promised Messiahas passed away on 26 May 1908 in accordance with the revelations vouchsafed to him by God Almighty and thus the falsehood of Dr Abdul Hakim Khan of Patiala was demonstrated by Allah Himself.
Lastly, we present an acknowledgement of the above fact in the words of a bitter enemy of the Promised Messiahas, Maulvi Sanaullah of Amritsar. Soon after the demise of the Promised Messiahas, he stated in his newspaper:
“In rejection of Dr Sahib’s [Abdul Hakim’s] prophecy, expressing the limit of 14 months, Mirza Sahib stated in the same announcement [of 5 November 1907], ‘God told me that I shall increase your age, i.e. those of my enemies who say that only 14 months of my age are left after July 1907 or prophesy my death within a certain time, I shall prove them false and increase your age, so as to demonstrate that I am God and everything is under His control.’
These words clearly show that the age of Mirza will prolong against the prophecy of Dr Sahib that expressed the limit of 14 months which was to end on September 1908. … Till this point, the prophecy of Dr Sahib holds great perfection, but we cannot refrain from saying what is true.
“Had the Dr Sahib stopped at what he had stated earlier, i.e. after his prediction of Mirza’s death within 14 months, if he had not fixed a specific date as he has done which is published in 15 May, Ahl-e-Hadith that Mirza will die on 21 Sawan, i.e. 4 August, then those objections could have never been raised as are being raised on Dr Sahib’s prophecy today by the respected editor of Paisa Akhbar in the publication of 27 [May 1908].
Wherein it is teasingly stated that had the prophecy been left as ‘up to the 21 Sawan’ and not altered to ‘on 21 of Sawan’ it would have, indeed, been wonderful. Hence, had he left his earlier revelations unaltered, without giving a specific date, then today, there could have been no objection.” (Ahl-e-Hadith, 12th June 1908)
(Research conducted by the Research Cell. Translated by Al Hakam)
No posts to display
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s
DR ABDUL HAKIM KHAN PATIALVI mentions the death of Maulvi Abdul Karim in his correspondence with MGA
http://www.thecult.info/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=357&hilit=1911&start=10
“My beliefs about non-Ahmadi Muslims”, dated 18 August 1911 by Khwaja Kamal-uddin
http://alhafeez.org/rashid/abuse/abuse.htm
Tashhiz al-Azhan was a Magazine founded by Mahmud Ahmad in 1906, quotes and background info
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and 2:62, the “Salvation” or “status” of Non-Muslim’s in an islamic state?
http://www.aaiil.org/text/articles/reviewofreligions/raw/reviewreligionsenglish1905.pdf
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/21/dr-abdul-hakim-khan-patialvi-vs-mga-continued/
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam
Truthfulness of Hadhrat Masih Maud (as)
Haqiqatul-Wahi PG 299:
‘Abdul-Hakim Khan writes about me:
‘I have no equivocation about you, I still believe that you are the like of the Messiah, that you are the Messiah, and that you are the like of Prophets.’
Again, on page 12 of the same book, from line 15 to 20, there is a passage affirming my claim, which is reproduced here in bold letters: There was one Maulawi, Muhammad Hasan Baig, a maternal cousin of mine who was bitterly opposed to your gracious self. I was informed concerning him, in a dream, that if he persisted in his opposition of the Messiah of the Age, he would die of plague. His residence was outside the city in a well-ventilated and commodious house. I had related this dream to his real brother, uncle, and other relatives. A year later, he did die of plague. See ‘Abdul-Hakim’s booklet Dhikrul-Hakim, page 12.
Now take note that, on the one hand, he not only acknowledges that I am the Promised Messiah, but also quotes a dream—which turned out to be true—as testimony to my truthfulness. Thereafter, at the end of the same book, as well as in his booklet al-Masihud-Dajjal, he names me as a dajjal and satan and denounces me as being an embezzler, a rogue, and an impostor. It is rather strange
that ‘Abdul-Hakim Khan has not cared to space these two contradictory statements even by a few days. On one hand, he called me the Promised Messiah and testified to my truthfulness with his dream, and on the other, he called me a deceiver and an impostor. I do not care why he did this, but let everyone ponder that the condition of this man is like one who is not in his senses in that he has a glaring contradiction in what he affirms. On the one hand, he pronounces me the true Messiah and even quotes a true dream of his which was fulfilled as testimony to my truthfulness. On the other, he considers me worse than all the disbelievers. Could there be a more egregious contradiction?