ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
Dr. Abdul Hakeem Khan is a very controversial figure in the world of Ahmadiyya, especially in terms of how MGA began calling Muslims as Kafirs in 1906. Abdul Hakeem Khan was a follower of MGA since at least 1886 (See Haqiqatul Wahi), since MGA himself admitted to this fact. Abdul Hakeem Khan was most likely a follower of Noorudin and thus followed Noorudin to MGA in 1889 (see lots of scans herein).

He left Ahmadiyya publicly in 1906 and later predicted that MGA would die in 1908. His main beef with MGA was on 2:62 on Salvation. In 1906, he wrote a series of books vs. MGA entitled, Zikrul-Hakim, in one of these he discussed the death of Maulvi Abdul Karim. Further, he caused MGA to begin to do open Takfir of the Muslim world. Dr. ‘Abdul-Hakim Khan, also wrote a booklet “al-Masihud-Dajjal”, which refers to MGA. Dr. Khan accuses MGA of telling lies, he calls MGA a dajjal [deceiver], corrupt, and an embezzler. In his booklet, al-Masihud-Dajjal, he has listed a number of my ‘vices’. He calls MGA as selfish, egotistical, arrogant, Antichrist, Satan, ignorant, insane, great liar, lazy, corrupt, one who breaks his word, and an embezzler. Dr. Khan then toured the major cities of the Punjab like Lahore, Amritsar, and the rest, delivering public lectures and invariably ascribing all kinds of misdeeds to MGA, ridiculing MGA, and declaring
MGA to be dangerous to the world; more dangerous than even the Devil. This was not all, he also publicly announced in each lecture, in the presence of hundreds of people that God had revealed to him: ‘During the next three years, this man [i.e. me] would die on account of his being a liar and an impostor.’ On 14 August 1906, Maulawi Nur-ud-Din received another letter from Dr. Khan, wherein he says that God Almighty had informed him on 12 July 1906 about MGA’s demise to the effect that MGA shall die within a period of three years from this date (by 1909).

Haqiqatul Wahi is written in the summer of 1906, with just small portions written in 1907, Abdul-Hakim Khan is mentioned 64 times.

On Nov-10-1907, MGA and his team of writers published an announcement in the Al-Hakam and Al-Badr of Nov-10-1907 (See the scans in the below)(Via Majmua Ishtiharat, V-3, pages 461-467). Bro Imtiaz explained it in full detail herein (1:19:40). This announcement is about Maulvi Sanaullah, the death of Mirza Mubarak Ahmad and a new promised son (Musleh Maud?) and how local newspaper like the Akhbar-e-Aam and others are saying that MGA’s prophecies failed and biggest sign is the death of MGA’s 7 years old son, Mirza Mubarak Ahmad. Also in this announcement, MGA mentions the prophecy vs. Dr. Abdul-Hakim Khan (from Patiala)(via Bro Imtiaz, 2:42:29) and how it started in July 1907 and was for 14 months (scheduled to end in Sep-1908). MGA says that his life will be prolonged, and he will win (see the “Age Prophecy“). MGA told Ahmadi’s to memorize and print this announcement (2:49:37) and post it on their walls. MGA also says that he knows the deaths of his close relatives (bahot qareeb mutalaqeen 2:52:34) is nearing.

In 1908, May-26, MGA died.

However, after MGA died, in 1911, his son, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad quoted the famous letter to Abdul Hakim Patialvi and thus authenticated it.

In 1914 (May-16), Mirza Bashir Ahmad was listed as the editor of the Al-Fazl (see Bro Imtiaz, 1:21:35 time stamp)(see scan in the below). Mirza Bashir Ahmad wrote an article wherein he accused Khwaja Kamaluddin of starting this dispute on Takfir and now as a result of that, there are 2 sects. Mirza Bashir Ahmad alleges that it was only Abdul Hakim Khan who didn’t agree with the Takfir of MGA in 1906-1907, i.e., that every person who has heard of MGA and has refused to accept MGA, he is not a Muslim. Mirza Bashir Ahmad says that Abdul Hakim Khan was kicked out of Ahmadiyya for the crime of not agreeing with MGA’s takfir.

He died on June 1st, 1920 (see Tarikh e Ahmadiyyat, Vol 2, page 463)(See scan in the below).
Continue reading “Who is Dr. Abdul-Hakim Khan, the famous Ex-Ahmadi?” →

Intro
MGA claimed many quranic verses were about his arrival, the list is getting long, 1:7, 2:4, 48:29, 61:09 and 9:32, 21:107, 10:16, 17:8, 18:83, 61:6, 62:3 and many others. We have also recently found 77:11. In “Shahadat ul Quran” (Testimony of the Quran)[1893], via the online english edition, on page 26, MGA clearly claims that this verse 77:11 (77:12) was revealed about his own coming. In this verse, MGA argued that ar-Roosulu means one messenger, in the singular, and that this verse was specifically about himself (MGA). This contradicts the Ahmadiyya argument on 3:144, and the assertion that Ar-Roosulu mean ALL. MGA also argued that this verse was about the muhaddaseen in the ummah, which was later contradicted.

Razi ullah Noman aka @ahmadianswers tried to respond here in this video (See at the 50:00 minute mark). Razi tries to counter-argue that MGA was claiming that Ar-rusul means ALL messengers, however, MGA was representing all of them. This is contradictory, since in Shahadatul Quran (1893), MGA clearly wrote that ar-rusul in 77:11 means a singular person. At this point in time, MGA was not claiming to be a rasul/nabi, only metaphorically, thus, MGA was including all mujadid’s, muhaddas’ and high-ranking imam’s.

In fact, 10 years later, in Tadhkiratul Shahadatain, MGA called himself the FINAL Khalifa (Khatamul Khulafa) and also claimed that the number of messengers had arrived (See ref in the below).

In Oct-2025, Bro Imtiaz had a debate with Azim Saifi and 77:11 (77:12 in the Kadiani Koran) was discussed. —At 3:31:55, Bro Imtiaz quoted Tohfah Golarhviyyah, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 17, p. 244, and explained how MGA quoted 77:11 of the Quran (77:12 in the Kadiani Koran) and argued that he was included in the master list of Rasul’s.

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed that the Quran, 77:11 (77:12 in the Kadiani Koran), was about his coming” →

Intro
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was given free reign by the British Government to make the wildest claims. We know he claimed to be the 2nd coming of Adam (as), Jesus (as), and Muhammad (Saw)(nauzobillah). However, MGA also claimed to be the second coming of Ibrahim (as) and Moses (as). In 1900, MGA was claiming that 20 years ago, his god named him Ibrahim (as)(nauzobillah), however, we haven’t found that reference as of yet.
Continue reading “Why did Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claim to be Ibrahim (as)?” →

Intro
In 1891, when MGA made the claim of being the Promised Messiah, he quoted 5:75 (5:76) and argued that this particular verse proved that ALL prophets/messengers of Allah had died.
MGA made this argument in Izala Auham, which appeared in the Summer of 1891. A similar verse and line of argumentation is found in 3:144 (3:145) in the Qadiani Quran numbering system). In fact, 3:144 proves that prophets can be killed, this was common, in fact, it appears 10 times in the quran. In the Izala Auham of 1891, MGA used 5:75 and argued that it said specifically that Esa (As) and his mother used to eat food (see pages 8-9), which per MGA proves that they are dead. MGA didn’t harp on the “Qad Khalat” part, which is similar to the phraseology in 3:144. However, MGA is incorrect, the phrase “they used to eat food” (kana ya’kulani), is only used to prove that they were human while on Earth and thus needed food to survive. While Esa (as) is in heaven, he may not need any food, since food is not required for survival in JANNAH, food is only eaten for sport and taste. We didn’t find MGA and his team of writers using this argument after 1891, the last time it appears is after MGA died, in the BA5.

In MGA’s famous debate with Athim in 1893 (See “Holy War”, online English edition, pages 12-13). MGA argued that “khallat” didn’t mean death and the word ALL was not in this verse (5:75 and 3:144).

In “Shahadatul-Quran” (1893)(online english edition from the Lahori-Ahmadi’s) MGA quoted 77:11 of the Quran and argued that “Ar-Rusulu” had a singular connotation and referred to himself (MGA)as the Promised Messiah. Thus contradicting his previous stance that Ar-rusulu meant ALL. Ar-rusulu also occurs in 23:51, as Allah does refer to ALL in this verse. 41:14 is another instance, also see 12:110, see also 13:38, 5:70 and 22:75.

Interestingly, MGA’s brother-in-lw, Mir Muhammad Ishaq translated 5:75 as “Many” and not ALL. Check out Al-Tabari on 5:75 and 3:144. Lisan Al-Arab also tells us that the main meanings of Qad Khallat is to leave a place.

In 2025, check out Brother Omar explaining how Ahmadi’s translate of “Al-Rusul” in 3:144 is different from “Al-Rusul” in 5:75 (See the clip on TikTok and Twitter), in fact, Zafrullah Khan gave the same translation in his version of the Quran.
Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and 5:75 of the Quran (5:76 in the Qadiani Quran)” →

Intro
Per the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s, from 1891 to 1901, MGA specifically argued that Esa (as) was supposed to return as a non-prophet (muhaddath aka metaphoric prophet)(see “Haqiqatun Nubuwwat”, [1915])(See also “Taudih-e-Maram”, 1891, online English Edition, see pages 15-16). In this era, MGA quoted 4:64 and claimed that prophets only follow Allah and not other others. The Lahori-Ahmadi’s claim that MGA never changed his position on prophethood and thus, even in 2020, the Lahori-Ahmadi’s believe that the return of Esa (as) is that of a non-prophet. In contrast, the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s believe that MGA changed his position on the idea that Esa (as) would only return as a non-prophet (in 1901) and his position on 4:64. MGA’s son, the Khalifa, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad, claimed in 1915 that MGA discovered a new type of prophethood in 1900-1901, the Ummati-Nabi. Per the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s after 1901, MGA realized that he had been a prophet since 1879 and he (MGA) had misunderstood the concept of the Ummati-Nabi until 1901.
Continue reading “From 1891 to 1901, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad argued that Esa (as) would return as a non-prophet” →

Intro
1:He will be from the family of Last Prophet Pbuh,
2: His name will be same as prophet name,
3: He will rule for seven years,
4: will fill the earth with equity and justice as it has been filled with oppression and tyranny.
If you believe that mahdi has arrived then show me a man with these characteristic and he must be a muslim from last ummah he should not Kafir, murtad or dajjal…
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Summary

The following are the collection of Sahih (authentic) Hadith regarding Mahdi.

Hadhrat Abdullah bin Mas’ood razil Allah hu anhu reports from the Prophet ( salullahu alaih wassalam ) , who said:

The world will not come to pass until a man from among my family, whose name will be my name, rules over the Arabs.
(Tirmidhi Sahih, Vol. 9, P. 74; Abu Dawud, Sahih, Vol. 5, P. 207;
also narrated by Ali b. Abi Talib, Abu Sa’id, Umm Salma, Abu Hurayra)

The Prophet ( salullahu alaih wassalam ) said:

Allah will bring out from concealment al-Mahdi from my family and just before the day of Judgment; even if only one day were to remain in the life of the world, and he will spread on this earth justice and equity and will eradicate tyranny and oppression.
(Musnad Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, Vol. 1, P. 99)

Hadhrat Ali ( razil Allah hu anhu ) narrates that Rasulullah ( salullahu alaih wassalam ) said:

Even if only a day remains for Qiyamah to come, yet Allah will surely send a man from my family who will fill this world with such justice and fairness, just as it initially was filled with oppression.
(Abu Dawood)

Ali b. Abi Talib ( razil Allah hu anhu ) has related a tradition from the Prophet (salullahu alaih wassalam) who informed him:

The promised Mahdi will be among my family. God will make the provisions for his emergence within a single night.
(Ibn Majah, Sahih, Vol. 2, P. 519)

Hazrat Umme Salmah ( razil Allah hu anhu ) , Prophet’s wife, narrates that she heard the Prophet ( salullahu alaihe wassalam ) say:

The promised Mahdi will be among my progeny, among the descendants of Fatima.
(Abu Dawud, Sahih, Vol. 2, P. 207; Ibn Majah, Sahih, Vol. 2, P. 519)

Rasulullah ( salullahu alaihe wassalam ) announced:

The Mahdi will be of my family, of the descendants of Fatima (the Prophet’s daughter). (Sunan Ibn Majah, Vol. 2, Tradition No. 4086)

The Prophet ( salullahu alaihe wassalam ) taught:

Al-Mahdi is one of us, the members of the household (Ahlul-Bayt).
(Sunan Ibn Majah, Vol. 2, Tradition No. 4085)

Abu Sa’id al-Khudari ( razil Allah hu anhu ) narrated that the Prophet ( salullahu alaihe wassalam ) said:

Our Mahdi will have a broad forehead and a pointed (prominent) nose. He will fill the earth with justice as it is filled with injustice and tyranny. He will rule for seven years.
(Abu Dawud, Sahih, Vol. 2, p. 208; Fusul al-muhimma, p. 275)

Hadhrat Abu Saeed Khudri ( razil Allah hu anhu ) relates that Rasulullah ( salullahu alaihe wassalam ) said:

Al Mahdi will be from my progeny. His forehead will be broad and his nose will be high. He will fill the world with justice and fairness at a time when the world will be filled with oppression. He will rule for seven years.

Hadhrat Umme Salmah ( razil Allah hu anhu ) narrates that Rasulullah ( salullahu alaihe wassalam ) said:

After the death of a Ruler there will be some dispute between the people. At that time a citizen of Madina will flee (from Madina) and go to Makkah. While in Makkah, certain people will approach him between Hajrul Aswad and Maqaame Ibraheem, and forcefully pledge their allegiance to him.

Thereafter a huge army will proceed from Syria to attack him but when they will be at Baida, which is between Makkah and Madina, they will be swallowed into the ground.

On seeing this, the Abdaals of Shaam as well as large numbers of people from Iraq will come to him and pledge their allegiance to him. Then a person from the Quraish, whose uncle will be from the Bani Kalb tribe will send an army to attack him, only to be overpowered, by the will of Allah. This (defeated) army will be that of the Bani Kalb. Unfortunate indeed is he who does not receive a share from the booty of the Kalb. This person (Imam Mahdi) will distribute the spoils of war after the battle. He will lead the people according to the Sunnat and during his reign Islam will spread throughout the world. He will remain till seven years (since his emergence). He will pass away and the Muslims will perform his Janazah salaat.
(Abu Dawood)

The holy Prophet ( salullahu alaihe wassalam ) said:

A group of my Ummah will fight for the truth until near the day of judgment when Jesus, the son of Marry, will descend, and the leader of them will ask him to lead the prayer, but Jesus declines, saying: “No, Verily, among you Allah has made leaders for others and He has bestowed his bounty upon them.
(Sahih Muslim)

It is reported from Abu Hurayra ( razil Allah hu anhu ) that the Prophet ( salullahu alaihe wassalam ) said:

What will be your reaction when the son of Mary (Jesus) descends and your Imam is from among yourselves?
(Sahih Muslim, bab nuzul ‘isa, Vol. 2; Sahih Bukhari, kitab bad’ al-khalq wa nuzul ‘isa, Vol. 4)

The holy Prophet ( salullahu alaihe wassalam ) said:

What would be your situation if the Son of Mary (i.e. Jesus) descends upon you and your Imam is from among you?
(Bukhari, kitabul-Anbiya, Chapter Nuzul Isa bin Maryam)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s

Intro
AN INTRODUCTION TO BOOK “AHMAQON KI JANNAT” (FOOLS PARADISE). In this book, the author confirms what Fauzia Faizi has said about the Mirza family and the story of Affaf Azhar. Rabwah is not a holy place. The full book can also be found here on this website. Who is G.R. Awan?
Continue reading “AHMAQON KI JANNAT (Fools paradise) by G.R. Awan” →

Intro
Another Ex-Ahmadi has came out and gave her story to AK Shaikh on Zaitoon FM. Towards, the end of the podcast, the famous Ahmadi troll, Muhammad Yahya Khan came on and complained that Affaf was doing proper purdah and etc., so shameful. You can see additional interviews of Affaf Azhar here.

In 2021, the Ahmadiyya movement officially attacked her, they sent out a letter to all Ahmadi’s to stay away from her. Affaf Azhar and Noman Alam on the Beyond Beliefs youtube channel discussing #JusticeforNida, they discussed the raping of Nida Al-Nasser. Affaf Azhar has also exposed Ahmadiyya on men masturbating at Rabwah and many other things herein. Affaf Azhar has also spoke about the personal life of Mirza Farid Ahmad and how he was a well-known playboy of Rabwah.

In 2022, Affaf Azhar Hafiz EXPOSED Muzaffar Ahmad as a wife beater. Also in 2022, Affaf Azhar interviewed with Tahir Gora on TAGTV and explained #JusticeforNida. She talked about the Ahmadiyya asylum scandal in Malaysia. She also talks about the legal notice that she issued vs. the Ahmadiyya Movement in Canada. She also spoke about how all the main news outlets (BBC) refused to publish anything about #JusticeforNida. At about the 30:00 mark, the host asserts that Ahmadi’s are persecuted, which is a lie. She also talks about how converts to Ahmadiyya in the west are tricked into signing a bait form and paying chanda for 2 years before they can marry an Ahmadi woman/man.

Her father is Abdul Sami Zafar, who was working at the Rabwah Train station in May of 1974 when Ahmadi’s attacked teenagers from the Nishter Medical School. In 2014, he interviewed on the rogue Ahmadi channel, Alghulamonline wherein he revealed the fact that the Mirza Nasir Ahmad and his brothers planned and executed the May 29th, 1974 Rabwah Train attacks. Feel free to read Charles Kennedy’s academic work on the Rabwah Train attacks here. Mirza Nasir Ahmad claims to have been 12 miles away and never even cared to ask about these attacks.
Continue reading “Affaf Azhar is also an Ex-Ahmadi” →