Search

ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Thorough research work on the Ahmadiyya Movement, #ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyat #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome

Search results

"Yacub Irfani"

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad cited phantom Jewish sources and alleged that Eisa (as) had fell in love with some woman (astagfarullah)

Intro
In a recent livestream (31:28 time stamp), Bro Imtiaz presented a source from Malfuzat, V-2, page 473-474 (See scans in the below). In this reference, MGA (and his team of writers) is again citing phantom Jewish sources (they have done this before to slander Maryam [as]) to allege that Eisa (as) had fell in love with some woman (See also “Dafi-ul-Bala”, page-3, online english edition)(astagfarullah)(check out the full translation in the below)(Check out MGA’s writings on Yahya [as]). It seems that MGA was eager to insult Eisa (as) and thus let loose. MGA was using the Quran (3:39, 3:40 in the Qadiani Quran) as he authenticated the biblical narrative that Eisa (as) drank alcohol/wine (astagfarullah).

In this utterance (initially published in the Al-Hakam, Feb-21-1902, page 3), Sheikh Yacub Ali Irfani was the editor, he must have heard this from MGA, the context is unknown, it is from a column in the Al-Hakam wherein the sayings of MGA were given without context in every edition. MGA is simply disrespecting Eisa (as) and using Jewish sources to allege that he was in love with random women (astagfarullah).

Al Hakam February 21 1902

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad cited phantom Jewish sources and alleged that Eisa (as) had fell in love with some woman (astagfarullah)”

Who is Lala Malawamal?

Intro
Lala Malawamal (aka Lalah Malawamal Khatri, see Haqiqatul Wahy) seems to have been a long time resident of Qadian, India. He was a member of the local hindu community, the Arya Samaj of Qadian. He was mentioned by MGA in Barahin-Ahmadiyya Vol. 4 (1882-1884 era), MGA even explained how he would go out for walks in and around Qadian with Lala Malawamal. MGA called him and his friend Lalah Sharampat as the 2 hindu’s of Qadian who would come and regularly visit MGA and etc. MGA even alleged to have miraculously cured Lala Malawamal from tuberculosis. MGA went to explain how Lala Malawamal saw a revelation that MGA received and saw other signs. MGA specifically mentioned how Lala Malawamal getting money from the post office and a handsome son, aka the promised son aka musleh maud. In Haqiqatul Wahy, MGA mentions a 3rd hindu, Bishandas Brahman, MGA said, wherever the term Aryas occurs in Barahin-e-Ahmadiyya these alone are meant; others too are meant elsewhere. MGA also claims that Lalah Sharampat and Lala Malawamal were the witnesses in this famous revelation, that became a ring that All Ahmadi’s wear, “Is Allah not sufficient for his servant”. MGA also claims that he prophecied the death of his father (Mirza Ghulam Murtaza) and these 2 were the witnesses. (See “Qadian Kei Aryah Aur Hamm”, in english it would be “The Aryas of Qadian”). MGA also alleges that he prophecied the assassination of Dayanand, and Lalah Sharampat was the witness.

However, Lalah Sharampat and Lala Malawamal were illiterate and barely understood what MGA was saying, thus, MGA used them in a deceptive and thought that no one would try to audit these witnesses. As soon as the prophecy was announced by him, Sharampat whom he had quoted as a witness, declared: “Ghulam Ahmad is a liar and an anti -Christ. I never heard this prophecy from him (See Anthology of Pandit Lakhram Takzib·i· Baraheen-i Ahmadiyya, via “Qadiyaniat: an analytical survey” by Ehsan Elahi Zaheer (1984) 21st edition free download – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog).

By 1906, these same 2 Hindu’s were able to communicate to MGA and his gathering at Qadian (an alleged Jalsa) that MGA was lying and these two Hindu’s had never seen any signs at all. This caused MGA and his team to write, “Qadian Kei Aryah Aur Hamm” (Feb-20-1907).

Continue reading “Who is Lala Malawamal?”

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and the marriage of Maulvi Muhammad Ali

Intro
This entire entry was taken from the islam_Ahmadiyya reddit forum.

The following material is referenced from Maktubat-e-Ahmadiyya (Letters of Ahmad) Volume 5, Number 3, published on February 18, 1929 compiled by Yaqoob Ali Irfani Sahib and printed in Qadian.

About these letters, Irfani Sahib has said in the preface, and I quote:

“I feel ashamed in having to say that it is sad that until now, there are very few admirers in the jamaat who fully appreciate the value of these invaluable gems”

One of these gems on page 166 is letter number 273 written by the Promised Messiah on October 31st, 1899 addressed to Munshi Rustam Ali Sahib, whereby he is trying to seek Munshi Sahib’s help in finding a match for his companion Maulvi Mohammad Ali Sahib.

I feel that the letter is self-evident in identifying what is critical in seeking a girl for marriage. I will just give some perspective to a couple of items here.

First of all, why the insistence on a female barber? I cannot think of any other reason other than the fact that female barbers having spent their lives providing female grooming services, had a hands-on knowledge of female anatomy, presumably unmatched by a woman in any other capacity. They would be able to provide the information the promised Messiah was looking for, in a much more accurate way than a lay person. I will let you do your own analysis of the situation.

Second, Maulvi Mohammad Ali was not a young man at the time of this Nikah, he had already been divorced a long time ago, so why seek the younger of the daughters of the Superintendent? I can only guess that young girls were most sought after and it is consistent with the pattern exhibited in other marriages of the family.

Third, why is all this information expected to be transmitted back to the promised Messiah and not Maulvi Mohammad Ali in private? Does a third person really have to know and be able to pass judgement on the detailed physical attributes of one’s future wife? Beats me.

Fourth, that laundry list of what to look for in the girl by sending in an ‘expert’ in female anatomy for inspections, is so sickening, I felt like puking. But that is probably just me, it must have increased others in faith.

I want to conclude by saying that perhaps our jamaat should actively encourage our young women to take up the profession of female barbers and provide their services free of charge to the membership, so the success rate of ahmadiyya weddings can improve. I see the aunties are doing a pretty pathetic job of evaluating the most important attributes of prospective brides. I also suggest that our Rishta Nata website should have a spreadsheet to voluntarily fill in all these physical attributes which could then be attested by the local sadr sahiba or the family physician.

In the end, I would love for the aplogists to provide an alternate spin to this letter so that all those of us who are feeble of heart and mind can regain the state of peace which was disturbed by my blasphemy.

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and the marriage of Maulvi Muhammad Ali”

That one time Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was sleeping underneath Maulvi Abdul Karim’s bed

Intro
In the 1960’s, Malfuzat was published for the first time from Rabwah. There is a strange story in this about Maulvi Abdul Karim and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. In this story, Maulvi Abdul Karim tells the world that he fell asleep and woke up to find Mirza Ghulam Ahmad sleeping under his bed (charpai). Why was MGA there? It seems like a sexual situation. The Qadiani-Ahmadi’s purposely mistranslated this quote, it can be found in the Malfuzat-2, online english edition, page 183. This is also quoted in Sirat Hadrat Masih-e-Mau‘ud.

Continue reading “That one time Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was sleeping underneath Maulvi Abdul Karim’s bed”

The 1917 Jalsa at Qadian

Intro
The Jan-1918 edition of the ROR (and the ROR of May-1918) reports that there were 5000 people at the 1917 Jalsa at Qadian. It posted an essay which talks about the split in the Ahmadiyya Movement, Muhammad Ali is mentioned as well as Nawab Muhammad Ali Khan. Sheikh Abdur Rehman Misri was one of the speakers, as was Maulvi Hafiz Roshan Ali, Mir Muhammad Ishaque, Maulvi Ghulam Rasul Rajeke and Maulvi Hafiz Ghulam Rasul of Wazirabad. It is also stated how the son of the Khalifa, Mirza Nasir Ahmad came out and read the Quran and is working on memorizing the Quran by heart. Zafrullah Khan also gave a speech (at the T.I. High School). Shaikh Yacub Ali Irfani and Chowdhery Fateh Muhammad Sayal, read about reports of Ahmadiyya work for the year of 1917. They also mentioned how the Ahmadiyya Movement presented something to the Viceroy of British-India. The ROR also reports that Ahmadi ladies held small meetings wherein the Khalifa and Maulvi Hafiz Ghulam Rasul of Wazirabad addressed them, they also allegedly raised money. They also reported that 150,000 rupees were spent by the Ahmadiyya Movement in 1917 and 13,000 rupees were collected during the Jalsa. There were also meetings by the Ahmadiyya Physicians Anjuman and the Talim ul Islam Old Boys Union. Hassan Nizam of Delhi was mentioned as someone who was willing to have a prayer duel with the Khalifa.

The ROR of May-1918 also alleges that 300 people converted to Ahmadiyya during this Jalsa. 

Continue reading “The 1917 Jalsa at Qadian”

The health of the 2nd Khalifa, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad

Intro
Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud was always extremely sick since his youth. Watch brother Zia’s video on this herein. Brother Zia with Aaqa Ka Ghulam gives many quotations which prove that Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud had many fits of bloody diarrhea in his life. Nusrat Jehan is also reported as suffering from bloody diarrhea (at the 1:28:30 mark).

Continue reading “The health of the 2nd Khalifa, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad”

Rangila Rasul was written in response to #Ahmadis

Intro
The book Rangila Rasul was dedicated to Lekh Ram, who was murdered by Ahmadi’s in 1897, he died in front of an Ahmadi doctor (Dr. Mirza Yacub Baig). Rangila Rasul was written by the Arya Samaj, of which Lekh Ram was a great leader. Thus, Ahmadi’s caused communal strife, just like how Bob Van Der Linden (See “Moral Languages from Colonial Punjab”, page 183) explained in his book. Maulvi Sanaullah responded to this book herein. This also wrapped up in the Ahmadiyya support of blasphemy laws, see herein.

In 1923, the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s began attacking the Arya Samaj Hindu’s again and specifically, their founder, Dayananda Saraswati, see the book, “Unneesvi Sadi ka Maharishi” (A 19th Century Maharishi) by Mir Qasim Ali (1923). This prompted Hindu’s to write Rangila Rasul, and it prompted the British government to pass blasphemy laws which protected Muhammad (saw) and all other founders of religions from random people cursing at them. Ironically, in 1984,  Zia ul Haq added to this in his famous Ord-XX. Zia added 298B and 298C. Thus, and very ironically, Ahmadi’s are shown crying about the blasphemy laws that they helped enact. In fact, even MGA supported blasphemy laws back in 1895.

In 1927, the primary organized opposition to the judgement was driven by the Khilafatists and the Ahmadis. Ahmadis printed posters in several cities urging a total economic boycott of Hindus in response to the perceived insult to their prophet. The then spiritual head of the Ahmadiya community, Mirza Bashir ud-din Ahmad, wrote to the British viceroy in support of an anti-blasphemy law where insult to the “prophet” should be clearly mentioned and made illegal. There was also a book by Ahmadi’s which insulted the founder of the Arya Samaj entitled, “Unneesvi Sadi ka Maharishi” (A 19th Century Maharishi).

In a cruel twist of karma, this is the same law that is used today in Pakistan to persecute the Ahmadiya community. The British introduced 295A, criminalizing future speech deemed insulting to religious groups, passed easily in parliament with widespread support. Lala Lajpat Rai, Hindu Mahasabha leader, called the legislation a “temporary measure” necessary to “satisfy some hyper sensitive folk”.

Rangila Rasul is mentioned in the ROR of March-1941 and April-1941.

Continue reading “Rangila Rasul was written in response to #Ahmadis”

The 2nd Khalifa also used a team of ghost-writers

Intro
Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad never wrote anything in his life, he was given opium as an infant and had terrible vision. He failed his matriculation exam in 1905-1906 and thus proved that he didn’t know Urdu/English/Arabic. Nevertheless, the Mirza family and their band of brainwashed Ahmadi’s boasted about him and helped create his own newspaper, the Tashhiz al-Azhan. Qazi Muhammad Zahuruddin Akmal was the editor and thus wrote essay’s on behalf of Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad. In 1914, when Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad became the Khalifa, they immediately began to call him the Musleh Maud (and he remained silent). In those days, in addition to Qazi Muhammad Zahuruddin Akmal (Mahmud Ahmad raped his daughter on the roof of Masjid Mubarak), Maulvi Sarwar Shah was also a ghost writer, as well as Maulvi Sher Ali. In 1915, the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s published an english commentary of the Quran (and ascribed to the 2nd Khalifa, who didn’t know english and failed his matriculation exam)(it was only 2 chapters and discontinued), this was done to counteract the Lahori-Ahmadi’s. This commentary was created to counteract the Lahori-Ahmadi’s. Muhammad Ali and the Lahori-Ahmadi’s published their famous commentary in 1917 and from London, England, the Nation of Islam used this commentary to create their kufr.

Over the years, they began to prepare murrabi’s who would happily write books on behalf of the Khalifa. From 1915 to 1947, the team consisted of Malik Ghulam Farid, Jalal ud Din Shams, Mufti Muhammad Sadiq, Bashir Ahmad Rafiq, Zafrullah Khan, Shaikh Yacub Ali Irfani, Maulvi Sher Ali, Hafiz Roshan Ali, Abdur Rahim Nayyar, Ismail Halalpuri, Mirza Bashir Ahmad and Maulana Abul Ata aka Maulana Abul Ata Jalandhari. This culminated in 1947, Malik Ghulam Farid (1897–1977), was deputed the task of preparing various commentaries on the Quran, in urdu and english. His urdu commentaries were ascribed to the Khalifa, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad and appeared with only nine chapters along with an introduction in 1947, the Khalifa signed off on the introduction on 2-28-1947, thus it was published in late February from Qadian, British-India.

Continue reading “The 2nd Khalifa also used a team of ghost-writers”

“Qadian Kei Aryah Aur Hamm” (1907), quotes and background information

Intro
On February 20, 1907, MGA and his team of writers published “Qadian Kei Aryah Aur Hamm”, in English it would be “The Aryas of Qadian”, it was published from Qadian from the Magazine Press, Qadian, it is barely 40 pages (See Hidden Treasures). In 2023, this book was published in english for the first time ever, however, many lies were told, for example, Ahmadi editor’s allege that MGA was leading Zuhr prayers when Hindu’s started yelling and etc., however, this is a lie, MGA never led the prayers and even on that day he admitted to being engaged in prayer, not leading it.

Lalah Sharampat Ra’i and Malawamal (these guys were also mentioned in Haqiqatul Wahy, 1906-1907) were the leaders from the Arya Samaj of Qadian (see Hidden Treasures). In 1906, he said that MGA had never shown any signs to the locals of Qadian. The Arya Samaj of Qadian set up a school called “Dyanand Jubilee School” as a parallel institution to “Ta‘limul Islam Madrasah” and also founded a journal in Qadian under the name of “Shubh Chantak”. Somraj was its editor and the prime object of this journal was to publish polemics against Mirza Ghulam Ahmad.

It seems that during the 1906 Qadian Jalsa, the Arya Samaj of Qadian and the Ahmadi’s of Qadian had an altercation. Just a few years ago (1903), MGA and Ahmadi’s also clashed with the Arya Samaj hindus of Qadian, see here. Ahmadiyya sources claim that during the Jalsa, the Arya Samah also held a rally/meeting and bothered the Ahmadi’s at their Jalsa. It seems that there was a police inspector onsite, who was against the Arya Samaj because they were anti-British. The police inspector doesn’t seem to have made any arrests. The “Shubh Chantak” published a summary of the alteration in their newspaper the next day.

Ahmadiyya sources claim that another journal, “Achar” had a debate/beef with Sheikh Yacub Ali Irfani, editor of the Al-Hakam. Chand seems to be the name of the editor of the “Achar”. Soon thereafter, the sons of Somraj and Bhagat Ram died of the plague (its unclear who these people are). Then Bhagat, Achar Chand and Somraj approached a local Hakim for medical treatment, MGA allowed the medical treatment.

MGA and his team of writers lie about converts to Ahmadiyya in Egypt in this book also. The ROR of May-1918 gives a partial english translation of this book by Chaudhry Ghulam Muhammad (B.A.).

Continue reading ““Qadian Kei Aryah Aur Hamm” (1907), quotes and background information”

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑