Intro
In terms of 7:35 (7:36 in the Kadiani Koran), this is a new argument developed by the 2nd Khalifa and his era. It is missing from MGA’s books, and Muhammad Ali’s books. However, we did find it in “Invitation to Ahmadiyya” (1926)(see page 56) written by the 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa and his team. Moreover, it should be noted that the Bahai’s use 7:35 as they argue for the new prophethood of their founder.
In 1903, MGA and his team of writers commented on 7:35 (See the Al badr, v-2 number 4 dated 13 Feb 1903 page 28, See also Urdu Malfuzat-4, pages 196 and 333 for additional refs). MGA didn’t argue that prophets would come forever based on this verse.
In 1917, in Maulvi Muhammad Ali‘s famous English commentary on the Quran, he totally avoided 7:35 and left it without commentary.
In 1988, Ahmadis also used 7:35 to argue that prophethood will never end (via the 5-volume commentary by Malik Ghulam Farid). They also claim that MGA was mentioned in 48:29 of the Quran. They also use 2:4, as they argue that prophethood will not end. It should be noted that the word Rasul is used here in 7:35, and Adam (as) was not a Rasul, nor was he ever mentioned as a prophet by Allah, nevertheless, in this specific verse of the Quran, Allah is simply telling the sons of Adam (as) to be ready to accept the messengers that Allah will send. Ahmadi’s believe that Nabi=Rasul. In the short commentary, also by Malik Ghulam Farid, there is a note with “O Children of Adam”, the notes specifies that these “children of Adam” were in the time of Muhammad (saw) and to the generations that are yet to be born and not to the people who lived in the distant past and came immediately after Adam (as).
In 1996 (Mar-12) it seems that on 3-12-1996, Mirza Tahir Ahmad had some type of discussion with an Arab-Egyptian on the famous Ahmadiyya program, “Liqaa Ma’al Arab”. The famous translator from the Odeh family is also in this video. Nevertheless, Mirza Tahir Ahmad argued that per 7:35, prophethood was wide open.
In 2025 (June), official Ahmadi Mullahs argued that 7:35 (7:36 in the Kadiani Koran) keeps the door open for prophethood at all time on the True Islam Uk Urdu stream vs. Bro Imtiaz. Qadiani’s also presented 22:75 (22:76 in the Kadiani Koran) as an argument for the continuation of prophethood, however, MGA never used this verse either as an argument for the continuation of prophethood.
In 2025 (Sep), Ansar Raza debated a Shia person, #ShamsuddinShigri seems to be hosting this debate. In his opening statement, Ansar Raza used 1:6, 4:69 and 7:35 as his main arguments that prophethood has not end and never ends. At 19:03, Ansar Raza added 3:81 (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran) and alleged that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is inferred herein as that “Musadaq-Rasul” (See the clip on Tiktok and Twitter). Again, Ansar Raza says that per 3:81 (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran), a Rasul will come who will authenticate (tasdiq) the Kitab and Rasul which was given to a previous Nabi (Ansar Raza was indirectly referring to MGA). At 21:41, Ansar Raza says it is lazmi (mandatory) that a “Musadaq-Rasul” was to appear after Muhammad (Saw) and it is lazmi (mandatory) for Muslims to accept him (see my article on Ahmadiyya Takfir). In conclusion, Ansar Raza argued that 3:81 (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran) includes Eisa (as) and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad only as the “Musadaq-Rasuls”. However, in reality, Muslims believe that only Muhammad (Saw) is the “Musadaq-Rasul” as mentioned in 3:81 (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran). This is why Muhammad led the Prophets in prayer during the night of Isra’ when they gathered in Bayt Al-Maqdis (Jerusalem)(See Ibn Kathir).
In 2026 (Mar-29), Bro Imtiaz debated Azim Saifi on 7:35 of the Quran (7:36 in the Kadiani Koran). In this debate, Azim Saifi played dumb and stupid the whole time, he pretended like he didn’t know the Islamic position on 7:35 and dragged this conversation accordingly.
In one clip, Azim Saifi admitted that there is NO verse of the Quran which supports the argument of MGA in “Eik Ghalti Ka Izala” (See page 4) that the window of “Sirat e Siddique” will open for one person and that is MGA, MGA also drinks from the same water, who wears the cloak (chadar) of Muhammad (saw) and then becomes Muhammad (Saw)(See the clip on TikTok and Twitter).
In 2026 (Mar-25), on an “Ask Islam” live stream, Ansar Raza presented 3:81 (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran) of the Quran and says that this verse proves that a new prophet will come in the future. Ansar Raza also presents 4:69 (4:70 in the Kadiani Koran) and 7:35 (7:36 in the Kadiani Koran). Ansar Raza says these 3 verses prove that after Muhammad (saw) a prophet will come. Ansar Raza even says that it is mandatory (fard) that Muslim’s must accept a new prophet after Muhammad (saw)(See the clip on twitter, TikTok and at 25:28). Ansar Raza says Ahmadi’s believe in a new prophet (MGA) and this is per the Quran and hadith (See the clip on TikTok, Twitter and 7:07). Ansar Raza says that the Quran says 1 nabi will come and the hadith says “Nabi-Ullah” 4 times and there is another hadith which says that there is NO Prophet between Muhammad (Saw) and Eisa (as)(the messiah).
In 2026 (Oct), Maulvi Razi streamed with “World Religions” youtube channel and at 52:10, that he doesn’t know if prophets will appear after Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. Maulvi Razi also argued that all prophethoods have not ended. At 1:01:25, Maulvi Razi quoted 7:35 of the Quran (7:36 in the Kadiani Koran) and alleged that prophethood is always open.
Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad on 7:35 of the Quran (7:36 in the Kadiani Koran)” →
