ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
I came across an interesting book just recently, it is: “A call to Islam in the USSR” by A.R. Mughal. This book is essentially an oral narrative by Maulvi Zahoor Hussain of his imprisonment in the USSR. You can read the history of Ahmadiyya in Russia herein.

In 1919, an ahmadi named Fateh Muhammad Sahib was working in the English Army in Iran.
From there, the army was ordered by the higher authorities to enter the territory of Russia to prevent the Bolshevik sedition and stayed there for some time. These events, Huzoor explained, are not generally known to the public because the interests of that time required that the advance of the English troops in Russian territory be kept hidden. The name of this person, Huzoor wrote, was Fateh Muhammad, and he held the rank of corporal in the army. Through his preaching efforts, he was able to convert another person with him to Ahmadiyyat while in the army. On one occasion, the new convert was sent with a few soldiers to a place some distance ahead of the camp to ascertain the movements of the Russian troops. Upon his return, he narrated what he witnessed to Fateh Muhammad Sahib, saying that they had gone to a dome-shaped building where some people lived outside the city.

I have read this book thoroughly and am shocked at the behavior of Ahmadiyyat and the involvement of the British in their support. This book essentially proves to the world that Ahmadiyyat always had support from the British government in almost every aspect of its operations. Another Ahmadi Murrabi was also sent, Maulvi Muhammad Amin.
Here are a few quotes from the Al-Fazl of 1923. It proves that Ahmadis did work with the British govt in terms of spying on Russia. Maulvi Abdul Majid was also sent by the Khalifa, not much is known about his life. Maulvi Zahoor Hussain’s grandchildren live in the USA nowdays, his grandson is a major worker of Ahmadiyya INC. @Harris_Zafar. The Khalifa, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad mentioned this incident in 1945 via a speech that was turned into a book, “The Economic System of Islam”, see page 75), Maulvi Zahoor Hussain was in the audience.

Thanks to the author “Ahmadyya, British-Jewish connections” by Bashir Ahmad
Continue reading “Ahmadiyya missionaries are sent to Russia illegally in 1923-1924” →

Intro
We recently came across Seeratul Mahdi (1923) edition written by Mirza Bashir Ahmad. The story of MGA hurting his arm as he fells from his parent second story house is below. MGA could thus never be Sultan ul Qalam, since he never wrote anyways.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1897
Siraj-e-Munir, online English edition, see page 46
The Shining Lamp

“”I once observed in the Jama‘at of my followers that some doubted me because, due to an illness of which they were unaware, I did not keep my right foot raised while in qa‘dah [the sitting posture] during Salat. Just based on this small matter, two men began talking and fell into doubt that this is opposed to the Sunnah [Practice of the Holy Prophet sas].

At one time, I held a cup of tea with my left hand because the bone in my right hand is broken and thus weak. Just because of this, some started criticising that this is contrary to the Sunnah.”””
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1923

The Narration
This is the page 198 from seerat almehdi Vol 1-written in 1923- Narration no 182-

“””Mirza Sultan Ahmad told me via Moulvi Raheem Buksh sahib MA (it means that mirza sultan told Raheem Buksh and he told the writer Mirza bashir ahmad) that once our father fell from the window of Chobaara (upper level of the house) and he hurt himself on his right ARM-as a result the right hand stayed weak till his end age-(now Mirza bashir is adding to it) humble person (mirza bashir) was told by mother (Nusrat) that MGA was going to come down via the window -there was a stool in front of the window -which toppled lost his balance and he fell-breaking the bone of right hand (above it says right arm -but now it says -bone of right HAND was broken) and this hand stayed weak till the end- He could take the food to his mouth (put luqma in his mouth) but could not carry/hold the utensil of water to his mouth. Humble (Khaksaar Mirza bashir) narrates that -during salat/namaaz MGA had to support his right hand with the left (again here they are saying about the hand and not the arm). “””

Transliteration
“Bayan kia mudge say mirza sultan sahib nay-bewasta (via) Moulvi rahim buksh MA- kay aik dafa walid sahib apnay chobaray kee khirki (window) say gir gaiy aur daeen (right) hath per choat aee-chonanchay ikhir umar tuk wo hath kumzoor raha- khaksaar arz karta hai kay walda sahiba furmatee theen – kay aap khirki (window) say uternay lagay thay – samnay stool rakha tha wo ult giaa aur aap gir (fall) gay aur daeen (right) haath kee hudi (bone) toot gayee -aur yay hath aakhir umar tuk kumzoor raha – iss hath say aap luqma to mun (mouth) tuk lay ja suktay thay mugar pani (water) kaa berton (pot/glass) waghaira munh (mouth) tuk naheen uthaa (pick) suktay thay -khaksaar arz kerta hay kay namaz main phi aap ko dayan (right) hath baeen (left) hath kay saharay say sumbhalna perta tha.

The scans
 

______________________________________________________________________________________________Links and Related Essays

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/09/06/mirza-ghulams-ahmad-lecture-in-amritsar-nov-1905-was-not-a-lecture-it-was-a-riot/

MGA’s right arm was disabled, he cant be Sultan-ul-Qalam

The 1923 edition of Seeratul Mahdi – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Who is Mirza Bashir Ahmad? – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

Intro
The best approach to apostacy in Islam is via the Hanafi Fiqh in the Mughal Empire (the Ottomans seem to have a much more aggressive interpretation). MGA and his team of writers never commented clearly on apostacy in Islam and purposely. Apostacy in Islam is decided by islamic governments, not by people. In fact, the Mughal Empire and Ottoman Empire had their own unique interpretation of apostacy. In the Mughal Empire, penalty for Apostasy limited for those who cause Hirabah after leaving Islam, not for personal religion change. The ROR of Apr-1942 has an essay on Apostacy in Islam.

Continue reading “Apostacy references from Sahih Bukhari” →

Intro
The Ahmadiyya Movement has been hiding money in off-shore accounts for long time.

The videos

Conclusion
Ahmadiyya needs to be reported for further investigation in America.  I hop charity watch is paying attention.

Links and Related Essays

https://www.completecontroller.com/how-to-spot-financial-fraud-in-a-non-profit-the-warning-signs/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/07/02/is-the-ahmadiyya-khilafat-a-proven-model-of-leadership/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/10/15/mirza-masroor-ahmad-owned-qadir-entreprises/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/28/ahmadiyya-and-the-panama-papers-2017-update/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/28/ahmadiyya-and-the-panama-papers/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/10/25/ahmadiyya-colluded-with-the-world-bank-1980/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/05/who-is-kareem-ahmad-the-ahmadi-mega-donor-indicted-in-federal-court-involuntary-manslaughter/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/09/21/who-is-mirza-muzzafar-ahmad/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/09/20/professor-humphrey-j-fisher-and-j-spencer-trimingham-called-ahmadiyya-a-maritime-implantation-in-west-africa/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/04/08/republican-congressman-peter-king-hates-muslims-but-likes-ahmadis/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/01/05/the-ahmadi-finances-all-the-sources/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/11/the-ahmadiyya-strategy-in-america-canada-germany-and-the-uk/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/07/the-goal-of-ahmadiyya-is-to-acquire-their-own-country/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/10/ahmadiyya-politicians-are-not-loyal-to-any-country-instead-they-are-loyal-to-the-mirza-family/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/01/the-ahmadiyya-playbook-in-africa/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/12/ahmadis-continue-to-provoke-people-of-all-religions-then-cry-persecution/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/10/15/sind-holdings-was-owned-by-mirza-muzzafar-ahmad/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/10/15/abdul-baqi-arshad-is-the-real-khalifa-of-ahmadiyya-not-mirza-masroor-ahmad/

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #panamaleaks #panamapapers #panama

Intro
Khatam in 2:7 (See ibn Kathir) and in 33:40, are exactly the same word, they are both derivatives of the same root word. “Khatama” in 2:7 is a verb while “Khatam” in 33:40 is a noun. “Khatama” is 2:7 literally means “he sealed”, while “Khatam” in 33:40 is the “the one who has sealed”. In terms of Khatim, it was used by Allah (see 42:24)(YU-KHTIM,  یَخۡتِمۡ), to explain the permanent sealing of the hearts of the Kafirs. Next is 36:65, NUKH-TI-MU, نَخۡتِمُ, wherein Allah again speaks of the Khatim that will be set on the mouths of the Kafirs on the day of judgement as they stand trial in the court of allah. This khatim will stop the disbelievers from speaking. Khatim cannot mean LAST in this case (see Ibn Kathir). Thus, it doesn’t matter how KTM is pronounced, it always has the same meanings. It should be noted that the letters KHA-TA-MEEM weren’t used exclusively by ALLAH when describing the sealing off of something. There is another Arabic word that translates into the english word seal/sealed/sealing. That word also has variations. It uses the root of TA-BA or T-B, with 2 variations. YUT-BA and NUT-BA are the variations. The English equivalent would be Y-T-B or N-T-B.

In 1900-1902 (Tohfa Golarvia, RK Vol-17, page 186), MGA called Muhammad (Saw) as the “Khatim un Nabiyeen”. There is similar usage in “Tiryaq ul Qulub” (1899-1902)(See RK-15, p. 478).

In 1906, via Haqiqatul Wahi, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad alleged that Muhammad was “Sahib-i-Khatam” (possessor of the seal of khatam) and could give it out (See pages 36-37, online English Edition of Haqiqatul Wahi)(See also Maulvi Muhammad Ali, “Prophethood in Islam”, 1915, pages 567-568). Furthermore, on pages 117–118 of the online English Edition of Haqiqatul Wahi, MGA argued that Allah made Muhammad (Saw) the “Khatam al Anbiya” and bestowed the seal (Khatam) to Muhammad (saw), at which point, Muhammad (Saw) bestowed it upon MGA (naozobillah)(See also Maulvi Muhammad Ali, “Prophethood in Islam”, 1915, page 571).

In 1914, Khatim vs. Khatam was discussed by an Ahmadi writer M. Ataur Rahman, “The Ahmadiyya Movement and Ahmad’s place among the Prophets” (Part-3) is published via the ROR of Dec-1914 (See page 455)(see scan in the below). M. Ataur Rahman argued that Khatam was used, not Khatim, and Khatam means seal.

In 1922, in Gurdaspur court, the 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad commented on “Khatam” (see pages 14-15)(via the Al-Fazl, June-26 and 29-1922) and alleged that “last prophet” is not the meaning of this term”. 

In the 1924-26, the Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa made a huge blunder in his book, “Invitation to Ahmadiyyat” (see the first Urdu edition), as he alleged that khatim specifically meant last, whereas khatam meant a seal of attestation. We created a scan of the 2019 English edition that shows Mirza Mahmood Ahmad, the second successor and the son of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad had once admitted that خاتِم (Khatim) means ‘the last one’ but either out of ignorance or refusal he did not address that it was used in the same Quranic verse (33:40) he felt only mentioned Khatam (خاتَم)(See 2019 English edition of ‘Invitation to Ahmadiyyat”, page 59). However, in the new 2022 edition, they totally erased a crucial sentence, which was: “””Khatim would mean ‘the last person’ or ‘the last one’.””” is totally missing. The first English translation appeared in 1961, the second in 1997, 2002, 2007, 2019 and 2022. Here’s a side-by-side of the two scans – showing clearly (including the page number) being changed: A Cover-Up in an Invitation to Ahmadiyyat: Khatim would mean ‘the last person’ or ‘the last one’. See the 1935 edition too (Scans in the below).

In 2024, Razi alleges that Khatim is a metaphor and that laymen Ahmadi’s are ignorant. On a recent livestream (see the clips on tik tok and twitter), Razi alleged that “Khatim” can be used as “Majazi” (metaphorical) only. He also said that Ahmadi’s accept all the Qira’at of the Quran in 2024, however, this is in contradiction to what Maulvi Farhan Iqbal (See pages 27-28) wrote in his book in 2014. Maulvi Farhan Iqbal clearly said that Hadhrat Uthman (ra) abrogated the order of Muhammad (Saw)(naozobillah) that it was OK to use different Qira’at. To be clear, Maulvi Farhan Iqbal alleged that all other Qira’at were abrogated and not valid to use after Uthman (ra) gave this strange order. However, MGA quoted rare Qira’at in BA-4 (1882-1884 era) from Ibn Abbas and quoted other Qira’at in other books in terms of 4:159 and his own revelations (See BA-5, pages 540-541) and about MGA’s own prophethood (See Correction of an Error, page 2). Also in 2024, a Qadiani-Ahmadi named Azeem Butt confessed that Ahmadi’s don’t believe in the 9 out 10 Qira’at‘s (23:40 time stamp)(the clip is also on tik tok and twitter). In a recent video on Ask Islam (2024), Qadiani-Ahmadi Maulvi Abdul Sami alleged that Khatam and Khatim have the same meaning.

In June of 2025, Maulvi Razi discussed Khatim on the True Islam Uk Urdu stream vs. Bro Imtiaz. Also in June of 2025, Dr. Shah interviewed a new former-Ahmadi (Omair Malik) and discussed the issue of Khatam vs. Khatim and Ahmadiyya editing.

Continue reading “Khatam vs. Khatim in the Quran–a research study by Dr. Shah” →

Intro
In terms of 7:35 (7:36 in the Kadiani Koran), this is a new argument developed by the 3rd Khalifa and his era. It is missing from MGA’s books, and Muhammad Ali’s books. However, we did find it in “Invitation to Ahmadiyya” (1926)(see page 56) written by the 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa and his team.

In June of 2025, official Ahmadi Mullahs argued that 7:35 (7:36 in the Kadiani Koran) keeps the door open for prophethood at all time on the True Islam Uk Urdu stream vs. Bro Imtiaz. Qadiani’s also presented 22:75 (22:76 in the Kadiani Koran) as an argument for the continuation of prophethood, however, MGA never used this verse either as an argument for the continuation of prophethood.

In 1917, in Maulvi Muhammad Ali‘s famous English commentary on the Quran, he totally avoided 7:35 and left it without commentary.

In 1988, Ahmadis also used 7:35 to argue that prophethood will never end (via the 5-volume commentary by Malik Ghulam Farid). They also claim that MGA was mentioned in 48:29 of the Quran. They also use 2:4, as they argue that prophethood will not end. It should be noted that the word Rasul is used here in 7:35, and Adam (as) was not a Rasul, nor was he ever mentioned as a prophet by Allah, nevertheless, in this specific verse of the Quran, Allah is simply telling the sons of Adam (as) to be ready to accept the messengers that Allah will send. Ahmadi’s believe that Nabi=Rasul. In the short commentary, also by Malik Ghulam Farid, there is a note with “O Children of Adam”, the notes specifies that these “children of Adam” were in the time of Muhammad (saw) and to the generations that are yet to be born and not to the people who lived in the distant past and came immediately after Adam (as).

It seems that on 3-12-1996, Mirza Tahir Ahmad had some type of discussion with an Arab-Egyptian on the famous Ahmadiyya program, “Liqaa Ma’al Arab”. The famous translator from the Odeh family is also in this video. Nevertheless, Mirza Tahir Ahmad argued that per 7:35, prophethood was wide open.

Moreover, it should be noted that the Bahai’s use 7:35 as they argue for the new prophethood of their founder.

In Sep-2025, Ansar Raza debated a Shia person, #ShamsuddinShigri seems to be hosting this debate. In his opening statement, Ansar Raza used 1:6, 4:69 and 7:35 as his main arguments that prophethood has not end and never ends. At 19:03, Ansar Raza added 3:81 (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran) and alleged that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is inferred herein as that “Musadaq-Rasul” (See the clip on Tiktok and Twitter). Again, Ansar Raza says that per 3:81 (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran), a Rasul will come who will authenticate (tasdiq) the Kitab and Rasul which was given to a previous Nabi (Ansar Raza was indirectly referring to MGA). At 21:41, Ansar Raza says it is lazmi (mandatory) that a “Musadaq-Rasul” was to appear after Muhammad (Saw) and it is lazmi (mandatory) for Muslims to accept him (see my article on Ahmadiyya Takfir). In conclusion, Ansar Raza argued that 3:81 (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran) includes Eisa (as) and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad only as the “Musadaq-Rasuls”. However, in reality, Muslims believe that only Muhammad (Saw) is the “Musadaq-Rasul” as mentioned in 3:81 (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran). This is why Muhammad led the Prophets in prayer during the night of Isra’ when they gathered in Bayt Al-Maqdis (Jerusalem)(See Ibn Kathir).

In 2026 (Mar-29), Bro Imtiaz debated Azim Saifi and 7:35 of the Quran was presented by Saifi as his main argument that prophets can never stop coming in Islam.

In 2026 (Mar-25), on an “Ask Islam” live stream, Ansar Raza presented 3:81 (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran) of the Quran and says that this verse proves that a new prophet will come in the future. Ansar Raza also presents 4:69 (4:70 in the Kadiani Koran) and 7:35 (7:36 in the Kadiani Koran). Ansar Raza says these 3 verses prove that after Muhammad (saw) a prophet will come. Ansar Raza even says that it is mandatory (fard) that Muslim’s must accept a new prophet after Muhammad (saw)(See the clip on twitter, TikTok and at 25:28). Ansar Raza says Ahmadi’s believe in a new prophet (MGA) and this is per the Quran and hadith (See the clip on TikTok, Twitter and 7:07). Ansar Raza says that the Quran says 1 nabi will come and the hadith says “Nabi-Ullah” 4 times and there is another hadith which says that there is NO Prophet between Muhammad (Saw) and Eisa (as)(the messiah).
Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad on 7:35 of the Quran (7:36 in the Kadiani Koran)” →