Search

ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Thorough research work on the Ahmadiyya Movement, #ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyat #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome

Month

February 2017

Ahmadiyya leadership refused to get the Samdani Commission report released

Intro
Ahmadiyya leadership has been involved with politics since at least 1889. Most of the Ahmadiyya political-work happens behind the scenes. The Ahmadiyya press is very strategic in terms of what info it is willing to release. Ever since the British govt. hired Zafrullah Khan in the 1930’s, Ahmadiyya has been using politics to push its agenda.

The Samdani Commission
This was the investigation into the “Rabwah-terrorist-attacks”. This report was not even ready, however, Bhutto cancelled all important work of the Pakistani govt. and decided to discuss the Ahmadiyya issue.  In my honest opinion, this was all a charade. When the Nishter Medical College students arrived on May 22, 1974, they only responded to the Ahmadis who were handing out literature onto on the passengers of the train. Eye-witness accounts and testimony from many online personalities like Mushtaq Malik and Ahmad Kareem and other testimony from the son of Noorudin tell us that Bhutto colluded with Mirza Nasir Ahmad to plan these series of events and to purposely get the Qadiani and Lahori-ahmadis declared as Non-Muslim.

New Data on Bhutto and the Samdani Commission
I was recently reading, “Perseverance”, which is sort of an autobiography on the life of Rashid Ahmad, the first African-American-Ahmadi-Imam, and he mentions that he was ordered by Mirza Nasir Ahmad to meet with Bhutto in 1975, in the USA. He immediately called the Pakistani-Embassy and demanded to speak to Bhutto in a very offensive way. The FBI were soon dispatched to investigate. Ahmadis had political sway over the Ambassador of Pakistan and he eventually convinced Bhutto to meet with the Ahmadi delegation (see pages 184–186).

Bhutto agreed to meet with the Ahmadiya movement
However, Bhutto had to return to Pakistan immediately and he recommended that the Ahmadi delegation meet with his foreign minister, Aziz Ahmad. Nonetheless, Rashid Ahmad and 3 other African-American-Ahmadis traveled to New York to meet with the foreign minister in strategic format.

Rashid Ahmad had a list of questions from Mirza Nasir Ahmad
One of the questions dealt with why the Samdani Commission report had never been published. Rashid Ahmad asked as to why the report hadn’t been given, since Ahmadiyya had indeed requested it. The Foreign Minister responded that the report could be easily attained, all Ahmadiyya leadership had to do was request it. Rashid Ahmad then claims that he reported all of his answers to Mirza Nasir Ahmad, who in return called Bhutto a liar.

Conclusions
Bhutto and the Pakistani govt. were always willing to release the report of the Samdani commission to the Ahmadiyya movement, however, the Ahmadiyya movement had simply never officially requested its release. This was all a charade by Mirza Nasir Ahmad, he sent in his team of Mullahs to make sure that everything was progressing as planned. As I continue to read more about Rashid Ahmad, it becomes evident that he was only hired by Ahmadiyya leadership in an attempt to buy political power in America and abroad.

An interesting pic
img_5695

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s

Mirza Nasir Ahmad, Mirza Tahir Ahmad and Mirza Masroor Ahmad are all missing on May 29th, 1974

The Samdani Commission began its interviews on Thursday, June 6th, 1974 in Lahore

The Samdani Commission interviewed Mr. Arbab Alam, President of the Student Union–Nishter Medical College, he was an eye witness—Pakistan Times, June 20th, 1974

Ahmadiyya leadership refused to get the Samdani Commission report released

Eye-witnesses state that Ahmadis had revolvers during the Rabwah incident, Pakistan Times, June 19th, 1974

Ahmadis were dancing “Bhangra-Style” as they beat teenagers to a bloody pulp—Rabwah Train Attacks!!! May 29th, 1974

Who is Zafrullah Khan?

Who is Mirza Nasir Ahmad? The 3rd Khalifa of the Ahmadiyya Community

Zulfikar Ali Bhutto and the Ahmadiyya Movement – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #ahmadianswers #mirzaghulamahmad #qadiani #qadianism

Qasim Rashid is ripped to pieces by another Ahmadi, Naveed Khanverse

Intro
In a seemingly interesting twist, Ahmadis in the USA seem to have began beefing with each other. Qasim Rashid, who is an official spokesman of Ahmadiyya in the USA has always spouted off about his political party and his ideas on american politics. However, he doesn’t represent ALL Ahmadis in the USA. Naveed Khanverse is also an Ahmadi, however, he is a republican, or he currently supports the Republican party POTUS, Donal Trump. He isn’t alone, I have met many Ahmadis on social media that support Trump. Nonetheless, feel free to read his essay vs. Qasim Rashid here.

The link
http://lostscribemedia.com/trumpwatch/2017/02/07/ahmadiyya-reject-progressive-qasim-rashid-attacks-sedition-trump/

Qasim Rashid is a Progressive ideologue, Democratic party-affiliated lawyer and American Ahmadiyya ‘spokesperson’ who has been, in our view, actively shilling for the Neo-Liberal Establishment led by former president Barack Obama. He promulgates Liberal-Progressive pedagogy and is amplifying Leftist hysteria, perhaps hopelessly indoctrinated with Cultural Marxism and Identity Politics. Mr. Rashid is now heaping ridicule and hostility on our newly minted, legitimately elected President in the name of the Ahmadiyya Community. Ahmadiyya Muslims unequivocally reject Qasim’s Leftist hysteria and reaffirm the loyalty of the Ahmadiyya Community to the United States and our new President, Donald J. Trump.
Continue reading “Qasim Rashid is ripped to pieces by another Ahmadi, Naveed Khanverse” →

Who is Mirza Fazl Ahmad (1860-1904), the son of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad?

Intro
Mirza Fadl Ahmad (also spelled Mirza Fazal Ahmad or Mirza Fazl Ahmad), was the second son of MGA from his first marriage (with Hurmat Bibi), born in roughly 1860 (Ahmadiyya sources push it back 4-5 years to 1855). His only sibling was Mirza Sultan Ahmad (born in roughly 1856-1858). Mirza Ghulam Ahmad had two sons from his first wife, which he neglected, those sons were pretty much raised by their uncle and Grandfather. MGA was not allowed to raise them.

In the 1870’s, Mirza Fazl Ahmad married his maternal uncle’s (Mirza Ali Sher Baig) daughter (Izzat Bibi).

In 1883, half of the family fortune fell into the lap of MGA, while the other half was given to MGA’s eldest son, Mirza Sultan Ahmad, this was only because he had been adopted by MGA’s brother and there were specific instructions to carry this out.

Initially (roughly 1886-1890), MGA told Mirza Fazl Ahmad to divorce his wife and he seems to have agreed (in terms of the Muhammadi begum saga). However, it also seems that he had 2 wives at the time (the other wife is totally unknown)(see Seeratul Mahdi quote, #36) and by 1891, he was on the side of Muhammadi Begum.

In 1891, he was working as a police officer in Jammu. MGA sent Mufti Muhammad Sadiq to check on him, since he was also in Jammu.

In 1892, when Muhammadi Begum got married, MGA disinherited Mirza Fadl Ahmad (see Dard, page 334 and pages 330-331).

He disappeared in Ahmadiyya sources from 1892 to 1903.

In 1904, he died in Montgomery (modern day Sahiwal), Punjab, British India (See Maulvi Muhammad Ali in “Heresy in Islam” [1922], page 83). MGA didn’t even pray Janaza-absentia. MGA was allegedly restless all night when he got the news. The dead body of Mirza Fadl Ahmad was brought to Qadian, he was most likely buried in the old family graveyard. It seems that Mirza Ghulam Murtaza owned 2 villages near Sahiwal, Ahmadabad and Qadirabad, both named after his sons (See Seeratul Mahdi).

In 1939, he is mentioned briefly in the ROR of June-1939.

In 1944, he is mentioned in the ROR of March-1944, as the 2nd Khalifa claimed to be the Musleh Maud.

In 2024 (Jun-14), the life and time of Mirza Fazl Ahmad were also discussed by Bro Imtiaz and Dr. Izhar Khan herein (4:56:26 time stamp).
Continue reading “Who is Mirza Fazl Ahmad (1860-1904), the son of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad?” →

Did MGA learn 40,000 roots in one night?

Intro
Ahmadiyya leadership has lied endlessly about Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and his life. We all know that MGA was a bon-vivant, however we admit, he did know basic quranic Arabic, since he grew up with a teacher who taught him as such. However, MGA was never an imam-proper, his close friend Maulvi Muhammad Hussain Batalvi was. 14 years after MGA died, in 1922, the Qadiani-Ahmadi jamaat published a book entitled “Minanur-Rahman” in english it would be “The Blessings of the Gracious God”, it was in Arabic (with translation in Urdu). They tried to back date the writing of this book to 1895, which is a farce.

Later in 1947, Dard claimed that Arabic has 1.7 million roots, which is another total lie. MGA never learned the proper recitation or even basic linguistics of Arabic, thus he spoke Arabic with a Punjabi accent his whole life, in fact, MGA couldn’t properly pronounce Arabic letters like Ain, Ghain, Qaaf and Duad. MGA never claimed to learn Arabic in one single night in one minute, however, after he died, Qadiani-Ahmadi’s did (see the Khalifa’s statement at the 1921 Jalsa). The book, “Minanur-Rahman” is available in english on alislam.org (1963 english edition, re-published in 1979 from the Nigerian Ahmadiyya Jamaat). Even in 1906, in the english ROR, the book is mentioned as being “in-process”, however, nothing is mentioned about 40,000 roots in one night.
Continue reading “Did MGA learn 40,000 roots in one night?” →

Ahmadiyya is working heavily with Fox news

Intro
Fox news is the official Republican/Conservative news channel in America. Their mission is to spread Islamaphobia, to malign Muslims, to call Muslims as bad, to call Muslims as terrorists and etc etc etc. Instead of calling respected Scholars of Islam onto their show and have an intelligent conversation, they have been recently working with the Ahmadiyya movement as both of these corporations collude with each other to call 1.5 billion Muslims as bad.

In this episode, Kashif Chaudhry, the “Ahmadi-refugee” goes on Fox news and indirectly supports the Fox news agenda, he arrogantly tells them that “I am saving lives”, as he refers to his job as a Cardiologist. However, he fails to mention that his father was a Mullah (aka employee) of the Ahmadiyya movement, and his entire education was most likely paid by Mirza Masroor Ahmad and company.

Moreover, this entire panel is not filled with any Muslims, it’s filled with Ahmadis. Ahmadis are the opposite of Sunni-Muslim’s. This display is essentially like doing a show on the Christian perspective, but stocking the crowd with Mormon’s or JW’s.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome #ahmadiyyat #trueislam #ahmadianswers #ahmadiyyamuslimcommunity #ahmadiyya_creatives #ahmadiyyatthetrueislam #ahmadiyyatzindabad #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiyyamuslim #mirzaghulamahmad #qadiani #qadianism

Mirza Masroor Ahmad keeps playing with the writings of MGA

Intro
Ahmadis have been editing the writings of MGA and company for a long time.  We are all late to this party.

Nonetheless, there seems to be a new attempt at creating more books of MGA and renaming them.  In this specific case, the Al-Hakam seems to have published a speech that was given by MGA in Dec 1905, most likely during the Jalsa of that year.  However, as we all know, MGA never gave any public speeches, he never led Juma, he never led regular Salaat, and never recited Arabic publicly.  Interestingly enough, the first sentence out of MGA’s mouth was that he was sick and couldn’t speak for long, which is proof that this speech was most likely some type of “unintelligible garble” that MGA must have spoke to his crowd, it was not a speech or anything intelligent, and then the editor of Al-Hakam concocted a fake speech and covered it all up.

The Preface explains the change
“”””Previously, this address has also been published in Urdu under the title Ahmadi Awr Ghayr Ahmadi Mein Kya Farq Hai i.e. The Difference between an Ahmadi & a Non-Ahmadi. However, as per the guidance of Hazrat Khalifatul-Masih V, may Allah be his Helper, it is now being published under the English title The Advent of the Promised Messiah. “”””

They changed the title of the address and added scribes errors
Anytime Ahmadiyya leadership sees an error in the writings of MGA and company, they double-back and call it a “scribes-error”, they then refuse to publish whatever error that was, they simply delete it and print a newer edition.  The new title for this book has nothing to do with the original fake-speech, which was published in 1906.

Conclusions
The Ahmadi mullah is vicious, he will do anything for job security.  Its really sad.

The usage of “Khaatam خاتم” in Arabic literature – a deep analysis

This essay was posted here: http://exahmadi.blogspot.com/2017/02/the-usage-of-khaatam-in-arabic_3.html

Ahmadis (Qadianis), in desperate attempt to reinterpret the Quran verse 33:40, have invented their own definition of the Arabic word Khaatam in order to prove that Khaatam-when referring to a group of people-does not mean the last of them, rather they say, it means the “Best, chief, or most perfect”. Any professor or expert in the Arabic language will agree that the Ahmadis are intellectually and academically dishonest in this regard.

This paper will explore the usage of the Arabic word khaatam and refute the Ahmadiyya/Qadiani invention of the meaning, it will be divided as follows:

PART 1: A deeper look into the examples provided by Ahmadis and translations from third-party sources

PART 2: Examples from the founder of Ahmadiyya and his contrasting belief to Ahmadis

PART 3: A look into 10 classical and modern Arabic lexicons/dictionaries and other works

 

PART 4: Usage in the Quran/Koran

PART 5: Usage in the Hadith/Hadeeth

PART 1: Examples provided by Ahmadiyya –a deeper look

This minority movement gives many examples, but the full contexts are never provided, and since majority of Ahmadis do not know Arabic, they cannot double check, but the contexts speak for themselves.

Note: The reason Ahmadis say that it should mean “best, or chief etc.” say so because of a misunderstanding of the language, they say “Well more poets/saint/imam came after so and so, therefore he wasn’t the last and it must mean best!!!”, this is absolutely absurd, this is logical fallacy of a mix of Hasty Generalization and Argument from the Negative.
Note: Those authors were not divinely inspired, they just said so in praise of the poet or Muhadith or Wali, that so and so is the last in this field, or he ended this topic, or he was so good no one else is needed after him etc” of course they knew more will come, that wasn’t the point though, it was for praise, and neither did they know the future or claimed to.

a)      Ali (May Allah be please with him) named khaatam al-awsiya خاتم الأوصياء :

Ali (r.a) himself says right after what it means which Ahmadis will never quote:

عن النبيّ صلّى اللَّه عليه و آله قال انا خاتم الأنبياء و انت يا عليّ خاتم الأوصياء و قال امير المؤمنين عليه السـلام ختم محمد صلّى اللَّه عليه و آله فلا نبيّ و انّي ختمت فلا وصيّ و انّيكلّفت ما لم يكلّفوا وَكانَ اللَّهُ بِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ عَلِيماً فيعلم من يليق ان يختم به النبوّة وكيف ينبغي شأنه

“The Prophet upon whom be blessings and upon his family, said “I am the seal of the Prophets, and you Ali are the seal of the awsiya”. And the leader of the believers (Ali) said: Muhammad blessings of Allah be upon him and his family has sealed so no more prophet, and I have sealed so no more wasiya, and I have entrusted like nobody has been entrusted, and Allah knows everything, Allah knows who should seal the prophethood and how befitting is his domain” 

-[Tafsir as-Saafi under 33:40]

b)      Al-Abbas (May Allah be please with him) named khaatam al-Muhajireen خاتم المهاجرين

Books of  Seerah, biography and history like أسد الغابة  and سير أعلام النبلاء  and many others mention how Al-Abbas was indeed the last of the Migrants in the context of the Migration:

“Al Abbas bin Abdul Muttalib sought permission from the Prophet (Peace be upon him) in the Hijra, so the Prophet said to him: “Oh uncle! Stay in your place, Allah has sealed the Hijra by you as He has sealed the Prophethood by me!” Then he (Al-Abbas) migrated with the Prophet (Peace be upon him) and witnessed the conquest of Makkah, and ended the Hijra, and witnessed Hunayn…”

Furthermore, Huston and Cyril mention in The New Encyclopedia of Islam pg.11:

Therefore, it is clear that khaatam al-Muhajireen means “Last of the Migrants” and not “Best, chief”.

c)      Abu Tammam Habib at-Tai named khaatam as-Shuaraa خاتم الشعراء
Here we provide an oriental, unbiased, third-party translation, as well as the context (just the context itself proves it means last i.e. poetry was dead at the death of the last poet):

Page 18 wifayatul a’yaan
Page 353 vol 1 (English-Mac De Slane by Oriental Translation Fund of Great Britain)
  1. d) The Mahdi named khaatam al-Aaimmah خاتم الأئمة

 

This is an example where the Mahdi is referred to as khaatam al a’imma, in many other books he is referred to as khaatam al awliya. Both these titles given to the Mahdi who will come in the latter days mean the last of the Imams, and last of the saints. In fact if you see their contexts it can only mean last, as the authors clearly state and believe that the Mahdi will be the last imam to come in the end of times and final saint, here is just one example:

 

 

  1. e) Diwaan al Jaami (Nurudeen Abdurrahman) is known as khaatam as-shuaraa خاتم الشعراء of Persia in multiple Arabic literature:

   

 

Three different sources in the English language define this title as “Last” and not “Best”:

(Catalogue of the Arabic and Persian Manuscripts pg.88-Kamal ud Deen M.A)
(Medieval Islamic Civilization: An Encyclopedia pg.622 – Josef W. Meri)
(The Cambridge History of Islam pg.630 – P. M. Holt, Peter Malcolm Holt, Ann K.)
  1. f) Khaatam at-Tasbeeh خاتم التسبيح – A misconception



    Khaatam at-tasbeeh doesn’t mean the best tasbeeh as many Ahmadis promote. It means Ring Tasbeeh, meaning you put it on like a ring. The ones without the ring are usually called idaad at-tasbeeh, just a regular counter you click for each zikr, and the original ones are called tasbeeh (old style ones everyone has). See the websites where they are sold and they put it under the ring section and describe its use etc. And when you see the picture of the product, it fits on like a ring. No sane Arab would ever think it to mean “The Best Tasbeeh”.

 

g)      A side note:

The authors do not specify which  خاتم they use (in Arabic, it can be khaatam or khaatim, but when referring to a group of people, both ways mean the last of the group), while other words that might cause confusion they specify the vowel signs, because they know that kasra or fatha for خاتم when referring to a group of people mean the last of them. Here is an example of some words having vowel signs (tashkeel) but majority do not, most Arabic literature do not have the vowel signs unless they must indicate what they mean so the reader doesn’t get confused:

Notice ghimda has the vowel signs, this is to tell the reader that the author means the noun version and not the verb “ghamada“. For خاتم they don’t need to add the vowel signs since both ways mean the same in that context.

PART 2: Examples from the founder of Ahmadiyya and his contrasting belief to Ahmadis

Ex-Ahmadi, Imam Hani Tahir, proves that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (founder of Ahmadiyya) uses Khaatam to mean last in Arabic, and that his son Mirza Bashir had changed this later on: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H86YfzNw5lI

Here are some examples from Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s Arabic writings and from Ahmadiyya Arabic literature:

“We believe that that Prophet PBUH is last of the Prophets, and that the Quran is the last of the divine books” (Arbaeen p.113)
“And he is the last of the Prophets, and I am the last of the Saints, there is no saint after me…”(Tadhkira p.367)
“And Muhammad PBUH is His Prophet and he is the last of the Prophets and the best of them, now there is no Prophet after him…” (Safina Nooh pg.23)

Note: One might say well Mirza put an exception after etc.. but that isn’t the point, the point here is that khaatam is to be translated as seal in the sense of last, not “best, chief, authority” otherwise it would make no sense, we know that Mirza claimed buroozi etc..but the point is that this is Arabic literature and we are finding instances where khaatam is used to mean last.) There is much more from Mirza’s writings, these should suffice.

 

a) “I was Khatam al-Walid (Seal of the Children) for my Father. No child was born after me.” 
-[Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya,Volume 5, Page 113 Roohani Khazain, Volume 21 Page 113]
 

 

b) “...My parents did not have any boy or a girl after my birth. I was khatam-ul-awlaad for my parents.”
-[Ruhani Khazain, Vol.15, P.479]

 

c) “There are many names of Promised Messiah in books of Allah, including those names one of his name is Khatam ul khulfa, meaning that Khalifa who will come at last.” (Chashma marfaat, Ruhani khazain vol 23 page 333)  (whether this means a different meaning of khalifa as Quran mentions, or the Lahores were right in that Mirza didn’t want a khilafa after him, but either case what we are focusing here is the word khataam and how it was used)

  

Note: We have also not seen Mirza say that Khaatam means “best”. Mirza uses khaatam to mean last in Arabic and in Urdu, see Mirza’s explanation on verse 33:40: https://www.alislam.org/quran/view/?page=345&region=P6&CR=

Furthermore, Mirza Tahir Ahmad tries to fool Ahmadis about the other version “khaatim” trying to suggest that it does not mean “last”. However, Mirza Bashir admits it means last: “But many seem to forget that in the divine text the word khatam is used by God with a fatha, that is, a stroke above t, not with a kasra, a stroke below t. Khatam means ‘seal’. Khatim would mean ‘the last person’ or ‘the last one’.”

https://alislam.org/books/invitation/prelim.html#L15

 

PART 3: A look into 10 classical and modern Arabic lexicons/dictionaries

No classical and modern Arabic dictionary and lexicon support the Ahmadiyya invention, except an extremely bias dictionary written by an Ahmadi leader, Malik Ghulam Farid. For more detail, and a glimpse into 10 lexicons, please see this: http://thecult.info/blog/2011/07/21/the-meaning-of-%D8%AE%D8%A7%D8%AA%D9%85-khaatam-in-lexiconsdictionaries-2/

 

Since many Ahmadis do not accept the lexicons simply because it goes against their religion, we provide an 1100 year old Arabic work which mentions how khaatam when referred to a people, mean the last of them:

“And ‘ختمت الکتاب وطبعته‘ means its piece is in the last phase of work. From it ‘الاعمال بخواتیمہا‘ means their (work) is in last (phase) of it by which the work will be discontinued. And so and so is ‘خاتم القوم وخاتمتہم‘means he is last one of them.”(Adab al-Kuttab vol. 1 pg. 140)

 

PART 4: Usage in the Quran/Koran

 

a)

 مَّا كَانَ مُحَمَّدٌ أَبَا أَحَدٍ مِّن رِّجَالِكُمْ وَلَٰكِن رَّسُولَ الله وَخَاتَمَ النَّبِيِّينَ ۗ وَكَانَ الله بِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ عَلِيمًا

“Muhammad is not the father of [any] one of your men, but [he is] the Messenger of Allah and seal (i.e. last) of the prophets. And ever is Allah, of all things, Knowing.” (Holy Quran 33:40)

An interesting observation:

The beauty of the Quran is that every word is in its place for a reason, many interesting patterns have been discovered by scholars like Nouman Ali Khan and continue to be discovered. Why does Allah name Prophet Muhammad the seal of the prophets in the same verse where it mentions that he is not the father of any man? Zamakhshari (a scholar of Arabic who has been praised even my Mirza) says regarding this:

 


خاتَمَ النَّبِيِّينَ يعنى أنه لو كان له ولد بالغ مبلغ الرجال لكان نبيا ولم يكن هو خاتم الأنبياء، كما يروى أنه قال في إبراهيم حين توفى. لو عاش لكان نبيا


“Seal of the Prophets, meaning: if he had had a son that reached the age of manhood, that son would have been a prophet, and he (Muhammad PBUH) would not be the seal of the prophets. As it has been narrated that the Prophet PBUH said about Ibrahim when he died: If he had lived he would have been a prophet.”(al-Kashaf, under 33:40)


In total, the Quran mentions the word khatam and its related forms 7 other times. Please check each one, and not a single one of them can mean “best”, rather they all mean seal, otherwise it would make no sense: 2:7, 6:46, 36:65, 42:24, 45:23, 83:25, and 83:26. The seal means closure, as verse 2:6 mentions (that a group of the polytheists will never believe no matter what).

  1. b) We cannot ignore the other qiraat of that word in the Quran, which 9 out of 10 uses khaatim, it’s just that Indian, Pakistani, Afghan, and some Arab countries use the Asim qirat and that most Qurans are printed in these countries and spread out so we are used to the khaatam But in many African, Arab, and other countries they have the khaatimrecitation. Allah protected this word so He revealed to Prophet two qiraats for this word, to show that it indeed does mean last. Prophet PBUH said and recited the different qiraats as well, and whenever a haafiz is done memorizing, he gets his ijaaza, an authentic chain which must go back to Prophet himself. Ahmadis don’t deny this, Malik Farid uses various qiraats in his commentary many times. But saying Allah used khaatam and not Khaatim simply because it goes against Ahmadiyya doctrine is biased and not fair, most qiraats going back to Prophet use Khaatim.

PART 5: Usage in the Hadith/Hadeeth

 

  1. a) Prophet Muhammad himself defines what khaatam an-Nabiyeen means:

لاَ تَقُومُ السَّاعَةُ حَتَّى تَلْحَقَ قَبَائِلُ مِنْ أُمَّتِي بِالْمُشْرِكِينَ وَحَتَّى يَعْبُدُوا الأَوْثَانَ وَإِنَّهُ سَيَكُونُ فِي أُمَّتِي ثَلاَثُونَ كَذَّابُونَ كُلُّهُمْ يَزْعُمُ أَنَّهُ نَبِيٌّ وَأَنَا خَاتَمُ النَّبِيِّينَ لاَ نَبِيَّ بَعْدِي

“The Hour shall not be established until tribes of my Ummah unite with the idolaters, and until they worship idols. And indeed there shall be thirty imposters in my Ummah, each of them claiming that he is a Prophet. And I am the seal of the Prophets, there is no Prophet after me.”
-[Tirmidhi Hadith # 2219, Abu Dawud and others – this is an authentic Sahih Hadith]

  1. b) Ahmadis quote some Hadith to prove that khaatam does not mean last, here we analyze each one:
  1. i) The hadith about Prophet being khaatam while Adam was being created:

إنِّي عند اللهِ في أمِّ الكتابِ لَخاتم النَّبيِّين، وإن آدمَ لمُنجدلٌ في طينتِه

“I was in the mother of the Books the Seal (last) of the Prophets when Adam was still being created” -[Mustadrak al Haakim and others]

This doesn’t mean that Prophet Muhammad was the authority or best Prophet while Prophet Adam was being created, in fact it means that he was the last prophet decreed in the Book even while Adam was being created, other Hadith shed more light on this topic. It shows how everything was already ordained before its actual creation, from the first prophet (Adam PBUH) to even the last Prophet (Muhammad PBUH).

Many Ahadith speak about how thousands of years before creation, Allah already wrote in a Divine supreme Book what will happen etc. Here is an example:

إِنَّ اللَّهَ كَتَبَ كِتَابًا قَبْلَ أَنْ يَخْلُقَ السَّمَوَاتِ وَالأَرْضَ بِأَلْفَىْ عَامٍ أَنْزَلَ مِنْهُ آيَتَيْنِ خَتَمَ بِهِمَا سُورَةَ الْبَقَرَةِ وَلاَ يُقْرَآنِ فِي دَارٍ ثَلاَثَ لَيَالٍ فَيَقْرَبُهَا شَيْطَانٌ 


“Indeed Allah wrote (i.e. ordained) in a book two thousand years before He created the heavens and the earth, and He sent down two Ayat from it to end Surat Al-Baqarah with. If they are recited for three nights in a home, no Shaitan shall come near it.”(Tirmidhi-authentic)

  1. ii) Last Mosque argument:

“My mosque is the last mosque” argument killed

  1. c) The alleged saying of Aisha RA:

    “Call him the Khaatam al-Nabiyyin; but do not say that there shall not come a Prophet after him.”
    -[Durr-i-Manthur, Vol. V, page 204].

Firstly, this alleged narration does not have any authentic chain (isnaad), it is upon the Ahmadis to provide the chain. Lots of false prophets made up hadith to prove continuation of prophethood during the caliphs times, and many of them admitted it on their death bed. So we cannot accept any narration that comes our way blindly. When it suits the Ahmadiyya community, they quote and spread false narrations, but when a weak and false narration is against their belief and is quoted by another group, they start criticizing, this is nothing but hypocrisy. However, even if it were authentic, it still does not support the Ahmadis, lets take a deeper look:
The same statement of Aisha has been quoted in the Ta’wil al-ahadith of Ibn Qutaiba. In the Durr-i-Manthur a similar statement of Mughira ibn Shu’ba has been quoted through a reference to the Musannaf of Ibn Abi Shaiba: (It is related) from al-Sha’bi who said that a man sitting near Mughira ibn Shu’ba proclaimed: Blessings be upon Muhammad the Last of the Prophets, and there shall not come after him any Prophet! Mughira told him: When you say Khatim al-Nabiyyin, you need not further say, there shall not come a Prophet after him. For we have been told a hadith (from the Prophet) that ‘Isa is also to be (again) commissioned: and he was sent before him and (will be sent) after him. (Durr-i-Manthur, Vol.V, p.264).

So from above hadith it is quite clear what Aisha RA meant and how the early generations understood this, that it is enough to say that Muhammad PBUH is the last prophet (in the sense of new prophets coming), but do not say no prophet will come after him, since Jesus will come back.

Sadia Saeed on the May 29th Rabwah train attacks

Intro
We all know that Ahmadis have lied constantly and consistently about everything since at least 1889. The May 29th, 1974 train attacks are just another instance. However, this case is much moire devious, in that Mirza Nasir Ahmad was most likely working with Bhutto as they arranged to have Ahmadiyya declared as a non-muslim minority. We have testimony from Ak Shaikh, Mushtaq Malik through Abdul Mannan, and other Ahmadis from Jamaat Ahmadiyya Islah Pasand. That’s 4 eye-witnesses. Moreover, Zaf Khan lied about the number of Ahmadis at the train station, liberal reports tell us that it was 400-500 Ahmadis at the train station ready to pounce on that day, whereas Zaf Khan claims that the students “just so happened to be there”, which is an obvious lie.

The Quotation
Find here book here: http://sociology.yale.edu/sites/default/files/sen_saeed.pdf

Links and Related Essay’s
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2020/02/01/as-soon-as-zia-ul-haq-came-to-power-he-made-ahmadis-as-muslims-again/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/12/14/did-general-muhammad-zia-ul-haq-join-ahmadiyya-in-the-1940s/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/10/10/who-is-zafar-ahmad-chaudhry-born-on-19-august-1926-in-british-india/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2020/01/12/per-ahmadiyya-sources-in-july-of-1947-there-were-199-ahmadi-officers-serving-in-the-british-military/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2020/02/01/as-soon-as-zia-ul-haq-came-to-power-he-made-ahmadis-as-muslims-again/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/05/16/ahmadis-brag-about-being-the-exact-people-who-walked-bhutto-to-get-hanged/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2020/01/01/who-was-major-general-abdul-saeed-khan/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_Zia-ul-Haq

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/25/statistics-showing-systematic-over-representation-of-ahmadis-in-the-bureaucracy-of-pakistan-by-charles-h-kennedy/

https://www.amazon.com/Abdus-Salam-Jagjit-Singh/dp/014017401X

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/11/04/mirza-tahir-ahmad-lied-about-ordinance-xx-and-his-exodus-from-pakistan/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/05/12/ord-xx-didnt-pass-until-29th-august-1985-more-than-16-months-after-it-was-proposed/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/04/20/ahmadis-get-exploited-by-the-mirza-family-after-asylum-to-the-west-germany-canada-the-uk-and-the-usa/

https://www.getsurrey.co.uk/news/surrey-news/major-redevelopment-planned-muslim-group-8546594

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/01/18/study-on-ahmadiyya-organized-conversion-through-marriage-scheme/

https://www.palgrave.com/gp/book/9781137499592

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/father-in-germany-strangled-19-year-old-daughter-in-honour-killing-after-she-was-caught-stealing-a6670541.html

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/03/abdul-sami-zafar-tells-the-inside-story-on-the-may-29th-1974-rabwah-train-attacks/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/30/evidence-which-proves-that-mirza-tahir-ahmad-radicalized-ahmadis-as-soon-as-he-came-to-power-1982/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/13/mirza-masroor-ahmad-owned-companies-that-stored-money-overseas-in-panama-the-panama-leaks/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/03/mirza-nasir-ahmad-mirza-tahir-ahmad-and-mirza-masroor-are-all-missing-on-may-31st-1974/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/05/30/ahmadis-are-not-allowed-to-have-minarets-on-their-places-of-worship-in-pakistan-but-ahmadis-wont-listen/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/11/04/mirza-tahir-ahmad-lied-about-ordinance-xx-and-his-exodus-from-pakistan/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/10/10/who-is-major-general-ijaz-amjad/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/10/10/who-is-general-akhtar-hussain-malik-died-22-august-1969/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/10/10/who-is-lieutenant-general-abdul-ali-malik-1938/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/25/statistics-showing-systematic-over-representation-of-ahmadis-in-the-bureaucracy-of-pakistan-by-charles-h-kennedy/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/26/dr-abdus-salam-liked-white-women-alcohol-and-a-busy-british-lifestyle/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/02/17/ahmadiyya-in-pakistan-by-s-e-brush-1955/

http://listofqadiani.blogspot.com/

http://www.thepersecution.org/50years/general.html

Kashif N Chaudhry

✔@KashifMD

Major Gen. Iftikhar Janjua Shaheed, only Pakistani general to have laid his life during military combat was an Ahmadi Muslim. 

View image on Twitter

Kashif N Chaudhry

✔@KashifMD

Pakistan’s 1st Chief of Air Staff & leading general in Pakistan Air Force, Air Marshal Zafar Ahmad Chaudhry, was also Ahmadi. 

View image on Twitter
44 people are talking about this

Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian #drabdussalam #abdussalam #salamonnetflix #drsalam #zia #ziaulhaq #ordxx

 

The Ahmadiyya response to the 1974 Rabwah Terrorist attacks

Intro
Ahmadiyya is a very deceptive organization, they normally get their work done through a specialized process of Black Ops.  There is a website out there which tells the world that its unofficial, however, we all know that it is operated by top Ahmadis.  Similarly, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad once disowned the Al-Hakaam newspaper, which is ironic, since MGA had declared it the first newspaper of his community just a few years earlier.  In the case which I am currently presenting, this unofficial Ahmadiyya website tries to refute some of the facts of the 1974 train attack, however, it is all opinion, since there are NO references at all.  This is shoddy work, elementary work.  SMH…..

The Link
http://cultgirlahmadiya.blogspot.com/2015/10/1974-rabwah-train-riots.html?m=1

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑