ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
Maulvi Noorudin seems to have went for Hajj in the late 1960’s, while it was under Wahabi rule (See page 30, Maulvi Nurudin by Zafrullah Khan)(and “Nur ud Din”, page 25). The very famous Rahmatullah Kairanawi was living there and personally taught Noorudin. Our research on Rahmatullah Kairanawi is still incomplete. He seems to have been exiled from India to Wahabi controlled Arabia after the famous mutiny of 1857. This seems to be the beginning of Noorudin’s connections with the Ahl-e-Hadith aka Wahabi-type of Muslims. Even Sir Syed Ahmad Khan became Ahl-e-Hadith for short while. Noorudin was a solid member, and had many students. This is probably how he met MGA. You can read about Noorudin’s affiliation to the Ahl-e-Hadith herein. He also had a connection with the Deobandi’s. In fact, he was also taught by Shah Abdul Ghani Mujaddadi, who was the teacher of the famous Nanautvi and many others (See the Deobandi school).

Interestingly, in 1889, he pretended to be Hanafi just to marry a 10-year old girl.

Continue reading “In the late 1860’s, Maulvi Noorudin went to Mecca and learned from Rahmatullah Kairanawi” →

Intro
Shortly after WW-1, the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s seem to have promoted the idea of having free sex with prisoners of war. In the below, we have a scan of the Al-Fazl of 1922 wherein Hafiz Raushan Ali (who was a Hafiz of the Quran), presents Chapter 70:29-30 of the Quran and argues that these verses give #Ahmadis the right to have sex without a Nikkah, and to girls who work in their house and other slave type of girls. 23:5-6 of the Quran is exactly the same phraseology. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad gave the exact same answer in 1908 (see Chashma-e-Ma‘rifat, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 23, p. 253, in the below). The second Khalifa even called a wife of Muhammad (saw) as a laundi (Sex slave). KM2 contradicts himself in his Tafseer, on one hand he says Maria is part of a different group and hence not comes under the verse which realtes to Haq Mehar, and says it was not needed since she was given as a Gift and was not a war booty. But at the same time says even then Muhammad’s Nikah with her is proven. So if she was not a sex slave and as a wife, why did he not give her Haq Mehar as a free woman and take permission of her Wali and if he himself was her Wali being the owner then Nikah was not necessary as suggested by Raushan Ali in the above context that Nikah can not even take place. Remember Raushan Ali is a senior Sahaba and a student of Maulvi Noorudin.

Many year later, Mirza Tahir Ahmad made the exact same arguments, watch the full video herein. We are quite sure that Tafsir-i-Saghir and Tafseer-i-Kabeer by the 2nd Khalifa contains the same explanation. We have also posted Mirza Bashir Ahmad’s comments in the below, and some comments by Luqman Ahmad, an Ahmadi Mauvi working in Canada. In 1988, via Malik Ghulam Farid’s famous 5-volume commentary, he told his readers to read 4:24 of the Quran, which is mainly about the Nikah Muta. He also continues to argue under 23:5-6 that female prisoners of war must be married before having sex with them, however, consent is not needed. However, Hafiz Raushan Ali and the Ahmadi’s from the previous generation disagreed and claimed that even a Nikkah is not needed when having sex with slave-girls. Malik Ghulam Farid then quotes other similar verses like 24:32, 4:3, 2:221.

Another point of note, both of these Chapters of the Quran (70 and 23) were revealed before Hijra and thus Muslims never even had slave girls since the Battle of Badr hadn’t happened yet. Finally, in reality, in Islam, marrying slave-girls is outside of the 4-wives-at-one-time rule. But Ahmadi’s refuse to address this properly.

Continue reading “In 1922, the #qadianiahmadis approved sex without marriage” →

Intro
Sheikh Imran Hosein is a famous desi imam who’s teacher was a student of Sir Muhammad Allama Iqbal. In this recent talk he did in Lahore, Pakistan, on August 7th. 2021 with the famous Orya Maqbool Jan. In this talk, he called Ahmadiyya beliefs as pathetic, he specifically quoted the fact that Eisa (as) will speak in the cradle and in old age (See Quran, 3:46), he mentioned how Muhammad Ali  (the top Lahori-Ahmadi) claimed that Eisa (As) spoke at age 26 and thus fulfilled this verse of the Quran.

He doesn’t believe in the substitution theory, and that’s OK, a Muslim isn’t forced to believe as such. In fact, in Islam, the ijma was always that Eisa (as) would physically return at a time when an an independent islamic government would be established on Earth. This is the only ijma. He also mentioned that some Muslims believe that Eisa (as) will return as a non-prophet, he called this pathetic. It should be noted that MGA argued as such from 1891 to 1901.

Sheikh Imran Hosein gave a really good interpretation of 3:55, he confirmed that Allah took the soul of Eisa (As)(all the details are vague) and would give it back. All of the details seem to be irrelevant. Sheikh Imran Hosein also mentioned how in 3:55 Allah told Eisa (as) that he would allow Christians to dominate the world until the Day of Resurrection approached and a Muslim government would emerge with the Mahdi, and that point, Eisa (as) would physically return.
Continue reading “Sheikh Imran Hosein believes in the physical return of Eisa (as), and calls #ahmadiyya pathetic” →

Intro
In 1900, MGA and his team of writers decided to abrogate Jihad altogether. Ever since 1947, #ahmadis have been denying this, since they moved to an Islamic country (Pakistan).

The story is as follows, initially, in 1891, when MGA claimed to be the Promised Messiah and in his book, “Taudhe Maram” in english as “Elucidation of Objectives”, MGA claimed that the famous sahih hadith on the Messiah repealing the Jizya only meant, “”The abolition of Jizyah is self-explanatory. It only means that Jizyah will no longer be required. Human hearts will spontaneously respond to the truth, rendering recourse to war unnecessary. Winds of change will blow and people will flock to enter the fold of Islam. The gates will be flung wide open; it will be an influx en masse. As a result, Jizyah will become obsolete, for no one will be left to pay it””.

9 years later, in 1900, MGA argued in “The British government and Jihad” and had it published on May 22, 1900 that the Messiah was prophesied to stop “religious” wars. However, this is a lie, in Bukhari the hadith says, ‘yada al-jizya’, not ‘yada` al-harb’. Even if it did say ‘yada` al-harb’, that would mean an end to “wars” (see Nuzhat Haneef) not “religious wars”. MGA wrote, ‘deenee jangoan kaa khaatimah kar day gaa’.

We have found 3 hadith from Sahih Bukhari which have the same report, and unanimously it reports the word “jizya”, not “harb”. It seems that MGA might have been referring to “Krehl’s edition of al-Bukhari” (1862), which reads jizya but mentions the other version on the margin. Al-Bukhari’s commentators deal only with the jizya version, though some of them also mention the other one (See Prophecy Continuous by Freidmann. See page 167, footnote 11, unconfirmed). Maudoodi seems to have (unconfirmed) agreed that there was another version which read as “harb”, but again, this was in terms of ending “wars”, not “religious wars”. Maudoodi is asserting that ending Jizya=ending war, since if everyone is Muslim, no would is even alive to pay jizya (Friedman and MGA admitted to this too). However, #ahmadis refuse to even acknowledge this position. Finally, it should be noted that MGA had called Abu Hurraira as stupid since he connected 4:159 to the return of Eisa (As). Abu Hurraira is the source of the information all three times.

MGA even quoted 47:5 of the Quran to support his view that the Messiah would end “religious wars”. Again, MGA and his team of writers lied, Chapter 47, verses 1–10 are about Muslims who were at war with the disbelievers in Mecca. MGA and his team of writers specifically quoted one small line from 47:5 and didn’t quote the entire verse or the context (See Tafsir ibn Kathir). Maudoodi also wrote that this hadith means “jizya will end”.

MGA and his team of writers don’t seem to have ever mentioned this argument again.

Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s violation of ‘yada` al-harb’ in 1900” →

Intro
In English it would be “The Sanatan Faith” (translated by the Qadiani’s into English in 2024), it was published on March 8th, 1903. It’s a small Urdu booklet of 16 pages, it was printed at the Diya’ul-Islam Press, Qadian.

MGA wrote this book as a book as a supplement to Nasim-e-Da‘wat. Nasim-e-Da‘wat, it was published in mid-February 1903 just before the annual gathering of the Aryah Samaj scheduled for February 28, 1903, in Qadian. In this book, MGA seems to be beefing with the Arya Samaj of Qadian. Ironically, MGA’s family collected tax on behalf of the British government from these same hindus. The Arya Samaj were openly anti-British and Lekh Ram had already been dead for 6 years. In Nasim-e-Da‘wat, MGA wrote about Niyog again (he wrote about it in 1895), he then praised the followers of Sanatan Dharam for their courage in rejecting such a teaching. MGA and his team of writers said that the exception of a few drawbacks, the followers of Sanatan Dharam were a thousand times better than the Aryah Samaj. They specially complimented them for not raising absurd and meaningless objections against Islam. Some of them were humble people and they were not cunning and clever as the Aryah Samaj (See Hidden Treasures). Dayananda is mentioned 4 times in this book. Lala Sharampat and Lala Malawamal are also mentioned in this book. MGA mentions Parmeshwar in this book 26 times. MGA clearly said that the word autar [avatar] is used for Prophets and Messengers on whom descends the light of Parmeshwar (see page 16).

This book is also mentioned in the March-April-1903 English edition of the ROR, they claim to have translated portions of it.
Continue reading ““Sanatan Dharam” (1903), quotes and background information” →

Intro
In the early 1980’s, a Maulvi of the Ahmadiyya community named Naseem Saifi (also spelled Nasim Saifi) wrote a book wherein he summarized many of the books of MGA. We have archived it in the below. The title is “Introducing the Books of the Promised Messiah” (1983) by Naseem Saifi.
Continue reading “Introducing the Books of the Promised Messiah (1983) by Naseem Saifi” →

Intro
Maulana N.M. Naseem Saifi became the Amir and Missionary in-charge of Nigeria from 1947 to 1965. Maulana Muhammad Ajmal Shahid in 1972 who remained in office till 1982 (See RoR of 1989).

In 1960 (Feb-20), The Afro-American of Sat, Feb 20, 1960 ·Page 9 reported that Billy Graham was in Nigeria and met with Qadiani-Ahmadi Maulvi Naseem Saifi who gave him a book, “Life of Mohammed”. Qadiani-Ahmadi Maulvi Naseem Saifi has written books vs. Christianity like “Five Points to Remember”, Saifi also challenged Billy Graham to a debate, however, Graham refused. 

In 1977, he responded to the famous ex-Ahmadi, Dr. Balogan.

Continue reading “Who is Naseem Saifi?” →

Intro
In 1903, MGA and his team of writers published “Nasim-e-Da‘wat” (An Invitation)(See Hidden Treasures). This was book was written vs. the Arya Samaj Hindu’s of Qadian and he presented Maryam (as) as a common “Israeli woman” (Yahoodi Aurat)(time stamp 1:07:33), as he denigrated her status and the miracle of the birth of Eisa (as). Khurram lied about all of this and because he only said what his Ahmadi handlers told him to say. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad told the Hindu’s of Qadian that Maryam (as) was partially blame worthy for being accused of ZINA by her Jewish elders and thus she stained the sign of the immaculate conception (astagfarullah). MGA also told the Hindu’s of Qadian that Maryam (as) married Joseph the Carpenter while pregnant.

This is the book wherein MGA told the world that he would never take opium for any reason, even a valid reason like diabetes, wherein MGA would urinate 100 times per day. MGA then claimed that the main reason as to why he wouldn’t take opium for his diabetes was because people would joke and call the first Messiah {Eisa (As)} an alcoholic and the second (MGA) a druggy (opium eater).

MGA alleged that The Holy Qur’an mentions three types of angels:

(1) The particles of earthly bodies and the faculties of souls.
(2) Heaven, the sun, the moon and the clouds of the earth that are in operation.
(3) The higher powers above all these like Gabriel and Michael, ‘Izra’il and others which are called Jum in the Vedas….

This book is in Urdu only still in 2021 and was printed at the Diya’ul-Islam Press in Qadian, it seems to be 104 pages. Per Ahmadiyya sources (Hidden Treasures), it was published in mid-February 1903 just before the annual gathering of the Aryah Samaj scheduled for February 28, 1903, in Qadian. In this book, MGA seems to be beefing with the Arya Samaj of Qadian. Ironically, MGA’s family collected tax on behalf of the British government from these same Hindus. The Arya Samaj were openly anti-British and Lekh Ram had already been dead for 6 years.

This book is also mentioned in the March-April-1903 english edition of the ROR, they claim to have translated portions of it. MGA wrote a supplement which was called Sanatan Dharam, it is barely 14 pages of urdu.

Continue reading “Nasim-e-Da‘wat (1903), quotes and background information” →

Intro
In “Hyat e Qudsi”, Maulvi Ghulam Rasool Rajeki told the world that MGA had a female angel named Sakina.

In 1884, via BA-4, MGA wrote that all prophets have Ruhul-Qudus with them. 7 years later, in 1891, when MGA claimed to be the Messiah, he immediately claimed that he also Ruhul-Qudus (1891) with him, although he was only a Muhaddas. MGA went a step further and claimed that he was also Ruhul-ullah, or the spirit of Allah (1892). By 1894, MGA was claiming that all prophets, messengers and Muhadas’ have had Ruhul al Qudus with them. In 1897, MGA was claiming that all righteous children have the Ruhul-Qudus with them.

In the famous faked-sermon (Khutbah-ilhamiya)(1901) MGA claimed that the Ruhul-Amin (Gabriel) was with him. It should be noted that MGA also asserted that the Ruhul Qudus would be with the promised son (Musleh Maud)(See Truth Prevails, 1965). Eisa (As) was also called, “Kalimatullah” in 3:45 of the Quran, which means the word of Allah. Yahya (as) is also called the same term in 3:38-39.

MGA claimed to be surrounded by angels all the time, he even called himself as as having Ruhul-Qudus (1891), in fact, his famous Khutbah ilhamiya was a situation wherein MGA claimed that his tongue was taken over by Gabriel. MGA had some weird angels who would visit him, sometimes, they would dance, sometimes they would bring money and call themselves Tichi Tichi. In 1905, MGA had a revelation of his published in his newspaper the Al-Badr wherein he described meeting an angel named Tichi Tichi. By 1907, MGA gave an explanation of this incident via Haqiqatul Wahy. However, this issue still haunts Ahmadi’s to this day. This is an embarrassing event in the history of Ahmadiyya. There were other strange angels who interacted with MGA, like Mithal Lal, Darshani, Khairati, Ayal or Ail, Sher Ali, and Hafeez. MGA had some weird angels who would visit him, sometimes, they would sing and dance. MGA even claimed that Noorudin and Muhammad Ahsan Amrohi were the 2 angels that he descended with, per the famous hadith. #Ahmadi sources claim that angels taught Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad the Fatiha, and no one knew it before him.
Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad had a female angel named Sakina” →