Intro
I wanted to write a biographical entry on the cousin of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Mirza Imam Din. He seems to be much older then MGA, I estimate 15+ years, that is based on the court case of 1865 and his entry into the mutiny of 1857.  He had 4 siblings in total as recorded in Dard, (see page 74), his brothers were Mirza Nizam Din and Kamal Din, and his sisters had the same name, Hurmat Bibi and Hurmat Bibi, MGA’s first wife, and Mirza ghulam Qadir’s wife, these were the children  of Mirza Ghulam Muhyuddin, who was the brother of MGA’s father, so these were MGA’s first cousins.  These were real close relations of MGA.  In fact, in Indian culture, and even Islamic culture, MGA and Mirza Imam Din were brothers, not cousins.  Further, Mirza Imam Din became the spiritual leader of the “sweepers” in the 1880’s, they considered him the the seconf coming of Lal Beg, it seemed like an age wherein “non-profits” or “peerism” was a booming business, nonetheless, his religion was called “the-sweepers” and they were mistakenly considered as Ahmadis by the British Government and Dr. Griswold, who wrote the first independent study on Ahmadiyya.

In 1857
During the course of my research I found this data:

Mirza Imamuddin of Qadian 511 served as a Risaldar in Hodson’s Horse during the siege of Delhi.It is possible that he was the commander of the 50 horses and cavaliers raised by Mirza Ghulam Murtaza (father of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad) for the British.(cited from ‘The Sepoy Rebellion of 1857-59 by AH Amin’)(original citation:  Pages-41 & 42-Chiefs and Families of Note in the Punjab-Volume Two, by Sir Lepel Griffin and revised by W.L Conran and H.D Craik, Civil and Military Gazette Press, Lahore-1910)

My commentary
Mirza Imam Din seems to have served with the British vs. the islamic independence movement of 1857. Per Ahmadiyya records, MGA was 22 years old, however, he didn’t serve.  The British were very friendly with the Mirza family and in the future, they bent the law many times to help MGA.  MGA’s brother, Mirza Ghulam Qadir also served (see Dard), in fact, it seems that MGA’s entire family served, -MGA.

In 1865, the family land was split up as follows
2

The Pension story
As we all know, MGA was sent to pickup his fathers pension money and ended up spending it all and living on-the-run for several months before finally returning after the money was spent.  MGA was already a father at the time and had 2 sons, this is very irresponsible behavior.  MGA was thus punished by having to take up a job in Sialkot as some type of “court clerk”, MGA grudgingly took the job and worked in Sialkot for a few years (see Nuzhat Haneef, page 180).

The pension Quote
“””in the name Allah the beneficient and the merciful. Stated to me by walda sahiba (mother of the author) that once , at the young age hazrat masih e moud went to receive pension of his father, when hazrat sahib (Mgaq) received the pension , he was chased and tracked by Mirza imamuddin who instead of bringing hazrat sahib to Qadiyan, lured him and took him from one place to other till the whole amount of pension was spent up. Then Imamuddin left hazrat sahib. Feeling regretted, hazrat sahib went to Sialkot instead of coming back to home. He got a job in the court of Deputy Commissioner Sialkot, on a very meagre amount as his father also desired him to get a job. Hazrat sahib remained there for some time till his mother got ill and he was called home by the grand father. At Amritsar He was received by a messenger from Qadiyan who told him that his mother had died.”””

Transliteration
Bismillah Alrehmani rahim
Bayan kia mudge say hazart walida sahib nay kay aik dafa apnee jawani (youth) kay zamana main hazart masih maoud alaih salam tumharay dada kee pension wasool kernai gaye to peachay peachay (behind) mirza imam din bhee chala gaiya. Jab aap nay pension wasool ker lee to wo aap ko phusla (trick) ker aur dhoka day ker bajayi (instead) qadian lanay kay bahir (meaning of the word is outside-but it means outside qadian somewhere else) lay giaya aour idher udher (here there) phirata raha. (according to this narration -this incident was just before sialkot employment which was 1864-1868-MGA is around 25 years old-purpose of this is to ascertain MGA age- he was not a child that imam din could lure him hither thither in India)
Phir jub us nay (imamdin) saraa rupiya ura (spend) ker khatam ker diya to aap ko schore (leave) ker kaheen aour chala gaya. Hazrat masih maoud ees (this) sharam kay maray wapis ghar naheen aiyee. Aour chounkay tumharay dada ka munsha (desire) rehtaa tha kay aap kaheen mulazam ho jayeen -ees liyay aap sialkot shahr (city) main -deputy commissionar kee katchehri main qaleel tunkhua (little wage) per mulazam ho gayay (now that proves that MGA was in his 20s and was not a child) aour kutch arsaa tuk wahan mulazmat per rahay. Phir jab tumharee dadee (MGA mother) beemar hounee to tumharay dada nay admee bhaija – kay mulazmat chour (leave) ker aa (come) jaao. Jiss per hazrat sahib forun rawana ho gayay. Amritsar pohuntch ker qadian aanay kay wastay yakka karayia per liyaa. Iss mouqa per qadian say aik aour adamee bhee aap kay laynay kay liyay amritsar pouhntch giyaa -us admee nay kaha yakka (tanga) juldi chalao kiunkay un (MGA mother) kee halat bohat nazuk thee. Phir thoree dair kay baad kehnay laga -bohat hee halat nazuk thee- jaldi karo kaheen fout (died) nah ho gaee houn. Walida sahiba bayan kertee theen -kay hazart sahib fermatay thay -kay main isee waqat sumahg giaa kay -derasal walida fout ho chukee hain. Kiunkay agar woh zinda hoteen to wo shakhas aisay alfaz na boltaa. Chonanchay qadian pohnchay to pata laga kay waqayee wo fout ho chukeen thee. Walida sahiba bayan kertee hain kay hazrat sahib fermatay thay kay humain (means -“us “ is plural- does that mean that there was at least one more person?) chore (leave) ker phir mirza imam din ihther udher (here and there) phirta raha. Akhir us nay chaiy (tea) kay qaflay per daka (theft) mara aour pakra giaa- magar muqadma main rihaa ho giya. Hazrat sahib farmatay thay kay maaloom hota hai kay Allah taala nay hamaree waja say hee usay kaid (prison) say bachaa liya-werna wo khud kaisa hee adamee tha hamaray mukhalif yahee kehtay -in kay aik chacha zaad bahee jail khana main reh chuka hai. Khaksaar araz kerta hai kay hazrat masih maoud alaih salam kee sialkot kee mulazmat 1864-1868 ka waqia hai.
Is rawait (narration) say yay naheen samajna chahiya kay hazart masih maoud ka sialkot main mulaazam hona is wajah say tha- kay aap say mirza imam din nay dada sahib kee pension kaa rupaya dhoka say ura (taken) liya tha-keyoon kay jaisa kay khud hazart masih maoud alaih salam nay apnee tasaneef main tasreeh (explain) kee hai. Aap kee mulazmat akhtiayar kernay kee waja (reason) siraf yay thee kay aap kay walid sahib mulazmat kay leyay zour daitay rehtay thay -werna aap kee apnee raiy (opinion) mulazmat kay khilaf thee. Isee tarha mulazmat chour (leave) daynay kee bhee asal wajah yahee thee – kay hazrat masih maoud mulazmat ko naapasand fermatay thay-aour apnay walid sahib ko mulazmat turk ker daynay kee ijazat kay leyay likhtay rehtay thay. laykin dada sahib turk a mulazmat kee ijazat naheen daytay thay. Magar jub dadi sahiba bemaar hunyee to dada sahib nay ijazat bhijwaa dee kay mulazmat chore ker aa jao.

 

15107281_1648396002126565_1543396798437115136_n

Another story about Imam Din
No: 44″””Mirza says mirza imamuddin later on attempted dacoity at a tea caravan, got arrested but released on trial . Allah swt saved him respite of his bad deeds, because of me ( mgaq) lest people would say miza,s cousin was jailed. “””

15137446_1648395952126570_8047469228983045832_o
My commentary on this additional story
Obviously, MGA hated his elder cousin (aka brother) and he told many stories to his 2nd wife and children about their uncle.  In this story, MGA tells that Imam Din should have been arrested for theft, however, the British Govt, released him simply because of MGA and etc.  This fuels the idea that MGA and his family were above the law in British-India.

Dard tells us that Imam Din paid for someone to kill MGA’s father
Another case of a one-sided story.  Dard tells us (without giving any reference) that Imam Din seems to have hired someone to kill MGA’s father, (see Dard, page 22).

Dard tells us that MGA’s cousins didn’t care about the lost land that MGA was going to court over
On page 69, Dard tells us that in contrast to his cousins, MGA and his father kept going to court and spending 100’s of rupees on trying to win back land, and they failed.  His cousins were the opposite, they simply didn’t care and moved on with their lives. 

In the Mid-1880’s
MGA lusted hard after Muhammadi Begum and this caused considerable family beef, MGA even threatened his cousins with death-threats and etc, very sick indeed.

The re-incarnation of Lal Beg and the leader of the sweeper community
Check out my other entry here :  https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.wordpress.com/2016/11/24/the-sweepers-of-qadian-1886/

Mirza Imam Din wrote books about MGA and Batalvi
He wrote: “Did-e-Haq”, “The Story of Each of the Two Kafirs” (in this he declares me and Muhammad Husain Batalwi as kafirs) and Gul Shiguft, etc. (See Dard, page 708)

qarchives.com/misc/Seeratul_Mahdi_1.pdf
pdf page 36 of 296
Narration no. 39

“My mother narrated to me that once I heard Mirza Imam Din (cousin of mgaq) loudly talking to someone saying that people are running their shops and making profits – he was referring to mgaq – we should also start some business. Mother used to say that he started the Chura Peeri “.

1901 and the case of the wall
Somehow, Mirza Imam Din and MGA’s father both owned a piece of land that Mirza Imam Din had built a wall in an attempt to block.  MGA knew this all along, and he purposely dragged out the case, he had worked in the courts in his youth and fad fought cases for his families land for years and years, in some cases, MGA was even above the law.  See Dard, chapter 67.

In 1903, he Mirza Imam Din and many residents of Qadian opposed the building of the minaret
Dard tells us that when MGA and his team began building the white minaret, the residents of Qadian, which included Mirza Imam Din, they had some serious issues with tourists being able to see down and into their homes, this was a serious case of “invasion of privacy” and MGA was purposely trying to annoy his neighbors in Qadian.  (See Dard, page 775)

1903, the punjab census report confuses MGA with Imam Din
See page 83

http://www.reviewofreligions.org/wp-content/pdf-downloads/RR190302.pdf#page=41

By 1904, Mirza Imam Din was dead
This cousin of MGA seems to be much older then MGA, he seems to have died of old age.  Ahmadis don’t give out those details.  Nonetheless, Ahmadis report that Mirza Imam Din and his brother Mirza Nizam Din were forced to pay MGA 147 rupees for damages and the wall had to be demolished.  Read the full case settlement in Dard.  Ahmadis report that the debt was then transferred to Mirza Nizam Din, however, MGA seems to have arrogantly refused it.  He seems to have died shortly after Aug 31, 1904.

1906
MGA had a dream about the wife of Imam ud Din
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/26/ahmadiyya-leadership-is-always-editing-books-on-ahmadiyya-and-mgas-so-called-ilhams/

MGA terrorized his cousins
Dard (page 717) tells us that all of MGA’s relatives eventually became Ahmadi…however, this is unverified…and most likely a lie.  In 1888..MGA was publishing revelation after revelation which seem to indicate that all of his cousins would die and their progenies would be cut off (see Tadkirah, 2009 edition, online, page 198–onwards..)

Read this also
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/10/26/ahmadiyya-leadership-is-always-editing-books-on-ahmadiyya-and-mgas-so-called-ilhams/