Intro
Akber Choudhry and Waqar Zaka discussed the Ahmadiyya Movement INC and money laundering. Our brother Akber Choudhry had written a new essay on the Ahmadiyya non-profit global business model. Also check out Akber’s previous amazing work on Ahmadiyya and how they stored money illegally overseas. Akber and AK Shaikh have made videos about all of this too. They proved that Mirza Masroor Ahmad owned companies that held money tax-free in Panama.
Continue reading “Waqar Zaka and Akber Choudhry discuss how the Mirza family conducts money laundering!!!”
Intro
The Ahmadiyya Mullah-team has spread so much mis-information in the world over the past 125 years, thus, most people have made mistakes in figuring out exactly who MGA was. The biggest mistake that we see is in the idea that MGA was some type of great debator within Islam in his early life. This is not true at all. Factually, in the first-40 years of MGA’s life he never had any debates, whether oral or as a written exchange. Technically, even Ahmadi sources admit that MGA only had 5 debates in his entire life and all of these were via written letters which were exchanged, responses were given many hours later, not on the spot. By 1880, (when MGA was 40), MGA was a member of the Ahl-e-Hadith, this was most likely a result of MGA’s life in Sialkot. MGA only held one debate with a Hindu person, that was in 1884-1885 with Murlidher. Lekh Ram seems to have came to Qadian a few months later, however, MGA refused and was stumped. At this point, MGA had already indirectly claimed prophethood (an abundance of diving communion) and was called a Kafir by the Ahl-e-Hadith Muslims of North India. Next, MGA had arranged to give a public lecture at Aligarh in 1889, however, MGA was unable to speak in-front of a huge crowd, since he had been stuttering since childhood. His next three debates were with Muslims and after his wild claims, and guess what? These were written debates, wherein letters were exchanged. MGA’s final debate was with a Christian (1893), the only christian he ever debated with, however, this wasn’t a debate either, it was another exchange of letters, which ended in embarrassment, as MGA lost, he predicted that Athim would die in 15 months, which didn’t happen. After 1893, MGA never had any written exchanges in the form of debate.
Links and Related Essay’s
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2020/05/03/mirza-ghulam-ahmads-life-the-first-40-years/
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=Athim
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=ghost
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/11/05/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-embarrassed-noorudin-in-1891/
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/14/who-is-syed-muhammad-hussain-batalvi-1840-1920/
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/02/23/noorudin-didnt-care-if-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-claimed-even-law-bearing-prophethood/
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/11/05/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-embarrassed-noorudin-in-1891/
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #ahmadiyyat #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #drsalam #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Sialkot #Mosqueattack
Intro
In 1891, in “Elucidation of Objectives”, MGA began calling all the prophets/messengers that were mentioned in the Quran and Hadith as independent-prophets (mustaqil). MGA was also calling all 124,000 prophets/messengers that were mentioned in Hadith as independent. The reason for this was because all prophets/messengers that were mentioned in the Torah/Bible/Quran became prophets via the will of Allah, thus, they didn’t acquire their prophethood through another prophet. It should be noted that MGA also used the phrase “Bara-e-Rast” (persian)(direct) Prophet (see the full quote in the below), this was used interchangeably for many years (per Bro Imtiaz). Bro Imtiaz told me that nowadays (2025), Ahmadi Maulvi use “Mustaqil” for non-law bearing direct prophets. They are also using “Haqiqi-Nabi” for law bearing prophets. Bro Imtiaz also explained how an “Ummati-Nabi” is the opposite of the “Bara-e-Rast” Prophet.
After 1901, MGA began calling himself an “Ummati-Nabi” and claiming that he acquired this prophethood as a result of perfecting following Muhammad (saw), it was thus granted to MGA from his God.
In Nov-1901, via the Al-Hakam, 24 November 1901, pages. 9-15, Syed Maulvi Muhammad Ahsan Amrohi responded to the criticism by Hafiz Muhammad Yusuf of Amritsar (scans are attached). On the surface it seems that Syed Maulvi Muhammad Ahsan Amrohi is alleging that there is no NEW claim of MGA and only a denial of “independent-prophethood”. An English translation by the Lahori-Ahmadi’s is also posted in the below. Interestingly, Maulvi Muhammad Ali never mentioned this reference in his books vs.Qadianism.
By 1903, MGA said that only he was allowed this title of Nabi in the entire Ummah (See RK, v. 20, p. 45; starts at approximately middle of the page; Tadhkirah-tush-Shahaadatayn; published 1903).
At the end of 1905, in “The Will”, MGA claims that some Muslims (he was only speaking about himself) have been able to become Ummati and Nabi (see English ROR of Jan. 1906). In 1906-07, in Haqiqatul Wahy, MGA again asserted that he was both an Ummati and a Nabi, and he was the only one the entire ummah of Muhammad to achieve this.
After MGA died (October of 1908), in the Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya Vol. 5, Noorudin wrote that MGA was always an Ummati and had become a Nabi. After the split of March 1914, Muhammad Ali wrote “Prophethood in Islam” (March 1915) and ripped the Qadiani belief that MGA was an Ummati-Nabi. In the below, we have many quotations wherein MGA rejects being an “independent-prophet” and explains how that type of prophethood ended via 33:40. All of these quotations are from Muhammad Ali’s, “Prophethood in Islam” (1915).
Check out Mirza Tahir Ahmad trying to explain the differences between a Tashreei Nabi, Mustaqil Nabi and Ghair Mushtaqil ya Zilli Nabi. Continue reading “What is an Independent Prophet aka Mustaqil Nabi?”
Intro
Syed Mir Hassan (18 April 1844 – 25 September 1929) was a fake scholar of the Qur’an, Hadith, Sufism, and the Arabic language. He was a professor of Arabic at Scotch Mission College in Sialkot and was awarded the title of Shams al-’Ulama’ (“Sun of Scholars”) by the British Crown.
After MGA died, Sayyid Mir Hasan allegedly came forward and spoke to the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s in 1923 and via Mirza Bashir Ahmad and his team on Seeratul Mahdi (1922-1923 era). He also worked with Lahori-Ahmadi’s (Dr. Basharat Ahmad and via his Mujadid-e-Azim book) and gave his testimony about MGA’s life in Sialkot. MGA knew Mir Hisamuddin (aka Hakim Hassam-ud-Din) since the 1860’s and MGA’s life in Sialkot. MGA allegedly lived in the house of Mir Hisamuddin (also spelled Hassam ud Din)(MGA called him the Chief of Sialkot). Mirza Ghulam Ahmad said that he was in Sialkot 7-8 years (See ROR of Nov-1904), and some time before the publishing of the Barahin (see Lecture Sialkot, page-60). Thus, MGA was in Sialkot from 1860-1868. After MGA died, this was changed to 1864-1868 (see Seeratul Mahdi, 1923( Vol. 2, p. 178). However, it was changed again soon thereafter. MGA moved from this house eventually and moved to “Kashmiri Mohalla”, this is the same neighborhood wherein Maulvi Abdul Karim Sialkoti was born. In 2018, the Ahmadiyya Jamaat in Pakistan tried to build a museum in one of these houses and failed. Mir Hamid Shah of Sialkot alleges that MGA would listen to commentary of the Quran at the house of Sheikh Nur Muhammad (Allama Iqbal‘s father) in Sialkot. Syed Mir Hassan was also around and was MGA’s friend in Sialkot in this era (1860–1868).
While in Sialkot (1864-1868), Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s best friend was a Hindu lawyer Lala Bhim Sen. MGA interacted with quote a bit and even tried to tell his fortune (in terms of predicting case outcomes). Through the efforts of Maulvi Elahi Baksh, Chief District Inspector of Schools, night classes in English were started for the clerical staff of the courts. Mirza sahib joined this class and completed the study of one or two primers of English and failed (via Syed Mir Hassan). MGA even took a test to become a lawyer and failed (see “Mujadid-e-Azim“, online abridged english edition). MGA worked in various capacities in Sialkot, mostly working in the Ahlmad department that was responsible for logging cases and file keeping etc. (Tarikh-e-Ahmadiyyat, Vol. 1, p.82-83), One narration indicates that MGA was also the “deputy sheriff” at the court (not in the policing department, but a role in the court. Research is needed in regard to this post). (Seerat-ul-Mahdi, Vol. 2, p. 178). One gentleman, Mian Buta Kashmiri, whose house MGA also lived at in Sialkot, said, “I see him as a walliullah [a saint who God holds dear]. Once, my father fell ill and all the doctors had given up, saying that he would die and that any further treatment would be a waste. We called Mirza Sahib. He prayed for my father and gave him some medicine. Allah the Almighty, through his prayers healed my father. Countless prayers he said for us were accepted.” (Tarikh-e-Ahmadiyyat, Vol. 1, pp. 85-86). MGA also spoke to a Bishop Weldon (see Seeratul Mahdi, page 255).
In the 1890’s, he became a teacher of the philosopher-poet Muhammad Iqbal and the poet Faiz Ahmad Faiz. He was also the paternal uncle of the Pakistani journalist Syed Nazeer Niazi and was affiliated with Sir Syed Ahmed Khan‘s rationalist school of Islamic modernism.
Numani Media Official channel also discussed Iqbal and Mir Hassan, see herein.
Continue reading “Syed Mir Hassan and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad in Sialkot 1860-1868”
Intro
As soon as MGA died (May of 1908), the Ahmadiyya editing team began changing his year of birth. In the Review of religions for June 1908 (english)(see pages 235-238), they began trying to backdate MGA’s year of birth, since they knew that MGA died abruptly and failed his famous prophecy that he would live 40 additional years after 1891-1892, just like it was prophecied in the hadith in terms of the Messiah, (see Nishan asmani {1892}, page 14–17). Furthermore, Ahmadiyya editors purposely edited (and added to) Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya Vol-5 as they were desperately trying to make MGA look older so as to fulfill the “age-prophecy”, they then published it in October of 1908. BA5 was never written by MGA, it was his editors who inserted the information in BA5 trying to show that MGA was 70 by 1905 (in fact, Dard, in his famous biography of MGA writes that the BA5 was written in 1905, which is a lie). Furthermore, they also inserted the part wherein MGA claims “5 years more or less of 80″. Thus, they created a window of age from 74 to 85. The Khalifa wrote exactly this in 1916 in his short autobiography on his father’s life. The Moslem Sunrise used 1837 and later 1836 and finally 1835 after 1946. Nuzul ul Masih was published in 1909, and the lies continued. After the split of 1914, Muhammad Ali wrote a book (1918) about MGA and continued to write that MGA was born in either 1839 or 1840. Check out Bro Imtiaz’s video on this topic herein.
Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was born in 1840, not 1835”
Intro
Our brother Akber Choudhry has written a new essay on the Ahmadiyya non-profit global business model. We have also re-produced it in the below. Also check out Akber’s previous amazing work on Ahmadiyya and how they stored money illegally overseas. Akber and AK Shaikh have made videos about all of this too. They proved that Mirza Masroor Ahmad owned companies that held money tax-free in Panama.
Continue reading “The Charity (Ahmadiyya INC) attacks like other Money Launderers–by Akber Choudhry”
Intro
Raja Gopadatta is mentioned in “Tarikh-i-Kashmir” (History of Kashmir), in 1420 Mullah Nadri compiled the first full record of the history of Kashmir. Pappas wrote his name as Raja Gopanand, also as Gondopatta.
Continue reading “Who was Raja Gopadatta from Kashmir?”
Intro
Check out Bro Imtiaz’s video on this and my essay on 61:6 (61:7 in the Kadiani Koran).
In 1906, in the English-Review of Religions, MGA seems to have written that his God named his “Mirza Ghulam Qadiani”, he also said that he was named as such since this name equals 1300 when the Arabic letters are all counted together. It is an ancient system of writing any amount without ‘Arabic’ numerals in the Arabic language. It is more like Roman Numerals where alphabet denotes count, like XXIV is 24 in Roman numerals. It is memorized as abjad hawwaz huttee kaliman sa’fas qurshat sakhaz dadhagh! MGA mentions this in many places with many connotations. The problem is that he could include ‘Mirza’ in his name or not, depending on whatever whim he had at that time.
There is a so-called revelation by MGA ‘kalbun yamootu alaa kalbin’ — a dog died on a dog’ or ‘as a dog’. Kalb = dog = 52. And they say Bhutto was hanged at 52 years old. Now, how he was a dog remains to be explained. And why was Zia not a dog? Go figure. The scan in the below is taken from the Lahori-Ahmadi english translation of Kitab ul Barriya.
The scan
The Math
غلام
1000
30
1
40
====
1071
احمد
1
8
40
4
==
53
قادیانی
100
1
4
10
1
50
10
===
176
Chart of Gematrical values
Continue reading “MGA claimed that his GOD named him Mirza Ghulam Qadiani”
Intro
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was most likely born in 1840 (see his own statement in Kitab ul Barriyya, 1897-98). The first 40 years of his life are interesting inasmuch as it lays the foundation for his final 28, wherein he claimed prophethood (1880, divine revelation as he explain technically, but 21 years later, he realized it was prophethood all along), the claim of being a Mujadid and the like of Esa, “Maseel-e-Masih”(1883), the claim that Esa (as) was dead (1889) and the claim that he was Esa himself in 1891, and his claim of being the Mahdi (1891) as mentioned in hadith, the claim of being the second coming of Muhammad (1900), the official claim of prophethood (1901), the claim of being Krishna (1904). Nevertheless, MGA’s father (Mirza Ghulam Murtaza) was a favorite of the British Government by 1858. However, 20 years earlier, he was working with the Sikhs as a Raj, a tax collector of sorts, in roughly 1814 when Ata Muhammad died, in roughly 1814, Mirza Ghulam Murtaza and his extended family were allowed to move back to Qadian (see Griffin, Punjab Chiefs). Ranjit Singh then gave 5 villages (+Qadian) back to Mirza Ghulam Murtaza and his brothers. The Mirza family, led by MGA’s father turned on the Sikhs in 1849, however, it took them 10 years to secure a pension with the British Government, which happened in 1858, since the Mirza family helped kill the Indian soldiers who had protested the Enfield Pattern 1853 rifle-musket (and its use of pork/beef fat). Mirza Ghulam Qadir was also there and he played a huge role in the killing of Indian soldiers, for this, a separate pension was given to him from 1876–1883. Nevertheless, the Mirza family was above the law and even when they were guilty, the British government would forgive them or let them win on appeal. It should be noted that MGA never reported any divine revelations uptil 1882. Further, MGA never had any verbal debates, they were all via letters, which started in 1878.
Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s life, the first-40 years”