Intro
We have found an early and rare english translation and commentary of the Quran from 1915, published by the Qadiani branch of Ahmadis. In this commentary, they assert that the Messiah was promised in 1:7, which is a total lie. Later on, all Ahmadi commentaries wrote the same. In this english commentary of the Quran, the Khalifa connected 2:4 with 1:6 and 62:3, it was published in 1915. english-translation-mirza-mahmood-1915.
After Nooruddin died in March of 1914, the argument on the nature of the prophethood of MGA intensified. The Lahori-Ahmadi’s and the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s differed on the exact nature of MGA’s prophethood. However, as soon as Khwaja Kamaluddin returned from England (Nov-1914) he gave a speech which was turned into an Urdu-only book, “Ikhtalayfaat-e-Silsilaa-e-Ahmadiyya kay Usbaab”. Khwaja Kamaluddin’s quotes “Tuhfatul-Muluk” (A Present to Kings) by the Khalifa, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad which seems to have been written in the summer of 1914. This book was published on Dec 24th, 1914, during the Qadiani Jalsa. It was the first ever book about the split in the Ahmadiyya Movement, in it, Khwaja Kamaluddin emphatically died the prophethood of MGA and takfir against non-Ahmadi’s.
The Khalifa, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad wrote Qaul al-Fasl in January of 1915 and Haqiqatun Nubuwwat in March of 1915, wherein he quoted 7:35, 4:69, 2:5 and 61:6 as verses from the Quran wherein MGA was explained as a prophet to come. MGA had never used these verse to argue pro-prophethood.
Nevertheless, Muhammad Ali responded in (December of 1915) and wrote “Prophethood in Islam” and ripped the Qadiani belief that MGA was an Ummati-Nabi. These conversations would continue uptil 1923, then they died off for about 10 years.
In Sep-2025, Ansar Raza debated a Shia person, #ShamsuddinShigri seems to be hosting this debate. In his opening statement, Ansar Raza used 1:6, 4:69 and 7:35 as his main arguments that prophethood has not end and never ends. At 19:03, Ansar Raza added 3:81 (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran) and alleged that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is inferred herein as that “Musadaq-Rasul” (See the clip on Tiktok and Twitter). Again, Ansar Raza says that per 3:81 (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran), a Rasul will come who will authenticate (tasdiq) the Kitab and Rasul which was given to a previous Nabi (Ansar Raza was indirectly referring to MGA). At 21:41, Ansar Raza says it is lazmi (mandatory) that a “Musadaq-Rasul” was to appear after Muhammad (Saw) and it is lazmi (mandatory) for Muslims to accept him (see my article on Ahmadiyya Takfir). In conclusion, Ansar Raza argued that 3:81 (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran) includes Eisa (as) and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad only as the “Musadaq-Rasuls”. However, in reality, Muslims believe that only Muhammad (Saw) is the “Musadaq-Rasul” as mentioned in 3:81 (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran). This is why Muhammad led the Prophets in prayer during the night of Isra’ when they gathered in Bayt Al-Maqdis (Jerusalem)(See Ibn Kathir).
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1901
Even MGA was connecting 1:6 (1:7 in the Qadiani Quran), with 4:69 and the continuation of prophethood (see “Correction of an Error” [1901]).
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
The scan work
Download it here—https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/english-translation-mirza-mahmood-1.pdf
english-translation-mirza-mahmood-1915
Tafsir Ibn Kathir on 1:7
http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=63&Itemid=35
_____________________________________________________________________________________________2025
Sep
In Sep-2025, Ansar Raza debated a Shia person, #ShamsuddinShigri seems to be hosting this debate. In his opening statement, Ansar Raza used 1:6, 4:69 and 7:35 as his main arguments that prophethood has not end and never ends. At 19:03, Ansar Raza added 3:81 (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran) and alleged that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is inferred herein as that “Musadaq-Rasul” (See the clip on Tiktok and Twitter). Again, Ansar Raza says that per 3:81 (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran), a Rasul will come who will authenticate (tasdiq) the Kitab and Rasul which was given to a previous Nabi (Ansar Raza was indirectly referring to MGA). At 21:41, Ansar Raza says it is lazmi (mandatory) that a “Musadaq-Rasul” was to appear after Muhammad (Saw) and it is lazmi (mandatory) for Muslims to accept him (see my article on Ahmadiyya Takfir). In conclusion, Ansar Raza argued that 3:81 (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran) includes Eisa (as) and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad only as the “Musadaq-Rasuls”. However, in reality, Muslims believe that only Muhammad (Saw) is the “Musadaq-Rasul” as mentioned in 3:81 (3:82 in the Kadiani Koran). This is why Muhammad led the Prophets in prayer during the night of Isra’ when they gathered in Bayt Al-Maqdis (Jerusalem)(See Ibn Kathir).
Furthermore, Ansar Raza’s arguments seem to be at odds with the official Ahmadiyya position as stated in the 5-volume English Commentary of the Quran (1988) by Malik Ghulam Farid, which told the world that this verse is considered to apply to other Prophets in general and to the Holy Prophet in particular. Both applications are correct. However, Ansar Raza said that it only includes Eisa (as) and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. It should be noted that in the “short commentary” by Malik Ghulam Farid, it is stated that the expression Mithaqun-Nabiyyin may either signify the covenant of the Prophets with God or the covenant which God took from the people through their Prophets. The expression has been used here in the latter sense because another reading of the expression as supported by Ubayy bin Ka‘b and ‘Abdullah bin Mas‘ud is Mithaqalladhina ’utul-Kitab meaning, the covenant of those who were given the Book (Muhit). This rendering is also supported by the words that follow, i.e. and then there comes to you a Messenger fulfilling that which is with you, because it was to the people and not to their Prophets that the Messengers of God came.
In this debate, the Shia debater told Ansar Raza that all of the verses that Qadiani’s present are 1:6, 4:69 and 7:35 are abrogated by 33:40. To this, Ansar Raza said that the Quran has contradictions in it.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad on 7:35 of the Quran (7:36 in the Kadiani Koran)
Barahin-e- Ahmadiyyah volume 5, was re-published in 1914, it was the second edition
“Eik Ghalti Ka Izala” aka “Correction of an Error” was re-published on March-1-1914
Are Ahmadis the fastest growing Islamic sect? The World Christian Encyclopedia opened and evaluated
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fateh_Muhammad_Sial
“My beliefs about non-Ahmadi Muslims”, dated 18 August 1911 by Khwaja Kamal-uddin
http://alhafeez.org/rashid/abuse/abuse.htm
“Haqiqat Un Nubuwwat” (1915) by Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad, some quotes and data
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad lost his court case vs. Karam din 1904, but won on appeal
“My beliefs about non-Ahmadi Muslims”, dated 18 August 1911 by Khwaja Kamal-uddin
Tashhiz al-Azhan was a Magazine founded by Mahmud Ahmad in 1906, quotes and background info
The Causes of Internal Dissensions in the Ahmadiyya Movement, By Khwaja Kamaluddin, 1914
Tashhiz al-Azhan was a Magazine founded by Mahmud Ahmad in 1906, quotes and background info
Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad had 20+ children with 7 wives
Click to access A-Misconception-Removed.pdf
Muhammad (saw) is prophet #124,000, Esa (as) is prophet number #123,999
“Haqiqat Un Nubuwwat” (1915) by Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad, some quotes and data
“Al-Qaul-ul-Fasl” by the Khalifa, Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad–early-1915
Maulvi Sanuallah acknowledges that MGA claimed prophethood in Nov 1901
MGA explains how he misunderstood his prophethood in 1880 and was confused for 20+ years
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/08/03/ahmadiyya-scholars-wrote-about-469-in-1908/
Maulvi Sanuallah acknowledges that MGA claimed prophethood in Nov 1901
The Causes of Internal Dissensions in the Ahmadiyya Movement, By Khwaja Kamaluddin, 1914
Maulvi Abdul Karim claims Prophethood per MGA, Maulvi Amrohi disagrees
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/13/what-is-arbain-a-book-by-mga-and-his-team-of-writers/
In 1891, when MGA made his big claims, he denied prophethood–Mufti Sadiq was heavily involved
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was accused of claiming prophethood in the 1879–1884 era
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was considered a Kafir in 1884, before his wildest claims
Some rare books from the 1901-1902 era, which refute MGA’s claim to prophethood
Maulvi Sanuallah acknowledges that MGA claimed prophethood in Nov 1901
Mirza Sultan Ahmad, Son Of Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, On Finality Of Prophethood
“Eik Ghalti Ka Izala” aka “Correction of an Error” was re-published on March-1-1914
A few months after becoming Khalifa, Mirza Mahmud Ahmad waffled on his father’s prophethood
MGA explains how he misunderstood his prophethood in 1880 and was confused for 20+ years
Noorudin didn’t care if Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed even law-bearing prophethood
______________________________________________________________________________________________Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #ahmadiyyat #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
7 Pingback