ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Intro
The publish date of Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya-4 is a big secret, Muhammad Ali didn’t even post it in 1915 in his famous work “Prophethood in Islam”. We think Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya V-4 was published in the early part of 1884, it seems that a few weeks after it was published, Muslim Ulema in Amritsar, Ludhiana and Bhopal did Takfir on Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. Nawab Sidiq Khan had criticized Braheen because of its anti-Christian views, a number of other Muslim leaders saw in it claims that ran counter to their understanding of Islamic doctrine. These included Amritsar and Ludhiana’s Muslim leaders (Muhammad, Abdul Aziz, and Abdullah, see page 14) who issued a fatwa of kufr against MGA and went around India to collect signatures from other Muslims to the same effect (Batalavi, 1884: 170)(Via Upal, page 126, 2017 edition). Even Nawab Siddiq Hassan Khan tore of the Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya and sent it back to Qadian in that condition, which enraged MGA. MGA was also accused of claiming prophethood by the Ahl-e-Hadith, only Batalvi defended him. I have written a full review of BA3 herein.

In 1900, in Arba’in (see page 33), MGA says to one has raised any objection up to this day, with the exception of two or three unintelligent men of Ludhiana, such as Maulawi Muhammad and Abdul Aziz.

In 1902, MGA mentions this incident in “I’jaz-e-Ahmadi”, in english as “Miracle of Ahmad” (see page 14), he mentions 3 ahl-e-hadith imam’s who called him Kafir: Muhammad, Abdul Aziz and Abdullah. MGA explains that they called him Kafir since MGA had named himself as Eisa (As) and ascribed all the prophecies of Eisa (as) onto himself. Maulvi Muhammad Hussain Batalvi argues on behalf of MGA and told Muhammad, Abdul Aziz and Abdullah (ahl-e-hadith imam’s from Ludhiana) that they were wrong with their assertions, since MGA was also claiming that Eisa (As) would physically return in the same book. However, time would tell, MGA was lying. He lied about his prophethood the same way.
Continue reading “Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was considered a Kafir in 1884, before his wildest claims” →

Intro
Syed Muhammad Hussain Batalvi and MGA were close friends up to 1891, they were both the same age and had shared some of the same teachers, further, MGA’s father knew Batalvi‘s father and they frequented each others homes. In 1884, A fatwa of Kufr landed on MGA’s head from many Muslims in India, this was in response to MGA’s Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya Vol. 4 which was published in the early summer of 1884. MGA had went the Sir Syed-route and denied all of the miracles of Esa (As), however MGA was a a Ahle-Hadith (aka Wahabbi) affiliated person, in fact, his friend Noorudin was also Ahle-Hadith, as was his future wife, Nusrat Jehan and her father. Batalvi was the one who helped MGA arrange this marriage. In this 156-page review, Batalvi is telling the ulema that MGA is not claiming prophethood. Batalvi went at length to defend MGA, over and over again.

Continue reading “Muhammad Hussain Batalvi gave Mirza Ghulam Ahmad a glowing review in 1884” →

Intro
In 1903, MGA admitted to the public that he never led prayers and it was because it was written in hadith that the Messiah would not lead the prayers (See Malfuzat Urdu, 1988 edition, via Al Badr of Oct-21-1903, and 2022 edition of Malfuzat-5-Urdu, page 294). In 1923, via Seeratul Mahdi, Ahmadi’s lied and said that MGA led the prayer once or twice. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad never gave a Friday sermon either.

MGA was incapable of leading Salaat and this was mostly because of his constant fits of hysteria/schizophrenia. MGA also spoke with a terrible stutter/stammer, and he could never properly memorize any chapters of the Quran and he was always high on opium and his Arabic tajweed was terrible and he had a Punjabee accent. MGA was never in wudhu either, since he had a terrible problem with urinating and diarrhea, he also claimed to be clad in two yellow garments, thus giving us a picture of how he looked, one more thing, we have no records of MGA ever taking a bath or doing wudhu. Further, in 1884, when MGA had Masjid Mubarak built, MGA hired an Imam. MGA’s wife confirms that MGA never led salat after 1888. In reality, he never led salaat before 1888 either. MGA’s wife suffered from the same conditions.

After MGA made his claim to be the Messiah in 1891, Abdul Karim, Maulvi Ahsan Amrohi, Nooruddin, Mufti Muhammad Sadiq or any other Ahmadi would lead the prayers, the same was to be said about the Masjid Aqsa, these were the two only masjids in Qadian. In fact, while MGA would perform Salaat, his fanatical followers were known to approach MGA (during salaat) and stroke his body sexually.

2022 edition of Malfuzat-5-Urdu, page 294
Continue reading “MGA never led Salaat in his entire life!!!!!!!!!!!!!!” →

https://youtu.be/paJH0QhcmXI
Intro
Mirza Tahir Ahmad was a vicious mullah.  He spent his whole life conditioning Ahmadis to be ready to give their lives for him and his family.  This speech seems to be from the 1980’s, Mirza Tahir ahmad was responding to Muslim-Imams in Pakisan as they laughed at the idea of a Khalifa living on asylum and claiming to represent Islam.  Well, Mirza Tahir Ahmad boasted that all Ahmadis would readily give up their lives just on an order by their Khalifa.  He has thus proved that Ahmadis are just as fanatical as the people who follow ISIS, or North Koreans.

Razi from Ahmadi answers posted this video
https://youtu.be/Wd4FzVPZ3a8
I found this video on Razi’s Ahmadianswers.com youtube page.  Razi is another one of those fanatical Ahmadis, on error he posted this video, Im sure he will delete it soon.

My father
My father was a fanatical Ahmadi. He was ready to sell all of his property in the USA and move anywhere the Khalifa ordered, he was also willing to sacrifice his life for the Mirza family, and the life of his children.  In fact, he spent his whole life working for and collecting money and converts for the Mirza family.

Intro
I have written about the role of Noorudin in Ahmadiyya development many times in the past.  What Ahmadis hate to mention is that Nooruddin’s Ahmadi-sons were forcibly kicked out of Ahmadiyya in the 1950’s, it was a messy divorce. In fact, One of Nooruddin’s sons went  on to represent he Lahori-Ahmadi’s in court in 1974, as the Lahori’s presented their case to the famous NA assembly. Nevertheless, Noorudin’s eldest daughter (Amamah or Imamah) was married into the Ghaznavi family, to a son of Abdullah Ghaznavi. This marriage must have happened in the 1880’s, Ahmadiyya sources don’t give a date (“”Hakeem Noor-ud-Deen – Khalifatul Masih I – The Way of the Righteous”” by Syed Hasanat Ahmad see page 40). They had 2 sons and one daughter and seemed to have also moved to Qadian. Amama died mysteriously in 1897 per Ahmadiyya sources, this entire family seems to have also lived with MGA in his mansion. Later on, these children would grow up and challenge their cousins in the Ahrars and the Ahmadiyya conflict their in the 1930’s (See Adil Hussain, “From Sufi-ism to Ahmadiyya”). Ahmadiyya leaders were are connected to Nawab Siddiq Hassan Khan also. In fact, the princess of Bhopal was married to Nawab Siddiq Hassan Khan and was the single biggest donor towards the failed Braheen e Ahmadiyya series.
Continue reading “Maulvi Noorudin was a Ahl-e-Hadith type of Muslim” →

Intro
Mansoor Shams is the son of a Qadiani-Ahmadi murrabi, it is unclear how he got a visa to the USA. His maternal grandfather is Bashir Shad, who seems to have worked in Africa as a murrabi.

In the 1980’s, he came to the US at roughly age 5-6. His parents were most likely part of the asylum surge in Ahmadiyya which happened in 1984, in terms of Ord-XX. 

In 1998, he seems to have been in the US Military roughly 98–2001, however, he was admin, he never deployed and never saw any combat action.

Since 2010, he sells his military service as a marketing chip for Ahmadiyya. He works in an Ahmadiyya-only-owned company and discriminates against people in terms of hiring, i.e., he only hires Ahmadis. He has also created a website and goes out and holds a sign which says, “Meet a Muslim”. However, he barely knows anything about Islam or Ahmadiyya, he is an amateur. Instead, of spending his time researching Ahmadiyya and Islam, he spends his time working for free for the Ahmadiyya movement.

In 2026, Mansoor Shams is running for Baltimore Executive starting on June-11-2026. He even showed up to the Nur Foundation in Baltimore at a Masjid and pretended to be a Muslim. On jJune-23-26, Mansoor Shams only got 4% of the votes and lost terribly.

Continue reading “Who is Mansoor Shams? The Fake Muslimmarine, who sells his life for Ahmadiyya” →

Intro
As of 2021 (the last update is from 2017), there are no updates on this case, Kareem Ahmad is not in jail and it seems that he has totally avoided this indictment. Nevertheless, we have posted the data. Ahmadi’s don’t care about any laws in any country, the live for the Mirza family and work tirelessly bringing them their money. In this case, there is a fanatical Ahmadi in California who gave over 1 million dollars to the Obama campaign and was able to secure for his Khalifa a trip to congress, the keys to the city of LA, and many other perks. His investment also helped #qadianis get their coveted Ahmadiyya Muslim Caucus, as well as getting many #qadianis air time on many news channels.Nevertheless, no one joined Ahmadiyya in the USA en masse. However, this did get #ahmadiyya validity for their asylum cases.
Continue reading “Who is Kareem Ahmad? The Ahmadi mega-donor, indicted in federal court–involuntary manslaughter” →

Intro
Check out Bro Imtiaz’s video on this herein. In 1900-1901, MGA began claiming prophethood, this started in “Arba‘in” and continued onward. MGA was discreetly claiming prophethood (See also “Haqiqat un Nubuwwat”,1915, tabdili aqida). Soon thereafter, MGA claimed to have gotten his prophethood from Muhammad (Saw) and is the 2nd coming of Muhammad (Saw)(naozobillah). However, after 1902, MGA began claiming to be greater than Muhammad (saw). In 1914, the Lahori-Ahmadi’s split from the Qadiani’s and alleged that MGA was only “metaphorically” the 2nd coming of Muhammad (Saw) and his prophethood was also only “metaphoric”. The Qadiani’s disagreed and called it the “Ummati-Nabi“. However, after 1947, the Qadiani’s have moved away from this belief and have adopted the Lahori-Ahmadi position (that MGA was the metaphoric second coming of Muhammad [saw]{naozobillah}).

In 1900, MGA gave “his” definition of a law-bearing “Rasul” as someone who “based on his wahi, lays down some commandments to do things and other commandments prohibiting things and establishes regulations for his people”. MGA then says that his own wahi also has “permissions and prohibitions” (just like that of a law-bearing Rasul). MGA says that his God has named his teachings and Wahi, like that comes to me as FALAK (Boat)….thus, see, God has declared my revelations, my teachings and my allegiance to be Noah’s Ark and as the basis of salvation for all human beings. Let him who has eyes see and him who has ears hear (See Arba‘in, RK-17-Urdu, page 435)(See also page 133-134 (of the English edition).

In 1900, MGA said this is not the time to manifest Muhammad (Saw)(Jalali-color), that event has already happened. Now people need the full light of the moon, some cooler, and that is me (MGA). MGA then quotes the famous sentence of 5:3 of the Quran (5:4 in the Kadiani Koran)(See Arba‘in, no. 4, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 17, pages 444-446).

In 1900, via “Jihad and the British Government” and via an announcement therein. On page-1 (page 29 of the book) of the announcement, MGA denied that he was Buruz like reincarnation, and he wasn’t actually the souls of both these holy men have reappeared in him was not true! You can listen to Maulvi Razi read it out herein. (“Kay suchmuch indo buzurg nabiyoon kee ruhain maray under khalool kargayain” Urdu). However, a few pages later MGA alleged that he was actually a combination of 2 souls (Muhammad [saw] and Eisa [as])(See the scan in the below) and a “blended compound (Majoon e Muraqqab) of the two (See page 35). It seems that MGA was lying! MGA was purposely denying the concept, which he accepted in total in Tohfa Golarvia.

In 1901 (Nov), in “Eik Ghalti Ka Izala“, MGA argued that he was the second coming of Muhammad (via Buruz), MGA said he was the Muhammad the 2nd (sanee) via Buruz.

In 1902, MGA said that the person who makes a difference between MGA and Muhammad (Saw) has neither seen me nor recognized MGA (See Khutba-e-Ilhamiah, RK, V16, P. 258 – 259). MGA also claimed to be the FINAL BRICK of the prophets (See RK-16, Pg 178, Khutba-e-Ilhamiah). MGA claimed that in the palace of prophets, one brick was left (See Rk-16, Pg 177, Khutba-e-Ilhamiah and via Bro Imtiaz). MGA also claimed that the time of the manifest victory of the era of the holy Prophet has expired, and the second victory which was to be much greater and clearer then the first one had yet to be achieved. It was ordained that its time should fall during the times of the promised Masih (See Khutba-e-Ilhamiah, pages 193-194, and via RK16, p.288).

In 1902, MGA was arguing that the spirituality (ruhaniyyat) of Muhammad (saw) radiated in a complete manner (pooree)(See RK, v. 16, pp. 266 (Khutbah ilhamia). Our Muslim brother @Seeker2.0 on TikTok explains how when Razi read he left out the word “pooree” (fully or complete manner)(See on Tiktok herein too).

In 1902, MGA said that the truth is that the spiritual power of the holy Prophet (SAW) at the end of the 6th thousand (13th century in Mirza Ghulam), i.e. these days, is MUCH STRONGER, MORE COMPLETE and STRONGER than in THOSE EARLY YEARS. Nay, it is like the fourteenth (moonlit) night (full moon)(Khutbah Ilhamiya RK 16:271). MGA also said, Islam was a crescent at the time of Muhammad (Saw), but now it is like a full moon (Khutbah Ilhamiya RK 16:275).

In 1902, a letter by Maulvi Abdul Karim is reproduced by the editor (Maulvi Muhammad Ali) of the ROR-Aug-1902 (see pages 306-336). The title/heading of the letter is given as “Muslim Resuscitation and The Means By Which It Can Be Brought Out”. This is a letter, which was written to the “Nudwat ul Ulema”, this was in response to their invitation to MGA to attend their annual Jalsa at Calcutta (Dec-1902). Maulvi Abdul Karim starts off with saying that he is looking out for Muslims and their welfare and yearns for Islam to dominate once again. Maulvi Abdul Karim gives a long speech and then finally says Muhammad (saw) is the best example of morals. He then presents MGA as the second coming of Muhammad (Saw)(naozobillah) and as a unifier for the Muslims in India. Maulvi Abdul Karim was critical of the Mutazalite‘s, and Sir Syed and his Aligarh College and that entire thrust of modernism and mixing it with Islam. Maulvi Abdul Karim then poses a question to the “Nudwat ul Ulema”, he asks as to who is the “perfect manifestation of the glory and attributes” of Muhammad (saw), Maulvi Abdul Karim then poses another question: “Who is it that claims to be Baruz? (representing the spiritual appearance) of the Great Arabian Prophet” (this is implying that MGA is the Baruz)(note by AFCB). Maulvi Abdul Karim then asks the “Nudwat ul Ulema” to point to anyone else that they had in mind who could fit as the 2nd coming of Muhammad (saw)(nauzobillah)(see page 321). Maulvi Abdul Karim then gives a long speech on the objectives of the “Nudwat ul Ulema”. On page 328, Maulvi Abdul Karim tells how (and laments) all Muslims, from the Ahl-e-Hadith to the “Naichri” (the English word ‘nature’ pronounced like a desi)(Sir Syed type of Muslims) believe that prophethood has finished. Maulvi Abdul Karim does describe other means of communication by Allah and he could mean the good dreams (which are 1/46th of prophethood) and seems to be implying MGA’s prophethood. Maulvi Abdul Karim criticizes the “Nudwat ul Ulema” and says that they keep trying to unite Muslims and will never achieve that. Maulvi Abdul Karim mentions Dowie and calls him a crazy old man. On page 330, Maulvi Abdul Karim presents the common Ahmadi argument that since Islam is a living religion, and thus, that must also mean that Allah is still speaking and via miracles and signs. Maulvi Abdul Karim then argues that any religion that is devoid of Allah’s speech should be laughed at. Maulvi Abdul Karim then argues that it’s sad that the Jews were blessed with so many prophets, but not in Islam. On page 332, Maulvi Abdul Karim argued that the previous Jalsa failed. Maulvi Abdul Karim the quotes 62:3 and presents MGA as someone who fulfills this so-called prophecy and as the second coming of Muhammad (saw)(naozobillah). On page 333, Maulvi Abdul Karim writes:

“””In other words, the wise and knowing God has raised Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian with the same spirit and power, the same blessings and favors and the same miracles, with which he raised the Holy Prophet. Since the same and even greater evils and corruption had appeared in the world, and the same teachings, the same sanctifying power, the same heavenly blessings, the same miracles, supernatural signs and grand prophecies were needed as at the time of the Holy Prophet, therefore, the God of jealousy and power has sent his true representative and perfect manifestation who has annihilated his own self in obedience to his Holy Master and tries day and night to re-establish his honor, glory and greatness, and he has given the same power and magnetism that the whole world may be replenished…..”
Continue reading “From 1901 to roughly 1922 Ahmadis believed MGA=Muhammad (saw) (naozobillah) and that Ahmadi’s could become greater than Muhammad (Saw)(Naozobillah)” →

Intro
I found this entire essay on reddit. Ahmadis are now working on discrediting the Imam. 
Continue reading “Shia “Imam Tawhidi” goading Qasim Rashid by pointing out MGA’s writings on Christianity being the “perfect manifestation of Satan”” →