Intro
62:3 (“And [to] others of them who have not yet joined them. And He is the Exalted in Might, the Wise.”— Saheeh International, وَءَاخَرِينَ مِنْهُمْ لَمَّا يَلْحَقُوا۟ بِهِمْ وَهُوَ ٱلْعَزِيزُ ٱلْحَكِيمُ ٣) of the Quran only means that the Muhammad’s message is universal (See Tafsir ibn Kathir) and thus all people of Earth can become Muslims. Ibn Kathir’s famous Quranic commentary even quotes the famous hadith (which Ahmadi’s also quote) and explains how it refers to all non-Arabs who will eventually believe in the truth of the Prophet, nothing more and nothing less. The non-Arabs would even be able to reach the heights of islamic, even if it was as far as the Ath-Thurayya (Pleiades). Further, there is a famous hadith from Bukhari wherein Muhammad (Saw) explains this hadith and says had faith reached the Pleiades, even non arabs could reach it, however, MGA purposely mis-translated this hadith to mean, “bring it down”. Akber Choudhry as fully explained it here in this video. Akber explains how the word “Lau na La who” means, “can reach it”, he also explains how MGA changed it to mean, “bring it down”.
In 1880-1881, MGA argued in Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya V-3 (see page 213) that NO prophet could ever equal Muhammad (saw) in holy excellences.
By 1891, MGA and his team of writers were asserting that this hadith should be translated as: “will descend with it to the earth”. It should also be noted that Ibn Kathir quotes a Hadith about the prophet SAW mentioning all the men and women from his ummah entering Jannah without being questioned, then quoting the verse “wa aakhareena…” (62:3) and the Hadith explains that this refers to all the remaining ones from among the ummah that will enter into Jannah (see full scan in the below). Even Qurtubi has several Sahaba and Tabi’in telling us that the Aakhareen refer to all Muslims from the non Arabs and the Ta.
In 1882, in the Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya Vol. 3, MGA asserted to have been given a divine revelation wherein his God told him, “”Had faith ascended to the Pleiades he would have reached there and brought it down.”” (See page 212, online english edition), thus, MGA was laying the groundwork for his all of his claims. In the BA-4 (see page 373), the same type of revelation exists. It was used again in 1891, in MGA’s book, Fath-e-Islam (Victory of Islam), however, in all of these instances MGA was only using this verse and hadith to assert that he was a reformer. And again in Hamamatul Bushra (1893).
In 1898, MGA and his team of writers asserted that MGA being the Promised Messiah had support from the Quran (See Kitab ul Barriya, in the below). Before 1898, MGA and his team don’t seem to have ever used this argument. In the same year, in Ayyam-us-Sulh (written in 1898 and published in 1899), MGA and his team of writers argued that this verse also meant that the followers of the Messiah were just like the early sahaba of Muhammad (saw)(nauzobillah), they received true dreams and divine revelation. In 1899, MGA argued that anyone could be a prophet, it was easy.
The year 1900 and early 1901 was a transitional phase in MGA’s prophethood (see Haqiqatun Nubuwat, 1915). In the Khutbah ilhamiya, MGA quoted 62:3 and claimed to be the second coming of Muhammad (saw)(nauzobillah), however, this book wasn’t published until 1902
When MGA finally claimed prophethood via the announcement of Nov. 1901 (Correction of an Error), he quoted 62:3 (62:4 in the Qadiani Quran) and emphatically declared himself as the second coming of Muhammad (saw)(Nauzobillah). A few sentences later, MGA called him the perfect reflection (zill)/baruz of Muhammad (saw)(nauzobillah). MGA claims that he was named Muhammad and Ahmad 20 years ago in the Barahin, and was also named “The Holy Prophet” in that era. Thus, MGA was asserting that he had been a prophet/messenger already for 20 years, he was also claiming to have been the second coming of Muhammad (Saw)(nauzobillah) for 20 years. Also in 1901 (see “Eikh Ghalti Ka Izala”), MGA argues that Chapter 108:1 of the Quran was revealed about himself (MGA), however, the verse really applies to Muhammad (saw).
In 1902, in Tohfa-Golarvia, MGA and his team of writers again asserted that MGA=Muhammad (saw)(nauzobillah). After MGA died, these arguments seem to have died off. However, in 1915, the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s revived them, specifically the sons of MGA began to aggressively assert that MGA=Muhammad (saw)(nauzobillah), whereas the Lahori-Ahmadi’s never mentioned this concept ever again. In fact, in Muhammad Ali’s famous commentary of 1917 on 62:3, he refused to mention how MGA wrote that Muhammad (Saw) (nauzobillah)=MGA. However, after 1919, even the Qadiani jamaat stopped making this argument, i.e., Muhammad (saw)(naozobillah)=MGA. In the famous 5-volume commentary of Malik Ghulam Farid (MGF), which was published in 1988. MGF admits that this verse only means, that the message of Muhammad (Saw) wasn’t only for the Arabs, it was universal, however, he again asserted that MGA was the second coming of Muhammad (Saw)(nauzobillah).
This isn’t all, there are many other verses of the Quran that MGA and his team of writers presented as they argued for the continuation of prophethood, in fact, in 1901, in “Correction of an Error”, MGA quoted 1:6 and was claiming that Muslims pray daily to be given the same blessings as the prophets, a few years later, he would connect 4:69 with 1:6. In 1915, after the split in the Ahmadiyya movement, the sons of MGA connected 2:4 (2:5 in the Qadiani numbering system, with 1:6 and 4:69, they also added 7:35 and 61:6, as they argued emphatically that MGA was a prophet and had sanction from the Quran. They also argued that MGA had initially believed per 4:64 that prophets didn’t follow other prophets, they only followed Allah, however, after 1901, MGA discovered a new type of prophethood, that had never existed in the Quran and a nabi could be a follower. MGA also began to claim to be greater than Esa (as)(nauzobillah) in this era.
Check out @FikranYusufzai engaged a qadiani-Ahmadi @TahirNasser in terms of the grammar of 62:3. @TahirNasser invented some new arguments that we had never seen before, nevertheless, @FikranYusufzai quickly explained the errors of @TahirNasser. Bro Imtiaz has an excellent stream on this too.
In 1998 (Nov), Mirza Tahir Ahmad alleges that 61:7 (61:8 in the Kadiani Koran) is about MGA, he also commented on 62:3 of the Quran (62:4 in the Kadiani Koran).
In June of 2025, Maulvi Razi and his team of paid Maulvi’s got caught lying by Adnan Rashid (2:44:40 timestamp) and Bro Imtiaz about many things (see the clips on TikTok and twitter). Maulvi Razi got caught mispresenting Ahmad Reza Khan and Shah Wali Ullah.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
The famous hadith by Salman Farsi which explains how any species can become good Muslims
Narrated Abu Huraira:
While we were sitting with the Prophet Surat Al-Jumu’a was revealed to him, and when the Verse, “And He (Allah) has sent him (Muhammad) also to other (Muslims)…..’ (62.3) was recited by the Prophet, I said, “Who are they, O Allah’s Apostle?” The Prophet did not reply till I repeated my question thrice. At that time, Salman Al-Farisi was with us. So Allah’s Apostle put his hand on Salman, saying, “If Faith were at (the place of) Ath-Thuraiya (pleiades, the highest star), even then (some men or man from these people (i.e. Salman’s folk) would attain it.”
______________________________________________________________________________________________
The same hadith from Sahih Muslim
Ibn al-Hajjaj narrates this hadith in the chapter: “The merits of the people of Persia“:
Abu Huraira reported Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: “If the deen were at the Pleiades, even then a person from Persia would have taken hold of it, or one amongst the Persian descent would have surely found it”.[3]
Then follows the consequent hadith:
Abu Huraira reported: We were sitting in the company of Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) that Sura al-Jumu’a was revealed to him and when he recited (these words) : “Others from amongst them who have not yet joined them.” A person amongst them (those who were sitting there) said: “Allah’s Messenger!” But Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) made no reply, until he questioned him once, twice or thrice. And there was amongst us Salman the Persian. The Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) placed his hand on Salman and then said: “Even if faith were near the Pleiades, a man from amongst these would surely find it”.[3]
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1882
In the Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya Vol. 3, MGA asserted that his God told him, “”Had faith ascended to the Pleiades he would have reached there and brought it down.”” (See page 212, online english edition), thus, MGA was laying the groundwork for his all of his claims.
The full quote
“””I am with you; so be with Me wherever you might be. Be with Allah wherever you are. In whatever direction you turn there will be the countenance of Allah. You are the best people
who have been raised for the benefit of mankind and as a pride for the believers. Despair not of the mercy of Allah. Hearken, indeed the mercy of Allah is near. Hearken, the help of Allah is
near. Help will come to you by every distant track. People will come to you so that the track will become deep due to excessive travel. So many people will come to you that the track on which
they travel will become deep. Allah will help you from Himself. Such people will help you whom We shall inspire from Ourself. No one can change the words of Allah. We will bestow upon you
a manifest victory. The victory of the friend of Allah is the true victory and We have bestowed upon him such intimate nearness that he becomes Our confidant. He is the bravest of people.
Had faith ascended to the Pleiades he would have reached there and brought it down. Allah will illumine his arguments. Mercy flows from your lips, O Ahmad. You are in Our sight, [under Our watchful care]. Allah will exalt your name and perfect His bounty upon you in this world and the Hereafter. He found you seeking His guidance and guided you. We looked at you and commanded the fire, which is the fire of mischief from the people: ‘Be cool and safe for this Ibrahim [Abraham]’. Treasures of the mercy of your Lord shall be granted to you. O you the one wrapped up, stand up and warn [people against the coming calamities] and proclaim the greatness of your Lord. Your name will come to an end O Ahmad, but My name will not come to an end. That is, you are mortal and your praise is limited, but Allah’s praise is unlimited for it is without count and without end.””
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1880-1881
In 1880-1881, MGA argued in Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya V-3 (see page 213) that NO prophet could ever equal Muhammad (saw) in holy excellences.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1884, Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya, Vol-4, pages 372-272, online english edition
“””Had faith been hanging in the Pleiades—that is, had departed from the earth altogether—even then the above-mentioned man would have found it.”””
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1891
Fath-e-Islam
Search Tadhkirah under the word Pleiades.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1891
Izala Auham
Izala-e-Auham, Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 3, pp. 452-456, Via Essence of Islam, Vol-1, pages 362-368
“””Knowledge of Holy Qur’an and Promised Messiah
This is the wealth concerning which it had been prophesied that the Messiah would distribute it so much that people will have their fill of it. The prophecy does not mean that the Messiah would collect together material wealth concerning which it has been said:
‘Your possessions and children are but a trial.’—al-Taghabun, 64:16
and that he would deliberately put people on trial by distributing wealth among them. In his first advent also, the Messiah felt no attraction towards worldly wealth. He has stated in the Gospel that the property of a believer are not gold and silver, but are the jewels of verities and understanding. This is the property that is bestowed by God Almighty on the Prophets, which they distribute. It is concerning this property that the Holy Prophet [peace and blessings of Allah be on him] said:
‘I am a distributor and Allah is the Bestower.’
It is stated clearly in the Ahadith that the Promised Messiah would come into the world when knowledge of the Qur’an will be lost and ignorance will prevail. That is the time which is referred to in the Hadith:
If faith ascends to the Pleiades it will be brought down by a man of Persia.
It has been revealed to me in a vision that the climax of that age will begin in the Hijri year which corresponds to the value of the letters of the verse:
‘It is We who determine its taking away.’—al-Mu’minun, 23:19
which amounts to 1274.
Consider this well and do not pass over it in haste and supplicate God that He should open your minds to it. A little reflection will make you understand the prophecy contained in the Hadith that in the latter days the Qur’an will be taken away from the world, its knowledge will be lost, ignorance will prevail and the eagerness and sweetness of faith will depart from the hearts. Among them is the Hadith that if faith will ascend to the Pleiades and will disappear from the earth, a man of the Persians will extend his hand and will bring it down. This Hadith shows clearly that when ignorance, faithlessness and error, which are described as smoke in the other Ahadith, will become widespread and true faith will become so rare as if it had been drawn up to the skies, and the Holy Qur’an will be abandoned as if it had been raised towards God Almighty, at that time, a man of Persia will take hold of the faith from the Pleiades and will descend with it to the earth. Be sure, therefore, that he is the son of Mary who was to descend.””
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1892
Nishan Asmani, online english edition, see pages 22-23
“””And, as I have already said, the object of including these verses in the booklet was to try
and establish Sayyid Ahmad Sahib as one of the Mahdis. Undoubtedly, people have greatly erred in understanding the Ahadith that mention the prophecy of the Holy Prophetsa about the coming of a person named Mahdi. In general, it has been erroneously assumed that the word ‘Mahdi’ invariably refers to ‘Muhammad son of ‘Abdullah’ who has been mentioned in some Ahadith. But a careful study reveals that the Holy Prophetsa has foretold the coming of several Mahdis. One of them has been called Sultan-e-Mashriqas in Hadith; he has to appear in an eastern country, like India; while the country of his origin must be Faras (Persia). In fact, it is he concerning whom is
written in a Hadith that even if faith ascended to the Pleiades, he would bring it back even from there. Yet another sign concerning him is that he will be a farmer. In short, it is a definite and proven fact that several Mahdis are mentioned in the Sihah Sittah, and one of them will
appear in the Eastern countries. But some people have been confused by the amalgamation of these Ahadith. However, the point which deserves most attention is that the time of advent of one Mahdias, as foretold by the Holy Prophetsa is the same in which we live, and he has called
him the Mujaddid of the 14th century (Hijra) as, God willing, I shall later elaborate. Anyway, though it is definitely clear that a great Mujaddid will appear in India at the beginning of the 14th century [Hijra], it is quite arbitrary to declare that this prediction applies to Sayyid Ahmad Sahib, because, as I have already pointed out, Sayyid Sahib did not even live to see the 14th century (Hijra).””””
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1893
Hamamatul Bushra, search Tadhkirah for the word Pleiades.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1892-3
A’ina-e-Kamalat-e-Islam, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 5, pp. 270-273, footnote, via Essence of Islam, Vol-3, online english edition, pages 50-52
“””Salvation Depends on Faith
I affirm repeatedly and emphatically that if religious doctrines had been self-evident like philosophical propositions and mathematical equations, they would certainly not have been considered the basis for achieving salvation. Dear brethren, rest assured that salvation depends
upon faith, and faith is related to the unseen. If the underlying reality of things had not been concealed, there would have been no faith, and without faith there would be no salvation. It is faith alone which is the means of winning Divine pleasure. It is a ladder for achieving nearness to God, and a spring for washing away the rust of sin. We are dependent upon God Almighty, and it is faith that discloses this dependence. We are dependent on God Almighty for our salvation and our deliverance from every ill. Such deliverance can be achieved only through faith. The remedy for the torments of this life and the hereafter is faith. When, through the power of faith, we find that a difficulty is not impossible of resolution, it is resolved for us. It is through the power of faith that we are able to achieve that which appears to be impossible and contrary to reason. It is through the power of faith that miracles and extraordinary events are witnessed, and what is considered impossible happens.
It is through faith that we are convinced of the existence of God. He remained hidden from philosophers, and thinkers could not discover Him; but faith leads to God even a humble one who is clothed in rags, and enables him to converse with Him. The power of faith is the means of contact between a believer and the True Beloved. This power leads a poor humble one who is rejected of mankind to the palace of holiness, which is the throne of Allah and, gradually removing all intervening obstructions, reveals the countenance of the Eternal Beloved.
Arise then, and seek faith and burn the dry and useless tomes of philosophy; only through faith shall you achieve blessings. One particle of faith is better than a thousand volumes of philosophy. Faith is not only the means of achieving salvation in the hereafter, but also provides deliverance from the torments and curses of this life. We find deliverance from soul-melting sorrows through the blessings of faith. It is faith through which a perfect believer finds comfort and joy in the midst of anxiety, agony, torment and sorrow, and when he is confronted with failure in all directions and all the familiar doors appear locked and barred. Perfect faith removes all feeling of distance and separation. There is no wealth that can be compared to faith. In this world everyone, with the exception of the believer, is overwhelmed with grief. In this world everyone is afflicted with the agony of loss and unfulfilled desires, except a believer.
Faith! how sweet are your fruits and how fragrant are your flowers; praise be to Allah, how wonderful are your blessings and what beautiful lights shine in you. No one can reach the Pleiades unless he is inspired by you. It has pleased God Almighty that now you should arrive and philosophy should depart. Nothing can stop His grace.”””
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1892-1893
A’ina-e-Kamalat-e-Islam, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 5, page 220
23:15 timestamp
MGA addresses the issue that Muslims say “Akhireena Minhum is plural” in terms of 62:3 (62:4 in the Kadiani Koran). MGA then falsely argues that Muhammad (Saw) applied it to only one person (this is a lie), Salman Farsi. MGA then argues that this “one person” will be born in an era wherein there are philosophical differences. People would be in a state of extreme weakness. MGA then argues that the Quran called “Abraham” (as) as ummah (many people), however, Abraham (as) was only one person. Razi says further that a great Ummah will be raised, not just one person.
Scan

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1893
Tohfa-e-Baghdad, pp. 17–25, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 7, pp. 21–31, Via the online english edition of Tadhkirah.
Search for the word Pleiades.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1898
Via Essence of Islam, Vol. 4, pages 62-65
Kitab-ul-Bariyyah, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 13, pp. 254-257, footnote
“””I see that those who wish to be the followers of nature and the law of nature have been offered a good opportunity by God Almighty of accepting my claim, inasmuch as they are not confronted by the difficulties in which our other opponents are involved. They know well that Jesusas has died and at the same time they have to confess that the prophecy contained in the Ahadith about the appearance of the Promised Messiah is among the long-established verities that cannot be denied by any reasonable person. Thus they are left with no other option but to accept that the Promised Messiah will be one of the Muslims. They are, however, entitled to inquire as to
why they should believe in me as the Promised Messiah, and on what grounds do I base this claim? The answer is that all the indications mentioned in the Holy Qur’an and the Ahadith with regard to the Promised Messiah have been combined in me and in my age and in my country; as, for instance, the age and the country and the town in which the Promised Messiah was to appear and the circumstances which called specially for his advent, and the earthly and heavenly occurrences which had been specified as indications of his advent, and the knowledge and
learning that were to be his characteristic, have all been combined in me. In addition to these, and to provide further satisfaction, I have been strengthened by Heavenly support.
As I was invested with authority for the Christians, I was,
therefore, named the Son of Mary. Heaven is showing signs and the
earth proclaims that this is the time. These two witnesses stand firm
in my support.
To illustrate: The indication given in the text of the Holy Qur’an proves that he Holy Prophetsa appeared in the likeness of Mosesas, and that the chain of Khilafat after the Holy Prophetsa would be very similar to the chain of Khilafat established after Mosesas. Just as Prophet Mosesas was promised that in the latter days—i.e., when the Prophethood of Bani Isra’il
would reach its limit and Bani Isra’il would be divided into many sects, each contradicting the other, so much so that some would declare others to be infidels—God Almighty would raise a successor, i.e., Prophet Jesusas, to support the faith of Mosesas; he would gather the scattered sheep of Israel, and bring sheep and wolves together at one place, and he would be an Arbiter for all the sects of Bani Isra’il, and he would iron out their differences and remove
all rancour and ill-will; likewise, a similar promise was made by the Holy Qur’an in the verse:
Others from among them who have not yet joined them.—Al- Jumu‘ah, 62:4
Many details of this are set out in the Ahadith. For instance, it is mentioned that Muslims would become divided into as many sects as the Jews; they would contradict each other and brand each other as infidels; and would increase in hatred and enmity towards each other, till the time when the Promised Messiah would appear as an Arbiter. He would remove all rancour and hostility. During his time, the wolf and the sheep will be brought together. All historians are aware that, at the time of the advent of Jesusas, the Israelite sects were ridden with dissension
and labelled each other as heretics and infidels. I have also appeared at a time when inner dissension has multiplied and each sect has started calling others Kafir. At such a time of dissension, the Muslims were in need of an Arbiter. God has, therefore, sent me as one.””””
_____________________________________________________________________________________________1898
Ayyam-us-Sulh, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 14, pp. 306-307, Via Essence of Islam, Vol. 4, see pages 272-273
“””Resemblance of the Jama‘at to the Companions of the Holy Prophetsa
Just consider whether, during the last thirteen hundred years, anyone has experienced a time which is so similar to the time of the Holy Prophetsa. Our Jama‘at, which has been established in this age, resembles in many respects the Companionsra of the Holy Prophetsa. Our people witness miracles and signs such as the Companionsra witnessed and gain light and certainty
from fresh heavenly signs and support as the Companionsra did. They endure, in the cause of Allah, the mockery and derision and reproaches of people, and bear persecution and boycotts, just as the Companionsra endured. They lead pure lives helped by clear heavenly signs and supports and wise teachings, as did the Companionsra. There are many among them who weep during their Prayers as the Companionsra wept—so profusely that their places of prostration were dampened. Many of them see true dreams and are honoured with Divine revelations, as was the case with the Companionsra. Many of them spend their hard-earned money in promoting the activities of the Jama‘at, purely for the sake of winning the pleasure of God Almighty, as did the Companionsra. Many among them keep death in mind and are gentle of heart and tread the path of true righteousness, as was the practice of the Companionsra. They are the party of God who are supported by God Himself and whose hearts He is purifying daily and whose bosoms He is filling with the wisdom of faith and whom He is drawing towards Himself through heavenly signs, as He did with the Companionsra. In short, this Jama‘at exhibits all those signs which are implied in the verse:
Others from among them.— Al-Jumu‘ah, 62:4
The Word of God Almighty was bound to be fulfilled.””””
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
1898
Anjam e Athim, Via the online english edition of Tadhkirah
The word Pleiades appears in the same context, i.e., MGA would bring the faith back.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1900
Arba‘in, no. 2, pp. 9–21, published December 1900, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 17, pp. 355–368, Via the online english edition of Tadhkirah
The word Pleiades appears in the same context, i.e., MGA would bring the faith back.
Arba‘in, no. 4, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 17, pages 444-446
MGA said this is not the time to manifest Muhammad (Saw)(Jalali-color), that event has already happened. Now people need the full light of the moon, some cooler, and that is me (MGA).
Scan

_______________________________________________________________________________________________
1900
Khutbah-e-Ilhamiah, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 16, P. 271-272; Khutbah-e-Ilhamiah, P. 181
“One who denies that the mission of the Prophet(SAW) is related to the 6th thousand (13th century) as it was related to 5th thousand (6th century), denies the truth and the text of the Quran and is among the zalemeen (gone astray). The truth is that the spiritual power of the holy Prophet(SAW) at the end of the 6th thousand (13th century in Mirza Ghulam), i.e. these days, is MUCH STRONGER, MORE COMPLETE and STRONGER than in THOSE EARLY YEARS . Nay, it is like the fourteenth (moonlit) night (full moon).”
and
Khutba-e-Ilhamiah, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 16, P. 258 – 259
“And Allah sent down upon me the bounty of the Holy Prophet and made it perfect; and he drew towards me the kindness and generosity of the merciful Prophet, so that I became one with him. Thus, he who joins my group, joins the group of the companions (Sahaba) of my Leader, the best of messengers. It is not hidden from those who have the ability to think that this is what the words “Akhareen Menhom” (others of them) mean. The person who makes a difference between me and the Mustafa has neither seen me nor recognized me.”
The scan work


Khutbah Ilhamiya, RK-16, page 275
Islam was a crescent at the time of Muhammad (Saw), but now it is like a full moon.
Scan

_______________________________________________________________________________________________
1901
Eik Ghalti Ka Izala
“””Since Jesusas is a Prophet, the same objection—of the breaking of the Seal of Khatamun
Nabiyyin—will be raised against him as is raised against me. But I say that, after the Holy Prophetsa, who was Khatamun Nabiyyin, there can be no objection whatsoever to my being addressed as Rasul or Nabi, nor does this break the Seal. I have stated repeatedly that, in accordance with the verse:
And among others from among them who have not yet joined them.—Al-Jumu‘ah, 62:4
As Buruz, I am the same Prophet Khatamun Nabiyyinsa. It was twenty years ago, in Brahin-e-
Ahmadiyya, that God named me ‘Muhammadsa’ and ‘Ahmadsa’ and declared me to be the Holy Prophetsa. Thus, the status of the Holy Prophetsa as Khatamun Nabiyyin is by no means in peril due to my Prophethood, since the Zill is never independent of the original. Since I am Muhammadsa by way of Zill, therefore, the Seal of Khatamun Nabiyyin remains intact, and the Prophethood of Muhammadsa remains confined to Muhammadsa. This means that in all
events it is Muhammadsa who remains the Prophet and no one else.
Since I am the Holy Prophetsa by way of Buruz, and all his perfections and excellences, including his Prophethood, are reflected in the mirror of my Zilliyyat, where then is the person who claimed to be an independent Prophet?
If you still do not accept me, then you should know that it is written in your own books of Hadith that the Promised Mahdi will be like the Holy Prophetsa, both in character and appearance. His name will correspond to the name of the Holy Prophetsa—which means that he will be given the name Muhammad and Ahmad; and that he will belong to the Holy Prophet’ssa household.”””
108:1 in Correction of an Error, online english edition
After quoting 62:3, MGA says:
“””There is a beautiful subtlety of expression in this verse. While it clearly mentions the people who will be counted among the Companionsra, it does not expressly mention the person who was to come as the Buruz, i.e., the Promised Messiah, and through whom those people would come to be counted among the Companions of the Holy Prophetsa and considered to be under his guidance. This deliberate omission is intended to signify that the Buruz in his own right would be a non-entity, therefore, his Prophethood or Messengership in the form of Buruz would not break the Seal of Finality. This is why the verse treats him as a non-entity and presents the Holy Prophetsa in his place. The appearance of a Buruz has similarly been promised in the verse:
Surely We have given thee abundance of good.—Al-Kauthar, 108:2
It means that in his time Kauthar would be manifested, i.e., springs of spiritual blessings will flow freely and a great number of people will become true adherents of Islam. This verse looks with disdain at the need of physical progeny and promises, instead, progeny by way of Buruz. Although God Almighty has blessed me with the honour that I am both an Israelite and a Fatimite, and I partake of both bloods, I still give precedence to the spiritual relationship, which is that of Buruz.”””
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
1901–Nov-19
Malfuzat-2, page 375
Who denies the end of Prophethood?
“”..According to us, no other prophet has come, neither a new prophet nor an old prophet, but the cloak of Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah (saw), has been clothed to someone else, and he himself has come…”
Scan


_____________________________________________________________________________________________1902
See Essence of Islam, Vol. 4, pages 179-180
Tohfah Golarhviah, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 17, pp. 114-115
Promised Messiah from Among the Muslims
I have already proved the death of the Messiahas and his spiritual exaltation….Now, after the death of the Messiahas, the next question is, what are the authorities contained in the Qur’an and Ahadith and other sources from which it is established that the Promised Messiah will appear from among the Ummah? I will set out these authorities below, please read them with care. Hopefully, God the Compassionate will guide you.
One of the arguments which prove that the Messiah who was promised to appear in this Ummah would be from among the Muslims is this Hadith set out both in Bukhari and Muslim and
It means that he will be your Imam from among you. Since this Hadith relates to Jesusas and it is he who has been described in this Hadith as Hakam and ‘Adal [Arbiter and Judge], it follows, therefore, that the word Imam also refers to him. It is true that the words ‘from among you’ were addressed to the Companions of the Holy Prophetsa, but we know that none of them claimed to be the Promised Messiah. This, therefore, shows that the words ‘from among you’ are meant for
someone who, in the knowledge of God Almighty, would be a substitute for the Companions and is the one referred to in the verse:
And among others from among them who have not yet joined them.—Al-Jumu‘ah, 62:4
This verse shows that he will be instructed through the spiritual power of the Holy Prophetsa, and will, in this sense, be one of the Companions. This verse is further explained by the Hadith:
Had faith ascended to the Pleiades, it would be brought down by a man from among the Persians.
Here the quality which was particularized in the Promised Messiah and Mahdi has been attributed to this man from Persia. This quality is to replenish the earth with justice after it has been filled with wrongdoing and has become empty of faith and the belief in the Unity of God. Thus this man is the Promised Messiah and Mahdi; and I am he.
Just as the prophesied eclipse of the sun and the moon in the month of Ramadan has not occurred during the time of any other person claiming to be Mahdi, likewise, during the thirteen hundred years that have elapsed since the time of the Holy Prophetsa, no one has claimed, on the basis of Divine revelation, to be ‘the Man of Persia’ about whom the Hadith says that
he will bring faith down from heaven.””
and
Via Nuzhat Haneef, [RK, v. 17, pp. 248-249; marginal note; starts at 7th line from the bottom of the marginal note; Tohfa-e-Goldrawiyah; published 1902]
“”Each prophet has one advent but our Prophet, the blessings of Allaah and peace be on him, has two advents and the categorical statement on this is the noble verse ‘wa aakhareena minhum lamma yalhaqoo bihim’ [And others of them who have not joined them] [Quraan 62:4]. All great Quraanic commentators write in the explanation of this verse that the final group of this nation, that is, Maseeh Mau`ood’s community, will be colored as [i.e., have the characteristics of] the Companions [of Muhammad] and like the Companions [of Muhammad], with whom Allaah be pleased, without any difference, will obtain grace and guidance from His Holiness [Muhammad], the blessings of Allaah and peace be on him. … His Holiness [Muhammad], the blessings of Allaah and peace be on him, has two advents or, in other words, it may be stated that His Holiness’ second coming into the world, the blessings of Allaah and peace be on him, in a ‘buroozee’ [projected or manifested or displayed] manner, had been promised, which [promise] was fulfilled by the appearance of the Maseeh Mau`ood and Mahdee Ma’hood [Mirza Ghulam Ahmad].”””
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1902
Tohfa-e-Golarhviyyah, Ruhani Khazain, Vol. 17, p. 254
“””as it is obligatory for a believer to believe in all other divine commandments. Similarly, it is obligatory for him to believe that there are 2 advents of the Holy Prophet (saw)…”””
Scan

_______________________________________________________________________________________________1902
RK-17, page 260
Tohfa Golarvia
https://www.youtube.com/live/LRrO6vB3CFU?si=G0uhvTdj1p3v_msk
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad states that there were only 2 advents of Muhammad (Saw)(naozbillah), the first one was for the completion/perfection of guidance (taqmeelay hidayt), the second coming was for the completion/perfection of literature (taqmeelay ishaatat hidayt)(Summary by Maulvi Farhan Iqbal, see 8:35 time stamp). MGA then quotes 5:3 of the Quran (5:4 in the Qaidani Quran) and specifically highlights the sentence, “al-yoma akmal lakum deenakum” and then MGA quotes a sentence from 61:9 (61:10 in the Qadiani Quran) and argues that in the latter days this verse predicts the second coming of Eisa (as)(MGA wrote this in Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya, 1883 too, (see page 374). Maulvi Farhan Iqbal goes on to argue that the propagation of Islam to the corners of the Earth hadn’t happened at the time of Muhammad (Saw) and was thus completed by MGA.
Scan

_______________________________________________________________________________________________1902
RK, v. 17, p. 263
“”..The spirituality (ruhuniyyat) of the Holy Prophet replied, book, I am coming as Baruz, but I will come in India..”
Scan

______________________________________________________________________________________________ RK-17, page 263
“””the need for this promise (of the 2nd coming of Muhammad) arose due to the fact that the second official duty of the Holy Prophet (saw), i.e., completion of the publication of the guidance of religion, which should have been fulfilled by his hand, was not fulfilled, due to a lack of resources. So, he fulfilled this obligation, in his second coming, in Baroozi form, at a time when the resources were available to spread Islam to all the nations of the Earth..””
Scan
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1902
Review of Religions (ROR), Aug-1902, English, pages 306-336
RR190208.pdf (reviewofreligions.org)
A letter by Maulvi Abdul Karim is reproduced by the editor (Maulvi Muhammad Ali) of the ROR-Aug-1902 (see pages 306-336). The title/heading of the letter is given as “Muslim Resuscitation and The Means By Which It Can Be Brought Out”. This is a letter, which was written to the “Nudwat ul Ulema”, this was in response to their invitation to MGA to attend their annual Jalsa at Calcutta (Dec-1902). Maulvi Abdul Karim starts off with saying that he is looking out for Muslims and their welfare and yearns for Islam to dominate once again. Maulvi Abdul Karim gives a long speech and then finally says Muhammad (saw) is the best example of morals. He then presents MGA as the second coming of Muhammad (Saw)(naozobillah) and as a unifier for the Muslims in India. Maulvi Abdul Karim was critical of the Mutazalite‘s, and Sir Syed and his Aligarh College and that entire thrust of modernism and mixing it with Islam. Maulvi Abdul Karim then poses a question to the “Nudwat ul Ulema”, he asks as to who is the “perfect manifestation of the glory and attributes” of Muhammad (saw), Maulvi Abdul Karim then poses another question: “Who is it that claims to be Baruz? (representing the spiritual appearance) of the Great Arabian Prophet” (this is implying that MGA is the Baruz)(note by AFCB). Maulvi Abdul Karim then asks the “Nudwat ul Ulema” to point to anyone else that they had in mind who could fit as the 2nd coming of Muhammad (saw)(nauzobillah)(see page 321). Maulvi Abdul Karim then gives a long speech on the objectives of the “Nudwat ul Ulema”. On page 328, Maulvi Abdul Karim tells how (and laments) all Muslims, from the Ahl-e-Hadith to the “Naichri” (the English word ‘nature’ pronounced like a desi)(Sir Syed type of Muslims) believe that prophethood has finished. Maulvi Abdul Karim does describe other means of communication by Allah and he could mean the good dreams (which are 1/46th of prophethood) and seems to be implying MGA’s prophethood. Maulvi Abdul Karim criticizes the “Nudwat ul Ulema” and says that they keep trying to unite Muslims and will never achieve that. Maulvi Abdul Karim mentions Dowie and calls him a crazy old man. On page 330, Maulvi Abdul Karim presents the common Ahmadi argument that since Islam is a living religion, and thus, that must also mean that Allah is still speaking and via miracles and signs. Maulvi Abdul Karim then argues that any religion that is devoid of Allah’s speech should be laughed at. Maulvi Abdul Karim then argues that it’s sad that the Jews were blessed with so many prophets, but not in Islam. On page 332, Maulvi Abdul Karim argued that the previous Jalsa failed. Maulvi Abdul Karim the quotes 62:3 and presents MGA as someone who fulfills this so-called prophecy and as the second coming of Muhammad (saw)(naozobillah). On page 333, Maulvi Abdul Karim writes:
“””In other words, the wise and knowing God has raised Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian with the same spirit and power, the same blessings and favors and the same miracles, with which he raised the Holy Prophet. Since the same and even greater evils and corruption had appeared in the world, and the same teachings, the same sanctifying power, the same heavenly blessings, the same miracles, supernatural signs and grand prophecies were needed as at the time of the Holy Prophet, therefore, the God of jealousy and power has sent his true representative and perfect manifestation who has annihilated his own self in obedience to his Holy Master and tries day and night to re-establish his honor, glory and greatness, and he has given the same power and magnetism that the whole world may be replenished…..”
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1903
Published in July 1962, in Urdu, 464 pages, covering the period from
October 1902 to January 16, 1903.
Malfuzat, vol. 4, p. 10, Via Essence of Islam, Vol. 4, page 127
“””Two Aspects of the perfection of Faith
It should be borne in mind that all bounties and the perfection of the faith that were bestowed on the Holy Prophetsa, had two aspects: first, the perfection of the guidance, and secondly, the completion of the propagation of the guidance. The perfection of the guidance from every aspect took place through his first advent, and the completion of the propagation of the guidance
was accomplished through his second advent. The verse of the Surah Al-Jumu‘ah:
Others from among them… Al-Jumu‘ah, 62:4
which refers to another people who will be prepared through his grace and instruction. This makes it clear that he will have a second advent, and this advent— which is by way of reflection—is now taking place. Thus this is the time of the completion of the propagation of the guidance.”””
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1904
Urdu-ROR, page 105 and page 173
Listen to Dr. Syed Holy Spirit explain it herein (40:21 mark).
Scans


_____________________________________________________________________________________________1906
Who is Qazi Muhammad Zahuruddin Akmal? (1881-1967) – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
–Qazi Muhammad Zahuruddin Akmal is hired as an editor of the Al-Badr by Mufti Muhammad Sadiq (who had just became the editor). He is paid 15 rupees per month and moves to Qadian. He was offered the same deal by the editor of the Al-Hakam, Shaikh Yacub Ali Irfani, however, he turned it down, citing a conflict of interest.
–Qazi Muhammad Zahuruddin Akmal then writes some poetry wherein he calls MGA as greater than Muhammad (saw)(Naozobillah), it gets published in the Ahmadiyya newspaper Al-Badr (See the 1974 NA proceedings page 785 (pdf page 410) and the Al-Badr of Oct. 25th, 1906. The poem is as follows:
Urdu:
“Mohammad phir uttar aaye hain hum main
Aagay say hain barah kar apni shaan main”
English:
“Muhammad has appeared among us again,
He is in greater glory than before.”
Scan work of Al-Badr

PDF of Al-Badr, Oct. 25, 1906
Albadr 25 Oct 1906[1947]
(See the Al-Badr issue of October 25, 1906 and ‘Kya Maulvi Muhammad Ali Sahib Sarasar Ghalt Aur Baybuniyad Ilzam Wapas Lain Gay?’ published in August 13, 1944 issue of Al-Fazl).
Scan from 1944

On Page-4, Akmal says that MGA said “Jazak amula Khair”.
Scans

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1906
Chashma Masihi
We have also recently found MGA (and his team of writers) arguing in 1906, via MGA’s book, “Chashma-Masihi”, that in a famous verse of Surah Fatiha wherein Muslims pray to Allah to be guided, they are actually asking Allah to be guided like the prophets and siddiqin (which is a direct inference to 4:69)(See pages 62-65). Thus, MGA would always connect the ability to achieve prophethood with the daily prayer, which is ridiculous, since prophethood is a gift, not something achieved (see 40:15)(See Muhammad Ali, Prophethood in Islam also). However, in Chashma Masihi, MGA doesn’t quote 4:69, nor have we found this quote in any other book after 1903.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1906-1907, Haqiqatul Wahy, online english edition
The word Pleiades appears 9 times, Chapter 62:3 (62:4) is quoted 4 times.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1908–May
Chashma-e-Ma‘rifat, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 23, pp. 339-341, see also Essence of Islam Vol.3
“””The Prophethood that has been bestowed on me belongs to the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) and is not a new Prophethood. Its only purpose is to make manifest to the world the truth of Islam and to display the righteousness of the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him.)”””
Scan
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1908–October
Brahin-e-Ahmadiyya, part 5, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 21, pp. 19-20, Via Essence of Islam, V-5.
Look, God has caused a whole world to turn towards me;
He found me a non-entity, and gave me universal fame.
He fulfilled all that I desired;
I had nothing, but He gave me plenty.
There is none among the bounties of this world,
That He has not granted me through His grace.
His bounty has transformed a single drop into a river;
I was mere dust, He turned me into the Pleiades.
I was destitute, helpless, unknown, and without any
ability;
No one even knew where Qadian was.
People were simply unaware of this place;
No one knew if I even existed.
Now, you see, how the world has turned this way!
This very Qadian has become focus of every eminent
person.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________1909
Ruhani Khaza’in, vol .18, page 381
“”God Almighty has entered me in Muhammad’s (saw) being, in everything, without even letting it (from me) to have a different name or a different grave…””
Scan

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1909
Ruhani Khaza’in, vol .18, page 384
“”from the hadith, it is clearly derived that in the end times, Prophet Muhammad (saw) will also appear in the world…””
Scan
_____________________________________________________________________________________________1910
Tashheez-ul-Azhan
Page no 5 of vol.5
title : maseeh Maoud is in the end of all). It is necessary that i think it important to show from the writings of Maseeh maoud that Hazrat Maseeh Maoud is in end of all the prophets -Last Maseeh-Last Adam- Last Mujjadad – Last Khalifa – Last Imam – Last Brick- Last Link- -Last way – Last Noor-As to take maseeh maoud in last it is neceesary that i explain and divide the things into five things
Scan
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1915
July
Reference: Al-Fazal 15th July 1915
According to Mirza Bashiruddin Ahmad, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad referred to Muhammad (ﷺ) as “hilal” and to himself as “badr”. So it’s compulsory that the person who denies the second coming (i.e. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad) is a GREATER disbeliever than the one who denies the first coming (i.e. Muhammad ﷺ).
“”As per the decree of Minhum (per Quran 62:3), it has been established that similar to the followers of previous prophets being Naaji (heavenly group), all others are Naari (hellfire group), Kuffar and outside the realm of Islam. And, to include the deniers of the first coming of Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) within the fold of Islam is an insult to him and a mockery of the Quranic verses. Hazrat Masih Maud drew a comparison between the first and second coming, likening them to Hilal and Badr in his Khutbah Ilhamia. This makes it mandatory to acknowledge that the Kuffar of the second coming have surpassed in their kufr those kuffar who rejected the first coming.””
Transliteration:
“”Pas minhum ke ammar se yeh bhi wazeha ho gaya ke jaise pehle nabi ke sahabi sab naaji groh hain or dosre sab naari firqay kaffir or daira e islam se khaarij thehre. Or anhazarat saw ki baas e awwal main aap ke munkro ko daakhil e islam samjhna yeh anhazrat ki hatak or ayatullah se istahzaa hai. Halanke khutbah ilhamia main hazrat masih e maood ne anhazrat ki baase ahwal or saani ki bahmi nishat ko hilal or badr se nisbat se taabir farmayaa hai. Jis se laazam aata hai ke baas e saani ke kaffir kuffr main baas e awwal ke kaffiro se bohat badh kar hain.”””
Scan work


_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1915
http://irshad.org/exposed/tirade.php

Al-Fazl, Qadian, vol.3, No.37, dated 16th September 1915, as cited in Qadiani Mazhab page 207, 9th edition, Lahore
“The entity of the promised Masih (Mirza), in the sight of Allah is the entity of the Holy Prophet (SAW). In other words, in the records of Allah there is no duality or difference between the promised Masih and the Holy Prophet (SAW). Rather they both share the same eminence, the same rank, the same status and the same name . …”.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________1915
Tazkiratul Mahdi, page 307
Scan

______________________________________________________________________________________________
1915
Al-Fazl, Oct-28-1915, V-3, Number 55
“””..the Promised Messiah is the same being of the Prophet Muhammad (saw), in terms of name, work, arrival and status..””
Scan

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1916
Kalimat-ul-Fasl , P. 113, by Mirza Basheer Ahmad Qadiani, 1916
“Every messenger was granted accomplishments and perfections according to his capacity and performance in varying degrees, but the Promised Messiah (Mirza Ghulam) was granted prophethood when he had attained all the accomplishments of the Prophethood of Muhammad(SAW) and was qualified to be called a shadow prophet. Thus, this shadow prophethood did not make the steps of the Promised Messiah lag behind, but it pushed them forward to such an extent that it brought him on equal footing with the holy Prophet(SAW). “
and
“Thus does any doubt remain that God has sent Muhammad (pbuh) again in Qadian to fulfill his promise?” (Kalimat-ul-Fasl by Mirza Basheer Ahmad, Review of Religions, P.105, No.3, Vol.14)
and
“Maseeh Mowud (The Promised Messiah) is not a separate thing from holy Prophet(pbuh), but it is he himself who has come again in this world in incarnated form….. Therefore is there any doubt that God has reincarnated Muhammad again in Qadian?”
(Kalimat-ul-Fasl, P.104-105, Review of Religions, Qadian, March 1915)
Scan
_____________________________________________________________________________________________1923
AI-Fazl Qadian. Vol. 10, No.5. 17th July, 1923, page 9 under the heading of ‘‘Khalifat-ul Masseih Ki Diary“)
1:16:16 time stamp
So they posted his diary from Jun-6-1922 in the Al-Fazl of July-17 1923
Transliteration
“Ye bilkul sahi baat hai ke har shaks taraki kar saktha hai aur bare se Bara darja pa sakta hai. Hata ke Muhammad rasoollallah sallaho aleihai wasalam se bhi barr sakta hai. magar dekhna je hai ke Ahn Hazrat saw is midhan main sab se aage bhar gaye”
Translation
“””….it is absolutely true that every human can excel, and take on the highest level, even be greater than Muhammad (Saw), the Messenger of Allah, however, as we look around, only MGA was able to go past everyone in this regard…”””
The 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa then argues that Lahoris are false because if you cannot become greater than the prophet Muhammad SAW (as Muslims and Lahoris believe) then there’s no point or benefit of Islam. He further states that there’s no praise in such an Islam but it’s only praiseworthy when one has the opportunity to become greater than the prophet SAW and then does (alluding to the Qadiani belief that MGA LA became greater Naudubillah).
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1923
Scan

______________________________________________________________________________________________
1928
Al-Fadl, May 28, 1928, Qadian
“Blessed is the head of the 14th century whence he descended like the moon through darkness. Muhammad has now come reincarnated as Ahmad Mujtaba (Mirza Ghulam) to help the (Muslim) Ummah. The reality of the rebirth became manifest to me when the Mirza declared to be Mustafa (Muhammad) incarnate.”
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1931
Jan-24
Al-Fazl
It is alleged that only MGA properly explained the second coming of Muhammad (Saw).
Scan

_____________________________________________________________________________________________1938
ROR, Dec-5-1938, page 41, V-37, No. 9
“””…in this verse, it is stated that apart from the companions, there will be another group to whom this Messenger will teach the things of religion. That is, the Holy Prophet (saw) will descend once more…”””
Scan
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
1942
Ibn Hazam is mentioned in the ROR of Jan-1942, MGA claimed in Malfuzat that Ibn Hazam claimed to have become Muhammad (Saw) (naozobilah), and MGA was claiming that same.
MGA argues that anyone can become like Muhammad (Saw) (astagfarullah).
The ROR of Feb-1942 reports that Maulana Zillur Rahman gave a speech on Jan-11-1942 in terms of the second coming of Muhammad (Saw)(astagfarullah) at the Ochterloney Monument at the Calcutta Maidan. He said that the second coming of Muhammad (Saw)(astagfarullah) was to be more comprehensive and more extensive from the point of view of propagation of Islam than his first advent. He also said that if the people of Bengal would repent and become Ahmadi, maybe the impending Japanese invasion would be avoided.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1943
The ROR of Dec-1943 alleges the Nawab Siddiq Hassan Khan said that 62:3 referred to the followers of the Mahdi would represent the companions of Muhammad (saw), whereas, the Mahdi himself would represent Muhammad (saw).
____________________________________________________________________________________________
1944
See the Al-Badr issue of October 25, 1906 and ‘Kya Maulvi Muhammad Ali Sahib Sarasar Ghalt Aur Baybuniyad Ilzam Wapas Lain Gay?’ published in August 13, 1944 issue of Al-Fazl).
The poet himself states
“the aforementioned couplet is in great respect in the Court of Muhammad Mustafa (saw) (the Chosen One). God, who knows the hidden secrets hidden within the hearts, is witness that even my subconscious never considered any personality to be in any way comparable to the Seal of the Prophet(saw). Allah the Almighty knows better that by writing this couplet – ‘and he is greater in status than before’—I never imagined that I was bringing anyone in comparison with the Holy Prophet(saw). Rather, what I said was that Muhammad(saw) has descended—that is his second coming has taken place. This is the belief of all Ahmadi Muslims. It is neither by the way of incarnation nor by the transmigration of souls, but is the descent which is his spiritual manifestation as Allah has mentioned in the Holy Quran :
Surely every hour that follows is better for thee than the one that precedes.(Chapter 93 verse 5)
By virtue of durud sharif and noble deeds, not only is such a believer blessed, but the status of the Holy Prophet(saw) is also raised and would continue to be raised because there is no limit to God’s bounties. Therefore, I have said only that the blessings and munificence of Muhammad Mustafa(saw) are descending once again, and that his descent can only mean that his glory is being manifested more than ever before. No other person is mentioned in this couplet, in fact, the final couple of the poem is:
“that is Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad(as) has attained the status of the Promised Messiah as a consequence of his complete submission to, and perfect followership of, the holy Prophet Muhammad(saw) (Al Fazl, August 13, 1944).
In the time of 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa, he removed this couplet and apologized and Musleh Maud said some people can misunderstand this. The 3rd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa said if it was read in the presence of MGA the poet would be removed from the Jamaat. The 2nd Qadiani-Ahmadi Khalifa has made it clear that anyone who thinks that MGA is greater is a disbeliever.
On Page-4, Akmal says that MGA said “Jazak amula Khair”.


______________________________________________________________________________________________
1974
Mirza Nasir Ahmad at the National Assembly
22:36 time stamp
At the 1974 NA (National Assembly), Mirza Nasir Ahmad denied that the poem of Akmal was read in front of MGA, that was disproven, they Mirza Nasir Ahmad denied that it was published in MGA’s time, that was also disproven by Yahya Bakhtiar (22:36 time stamp), and it was proven that Mirza Nasir Ahmad contradicted himself.
Scan

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1980
The Jan-Apr-1980 edition of the Muslim Sunrise was edited by Dr. Khalil Ahmad Nasir only. It’s unclear as to who was the missionary-in-charge in the USA. Dr. Khalil Ahmad Nasir’s private address is given out for those who have questions about the subject matter, all questions about the business affairs of the Muslim Sunrise are addressed at 2141 Leroy Place, N.W., Washington D.C., at the American Fazl Mosque (which was the headquarters of the USA jamaat). In this editorial, Dr. Khalil Ahmad Nasir writes about the visit of the Pope to the USA in 1979 as well as Dr. Abdus Salam winning the Nobel Prize in 1979. A speech by Zafrullah Khan which was given in Oct-1979 at the University of Calgary (department of religious studies) is reproduced. Zafrullah Khan quotes 62:3 and alleges that Muhammad (Saw) was destined to come back into this world. There is also an essay by Abdullah A. Odeh (on Jihad)(from the Odeh family of Kababir, Haifa, Israel). An essay about the Shroud of Turin is also given. Ahmadiyya locations around the world are given: the Gambia, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Liberia, Mauritius, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, Canada, Guyana, Suriname, Trinidad, Burma, Fiji, India, Indonesia, Japan, Pakistan, Philippines, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Denmark, Germany, Holland, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. They also give 5 Ahmadiyya locations in the USA, 2141 Leroy PL, N.W. Washington D.C., 637 Randolph Street, Dayton, Ohio, 45408, 1064 Union Street, Brooklyn, N.Y., 112225 and 3336 Maybelle Way, Oakland, CA 94619.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1988
In the famous 5-volume commentary of Malik Ghulam Farid (MGF), which was published in 1988. MGF admits that this verse only means, that the message of Muhammad (Saw) wasn’t only for the Arabs, it was universal, however, he again asserted that MGA was the second coming of Muhammad (Saw)(nauzobillah).
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1998
https://youtu.be/HUaQdS6ncDU?si=IOPSvKXaS_YKcVp1
In 1998 (Nov), Mirza Tahir Ahmad alleges that 61:7 (61:8 in the Kadiani Koran) is about MGA, he also commented on 62:3 of the Quran (62:4 in the Kadiani Koran).
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
2025
A’ina-e-Kamalat-e-Islam, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 5, page 220
23:15 timestamp
MGA addresses the issue that Muslims say “Akhireena Minhum is plural” in terms of 62:3 (62:4 in the Kadiani Koran). MGA then falsely argues that Muhammad (Saw) applied it to only one person (this is a lie), Salman Farsi. MGA then argues that this “one person” will be born in an era wherein there are philosophical differences. People would be in a state of extreme weakness. MGA then argues that the Quran called “Abraham” (as) as ummah (many people), however, Abraham (as) was only one person. Razi says further that a great Ummah will be raised, not just one person.
Scan

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Ibn Katheer on 62:3
Ibn Kathir quotes a Hadith about the prophet SAW mentioning all the men and women from his ummah entering Jannah without being questioned, then quoting the verse “wa aakhareena…” (62:3) and the Hadith explains that this refers to all the remaining ones from among the ummah that will enter into Jannah… nothing to do with MGA, Ahmadiyya or a future prophet whatsoever.
Scan work

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Qurtubi has several Sahaba and Tabi’in telling us that the Aakhareen refer to all Muslims from the non Arabs, the Tabi’in and all those entering Islam until the day of judgment…
For instance, Ibn Umar RA and Saeed bin Jubair RA say that this refers to al Aajam (non Arabs)
Ikrimah RA says that they are the Tabi’un (generation of Muslims after the Sahaba RA)
Muhajid the Tabi’ says that this refers to all the people, meaning after the Arabs.
Scan

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
The famous Hadith of Ibn Umar RA is here on Tabari, where he **recites 62:3 and tells the Tabi’un “fa antum hum” which means that you are them, the Aakhareen
Scan

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Here we have Ibn Zayd and Muqatil bin Hayyan from Tafsir Qurtubi continued, saying that this refers to all the Muslims entering Islam until the day of judgment
Scan

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
In Tafsir Tabari, the earliest Tafsir:
Abu Huraira narrates the Hadith of Salman Farsi and then see what it says… they all say that akhareen means all the people that enter Islam until the day of judgment…
they say it means the non arabs (al aajam)… Ibn Umar even told the Tabi’een that they are the Aakhareen
Scan

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Is the Arab Muslim better than the non-Arab Muslim? – Islam Question & Answer (islamqa.info)
Iqtida’ Al Sirat Al Mustaqim : who knows : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
Is the Arab Muslim better than the non-Arab Muslim?
Question
My question is:
Why did the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) curse the non-Arabs, the Persians and Byzantines? Didn’t many of them become Muslim after the conquest of Syria and Iraq, and even as far as China? Is the hadith proven to be sound and of a high level of authenticity? Why did he not say, O Allah, curse the disbelievers, and leave it at that? Is the Arab Muslim considered to be better than the non-Arab Muslim? I am from Syria and am not fully Arab; does this mean that my Islam is less than the Islam of those who are fully Arab among you? Were there any of the Sahaabah who were not Arabs?
Answer
Praise be to Allah.
Firstly:
We have explained previously that Islam does not pay attention to differences in colour, race or lineage. All people are descended from Adam, and Adam was created from dust. Rather according to Islam, superiority of some people over others is measured by faith and taqwa (piety, mindfulness of Allah), doing what Allah has enjoined and refraining from what Allah has forbidden.
At-Tirmidhi (3270) narrated from Ibn ‘Umar that the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) addressed the people on the day of the conquest of Makkah and said: “O people, verily Allah has taken away from you the arrogance of Jaahiliyyah and its pride in forefathers. People are of two types: righteous and pious, who are dear to Allah, and doomed evildoers, who are insignificant before Allah. People are the descendants of Adam, and Allah created Adam from dust. Allah says (interpretation of the meaning): ‘O mankind, indeed We have created you from male and female and made you peoples and tribes that you may know one another. Indeed, the most noble of you in the sight of Allah is the most righteous of you. Indeed, Allah is Knowing and Acquainted’ [al-Hujuraat 49:13].”
Classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh at-Tirmidhi.
Ahmad (22978) narrated from Abu Nadrah: Someone who heard the khutbah of the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) on the second of the days of at-Tashreeq told me that he said: “O people, verily your Lord is One and your father is one. Verily there is no superiority of an Arab over a non-Arab or of a non-Arab over an Arab, or of a red man over a black man, or of a black man over a red man, except in terms of taqwa. Have I conveyed the message?” They said: The Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) has conveyed the message.
Classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in as-Saheehah (6/199).
Al-Bukhaari (4898) and Muslim (2546) narrated that Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) said: We were sitting with the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) and Soorat al-Jumu‘ah was revealed to him: “And [He has sent the Prophet to] others of them who have not yet joined them” [al-Jumu‘ah 62:3]. I said: Who are they, O Messenger of Allah? He did not answer him until he had asked three times. Among us was Salmaan al-Faarisi and the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) put his hand on Salmaan and said: “If faith were at the Pleiades, some men from among these people [the Persians] would get it.”
Al-Bukhaari (5990) and Muslim (215) narrated that ‘Amr ibn al-‘Aas said: I heard the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) say, out loud and not secretly: “The family of Abu Fulaan (the Father of So and so) are not my friends. My friends are Allah and the righteous believers.”
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) was speaking of a clan that was closely related to him, and pointed out that mere lineage did not make them his friends; rather his friends were Allah and the righteous believers of all backgrounds.
End quote from Iqtida’ as-Siraat al-Mustaqeem (144).
See also the answers to questions no. 12391 and 3793.
Secondly:
Imam Ahmad (17195) narrated: Haywah ibn Shurayh told us: Baqiyyah told us, Baheer ibn Sa‘d told me, from Khaalid ibn Ma‘daan, from ‘Utbah ibn ‘Abd that he said: A man said: O Messenger of Allah, curse the people of Yemen for they are tough fighters and great in number, and their fortresses are well fortified. He said: “No.” Then the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) cursed the non-Arabs, and the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “If they come to you, with their women and carrying their children on their shoulders (then show kindness to them), for they are of me and I am of them.”
The commentators on Musnad al-Imam Ahmad (ar-Risaalah edn., 29/194) said:
Its isnad is da‘eef (weak). Baqiyyah – who is the son of al-Waleed – is mudallis [i.e., he engaged in tadlees, which is when a narrator narrates a hadith that he did not hear directly from his shaykh, without mentioning the name of the third party from whom he did hear it, using wording that may or may not give the impression that he heard it directly], and narrated by saying ‘an (“from”, without clearly stating that he heard the hadith himself from another narrator). His hadith cannot be accepted unless it is clearly stated that each stage of the isnad that one narrator heard it directly from another.
It was also narrated by Ibn Abi ‘Aasim in al-Aahaad wa’l-Mathaani (2280); at-Tabaraani in al-Kabeer (17/304) and in ash-Shaamiyyeen (1139), via ‘Abd al-Wahhaab ibn Najdah al-Hooti; and by Ibn Abi ‘Aasim (2280) from Hishaam ibn ‘Ammaar, both of whom narrated it from Baqiyyah ibn al-Waleed with this isnaad. In ash-Shaamiyyeen it mentions Ismaa‘eel ibn ‘Ayyaash instead of Baqiyyah, and we think it most likely that this is an error on the part of the copyist. End quote.
Even if we assume that the hadith is saheeh (sound), it is to be understood as referring to those among them who are deserving of being cursed, namely the disbelievers, evildoers and their ilk. These people were only singled out for mention because in most cases they were disbelievers and were misguided, especially at that time.
Thirdly:
In the answer to question no. 115934, we noted that Ahl as-Sunnah wa’l-Jamaa‘ah are unanimously agreed that the Arabs are superior to others in terms of descent and lineage, and that regarding the Arabs as superior is in general terms, and does not apply at the individual level. So a non-Arab who is pious and righteous is better than an Arab who falls short in his duties to Allah, may He be exalted.
Therefore an Arab Muslim cannot be superior to a non-Arab Muslim just because he is an Arab. Rather superiority is based on taqwa (piety, mindfulness of Allah). So whoever is more mindful of Allah and obedient to Him is better than his counterpart, regardless of whether he is an Arab or a non-Arab.
So the fact that you are not fully Arab does not mean that you are less than one who is fully Arab in terms of virtue and status simply because of that. As is clear from what we have mentioned above, the real standard is faith and righteous deeds.
Fourthly:
There were some of the Sahaabah who were not Arabs, such as Salmaan and Miqsam, who were Persians, Bilaal al-Habashi (who was Ethiopian) , Zunayrah ar-Roomiyyah (who was Byzantine), Barakah al-Habashiyyah (who was Ethiopian) and others such as Suhaym the freed slave of Banu’l-Has-haas, Ya‘eesh the slave of Banu’l-Mugheerah, Khaalid ibn al-Hawaari, and Tamaam al-Habashi.
Al-Haakim (8194) narrated that Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) said: The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “I saw (in a dream) many black sheep who were joined by many white sheep.” They said: How did you interpret it, O Messenger of Allah? He said: The non-Arabs will join you in your religion and your lineage.” They said: The non-Arabs, O Messenger of Allah? He said: “If faith were at the Pleiades, some men from among the non-Arabs would get it.”
Classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in as-Saheehah (1018).
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
The confirmation of that is seen in the many Persians, both free men and freed slaves, among the Taabi‘een and those who came after them, such as al-Hasan, Ibn Sireen, ‘Ikrimah the freed slave of Ibn ‘Abbaas, and others, and those who came after that of people who were prominent in faith, religious commitment and knowledge, until these prominent figures became better than most of the Arabs.
Similarly, among types of non-Arabs, such as the Ethiopians, Byzantines, Turks and others, there are people who excelled in faith and religious commitment, too many to be counted, which is something well known to the scholars, because true virtue is in following that with which Allah sent Muhammad (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) of faith and knowledge, both inwardly and outwardly. So the more strongly a person adheres to it, the better he is, and virtue is only in terms of the praiseworthy qualities mentioned in the Qur’an and Sunnah, such as Islam, faith, righteousness, taqwa, knowledge, righteous deeds, ihsaan and so on. There is no virtue in a person simply being an Arab or non-Arab, or being black or white, or being a city dweller or desert dweller.
End quote from Iqtidaa’ as-Siraat al-Mustaqeem (p. 145)
And Allah knows best.
Scans from Al-Mustadrak ala al-Sahihayn by Al Hakim


______________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s
https://quran.ksu.edu.sa/tafseer/katheer/sura62-aya3.html
Why did Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claim to be the second coming of Muhammad (saw)(nauzobillah)?
Ahmadiyya leadership began twisting the Quranic verse in 2:4 in 1915
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad on 7:35 of the Quran (7:36 in the Kadiani Koran)
“Haqiqat Un Nubuwwat” (1915) by Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad, some quotes and data
“Al-Qaul-ul-Fasl” by the Khalifa, Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad–early-1915
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/06/27/do-ahmadis-believe-in-the-same-kalima-as-muslims/
Click to access splitahmadiyyamovement.pdf
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/03/03/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-got-stroked-during-salaat/
http://wiki.qern.org/ahmadiyya/organisations/qadiani-claimants/abdullah-timapuri
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/13/what-is-arbain-a-book-by-mga-and-his-team-of-writers/
https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/06/27/do-ahmadis-believe-in-the-same-kalima-as-muslims/
Who is Qazi Muhammad Zahuruddin Akmal? (1881-1967) – ahmadiyyafactcheckblog
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Tags
#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiyyaPersecution #trueislam #messiahhascome #exahmadimovement #amongtheothers




38 Pingback