Search

ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Thorough research work on the Ahmadiyya Movement, #ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyat #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #messiahhascome

Month

May 2018

Review of Religions, August of 1932, “Factors which contribute to the success of a new religion and their application to the Ahmadiyya Movement”


Intro

My team and I have found an old edition of the Review of Religions (ROR) from August of 1932.  Malik Ghulam Farid was the editor in those days, he went on to write the 5-volume official commentary of the Quran, which can be found here.  Malik Ghulam Farid (1897–1977), was a notable Ahmadiyya scholar. He was deputed the task of preparing the 5 Volume The English Commentary of the Holy Quran,[1] in 1942, by Mirza Mahmood Ahmad, the second Khalifa.[2] He published the said Commentary in 1962. Later, in 1969, Malik published the Abridged Edition.[3] Malik Ghulam Farid also produced a Dictionary of the Holy Quran, but it could not be published in his lifetime. He died in 1977.[4]

The essay itself
Ahmadi’s claim that Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad wrote this essay and many others, however, that’s a lie, he rarely wrote anything. Just like MGA, he had his resident mullahs write everything, he was simply their figure head. This is another case of exactly that. In fact, Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad claims to have written a Tafsir of the Quran, however, that’s a lie, it was really written by his Mullahs.
Continue reading “Review of Religions, August of 1932, “Factors which contribute to the success of a new religion and their application to the Ahmadiyya Movement””

Ahmadi’s edited “A’ina Kamalat Islam” and didn’t leave notes

Intro
Dear readers, we have caught Ahmadiyya leadership editing the writings of MGA many times.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Dard tells us…

Dard tells us that the marriage of Muhammadi Begum happened on April 7th, 1892, see page 334. He also tells us that her father, Mirza Ahmad Baig died Sep 30th, 1892. However, he doesn’t venture to explain the discrepency. Further, in the original edition of “A’ina Kamalat Islam”, MGA and his team of writers wrote that Ahmad Baig died in 4 months, in the proceeding edition, 6 months was written and no notes explaining the change.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________The scans

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related essays

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/25/ruhani-khazain-the-breakdown/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/?s=muhammadi

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/10/ahmadiyya-leadership-admitted-that-mga-used-lots-of-editors-and-ghost-writers/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/08/even-in-1907-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-still-lusting-for-his-niece-muhammadi-begum/

http://wiki.qern.org/mirza-ghulam-ahmad/biography/muhammadi-begum

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/06/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-had-a-sister-that-was-also-crazy-and-had-crazy-dreams-just-like-mga/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/06/27/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-offering-bribes-just-to-get-muhammadi-begum/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/01/13/mirza-sultan-ahmad-mgas-eldest-son/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/09/who-is-mirza-ghulam-muhi-ud-din-mirza-ghulam-ahmads-paternal-uncle-died-in-1866/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/24/mirza-imam-ud-din-the-cousin-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/16/the-punjab-chiefs-by-lepel-griffin-1890-edition-doesnt-even-mention-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/12/11/who-is-mirza-nizam-ud-din-1845-the-first-cousin-of-mirza-ghulam-ahmad/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/01/10/new-data-on-muhammadi-begum-found-2017/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/05/24/mirza-sultan-muhammad-and-wife-muhammadi-begum-lived-and-died-as-muslim-had-5-sons-and-two-doughters/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/07/29/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-wanted-muhammadi-begums-husband-to-be-killed/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/05/14/mirza-sultan-muhammad-from-patti-district-lahore-married-muhammadi-begum-mgas-niece-daughter-not-mga/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/01/10/new-data-on-muhammadi-begum-found-2017/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/02/14/in-terms-of-muhammadi-begum-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-guaranteeing-that-she-would-eventually-taqdir-e-mubra-be-married-to-him/

https://www.alislam.org/library/book/haqiqatul-wahi/

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

 

NA of Pakistan passes resolution to rename QAU’s Abdus Salam Centre to al-Khazini Department

Intro
The mullahs aka employees of Ahmadiyya INC are working day and night to further their agenda, they are ordered by the Mirza family to find unique ways of marketing Ahmadiyya.  What Ahmadi’s don’t know or don’t want to know is that in 1979, General Zia Ul Haq awarded with Highest civilian award Nishan-e-Imtiaz in 1979.

Also read this: https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/26/dr-abdus-salaam-liked-white-women-alcohol-and-a-british-lifestyle/

The story

The National Assembly on Thursday passed a resolution to change the name of the National Centre for Physics at the Quaid-i-Azam University (QAU) from the Professor Abdus Salam Centre for Physics to al-Khazini Department, after Byzantine-origin astronomer Abu al-Fath Abd al-Rahman Mansur al-Khazini.

The resolution was tabled by PML-N lawmaker Captain Muhammad Safdar, who is former prime minister Nawaz Sharif’s son-in-law and aspiring PML-N leader Maryam Nawaz’s husband.

Nuclear physicist Abdus Salam hailed from the Ahmadi community, whose members constitute a minority in Pakistan. Its members have faced persecution and were declared non-Muslims through a constitutional amendment in 1974.

Last year, during an anti-Ahmadi tirade on the floor of the National Assembly, Safdar had criticised the renaming of the QAU physics centre after Professor Dr Abdus Salam — the country’s first Nobel laureate — on the grounds that the scientist followed the Ahmadi faith.

The physics centre had been named after Abdus Salam in December 2016 following the approval of then prime minister Nawaz Sharif, who had also approved a grant for five annual fellowships for Pakistani PhD students.

The fellowship programme was called the Professor Abdus Salam Fellowship. It is unclear whether its renaming is also on the PML-N’s agenda.

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #ahmadiyyat #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

The British Government banned Ahmadiyya medicines in 1899

Intro
Ahmadiyya medicines are bogus. Going back to 1889. Nowadays, the Mirza family is still up to the same thing…selling fake medicines, specifically homeopathy. We have found some specifics about how the British Government had to step in and ban Ahmadiyya medicines in the 1899 era.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Walter re-confirms that the British Govt banned Marham-i-Esa and other Ahmadiyya medicines

In Oct of 1899, Ahmadiyya medicines were banned, however, Ahmadiyya leadership seems to have filed an appeal, however, the appeal was rejected and the ban was held up in 1900.  

See page 42.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________Links and Related Essays

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/17/nooruddin-treated-mirza-ghulam-ahmad-for-impotency-and-many-others-with-opium/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/05/03/the-ahmadiya-movement-by-h-a-walter-religious-life-of-india-series-new-york-oxford-university-press-1918/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/02/08/mirza-basheer-uddin-mahmud-ahmad-was-poisoned-as-a-child-then-had-many-mental-issues/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/03/30/mga-and-his-team-mixed-sauternes-wine-with-his-foods-and-medicines-at-qadian/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/03/a-newspaper-the-lancet-calls-mga-a-blasphemous-idiot-1898/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/05/03/the-british-government-banned-ahmadiyya-medicines-in-1899/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/19/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-and-plommers-wine-shop/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/07/mgas-teachers-were-opium-addicts-2/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/14/mga-looked-like-an-opium-addict/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/03/mgas-tried-to-cure-plague-in-british-india-with-a-super-opium-medicine-that-didnt-work/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/05/07/mirza-tahir-ahmad-glosses-over-the-opium-issue/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/06/21/tiryaq-e-ilahi-never-worked-on-anyone-it-was-just-a-super-opium-drug/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/10/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-used-poison-opium-and-wine-in-his-medicines/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/14/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-high-in-opium-247/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/09/22/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-overdosing-on-opium-everyday/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/12/22/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-liked-his-opium-sprinkled-into-his-lassi/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/08/13/mga-lied-about-his-opium-use/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/11/21/ahmadiyya-homeopathy-is-an-obvious-fraud/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/08/16/ahmadiyya-leadership-was-selling-weird-medicines-in-1939-which-claimed-to-guarantee-a-son-to-any-man/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/04/25/was-mirza-ghulam-ahmads-wife-a-concubine-aka-laundi-of-noorudin/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2018/11/26/mirza-ghulam-loved-to-have-multiple-women-on-his-bed/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/25/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-was-addicted-to-paan-beetle-leef/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/11/16/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-suffered-from-hysteria-and-convulsions-and-his-wife-and-his-son-mirza-basheer-uddin-mahmud-ahmad-the-2nd-khalifa/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/08/19/mirza-ghulam-ahmad-prescribed-alcohol-for-ahmadis-to-take/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/07/30/what-is-zadham-e-ishq-aka-the-love-potion/

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/12/03/a-newspaper-the-lancet-calls-mga-a-blasphemous-idiot-1898/

______________________________________________________________________________________________
Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog #nolifewithoutkhalifa #AhmadiMosqueattack #AhmadiyyaPersecution #Mosqueattack #trueislam #atifmian

 

Ahmadi’s claim that Surah Fatiha has a mention of MGA, specifically in the Quran 1:6 (1:7, in the Qadiani Quran)

Intro
After Nooruddin died in March of 1914, the argument on the nature of the prophethood of MGA intensified. The Lahori-Ahmadi’s and the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s differed on the exact nature of MGA’s prophethood. However, as soon as Khwaja Kamaluddin returned from England (Nov-1914) he gave a speech which was turned into the an urdu-only book, “Ikhtalayfaat-e-Silsilaa-e-Ahmadiyya kay Usbaab”. Khwaja Kamaluddin’s quotes “Tuhfatul-Muluk” (A Present to Kings) by the Khalifa, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad which seems to have been written in the summer of 1914. This book was published on Dec 24th, 1914, during the Qadiani Jalsa. It was the first ever book about the split in the Ahmadiyya Movement, in it, Kwaja Kamaluddin emphatically died the prophethood of MGA and takfir against non-Ahmadi’s. The Khalifa, Mirza Basheer ud Din Mahmud Ahmad wrote Qaul al-Fasl in January of 1915 and Haqiqatun Nubuwwat in March of 1915, wherein he quoted 7:35, 4:69, 2:5 and 61:6 as verses from the Quran wherein MGA was explained as a prophet to come. MGA had never used these verse to argue pro-prophethood. Nevertheless, Muhammad Ali responded in (December of 1915) and wrote “Prophethood in Islam”  and ripped the Qadiani belief that MGA was an Ummati-Nabi. These conversations would continue uptil 1923, then they died off for about 10 years. With that being said, we have found an early and rare english translation and commentary of the Quran from 1915, published by the Qadiani branch of Ahmadis. In this commentary, they assert that the Messiah was promised in 1:7, which is a total lie. Later on, all Ahmadi commentaries wrote the same. In this english commentary of the Quran, the Khalifa connected 2:4 with 1:6 and 62:3, it was published in 1915.  english-translation-mirza-mahmood-1915.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1901

Even MGA was connecting 1:6 (1:7 in the Qadiani Quran), with 4:69 and the continuation of prophethood (see “Correction of an Error” [1901]).

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

The scan work

Download it here—https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/english-translation-mirza-mahmood-1.pdf

english-translation-mirza-mahmood-1915


Tafsir Ibn Kathir on 1:7
http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=63&Itemid=35
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Links and Related Essay’s

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/11/21/in-1914-mirza-bashir-ahmad-simply-called-mga-a-mujadid-not-a-prophet/

The Qadiani-Ahmadi’s declared that MGA was “Ismuhu-Ahmad” in Quran 61:6, not Muhammad (Saw), then changed it later

Ahmadis lie about 7:35 of the Quran

The concept of the Ummati-Nabi

MGA’s age-prophecy discussed in the ROR of March-1914

The Pagham-e-Sulh of July 1914 proves that even the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s were unsure how to categorize MGA’s prophethood immediately after the split

Who is Fateh Muhammad Sial?

Who is Mirza Bashir Ahmad?

Barahin-e- Ahmadiyyah volume 5, was re-published in 1914, it was the second edition

“Eik Ghalti Ka Izala” aka “Correction of an Error” was re-published on March-1-1914

Muhammad Ali, the eventual Lahori-Ahmadi was always against Takfir, whereas the family of MGA was not (1914)

Are Ahmadis the fastest growing Islamic sect? The World Christian Encyclopedia opened and evaluated

In 1914, Mirza Bashir Ahmad simply called MGA a Mujadid, not a Prophet—Review of Religions of June 1914

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fateh_Muhammad_Sial

Who is Qazi Muhammad Zahuruddin Akmal? (1881–1967)

Qadian in August of 1947 during partition, the invasion of Sikhs and Ahmadi’s were issued tanks by the British

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2016/10/20/tasheeshazul-adhan-was-a-magazine-founded-by-mahmud-ahmad-in-1913/

In June-July of 1908, Mirza Mahmud Ahmad wrote that the ‘Promised Son’ would not be actual son of Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad

“My beliefs about non-Ahmadi Muslims”, dated 18 August 1911 by Khwaja Kamal-uddin

Professor Muhammad Ilyas (Elias) Burney: Exhaustive Contemporary Study on the Ahmadiyya Sect from a highly respected academic

http://alhafeez.org/rashid/abuse/abuse.htm

Khwaja Kamal-Ud-Din Prevents MGA From Being Jailed (1904)

When Khwaja Kamaluddin arrived in England (1912)

“Haqiqat Un Nubuwwat” (1915) by Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad, some quotes and data

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad lost his court case vs. Karam din 1904, but won on appeal

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad vs. Maulvi Karam Din–Court Case 1903–1905, references from the 2009 edition of Tadhkirah and some other sources

“My beliefs about non-Ahmadi Muslims”, dated 18 August 1911 by Khwaja Kamal-uddin

Tashhiz al-Azhan was a Magazine founded by Mahmud Ahmad in 1906, quotes and background info

“A Muslim is only he who accepts all those appointed by God” by Mirza Bashir-uddin Mahmud Ahmad, April 1911

The Causes of Internal Dissensions in the Ahmadiyya Movement, By Khwaja Kamaluddin, 1914

“”Prophethood among the Followers of Muhammad”” by Maulana Sayyid Muhammad Ahsan of Amroha, Oct-1913, in Tashhizul Azhan

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/08/03/some-quotes-from-mirza-basheer-uddin-mahmud-ahmads-magazine-tashhiz-al-ahzan/

Tashhiz al-Azhan was a Magazine founded by Mahmud Ahmad in 1906, quotes and background info

“”Prophethood among the Followers of Muhammad”” by Maulana Sayyid Muhammad Ahsan of Amroha, Oct-1913, in Tashhizul Azhan

Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad had 20+ children with 7 wives

Click to access A-Misconception-Removed.pdf

https://books.google.com/books?id=3QjPDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA686&lpg=PA686&dq=Ummati+Nabi&source=bl&ots=fk0uRPujFk&sig=ACfU3U1SDQymXhEopA2JDlz3j068ocTtWA&hl=en&ppis=_e&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiUpsO58ODoAhVFsp4KHZOuDvI4ChDoATAEegQIDBA3#v=onepage&q=Ummati%20Nabi&f=false

Muhammad (saw) is prophet #124,000, Esa (as) is prophet number #123,999

“Haqiqat Un Nubuwwat” (1915) by Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad, some quotes and data

“Al-Qaul-ul-Fasl” by the Khalifa, Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad–early-1915

Maulvi Sanuallah acknowledges that MGA claimed prophethood in Nov 1901

MGA explains how he misunderstood his prophethood in 1880 and was confused for 20+ years

Ahmadiyya and 4:69, everything you need to know

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/08/03/ahmadiyya-scholars-wrote-about-469-in-1908/

Maulvi Sanuallah acknowledges that MGA claimed prophethood in Nov 1901

The Causes of Internal Dissensions in the Ahmadiyya Movement, By Khwaja Kamaluddin, 1914

“”Prophethood among the Followers of Muhammad”” by Maulana Sayyid Muhammad Ahsan of Amroha, Oct-1913, in Tashhizul Azhan

An Ahmadi claimed prophethood in late-1901 or early 1902, and was boycotted by Ahmadis–Chiragh Din of Jammu (Jamooni)

Maulvi Abdul Karim claims Prophethood per MGA, Maulvi Amrohi disagrees

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2019/01/13/what-is-arbain-a-book-by-mga-and-his-team-of-writers/

In 1891, when MGA made his big claims, he denied prophethood–Mufti Sadiq was heavily involved

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was accused of claiming prophethood in the 1879–1884 era

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was considered a Kafir in 1884, before his wildest claims

Some rare books from the 1901-1902 era, which refute MGA’s claim to prophethood

Maulvi Sanuallah acknowledges that MGA claimed prophethood in Nov 1901

Mirza Sultan Ahmad, Son Of Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, On Finality Of Prophethood

“Eik Ghalti Ka Izala” aka “Correction of an Error” was re-published on March-1-1914

https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2017/01/16/hani-tahir-explains-mirza-ghulam-ahmads-prophethood-and-pre-1901-vs-post-1901/

A few months after becoming Khalifa, Mirza Mahmud Ahmad waffled on his father’s prophethood

Do Ahmadis believe in the same Kalima as Muslims?

MGA explains how he misunderstood his prophethood in 1880 and was confused for 20+ years

Noorudin didn’t care if Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed even law-bearing prophethood

______________________________________________________________________________________________Tags

#ahmadiyya #ahmadiyyatrueislam #ahmadiapartheid #Ahmadiyyat #rabwah #qadian #meetthekhalifa #ahmadiyyat #muslimsforpeace #ahmadiyyafactcheckblog

Ahmadiyya leadership began twisting the Quranic verse in 2:4 in 1915

Intro
Dear readers, as we all know, Ahmadiyya leadership and specifically Mirza Basheer-uddin Mahmud Ahmad began twisting additional verses of the Quran after the split of 1914. These verses had to do with the continuation of prophethood. It should be noted that MGA quoted Chapter 2:1–7 in the Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya Vol. 3, however, he didn’t comment specifically on 2:4 (2:5 in the Ahmadi Quran). It was in 1915, with the publishing of the Khalifa’s 2 books, “Qaul al-Fasl” and “Haqiqatun Nubuwat” wherein additional verses of the Quran were used to argue for the prophethood of MGA. In these books, they used 1:6 and connected it with 4:69 (4:70 in the Qadiani Quran)(as MGA did in 1906), as they argued that any Muslim could become a prophet. They were indirectly arguing that prophethood in the Muslim ummah could be achieved, which is against the quran. They also presented 7:35, 62:3 2:4, and 61:6. They even published an english commentary of the Quran in 1915, wherein they translated and commentated on 1:6 and 2:4 and presented MGA’s prophethood as inevitable. Watch a video where by Imam Noman Ali Khan, wherein he briefly discusses the #ahmadiya deception on 2:4. We have collected all the instances of the phrase Unzila herein, feel free to read it.

This cannot be allowed to pass unchallenged. Why did the Qadiani Jamaat argue for decades that “al-akhirat” here means “the revelation which is yet to come”.

Read the following page in the 5-volume English commentary of Malik Ghulam Farid:

http://www.alislam.org/quran/tafseer/?page=35&region=E1

Read starting from 2nd column, para beginning: “The word al-akhirat (what is yet to come)”. He says that al-akhirat here means the coming of the Promised Messiah.

The Qadiani Jamaat even concocted a story which attributed this explanation to the Promised Messiah. Read it here on the Qadiani Jamaat website, starting at the words: “Aaj meray dil mein yeh khiyal paida hua” (“Today it occurred to me …”).

According to this concocted report, first published in 1915, the Promised Messiah said that Al-Akhirat in this verse means the revelation that was to come after the Holy Prophet Muhammad.

After doing all this for decades, they should explain why they were wrong before, and what made them change to the traditional Muslim understanding of this word in this verse.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ Continue reading “Ahmadiyya leadership began twisting the Quranic verse in 2:4 in 1915”

The Qadiani branch of Ahmadi’s published an english translation and commentary of the Quran in 1915

Intro
In December of 1915 (See ROR of Nov and Dec-1915), the Qadiani-Ahmadi’s published a short commentary of the first 2 chapters of the Quran in english. They covered 2:4 (2:5 in the Qadiani Quran) and claimed that the last sentence was translated as, “the revelations to come”. This would become the basis of the Qadiani belief that the revelations of MGA were mentioned in the Quran. Even the Muslim World , vol . 6,no. 2 (1916), p. 174; Khan, “English Translations”, p. 89 posted an entry on the Qadiani Quran by R. F. McNeile, “The Koran According to Ahmad”.
This commentary was created to counteract the Lahori-Ahmadi’s. Muhammad Ali and the Lahori-Ahmadi’s published their famous commentary in 1917 and from London, England, the Nation of Islam used this commentary to create their kufr. The Feb-1918 edition of the ROR reports that Mufti Muhammad Sadiq helped in preparing this english translation, of 30 parts (only 1 part had been published by then)(this was published in a newspaper in Ventnor). The ROR of May-1918 reports that the Anjuman Tarraqi Islam published this english translation of the Quran.

Per Ahmadiyya sources 25 years later, in 1942, the 2nd Khalifa ordered Malik Ghulam Farid to create urdu and english commentaries which would be ascribed to the Khalifa. They begun to be published in early 1947, the Khalifa signed off on the introduction on 2-28-1947, thus it was published in late February from Qadian, British-India. An english commentary also appeared in 1947.

The introduction of these commentaries are now a book called, “Introduction to the study of the Holy Quran”. This was the first instance of the Ahmadiyya movement (Lahori or Qadiani) arguing that there were humans on Earth before Adam (as) of the Quran arrived and were Jinn. Ahmadiyya sources claim that “Tafseer-e-Kabeer” was split into two parts. The first volume of “Tafseer-e-Kabeer”, which was nine chapters along with an introduction appeared in February of 1947 and from Qadian, British-India. Volume 1 part I, containing the introduction & the first two chapters (now Vol. 1), was reprinted in 1964, and volume 1 part II, dealing with the next seven chapters (now Vol. 2) was reprinted in 1965 in Pakistan. These Tafseer’s were most likely written by the paid Mullahs who worked directly for the Khalifa. The Khalifa didn’t have a full commentary written on the Quran, only about half, per the introduction of the 1988 edition of the 5 volume commentary by Malik Ghulam Farid (died in 1977), Mirza Basheer ud Din’s “Tafsir-e-Kabir” only covered Chapters 1, 2, 10-29 and 78–114, he missed Chapters 3-9 and 30-77, he missed 53 chapters and purposely, since most of the controversial verses about Jesus and prophethood were contained therein, as well as the famous verse of Ismuhu Ahmad and the famous verse of Chapter 62:3 that #ahmadis quotes as they claim that MGA was the second coming of Muhammad (saw)(nauzobillah).

The first edition of “Tafseer-e-Sagheer” was printed in Dec 1957. The final volume was published in 1979. Ahmadiyya sources claim that the first ever 5-volume english commentary was published in 1962 and an abridged version showed up in 1969, however, these are missing from the records.

In 1988, a new 5-volume commentary of the Holy Quran was published with Malik Ghulam Farid‘s name on it. He had died in 1977, thus, this was dubious. Nevertheless, this became the official commentary that all Ahmadi’s in the west read. In 2018, another 5-volume commentary was published and can be found on alislam.org.

Continue reading “The Qadiani branch of Ahmadi’s published an english translation and commentary of the Quran in 1915”

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑